EVIDENCE 18: WHATSAPP CHAT ACTIVITY OF JESSICA KUMALA WONGSO MANIPULATED BY MUHAMMAD NUH AL-AZHAR

  • 2 months ago
The 37 Scientific Evidence of Digital Evidence Tampering on CCTV Footage at Olivier Café: The Jessica Kumala Wongso Case (2016), Carried Out by Muhammad Nuh Al-Azhar and Christopher Hariman Rianto, Who were Under the Leadership of the General Crime Director of the Jakarta Metropolitan Police, Krishna Murti, and the Chief of the Jakarta Metropolitan Police, Tito Karnavian.

EVIDENCE 18: WHATSAPP CHAT ACTIVITY OF JESSICA KUMALA WONGSO AT 16:29:18 LOCAL TIME AND 16:29:23 LOCAL TIME ALTERED AND FABRICATED

The motives behind Muhammad Nuh Al-Azhar and Christopher Hariman Rianto's manipulation of Jessica Kumala Wongso's chat activity at 16:29:18 and 16:29:23 local time, just before she was accused of taking cyanide from her bag and putting it into Mirna Salihin's coffee glass at 17:18:29 local time, appear to be intricately linked to strengthening the prosecution's case. By changing her WhatsApp chat activity into head-turning movements, they intended to create a misleading narrative, casting further suspicion on Jessica.

At 17:18:29 local time, Jessica was accused of committing a crucial act captured by CCTV 7 footage. This footage, originally in 1920x1080 pixels and 25 fps, was downscaled to 960x576 pixels and 10 fps, significantly degrading its quality. The reduced resolution and frame rate caused the video to lose much of its clarity and smoothness, making Jessica's hand movements appear artificial and jerky. This manipulation was likely intended to obscure any exculpatory details and frame Jessica more convincingly as the perpetrator.

By altering the footage, Muhammad Nuh Al-Azhar and Christopher Hariman Rianto aimed to support the prosecution's narrative. They wanted to ensure that Jessica's actions appeared deliberate and malicious, making it more challenging for the defense to argue against the visual evidence. The lower frame rate of 10 fps, in particular, made it difficult to see the fluid motion of her hands, creating a stuttered effect that could be used to suggest guilt.

Their actions can be seen as an effort to eliminate any reasonable doubt about Jessica's involvement in the crime. By presenting manipulated evidence, they sought to strengthen the case against her, possibly under pressure from the prosecution or due to their own beliefs in her guilt. The artificial and disjointed appearance of Jessica's hand movements in the downscaled video would help to create a stronger impression of her culpability in the minds of the jury and judge.

Furthermore, by manipulating the chat activity times and altering the video, they aimed to create a cohesive timeline that supported the prosecution's theory. The artificial nature of Jessica's movements would align with the narrative of her preparing and executing the poisoning, leaving little room for alternative interpretations. This strategic manipulation highlights the lengths to which they were willing to go to secure a conviction.

Their actions raise serious ethical and legal concerns about th

Category

📚
Learning
Transcript
00:00Australian resident Jessica Wongso has been charged with the murder of Minis Alihin.
00:10Police allege she poisoned her friend by adding cyanide to her coffee.
00:14Jessica is like a devil.
00:17Deep inside is something like evil.
00:20It is said that the trial of the century is true.
00:29In 2018, WhatsApp chat activity of Jessica Kamala Wongso at 16 hours 29 minutes and 18
00:35seconds local time and 16 hours 29 minutes and 23 seconds local time altered and fabricated.
00:43The motives behind Mohamed Nuh Al-Azza and Christopher Harriman Rianto's manipulation
00:47of Jessica Kamala Wongso's chat activity at 16 hours 29 minutes and 18 seconds and 16
00:54hours 29 minutes and 23 seconds local time.
00:58Just before she was accused of taking cyanide from her bag and putting it into Myrna Salehin's
01:02coffee glass at 17 hours 18 minutes and 29 seconds local time, appeared to be intricately
01:08linked to strengthening the prosecution's case.
01:11By changing her WhatsApp chat activity into head-turning movements, they intended to create
01:15a misleading narrative, casting further suspicion on Jessica.
01:20At 17 hours 18 minutes and 29 seconds local time, Jessica was accused of committing a
01:26crucial act, captured by CCTV7 footage.
01:30This footage, originally in 1920 by 1080 pixels and 25 frames per second, was downscaled to
01:37960 by 576 pixels and 10 frames per second, significantly degrading its quality.
01:44The reduced resolution and frame rate caused the video to lose much of its clarity and
01:48smoothness, making Jessica's hand movements appear artificial and jerky.
01:53This manipulation was likely intended to obscure any exculpatory details and frame
01:58Jessica more convincingly as the perpetrator.
02:01By altering the footage, Mohamedna Al-Azza and Christopher Harriman-Rianto aimed to support
02:06the prosecution's narrative.
02:08They wanted to ensure that Jessica's actions appeared deliberate and malicious, making
02:13it more challenging for the defense to argue against the visual evidence.
02:17The lower frame rate of 10 frames per second, in particular, made it difficult to see the
02:22fluid motion of her hands, creating a stuttered effect that could be used to suggest guilt.
02:28Their actions can be seen as an effort to eliminate any reasonable doubt about Jessica's
02:33involvement in the crime.
02:35By presenting manipulated evidence, they sought to strengthen the case against her, possibly
02:40under pressure from the prosecution or due to their own beliefs in her guilt.
02:45The artificial and disjointed appearance of Jessica's hand movements in the downscaled
02:49video would help to create a stronger impression of her culpability in the minds of the judge.
02:54Furthermore, by manipulating the chat activity times and altering the video, they aimed to
02:58create a cohesive timeline that supported the prosecution's theory.
03:03The artificial nature of Jessica's movements would align with the narrative of her preparing
03:07and executing the poisoning, leaving little room for alternative interpretations.
03:13This strategic manipulation highlights the lengths to which they were willing to go to
03:17secure a conviction.
03:19Their actions raise serious ethical and legal concerns about the integrity of the evidence
03:23presented in court.
03:26By tampering with the video and chat activity, they undermine the credibility of the digital
03:30evidence, potentially compromising the fairness of the trial.
03:35Such manipulation not only questions the authenticity of the prosecution's case, but also poses
03:40significant risks to the judicial process and the pursuit of justice.
03:45Ultimately, the motives behind their manipulation appear to be driven by a desire to ensure
03:50a guilty verdict against Jessica.
03:52By presenting doctored evidence that portrayed her actions in a negative light, Mohammed
03:56Nah al-Azhar and Christopher Harriman Rianto sought to reinforce the prosecution's argument.
04:02This manipulation risks distorting the truth and undermines the fundamental principles
04:07of justice, highlighting the need for rigorous standards and scrutiny in handling forensic
04:11evidence.
04:13The manipulation of CCTV7 footage and the alteration of Jessica Kamala Wongso's chat
04:18activity to head-turning movements by Mohammed Nah al-Azhar and Christopher Harriman Rianto,
04:23along with the presentation of this doctored evidence by the prosecution team led by Ardito
04:28Mawardi, should result in severe legal consequences.
04:32Such actions not only violate ethical and legal standards, but also undermine the integrity
04:37of the judicial process.
04:40The discovery of these manipulations would lead to significant repercussions for all
04:44parties involved.
04:46Mohammed Nah al-Azhar and Christopher Harriman Rianto should face criminal charges for their
04:50roles in tampering with the evidence.
04:53The court should find them guilty of fabricating and falsifying critical digital evidence,
04:58which is a serious offense.
05:00They should receive lengthy prison terms, reflecting the gravity of their actions.
05:05In addition to imprisonment, they should also face heavy fines, and their professional
05:10reputation should suffer irreparable damage.
05:13Their ability to work in forensic or legal capacities in the future should be permanently
05:18revoked.
05:19The prosecution team led by Ardito Mawardi should also face serious legal and professional
05:25consequences.
05:26The court should determine that presenting manipulated evidence in a trial is a severe
05:31breach of legal ethics and professional conduct.
05:34Ardito Mawardi and the five other prosecutors involved should be found guilty of prosecutorial
05:40misconduct.
05:41They should receive various punishments, including disbarment, which means they can no longer
05:46practice law.
05:47Additionally, they should face imprisonment for their roles in knowingly presenting false
05:52evidence to the court.
05:54These legal penalties should serve as a stark reminder of the importance of maintaining
05:58the integrity of the judicial process.
06:01The sentences handed down to the prosecutors and the forensic experts should be intended
06:05to deter future misconduct and reinforce the critical role of honesty and accuracy in legal
06:10proceedings.
06:12The court should emphasize that any attempt to manipulate or falsify evidence will be
06:16met with the harshest penalties to protect the sanctity of the justice system.
06:21The aftermath of this case should lead to widespread reforms in how digital evidence
06:25is handled and presented in court.
06:28Stricter guidelines and oversight mechanisms should be implemented to ensure that all forensic
06:32evidence submitted in legal proceedings is thoroughly vetted for authenticity and accuracy.
06:38These reforms should aim to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future and
06:42to restore public trust in the legal system.
06:45Ultimately, the case of Mohamedna Al-Azhar, Christopher Harriman Rianto, and the prosecution
06:51team led by Ardito Mawardi highlights the critical importance of ethical conduct and
06:55integrity within the legal profession.
06:58The severe punishments they should face underscore the judiciary's commitment to upholding justice
07:03and ensuring that the pursuit of a conviction does not come at the expense of truth and
07:07fairness.

Recommended