👉Tras 18 años de espera, comienza el juicio por el asesinato de Nora Dalmasso. La prueba clave es un ADN encontrado en la escena del crimen que podría cambiar completamente el rumbo del caso. Se señala que Dalmasso fue víctima de abuso sexual antes de ser asesinada, lo que agrega un agravante al homicidio. El camino hacia el dictamen final se ve entorpecido por las prescripciones y la intervención del jurado.
👉 Seguí en #ElNoticieroDeA24
📺 a24.com/vivo
👉 Seguí en #ElNoticieroDeA24
📺 a24.com/vivo
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00The week of a trial that has been 15 years, this week the first statements are produced.
00:07The impact that it generates to listen to the children.
00:12Both bet on a name that is this so-called Francés Rorel.
00:16Friend of the Dalmasos and at the time the report that was delivered,
00:21that he had been in Buenos Aires between 24 and 26 November.
00:25They accused him of being violent, misogynist.
00:29To whom the girl said Valentina was afraid of him.
00:32The past 15 years, prescriptions and a trial with jurors,
00:37hinder the way to the final judgment today.
00:40Put on the table everything that was done during these 15 years,
00:44what was not done during these 15 years and the reason why the family
00:48is sitting on the bench of the accused instead of the true murderer.
00:51The cause went ahead and they began to involve the family.
00:56The bench of the accused leaves complex sequels for the whole family.
01:01The testimony of Marcelo Macarrón, crying and sobbing from the first moment,
01:06a little more than 15 minutes, said that he was under psychiatric treatment,
01:12practically from the very moment of knowing the crime of his wife and to date.
01:18I think it would be ridiculous for me to kill my beloved wife.
01:23He said he had suicidal ideas, but he went ahead thanks to his children.
01:28At some point it goes through your head, do you have that fear
01:31that your father may go to jail?
01:33Yes, unfortunately that is the great fear we have and that is why the anguish.
01:36Miguel Roer, also known as the Frenchman,
01:39declares Furcios in a tone of truth as evidence.
01:43The son of Nora Dalmasos, Facundo Macarrón,
01:45stated that he had suspicions about a possible link
01:49between his mother and the businessman Miguel Roer.
01:52I saw her twice a year in some relationship.
01:57Marcelo Macarrón's lawyer asked Valentina about the relationship.
02:03Who was Roer in this family?
02:06She said he was a violent person, he looked at her a lot.
02:12I never had a key to Marcelo Macarrón's house.
02:20A member of the popular jury today is denied
02:23for delivering a written message to Facundo Macarrón.
02:26The one you are seeing there is Luis Moresi,
02:28a member of the jury, a substitute.
02:30They detected that he had delivered a paper to Facundo Macarrón in the last few hours.
02:36Having had contact with one of the parties, they just threw him out.
02:40It's a huge scandal.
02:42It's a total scandal.
02:44They told me, if you can, just give him this.
02:5111.35, how are you doing?
02:53Good afternoon to everyone, welcome to Noti, day 24.
02:57With this opening, with a report that reviewed one of the police events,
03:02one of the police cases that has generated the most commotion.
03:06And as if this were not enough, after 18 years, the case takes an unexpected turn.
03:11And now, a few days after closing this 24th event,
03:15very important details are being known by the Provincial Prosecutor's Office of Córdoba.
03:21Now, at this time, it is being confirmed
03:25that after the collection of a DNA sample,
03:29it would be identified who the murderer of Nora Dalmas would have been.
03:34Javi, how are you? Good afternoon, how are you?
03:36Good afternoon, Facundo.
03:38Let's do a review.
03:40Remember, November 2006.
03:43In the city of Río Cuarto, in the province of Córdoba,
03:47Nora Dalmas was murdered,
03:50with the belt of the bathrobe,
03:53that she had, at least, the bathrobe,
03:57that she had in her room,
03:59and from which a new sample was taken,
04:02according to what there is about this.
04:06A new sample that gives a genetic profile,
04:10apparently, of a person who has declared in the trial,
04:14and within the instruction,
04:17that he is not the son,
04:20he is not the husband,
04:23in this case, Macarrón,
04:25that he is someone who had closeness
04:29with that house, with Nora Dalmas,
04:32with Macarrón, with the children, apparently,
04:36and that after 18 years,
04:3918 years...
04:40After, Javi, after 18 years,
04:43after pointing out the environment of Nora Dalmas,
04:47pointing out the husband, pointing out the son,
04:49pointing out all that community of Río Cuarto,
04:53a complete change of course appears,
04:57with a key proof.
04:59Let's remember that in a criminal case of these characteristics,
05:03a DNA, or the cortex of a DNA,
05:05is an undoubtable proof.
05:07Yes, yes, exactly.
05:08Or at least, a proof in which that person
05:11will have to give explanations
05:12of why genetic traces of that person were found
05:16in that particular place.
05:18One thing is on a wall,
05:20one thing is in a glass,
05:23and another thing is with, in principle,
05:25what would be precisely in the belt of that coat.
05:29Some others say that it is a find
05:32on the floor, a hematic stain on the floor
05:36of precisely the house of Macarrón Dalmas.
05:39There is even talk of a beautiful man kidnapped
05:42in the scene.
05:43At the time too.
05:44That everything would serve...
05:45Now, one of the questions that emerges initially is
05:49why this now and not 18 years ago?
05:51Why in that cortex?
05:53In a case where, I remember...
05:55How are you Mechimora? How are you?
05:56How are you?
05:57Good afternoon.
05:58Hello Winokur, how are you? Good afternoon.
05:59Good afternoon.
06:00I remember that at the time,
06:01there was talk of the FBI investigating,
06:04or at least assisting...
06:05No, they sent samples there to the United States
06:08for the cortex of the samples,
06:11but the FBI said that the samples collected
06:13and sent there were not enough
06:15to mark a strong genetic profile,
06:18that they were weak.
06:20And that obviously came back here.
06:22Now what is being talked about is a genetic profile
06:24of a man.
06:26That is, a male genetic profile.
06:29Undoubtedly so far.
06:31We'll have to see.
06:32If a prosecutor calls a press conference
06:34after 18 years of not being known,
06:37beyond the absolution of Macarrón,
06:39I would pay a lot of attention to what he is going to say
06:43and what is going to happen from now on.
06:45Sure, sure.
06:46Well, there is a genetic trace, let's remember.
06:48We will be live with more details there in Córdoba.
06:52In a few minutes we will be able to talk to Raúl Torres,
06:56who is obviously an eminence,
06:58he is an expert whom we always consult.
07:00But wait, and also Raúl...
07:02Yes?
07:03He was part of one of Brito's research teams.
07:05Sure.
07:06Exactly.
07:07And also, now when you talk to him,
07:10we are going to ask him about what they found
07:13in the crime scene.
07:14They found Nora Dalmaso's killer.
07:17It can be said that for the first time in Argentina,
07:21in a case that has spread so much over time,
07:2418 years,
07:25this idea of a perfect crime is going to be broken.
07:29Because after a long time, the DNA collection
07:31and this genetic trace
07:33inform that there may indeed be a resolution.
07:36Is Raúl Torres online?
07:39Raúl, how are you?
07:41Facundo Pastor greets you in A24.
07:44A pleasure to greet you.
07:46Good.
07:47What do you think about what is happening in Córdoba, Raúl?
07:50Well, we were aware of it.
07:52A few days ago we had this information,
07:55but we were told that we should keep a reserve,
07:58which we did.
08:00It is being confirmed,
08:02I was listening to you and Javier,
08:05it is being confirmed that a genetic trace
08:09that was present in the belt of the coat,
08:13which I remind you was the murder weapon, by the way,
08:16because death is by extraction,
08:18double mechanism,
08:20is in a vein of the victim,
08:22in an intestinal vein of the victim.
08:24Yes.
08:25And that genetic trace has been collected
08:28at the instance of the investigation
08:30that the Córdoban Public Prosecutor's Office is carrying out
08:33and has given positive results,
08:35which means that it has given an inevitable coincidence,
08:38with which this person would become linked
08:42to having had clear contact with the victim's body
08:46and with what is the murder weapon.
08:49Sure, sure.
08:50Raúl, let's see, I ask you,
08:52because you were investigating with your team too,
08:55at the instance of Brito, right?
08:57Yes, yes.
08:58The doctor.
08:59We formed an interdisciplinary team
09:03with Dr. Osvaldo Rajo, deceased,
09:06and Dr. Juan José Penoblo.
09:08Rajo in his medical forensic qualities
09:10and Penoblo in his anatomopathological qualities
09:13and who speaks to them as a criminal.
09:16Our conclusion was that we were facing,
09:19in an unquestionable way,
09:21to make it clear and so we wrote it,
09:24a crime against sexual integrity followed by...
09:26It was a murder.
09:28Yes, yes, it was a murder, clearly.
09:30Let's see, that is to say,
09:32the one who murdered Nora Dalmasso
09:34did not steal, or maybe he did,
09:36but he did kill her
09:38to be able to commit another crime?
09:40No, we understand that the homicide
09:43prevails as a criminal cause
09:45to the crime against sexual integrity.
09:47Nora Dalmasso...
09:48That is to say, Raúl kills her,
09:50the homicide is a criminal cause.
09:52Abuses and kills her, rapes and kills her.
09:55As an aggravating factor of the simple figure of the homicide
09:58is to kill to hide a previous crime.
10:01That previous crime would be precisely
10:04the attempt or the consumption of a sexual abuse.
10:07No, no, to make it clear,
10:09from the evidence there is,
10:11the sexual abuse is consumed.
10:13That is, he sexually abuses Nora
10:16and then, to erase evidence,
10:18he ends up killing her.
10:20To ensure her impunity.
10:23Yes.
10:24Look, I'm going to tell you something.
10:26When we teach at the university,
10:29there is one thing that is an omelette.
10:32The male organ lasts about 20 seconds.
10:35For those 20 seconds that he speaks to them,
10:38he has seen the most horrendous crimes
10:41that anyone can imagine.
10:43This is one of them.
10:45Of course, this is one of them.
10:47Now, Raúl, are we talking about a person
10:50who had already stated in the file as a witness?
10:53The information that is transcending is like this.
10:56We are going to maintain respect for the public ministry
11:00that gives the information and see what is his gaze.
11:03Because here there are procedural issues.
11:06You know this, Facundo.
11:08Because this fact, in reality,
11:10is legally prescribed.
11:12But we have to see if there are any circumstances
11:15that the prescription has been introduced.
11:18We don't know.
11:19But Raúl, what you just said is very important.
11:23Eighteen years have passed.
11:25Here we begin to see a game
11:27regarding the passage of time in favor,
11:30in this case, of the murderer, of the alleged murderer.
11:33With which, in the face of a fact that is prescribed,
11:36what they are evaluating processually
11:39is to see if there has been something
11:42that has interrupted that prescription
11:44to start counting, not from the day of the murder,
11:47but from a later day,
11:49and not count 18 years, but less,
11:52and see if the prescription is actually interrupted.
11:55Correct?
11:56Because if not, we are going to talk about a murderer
11:59walking down the street.
12:01I understand that the public ministry is evaluating that.
12:04If I were currently part of the investigation,
12:07I would certainly do it.
12:09What would be an example of the interruption of the prescription?
12:12If the criminal or alleged criminal, to be correct,
12:16for example, during all these years,
12:19had committed another crime for which he has been convicted.
12:22That would interrupt.
12:24That is why it is a very fine issue
12:26that we can speculate about,
12:28but we have to be aware of the results of the public ministry.
12:31And Raúl, let's see,
12:33about the fact itself,
12:35that we are already counting the mechanics,
12:38this person,
12:40I am obviously protecting what you have to preserve
12:42until the prosecutor speaks,
12:44is it from the family environment,
12:47in the sense of a relative, a friend,
12:50or can it be someone external?
12:53No, no, what we have understood,
12:55and that something has transcended this,
12:57is that it is someone who worked in the house.
12:59Someone who worked in the house?
13:01A circumstantial employee?
13:03Or a daily employee?
13:07No, no, I understand,
13:09someone who did some work at home.
13:13Undoubtedly, I don't know if it was a domestic violence.
13:16Clara Dalmas was undoubtedly stalked that night.
13:21She finishes dinner with her friends
13:24around 11 p.m.
13:26She returns home curiously alone.
13:30She was going to stay alone.
13:32Raúl, can you wait for me for a minute?
13:34Because there is information from the last moment
13:36that will be very important for this story.
13:39Because in this way,
13:41it is already the Cordoban prosecution
13:43that is clarifying.
13:45Let me tell you that it is really incredible.
13:48We are talking about an unexpected turn
13:50in a case where for a long time
13:52it was pointed out, and the family
13:54even pointed it out to the investigators themselves.
13:57And now it takes a turn after 18 years
14:00in a case where now it begins to be discussed
14:03if the crime is not prescribed
14:05and if that prescription does not make that
14:07even knowing who could be the murderer,
14:10the murderer is free.