đ El fiscal Pablo JĂĄbega, sexto fiscal del caso, revela detalles exclusivos sobre un caso de abuso sexual y homicidio que ha estado en proceso durante 18 aĂąos. Roberto Marcos BĂĄrzola, quien trabajĂł en la casa de la vĂctima, ha sido sindicado pero no imputado. La defensa probablemente argumentarĂĄ que el caso estĂĄ prescrito.
đ SeguĂ en #ElNoticieroDeA24
đş a24.com/vivo
đ SeguĂ en #ElNoticieroDeA24
đş a24.com/vivo
Category
đ
NewsTranscript
00:00We urgently go to Cordoba, what you are going to see now is the prosecutor, I repeat, the sixth prosecutor of the case, it is the prosecutor Pablo Javega, yes, who moments ago said this, attention that it is exclusive material, look at what the prosecutor said, 18 years have passed.
00:18I am not aware of this process with the appeal, at least not, so it seems to me that at the end of the proceedings, for the sake of relativity, I make a recapitulation, this prosecutor unit that is here present has worked with posterity to the trial that was carried out in the present process with the only defendant he had, and by derivation of the court of justice that intervened, to the suggestion that it was the representative in that trial, the prosecutor general,
00:48as soon as he understood that an investigation had to be continued, while there were certain genetic markers, genetic traces in certain places that did not appear to be controversial, that deserved to be deepened.
01:04Since then, as I have referred to several of the colleagues here present, the prosecutor unit was working in tandem with other agencies, with the Forensic Genetics Center, with detectives of judicial police, with laboratories that at the time intervened in the United States, as the National Center for Forensic Sciences of the University of Orlando, with the area of ââthe Executive as the Minister of Justice.
01:34And in the framework of this investigation, it had been transmitted to them that the first part that we were going to work on was this sweeping or genetic mapping in order to try to locate who belonged, who could be the carrier of the traces that appeared as unknown in the belt of the robe that was located on the victim's neck.
02:04It was known, according to the trial, that there were two other genetic traces that were identified, that the family was mimicked and were ruled out as having a criminal interest.
02:15From the development of this interdisciplinary investigation, a compatible impact has been recently determined, as it was seen and known by the press, regarding a person of older age, male, who gave compatibility with the haplotype that was remaining in the belt of the robe.
02:40With this, participation was given to this person, he was summoned to propose defenders, to remain syndicated, although by virtue of the number of samples that had been collected and that there was no hypothesis of licitude as a justifier, then participation was given in the syndicated key so that he could know which elements were against him.
03:10And he could file a dismissal, which he preferred to reserve, let's say, and wait to be declared.
03:16Likewise, it was also allowed, of course, also to the believing family, and this person indicated, to participate in the genetic context experiments, both of what is the genetic trace on the belt, as well as what was another sample that had not been questioned, that arose as undoubted within the process, which was a hair that had been kidnapped at the time of finding the victim in the area of ââIndia.
03:46This result was obtained on Friday, at one o'clock in the afternoon, which also confirmed that it would correspond with the same lineage, that is, the lineage of the suspected person.
03:58On Saturday, let's say, the part of the press was denied, perhaps it is verified, let's say, a genetic compatibility, both in the traces that were not known to whom they belonged, in the belt of the bat, as within the hair in the area of ââthe victim.
04:17All this has been informed to the family, this person has been informed, in order to, let's say, guarantee the right of defense.
04:25And well, as it corresponded, it was also to accompany them here, let's say, the advances that had already been made.
04:36Doctor, is it a person who had worked in the victim's house?
04:40Yes, well, it is being reported, let's say, in his probationary record, but yes, let's say, the statement that we have is that that person, in the previous week, was providing work.
04:52Will you give the name, doctor, of the person?
04:55The name, I think, has already been transferred.
04:57Can we confirm who you are talking about?
04:59If you point it out to me, I will confirm it.
05:01Roberto Marcos Garzola.
05:03Is there an indictment?
05:05There is an indictment under Article 80 of the Penal Code.
05:08What is the indictment?
05:10Sexual abuse and death indictment.
05:12Doctor, can this person be arrested? The prescribed cause? What is the future of this?
05:18We are precisely in that stage, having, as another colleague had told you, first, to determine who could be the carrier,
05:27second, if there was any hypothesis or not, if there were suspicions, and if there were suspicions,
05:33what has to be analyzed is a question linked to the analysis of the validity or not of the criminal action.
05:38So, we are in that scenario.
05:40Currently, we are going to do an extensive investigation to verify if there is subsistence in the action or if, on the contraryâŚ
05:46Is there a person with a background?
05:49A person with a background for this person's processual situation.
05:52This person is syndicated, but so far we have not been able to verify the matter associated with the action.
05:57It is not prudent to work with this person.
05:59Is he here in RĂo Cuarto?
06:01Is there a possibility that he is convicted? Is there a possibility that he is convicted for the fact?
06:06There is a possibility. It is in pre-trial that the action subsists.
06:08What kind of task was he doing?
06:10Sorry?
06:12What kind of task was he doing in the house?
06:13He was hired, let's say, by someone who had been hired by the family to do floor services in the house.
06:20Doctor, that is, you as a prosecutor, as a member of justice,
06:25do you think it is still time to do justice for the death of Dora Dalmaso?
06:31Let's see, that is an answer that could have multiple answers.
06:36We are working, as from the beginning, with a very persevering attitude of all those involved
06:43and still with knowledge of this high prognosis that could be given in pre-trial,
06:49but always with the conviction of trying to give an answer to the family.
06:53Basically, the engine of the work of the members who accompany me here,
06:58of the Forensic Genetics Center, of the detectives and all those involved,
07:02was to try to give an answer to the family that, well, it will depend on them if ...
07:07Well, until then, who was talking was the prosecutor of the case, 18 years later,
07:11explaining, in effect, that it was worked in a very consistent way
07:16in the genetic traces that were in the scene of the crime of Dora Dalmaso.
07:21And a genetic pattern of a link was found, which was coincident with another find in the inguinal area.
07:29That was explained by the statement, now it was explained in more detail by Mercedes.
07:33Yes, a kiss, he said. It was a kiss that leaves a genetic trace
07:36that coincides with the one that was found of traces in the tie of the robe,
07:42but that was unknown until the moment.
07:44There the search work to see who coincides.
07:47Obviously they had not contemplated this man as to be able to obtain his profile.
07:53Now, yes, already with that obtaining and having a name and surname,
07:57it is sexual abuse followed by death.
08:01There is a data that is important.
08:03All this will depend on whether the cause is prescribed or not.
08:07That is the fundamental thing in this case.
08:09The most important thing they already have.
08:11Let's see, there is a profile, coincident, as we said before,
08:14of a sample taken and recovered,
08:18which had remained on one side, because it could not be determined,
08:22and now they did, of Roberto Barsola, of this man.
08:26In the tie of the robe, tied to the neck of Dora Dalmaso,
08:30with which they produced the asphyxiation,
08:33and also in the inguinal area.
08:36Now, the prosecutor said,
08:38we have to see if there is validity of the criminal action.
08:42If it is valid, if we can continue to advance,
08:45or do we have to stay here, even though everyone will be against it?
08:48Not with much expectation, said the prosecutor.
08:50That's why.
08:52Eighteen years have passed.
08:54You have to see, because if you can move forward,
08:56you will be impeached.
08:57You will be impeached.
08:59What they found was communicated to him.
09:01Now you will see, the defense will surely go for the prescription of the cause.
09:05They can investigate my defendant,
09:08because the cause is prescribed.
09:10We are not saying that he is guilty, nor that he is innocent.
09:13It is prescribed.
09:15You can't go any further, not with him, not with anyone.
09:17That will be the defense.
09:19Now, he is not impeached, but he is syndicated.
09:22That is, what does it mean?
09:24That he is not accused yet,
09:25but there is a fact that marks him.
09:27Syndicated is to mark him.
09:29We have this identification.
09:32What do we do?
09:34And this is what the court is waiting for in Cordoba.
09:36The explanation of the prosecutor is still unclear
09:39why it took so long,
09:41why they did not find it before,
09:43considering that it would seem to be a very obvious test.
09:47It is true, there will be technological issues to solve,
09:49but the prosecutor does not explain it,
09:52they even ask him, is it possible to do justice?
09:53And he looks down.
09:55It seems to me that he does not see
09:57that this can finally be found
10:01and judged this allegedly guilty person.
10:04I understand that the cause is completely prescribed,
10:06but well, this is what Javier marked.
10:08That is, it is a message that justice is giving.
10:12To justice itself.
10:14To justice itself.
10:16That being able to incorporate technology
10:18and doing things in a certain way,
10:20the idea does not remain in society.
10:23Because yes, this is an idea that overflows
10:26in Mercedes, Javi, Pablo,
10:28and many times when we are in the stage
10:31of electoral or pre-electoral scenario,
10:34the idea of ââa country that does not have justice emerges,
10:37that has a slow justice, which is definitely not justice,
10:39or a silly justice.
10:41Then the cases proliferate,
10:43as you said Pablo a little while ago,
10:45an innumerable number of cases
10:47that are synonymous with impunity
10:49or confusion.
10:51Cases that seem infinite,
10:53that appear from minute zero designed
10:58or because the murderer acts in a certain way,
11:03or because justice, or because the police,
11:05or because the political power,
11:07or whatever, appear designed
11:09as cases that in effect
11:11will never be able to be solved.
11:13Infinite cases.
11:15Then you are going to look for
11:17the average resolution
11:19that applies in time
11:22and you will find that there are cases of 10, 12, 15, 20,
11:25of course, in the middle there is a criminal order
11:27that predicts that the passage of time
11:30determines the end of the criminal action.
11:38The end of the criminal action,
11:40the criminal action ends, for example,
11:42when the suspect dies,
11:44with the life of the defendant,
11:46but also by the passage of time.
11:47In this case, even more,
11:49there was an oral trial
11:51and the one who was sitting
11:53on the bench of the accused
11:55who was acquitted,
11:57was Macarron himself.
11:59Of course, he was acquitted
12:01because when the direct evidence,
12:03scientific evidence,
12:05as it is a DNA,
12:07and not an indicial evidence,
12:09it was given that it had nothing to do
12:11with the acquittal of the sample
12:13offered by Macarron himself
12:15and the acquittal of the findings
12:17of the trial.
12:19Absolution.
12:21And shortly after that absolution
12:23this data appears.
12:26The data of the possibility
12:28that the technology
12:30removes,
12:32makes a better sweep
12:34of the tie of the robe
12:36and can effectively
12:38court it with the 45 people
12:40who passed through there.
12:42I think there is a declaration
12:44that is known about Macarron
12:45who just spoke.
12:47Give me the sweep.