👉 El esposo de Nora expresó su emoción por finalmente acercarse a la verdad después de 18 años de sufrimiento y persecución judicial. El caso, que podría estar cerca de un cierre legal, ha estado marcado por la tardanza en la resolución y las dudas sobre la prescripción del mismo.
👉 Seguí en #ElNoticieroDeA24
📺 a24.com/vivo
👉 Seguí en #ElNoticieroDeA24
📺 a24.com/vivo
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00...to speak, Marcelo Macarron.
00:05Macarron, this man you're going to see on the screen, just said,
00:11I'm very excited and happy.
00:17We repeat, Marcelo Macarron just spoke.
00:21He just said, I'm very excited and happy
00:25that we can, as a family, know the truth
00:29after a great suffering and judicial persecution.
00:35After 18 years, it's not little.
00:38Macarron just spoke, Mechí.
00:40Well, this is a little bit what also marked the prosecutors, right?
00:44Try to bring a closure to the family of this.
00:46It's more of a legal issue that possibly ends with someone arrested.
00:52It has to do with giving a closure to the family.
00:54That's why I understand that these words of saying,
00:57I'm excited and happy, because, of course,
01:00these are words that don't go hand in hand with this whole case.
01:05But it has to do with that, with having, at least,
01:08a result and an answer to so many years of feeling that there was no justice.
01:13Then, of course, we have to continue investigating,
01:16we have to truly analyze that he is the murderer.
01:20But, at least, for that family, there begins to be progress.
01:23I think it's about this, what the ex-husband of Norita Dalmaso just said,
01:28the widow, through his words.
01:31I imagine that carries that, doesn't it?
01:33Let's remember that Javi was subjected at the time to an oral trial,
01:38that they investigated him, that they asked for his DNA.
01:41At the time of the crime, he had the excuse of having been out of the country.
01:46Do you remember? In a tournament.
01:47Marcelo Macarron, yes.
01:48In Punta del Este.
01:49He was in Punta del Este, he had gone before.
01:51The first suspicion was that he had put everything together
01:54and had gone so as not to get caught with the crime.
01:58The idea of a crime by commission was automatically investigated.
02:01Exactly.
02:01Then he was obviously arrested.
02:03Norita Dalmaso came back, she had gone out with her friends that night
02:08and returned to her house, there in the country, and there she was attacked.
02:14That is, if it is this person, what they believe,
02:17what they are telling me, what they suspect,
02:18is that he could have had some access door to the house
02:22or have left some access, without a key,
02:27those that were not used too much, of that house to be able to enter at night.
02:34In other voices it is indicated that he would have found him outside,
02:38and abused his confidence to get something,
02:43some tool that had been left or something like that.
02:47All this is part of the investigation, the assumptions,
02:50because there, in that place, at least there was no security camera
02:53that could determine the presence of another person.
02:56I repeat, I want to put a lot of emphasis, as Pablo said,
03:01to ask the prosecutor or someone from the Court of Córdoba
03:05what happens with the issue of prescription there in Córdoba,
03:09what happens with a case with these characteristics.
03:11I did not see him very excited to ask that question.
03:13No, because he gave the three options
03:16and said that for now it is indicated.
03:18But they can not impute it because they have to first define
03:21the situation linked to whether he prescribed or not the cause.
03:24I think it is also important to go through two lanes.
03:27On the one hand there is the judicial lane, which is that of the prescription,
03:30whether it can be done or not.
03:31And then, at some point we have to know why these things happen,
03:34why it takes 18 years in this.
03:37And the prosecutor did not explain this, the statement does not explain it,
03:40and the prosecutor did not explain it in a speech that lasted a long time.
03:45And he does not say, well, what happens is that there was not yet the technology
03:49in the year that Nora Dalmaso was murdered
03:51to be able to track the last trace of DNA.
03:54That explanation does not appear.
03:56It is imperishable of those who worked on this case.
03:59And well, I'm finishing preparing a document that I just gave to Noelia,
04:03the last photo of Bárcola.
04:05Where is this man, let's remember,
04:08accused of the murder of Nora Dalmaso?
04:12In minutes, when we have it,
04:14we throw an emergency and we put it in the air.
04:16We are talking about a man
04:21who at the time of the murder was 27 years old.
04:25Today he is 45.
04:2927 years at the time of the murder.
04:32Today he is 45.
04:34And the police itself is already spreading an image
04:38of how Bárcola would be today.
04:40Give me the emergency, please.
04:59You are going to see an image of the man
05:02pointed out by justice,
05:07by the Prosecutor's Office.
05:09This is how Bárcola is today.
05:12This is how Roberto Bárcola is today.
05:14The floor cleaner pointed out by the crime of Nora Dalmaso.
05:20The full name of this man is Roberto Marcos Bárcola.
05:25He still resides in Río Cuarto.
05:28This is a current image.
05:31He was 27 years old at the time of the murder
05:34that the justice is imputing on him.
05:38Today he is 45.
05:42There you can see an image to see
05:45if there is any change in his body, in his physiognomy.
05:49There is little.
05:52Body change, a little less hair.
05:55This is the man and this is the image of Bárcola now, today.
06:00We repeat, Mechi, that in the Prosecutor's Office's report
06:04there is talk of an imputation and a designation of a defender.
06:08Yes, he was asked to present himself with a defender.
06:12They gave him the possibility and at the time of giving him the opportunity
06:16to contribute something, he reserved himself.
06:20He preferred not to speak.
06:22Bárcola was hired to carry out refactoring work
06:27by a carpenter.
06:29He is a general carpenter.
06:31He was a person to whom the carpenter himself
06:34had authorized the work of refactoring floors.
06:38He had the data, the antecedent of Bárcola himself.
06:46And in fact, Bárcola ends up inside the house of Nora Dalmas.
06:51That November 25th, he went to the place.
06:56In none of his statements, six as a witness,
07:00he stopped recognizing that he had been at the door of the house,
07:04possibly covering himself, that there had been a camera
07:07that had identified him.
07:09But that he had not entered.
07:11But that he had not entered.
07:12Why didn't he enter? They asked him.
07:14Because I rang the doorbell and no one answered me.
07:16And I stayed 10, 15, 20 minutes and I told my boss,
07:20that general carpenter, just to cover myself
07:25and to be able not to look bad with the person who had taken me.
07:30The day was already paid,
07:32so Bárcola at 15, 20 minutes, he says,
07:35turned around and left.
07:37Well, none of this would have happened,
07:40considering that now he ends up realizing
07:45that there were three thematic stains in the crime scene.
07:48And even what he said at that moment
07:50is that he had not even had contact with her,
07:52that he had received a complaint because there was a lot of dust.
07:56This was transmitted to his boss,
07:58but that they had not had any kind of conversation
08:00and that he had only seen her after a few minutes.
08:03We repeat, the image you are seeing
08:05is the image of Bárcola declaring,
08:07a few years later, as a witness,
08:09Bárcola at present.
08:11There is a difference of two, three years
08:14between one image and the other.
08:16This is today's image.
08:17The one on the left, from 2022.
08:19Correct.
08:20And this is the last of the last days,
08:23the last days of this year.
08:25Then we will listen again, right?
08:27To Bárcola, surely.
08:29And also to the prosecutor.
08:30Get him back to Bárcola, please.
08:31And then to the prosecutor.
08:32The prosecutor is very forceful,
08:34with some appreciations.
08:36If he had, if he had no doubts,
08:38I would say, we are going to sue him,
08:40I would say, let's move on.
08:43I think what they have done today
08:47is more towards,
08:49not only to communicate to the citizens,
08:52but to require the judicial authorities,
08:57the superiors,
08:59to define if they can continue to advance
09:02with this cause.
09:03And that, well,
09:05if it doesn't get to a good port,
09:07it would be a scandal.
09:08A scandal.
09:09Again.