A day after the Nagpur riots, a political blame game has erupted over the incident. Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis claimed the violence was pre-planned, while the opposition alleged an intelligence failure.
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00With sticks, stones, swords, other sharp-edged weapons and incendiary material including
00:08petrol, a mob assembled and is reported to have systematically targeted vehicles, homes
00:15and establishments of another community on the basis of a rumour that a religious sheet
00:21had been desecrated as effigies of Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb were burnt in Nagpur in
00:27Maharashtra.
00:29Is there then merit in the Maharashtra Chief Minister, Devendra Fadnavis, insisting that
00:34the riotous situation was engineered, pre-planned and the guilty will not be spared?
00:59Who stoked Aurangzeb's fire?
01:05Who mobilised the mob?
01:09Violence, pre-planned or spontaneous?
01:14Big focus on NewsTrack.
01:18The opposition on the other hand has come out all guns blazing, targeting Chief Minister
01:22Devendra Fadnavis who is also the Home Minister of the state, saying even if rumours were
01:28being spread, what was the administration doing and how could riots take place in Nagpur,
01:34the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh headquarters, the Chief Minister comes from there, Union
01:39Minister Nitin Gadkari comes from there, there are investigations that have been initiated.
01:45But is there merit that a pattern to riots on the basis of rumours are being orchestrated
01:53in our country?
01:54Like the Anti-Citizenship Amendment Act riots in Delhi, where it was claimed that Indian
01:58Muslims would lose their citizenship, that was a rumour, government insisted no Indian
02:03Muslim would be targeted by CAA and yet riots took place.
02:08Devendra Fadnavis says the guilty will not be spared for conspiracy and pre-planned riots.
02:13Is the government able to send across a message, zero tolerance for riots, rioters and their
02:19masterminds?
02:20We debate.
02:21I'm Gaurav Sawant, let's get started with the headlines.
02:27Big political showdown over Maharashtra violence, Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis hints at
02:32a planned conspiracy, Maharashtra Vikasa Gadi accuses the Mahayuti of fanning the Aurangzeb
02:38fire.
02:45Prime Minister Narendra Modi lauds the Mahakum success in Parliament, opposition hits back,
02:50Samajwadi Party asks why didn't the Prime Minister mention stampede deaths, Rahul Gandhi
02:54says he was not permitted to speak in the House.
03:03US Director for National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard praises Prime Minister Narendra Modi
03:07says like President Donald Trump, Prime Minister Narendra Modi committed to nation first, ends
03:14her speech with an aloha and a Jai Shri Krishna chant.
03:38Enforcement directorate heat on George Soros-linked organizations in India, Open Society Foundation
03:45affiliates raided, Forex violation probed by Enforcement Directorate on firms linked
03:51to George Soros.
03:59Astronaut Sunita Williams is finally earthbound, SpaceX Falcon unlocks from the International
04:05Space Station, splashdown on earth expected at 3.27 am IST.
04:17Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis today made a startling disclosure in the Maharashtra
04:23Assembly.
04:24Fadnavis, who also holds the home portfolio, insisted that the Nagpur riots were pre-planned.
04:29Specific homes and establishments were systematically targeted, he said.
04:33He called the riots a conspiracy and insisted that the guilty will not be spared.
04:38So far, close to 50 alleged rioters have been taken into custody.
04:42The police are carrying out multiple raids to arrest other accused, seen on CCTV cameras,
04:48some with their faces covered, and in some instances, CCTV cameras were first destroyed
04:53before the riots happened.
04:54So is there merit in the Chief Minister calling the riots pre-planned?
04:58The opposition has hit back saying either ways, even if the riots were pre-planned,
05:03what was the government doing?
05:04It's a total failure of the Devendra Fadnavis government.
05:08Sumi Kewal Patel and Mustafa Shaikh bring you our top story.
06:03Maharashtra
06:24Chief Minister also hinted at a conspiracy.
06:53How exactly did the situation escalate?
06:57Around noon on Monday, members of VHP and Bajrang Dal held a protest demanding the removal
07:02of Aurangzeb's tomb.
07:04They burnt an effigy of the Mughal ruler.
07:09Soon after, rumours began to swirl among the Muslim community.
07:14Close to 5pm, Muslim youth in the area started gathering.
07:17A couple of hours later, they hit the streets shouting slogans.
07:23Shortly after, some started pelting stones at the cops.
07:27Around 7.30pm, it was a full-blown riot.
07:57Cars and bikes were burnt.
08:05People's homes were pelted with stones.
08:09Cops retaliated with lathi charge first, then resorted to tear gas.
08:16How was the mob mobilised?
08:18How were the stones, swords and weapons gathered?
08:22Was the violence carefully planned?
08:24Social media play a crucial role.
08:27Cyber police is investigating more than 100 suspicious social media accounts.
08:32A full investigation will reveal the truth.
08:35With Sumi Rajappan in Nagpur, Bureau Report, India Today.
08:44On India Today, we get you all sides of the story.
08:46And the opposition is right in asking that even if there was a rumour, even if there
08:51was rumour mongering, even if the riots were pre-planned, what was the police doing on
08:57ground?
08:58What was the administration doing?
08:59Why were they caught napping?
09:01But then, it's also fair to ask, does a rumour entitle a mob to assemble, collect sharp-edged
09:07weapons, incendiary material including petrol and then attack, not just the police, but
09:11also vandalised property, burn down two wheelers and cars and even heavy earth-moving JCB machines
09:17and then attempt to burn down homes and target specific establishments including the clinic
09:22of a doctor?
09:23Was there an attempt to incite the community in the name of Aurangzeb and religious verses
09:27being set on fire?
09:29There are multiple conspiracy theories from both sides.
09:32Joining me on the show is Guru Prakash Paswan, representative of the Bharatiya Janata Party,
09:37Seema Malik is the spokesperson of the NCP, Sandeep Singh is an author and an RSS supporter,
09:43Sanjay Jha is a political analyst and commentator.
09:46Joining us on this broadcast, SP, where this former Director General of Police, to give
09:49us an investigation, police and law and order perspective on the story and Guru Prakash
09:54Paswan, Aditya Thackeray says that the BJP wants to turn Maharashtra into Manipur, even
10:01a peaceful Nagpur saw riots and this is a failure of the Devendra Fadnavis government.
10:06Where is the evidence on ground to suggest that the riots were pre-planned sir?
10:36The government of Maharashtra, the Bharatiya Janata Party has a track record when it comes
10:40to communal harmony.
10:41Gaurav, you are very well aware of the fact that communal harmony has been one of the
10:46most top most priority of the NDA led by Prime Minister Modi.
10:50Look at the last 10 years for example, nationally from 2014 and 2024, the data suggests that
10:56the incidence of communal violence has been at the lowest under Prime Minister Modi.
11:00I am not doing any whataboutery here, but you speak of the Congress party and the entire
11:05charade of secularism, the entire charade of peace, we are very well aware of the fact
11:09that the Congress party used violence as a political tool.
11:13But as far as the episode in Nagpur is concerned, it is being monitored.
11:16Not only monitored, we also saw the observations of the high police officer were involved.
11:21Curfew is already imposed, section 144 is already imposed, but the larger question here,
11:26the larger question Gaurav, which you must understand, you have done a chain of events.
11:30What has happened?
11:31The community demanding historical accountability, soon after that, you see, there is a mob,
11:37an uncontrollable mob after the police station and setting the police station on fire, setting
11:42the public property on fire, you know who does it?
11:45But the government of Maharashtra, let me make this point very clear on your show, let
11:49me make this point very, last 10 seconds Gaurav, let me make this point very clear on your
11:53show tonight, that the government of Maharashtra has already done 60 arrests, we will not sit
11:58silent, we will ensure that the justice is done.
12:01No, but why should a riot take place in the first place, sir?
12:06Sanjay Jha, a rumor was spread, a mob assembled and a riot took place.
12:13Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis claims that this mob had weapons and a trolley full, I'm
12:18quoting the chief minister here, trolley full of stones they assembled with the specific
12:22intention of disturbing law and order.
12:26This clearly cannot be permitted, sir.
12:29Gaurav, good evening.
12:30You know, you asked a very pertinent question to the BGP spokesperson.
12:35Why did the riots happen to begin with?
12:38And what you're witnessing, Gaurav, you're a seasoned veteran in the media.
12:43This is a standard BGP playbook, you know, raising the communal temperature, keeping
12:49it at a certain acceptable level where it can be suddenly made very inflammatory.
12:55Look at the environment in our country today, Gaurav.
12:58For having these protests on the Waqf board, and it suits the BGP to try and make the minority
13:04communities of India look like the fifth columnists.
13:08And let's take the example of Maharashtra.
13:10I live here.
13:11I've lived here for over three decades, Gaurav.
13:14And we all know that this is one of the most prosperous, eclectic, inclusive states of
13:19India.
13:20We are very proud of Maharashtra.
13:21Bombay is based out of here.
13:23It's a commercial capital, the entertainment capital, Nagpur is not too far away.
13:28But here is the question.
13:29Why are things happening the way they are?
13:31Somebody needs to ask this question of the chief minister, Mr. Fadnavis, whose own comments,
13:36whether it was during the time of the elections, where he used terms like vote jihad, whether
13:41he talked about removing of the tomb of Aurangzeb himself.
13:44I mean, there is a lot of dog whistle politics being played out here right now in broad daylight.
13:50And you know, Gaurav, just look at one quote.
13:53Look at the minister.
13:54There is a minister in the Maharashtra cabinet who has been making the most vulgar, provocative
14:00statements against Muslims for a long time.
14:04And there is no trial, no charge sheet, nothing.
14:08Basically, this government in Maharashtra is sending out a clear message that they will
14:13continue to divide and rule, polarize the state that is going to rule.
14:16Fair enough.
14:17You're saying BJP wants to divide and rule since you've made a direct allegation.
14:20I'll get, I'll get Guru Prakash Paswan to quickly respond to the point that you're making
14:24on dog whistle politics of the BJP before I bring in Sandeep Singh and Seema Malik and
14:29Mr. Ved.
14:30Quickly, sir.
14:31Mr. Paswan, you had your hand up.
14:32Please respond, sir.
14:33No, no, Gaurav, a very pointed observation to my dear friend, Mr. Sanjay Jha.
14:41He is saying that the Muslims in this country are being reduced to fifth columnist.
14:45Mr. Jha, my learned friend, please go and read the observation of a report by EACPM
14:50where it has been said that the numbers, the population of Muslims in India have increased
14:55exponentially unlike other countries.
14:58So in a country where Muslims are safe, Muslims are happy, only there the population increases.
15:03I strongly recommend the work which is being done for the Muslim women, abolition of triple
15:07talaq, revocation of Article 370.
15:10You look at the mudra beneficiary, ujwala beneficiaries, the pasmanda discourse, a very
15:14pointed.
15:15Mr. Jha, you are my learned friend.
15:16Please don't indulge in whataboutery.
15:18I can give you 10 such examples where senior Congress leaders have also indulged in whataboutery.
15:23They have also indulged in Islamophobia.
15:25But the problem is not that.
15:26Since I need to bring in my other guest, quickly, Mr. Jha, before I bring in Sandeep Singh.
15:32You know, Gaurav, I want to tell your viewers, India today is one of the few remaining, I
15:37would say, credible mainstream organizations.
15:40I want to tell your viewers, ask yourself this question, dear viewers of India today.
15:45Why is the BJP today suddenly resurrecting an emperor during the Mughal era who died
15:51318 years ago?
15:53And you will get your answers.
15:54Fair enough.
15:55It was Abu Azmi who started.
15:56Abu Azmi.
15:57Abu Azmi started.
15:58Sanjay ji, now BJP has also come.
15:59It was your leader, Abu Azmi, who started this controversy.
16:00Fair enough.
16:01Fair enough, Sandeep Singh.
16:02Uddhav Thackeray has come out, all guns blazing.
16:04Sir, you've responded.
16:05You've responded.
16:06Devendra Fadnavis' government is being blamed for riots.
16:07Asking this question and pertinent question.
16:08Nagpur has RSS headquarters.
16:09The state chief minister and home minister come from Nagpur.
16:10Union Minister Nitin Gadkari is MP from Nagpur.
16:11Is this then not the failure, not just of the party, but the failure of the party?
16:12Is this not the failure of the party?
16:13Is this not the failure of the party?
16:14Is this not the failure of the party?
16:15Is this not the failure of the party?
16:16Is this not the failure of the party?
16:17Is this not the failure of the party?
16:18Is this not the failure of the party?
16:19Is this not the failure of the party?
16:20Is this not the failure of the party?
16:21Is this not the failure of the party?
16:22Is this not the failure of the party?
16:33Is this not the failure of the party?
16:34Is this not the failure of the party?
16:35Is this not the failure of the party?
16:36Is this not the failure of the party?
16:37Is this not the failure of the party?
16:38Is this not the failure of the party?
16:39Is this not the failure of the party?
16:40Is this not the failure of the party?
16:41Is this not the failure of the party?
16:42Is this not the failure of the party?
16:43Is this not the failure of the party?
16:44Is this not the failure of the party?
16:45Is this not the failure of the party?
16:46Is this not the failure of the party?
16:47Is this not the failure of the party?
16:48Is this not the failure of the party?
16:49Is this not the failure of the party?
16:50Is this not the failure of the party?
16:51Is this not the failure of the party?
16:52Is this not the failure of the party?
16:53Is this not the failure of the party?
16:54Is this not the failure of the party?
16:55Is this not the failure of the party?
16:56Is this not the failure of the party?
16:57Is this not the failure of the party?
16:58Is this not the failure of the party?
16:59Is this not the failure of the party?
17:00Is this not the failure of the party?
17:01Is this not the failure of the party?
17:02Is this not the failure of the party?
17:03Is this not the failure of the party?
17:04Is this not the failure of the party?
17:05Is this not the failure of the party?
17:06Is this not the failure of the party?
17:07Is this not the failure of the party?
17:08Is this not the failure of the party?
17:09Is this not the failure of the party?
17:10Is this not the failure of the party?
17:11Is this not the failure of the party?
17:12Is this not the failure of the party?
17:14Is this not the failure of the party?
17:15Is this not the failure of the party?
17:16Is this not the failure of the party?
17:17Is this not the failure of the party?
17:18Is this not the failure of the party?
17:19Is this not the failure of the party?
17:20Is this not the failure of the party?
17:21Is this not the failure of the party?
17:22Is this not the failure of the party?
17:23Is this not the failure of the party?
17:24Is this not the failure of the party?
17:25Is this not the failure of the party?
17:26Is this not the failure of the party?
17:27Is this not the failure of the party?
17:28Is this not the failure of the party?
17:29Is this not the failure of the party?
17:30Is this not the failure of the party?
17:31Is this not the failure of the party?
17:32Is this not the failure of the party?
17:33Is this not the failure of the party?
17:34Is this not the failure of the party?
17:35Is this not the failure of the party?
17:36Is this not the failure of the party?
17:37Is this not the failure of the party?
17:38Is this not the failure of the party?
17:39Is this not the failure of the party?
17:40Is this not the failure of the party?
17:41Is this not the failure of the party?
17:42Is this not the failure of the party?
17:43Is this not the failure of the party?
17:44Is this not the failure of the party?
17:45Is this not the failure of the party?
17:46Is this not the failure of the party?
17:47Is this not the failure of the party?
17:48Is this not the failure of the party?
17:49Is this not the failure of the party?
17:50Is this not the failure of the party?
17:51Is this not the failure of the party?
17:52Is this not the failure of the party?
17:53Is this not the failure of the party?
17:54Is this not the failure of the party?
17:55Is this not the failure of the party?
17:56Is this not the failure of the party?
17:57Is this not the failure of the party?
17:58Is this not the failure of the party?
17:59Is this not the failure of the party?
18:00Is this not the failure of the party?
18:01Is this not the failure of the party?
18:02Is this not the failure of the party?
18:03Is this not the failure of the party?
18:04Is this not the failure of the party?
18:05Is this not the failure of the party?
18:06Is this not the failure of the party?
18:07Is this not the failure of the party?
18:08Is this not the failure of the party?
18:09Is this not the failure of the party?
18:10Is this not the failure of the party?
18:11Is this not the failure of the party?
18:12Is this not the failure of the party?
18:13Is this not the failure of the party?
18:14Is this not the failure of the party?
18:15Is this not the failure of the party?
18:16Is this not the failure of the party?
18:17Is this not the failure of the party?
18:18Is this not the failure of the party?
18:19Is this not the failure of the party?
18:20Is this not the failure of the party?
18:21Is this not the failure of the party?
18:22Is this not the failure of the party?
18:23Is this not the failure of the party?
18:24Is this not the failure of the party?
18:25Is this not the failure of the party?
18:26Is this not the failure of the party?
18:27Is this not the failure of the party?
18:28Is this not the failure of the party?
18:29Is this not the failure of the party?
18:30Is this not the failure of the party?
18:31Is this not the failure of the party?
18:32Is this not the failure of the party?
18:33Is this not the failure of the party?
18:35Is this not the failure of the party?
18:36Is this not the failure of the party?
18:37Is this not the failure of the party?
18:38Is this not the failure of the party?
18:39Is this not the failure of the party?
18:40Is this not the failure of the party?
18:41Is this not the failure of the party?
18:42Is this not the failure of the party?
18:43Is this not the failure of the party?
18:44Is this not the failure of the party?
18:45Is this not the failure of the party?
18:46Is this not the failure of the party?
18:47Is this not the failure of the party?
18:48Is this not the failure of the party?
18:49Is this not the failure of the party?
18:50Is this not the failure of the party?
18:51Is this not the failure of the party?
18:52Is this not the failure of the party?
18:53Is this not the failure of the party?
18:54Is this not the failure of the party?
18:55Is this not the failure of the party?
18:56Is this not the failure of the party?
18:57Is this not the failure of the party?
18:58Is this not the failure of the party?
18:59Is this not the failure of the party?
19:00Is this not the failure of the party?
19:01Is this not the failure of the party?
19:02Is this not the failure of the party?
19:03Is this not the failure of the party?
19:04Is this not the failure of the party?
19:05Is this not the failure of the party?
19:06Is this not the failure of the party?
19:07Is this not the failure of the party?
19:08Is this not the failure of the party?
19:09Is this not the failure of the party?
19:10Is this not the failure of the party?
19:11Is this not the failure of the party?
19:12Is this not the failure of the party?
19:13Is this not the failure of the party?
19:14Is this not the failure of the party?
19:16Is this not the failure of the party?
19:17Is this not the failure of the party?
19:18Is this not the failure of the party?
19:19Is this not the failure of the party?
19:20Is this not the failure of the party?
19:21Is this not the failure of the party?
19:22Is this not the failure of the party?
19:23Is this not the failure of the party?
19:24Is this not the failure of the party?
19:25Is this not the failure of the party?
19:26Is this not the failure of the party?
19:27Is this not the failure of the party?
19:28Is this not the failure of the party?
19:29Is this not the failure of the party?
19:30Is this not the failure of the party?
19:31Is this not the failure of the party?
19:32Is this not the failure of the party?
19:33Is this not the failure of the party?
19:34Is this not the failure of the party?
19:35Is this not the failure of the party?
19:36Is this not the failure of the party?
19:37Is this not the failure of the party?
19:38Is this not the failure of the party?
19:39Is this not the failure of the party?
19:40Is this not the failure of the party?
19:41Is this not the failure of the party?
19:42Is this not the failure of the party?
19:43Is this not the failure of the party?
19:44Is this not the failure of the party?
19:45Is this not the failure of the party?
19:46Is this not the failure of the party?
19:47Is this not the failure of the party?
19:48Is this not the failure of the party?
19:49Is this not the failure of the party?
19:50Is this not the failure of the party?
19:51Is this not the failure of the party?
19:52Is this not the failure of the party?
19:53Is this not the failure of the party?
19:54Is this not the failure of the party?
19:55Is this not the failure of the party?
19:57Is this not the failure of the party?
19:58Is this not the failure of the party?
19:59Is this not the failure of the party?
20:00Is this not the failure of the party?
20:01Is this not the failure of the party?
20:02Is this not the failure of the party?
20:03Is this not the failure of the party?
20:04Is this not the failure of the party?
20:05Is this not the failure of the party?
20:06Is this not the failure of the party?
20:07Is this not the failure of the party?
20:08Is this not the failure of the party?
20:09Is this not the failure of the party?
20:10Is this not the failure of the party?
20:11Is this not the failure of the party?
20:12Is this not the failure of the party?
20:13Is this not the failure of the party?
20:14Is this not the failure of the party?
20:15Is this not the failure of the party?
20:16Is this not the failure of the party?
20:17Is this not the failure of the party?
20:18Is this not the failure of the party?
20:19Is this not the failure of the party?
20:20Is this not the failure of the party?
20:21Is this not the failure of the party?
20:22Is this not the failure of the party?
20:23Is this not the failure of the party?
20:24Is this not the failure of the party?
20:25Is this not the failure of the party?
20:26Is this not the failure of the party?
20:27Is this not the failure of the party?
20:28Is this not the failure of the party?
20:29Is this not the failure of the party?
20:30Is this not the failure of the party?
20:31Is this not the failure of the party?
20:32Is this not the failure of the party?
20:33Is this not the failure of the party?
20:34Is this not the failure of the party?
20:35Is this not the failure of the party?
20:36Is this not the failure of the party?
20:37Is this not the failure of the party?
20:38Is this not the failure of the party?
20:39Is this not the failure of the party?
20:40Is this not the failure of the party?
20:41Is this not the failure of the party?
20:42Is this not the failure of the party?
20:43Is this not the failure of the party?
20:44Is this not the failure of the party?
20:45Is this not the failure of the party?
20:46Is this not the failure of the party?
20:47Is this not the failure of the party?
20:48Is this not the failure of the party?
20:49Is this not the failure of the party?
20:50Is this not the failure of the party?
20:51Is this not the failure of the party?
20:52Is this not the failure of the party?
20:53Is this not the failure of the party?
20:54Is this not the failure of the party?
20:55Is this not the failure of the party?
20:56Is this not the failure of the party?
20:57Is this not the failure of the party?
20:58Is this not the failure of the party?
20:59Is this not the failure of the party?
21:00Is this not the failure of the party?
21:01Is this not the failure of the party?
21:02Is this not the failure of the party?
21:03Is this not the failure of the party?
21:04Is this not the failure of the party?
21:05Is this not the failure of the party?
21:06Is this not the failure of the party?
21:07Is this not the failure of the party?
21:08Is this not the failure of the party?
21:09Is this not the failure of the party?
21:10Is this not the failure of the party?
21:11Is this not the failure of the party?
21:12Is this not the failure of the party?
21:13Is this not the failure of the party?
21:14Is this not the failure of the party?
21:15Is this not the failure of the party?
21:16Is this not the failure of the party?
21:18Is this not the failure of the party?
21:19Is this not the failure of the party?
21:20Is this not the failure of the party?
21:21Is this not the failure of the party?
21:22Is this not the failure of the party?
21:23Is this not the failure of the party?
21:24Is this not the failure of the party?
21:25Is this not the failure of the party?
21:26Is this not the failure of the party?
21:27Is this not the failure of the party?
21:28Is this not the failure of the party?
21:29Is this not the failure of the party?
21:30Is this not the failure of the party?
21:31Is this not the failure of the party?
21:32Is this not the failure of the party?
21:33Is this not the failure of the party?
21:34Is this not the failure of the party?
21:35Is this not the failure of the party?
21:36Is this not the failure of the party?
21:37Is this not the failure of the party?
21:39Is this not the failure of the party?
21:40Is this not the failure of the party?
21:41Is this not the failure of the party?
21:42Is this not the failure of the party?
21:43Is this not the failure of the party?
21:44Is this not the failure of the party?
21:45Is this not the failure of the party?
21:46Is this not the failure of the party?
21:47Is this not the failure of the party?
21:48Is this not the failure of the party?
21:49Is this not the failure of the party?
21:50Is this not the failure of the party?
21:51Is this not the failure of the party?
21:52Is this not the failure of the party?
21:53Is this not the failure of the party?
21:54Is this not the failure of the party?
21:55Is this not the failure of the party?
21:56Is this not the failure of the party?
21:57Is this not the failure of the party?
21:58Is this not the failure of the party?
22:00Is this not the failure of the party?
22:01Is this not the failure of the party?
22:02Is this not the failure of the party?
22:03Is this not the failure of the party?
22:04Is this not the failure of the party?
22:05Is this not the failure of the party?
22:06Is this not the failure of the party?
22:07Is this not the failure of the party?
22:08Is this not the failure of the party?
22:09Is this not the failure of the party?
22:10Is this not the failure of the party?
22:11Is this not the failure of the party?
22:12Is this not the failure of the party?
22:13Is this not the failure of the party?
22:14Is this not the failure of the party?
22:15Is this not the failure of the party?
22:16Is this not the failure of the party?
22:17Is this not the failure of the party?
22:18Is this not the failure of the party?
22:19Is this not the failure of the party?
22:20Is this not the failure of the party?
22:21Is this not the failure of the party?
22:22Is this not the failure of the party?
22:23Is this not the failure of the party?
22:24Is this not the failure of the party?
22:25Is this not the failure of the party?
22:26Is this not the failure of the party?
22:27Is this not the failure of the party?
22:28Is this not the failure of the party?
22:29Is this not the failure of the party?
22:30Is this not the failure of the party?
22:31Is this not the failure of the party?
22:32Is this not the failure of the party?
22:33Is this not the failure of the party?
22:34Is this not the failure of the party?
22:35Is this not the failure of the party?
22:36Is this not the failure of the party?
22:37Is this not the failure of the party?
22:38Is this not the failure of the party?
22:39Is this not the failure of the party?
22:40Is this not the failure of the party?
22:41Is this not the failure of the party?
22:42Is this not the failure of the party?
22:43Is this not the failure of the party?
22:44Is this not the failure of the party?
22:45Is this not the failure of the party?
22:46Is this not the failure of the party?
22:47Is this not the failure of the party?
22:48Is this not the failure of the party?
22:49Is this not the failure of the party?
22:50Is this not the failure of the party?
22:51Is this not the failure of the party?
22:52Is this not the failure of the party?
22:53Is this not the failure of the party?
22:54Is this not the failure of the party?
22:55Is this not the failure of the party?
22:56Is this not the failure of the party?
22:57Is this not the failure of the party?
22:58Is this not the failure of the party?
22:59Is this not the failure of the party?
23:00Is this not the failure of the party?
23:01Is this not the failure of the party?
23:02Is this not the failure of the party?
23:03Is this not the failure of the party?
23:04Is this not the failure of the party?
23:05Is this not the failure of the party?
23:06Is this not the failure of the party?
23:07Is this not the failure of the party?
23:08Is this not the failure of the party?
23:09Is this not the failure of the party?
23:10Is this not the failure of the party?
23:11Is this not the failure of the party?
23:12Is this not the failure of the party?
23:13Is this not the failure of the party?
23:14Is this not the failure of the party?
23:15Is this not the failure of the party?
23:16Is this not the failure of the party?
23:17Is this not the failure of the party?
23:18Is this not the failure of the party?
23:19Is this not the failure of the party?
23:20Is this not the failure of the party?
23:21Is this not the failure of the party?
23:22Is this not the failure of the party?
23:23Is this not the failure of the party?
23:24Is this not the failure of the party?
23:25Is this not the failure of the party?
23:26Is this not the failure of the party?
23:27Is this not the failure of the party?
23:28Is this not the failure of the party?
23:29Is this not the failure of the party?
23:30Is this not the failure of the party?
23:31Is this not the failure of the party?
23:32Is this not the failure of the party?
23:33Is this not the failure of the party?
23:34Is this not the failure of the party?
23:35Is this not the failure of the party?
23:36Is this not the failure of the party?
23:37Is this not the failure of the party?
23:38Is this not the failure of the party?
23:39Is this not the failure of the party?
23:41Is this not the failure of the party?
23:42Is this not the failure of the party?
23:43Is this not the failure of the party?
23:44Is this not the failure of the party?
23:45Is this not the failure of the party?
23:46Is this not the failure of the party?
23:47Is this not the failure of the party?
23:48Is this not the failure of the party?
23:49Is this not the failure of the party?
23:50Is this not the failure of the party?
23:51Is this not the failure of the party?
23:52Is this not the failure of the party?
23:53Is this not the failure of the party?
23:54Is this not the failure of the party?
23:55Is this not the failure of the party?
23:56Is this not the failure of the party?
23:57Is this not the failure of the party?
23:58Is this not the failure of the party?
23:59Is this not the failure of the party?
24:00Is this not the failure of the party?
24:01Is this not the failure of the party?
24:02Is this not the failure of the party?
24:03Is this not the failure of the party?
24:04Is this not the failure of the party?
24:05Is this not the failure of the party?
24:06Is this not the failure of the party?
24:07Is this not the failure of the party?
24:08Is this not the failure of the party?
24:09Is this not the failure of the party?
24:10Is this not the failure of the party?
24:11Is this not the failure of the party?
24:12Is this not the failure of the party?
24:13Is this not the failure of the party?
24:14Is this not the failure of the party?
24:15Is this not the failure of the party?
24:16Is this not the failure of the party?
24:17Is this not the failure of the party?
24:18Is this not the failure of the party?
24:19Is this not the failure of the party?
24:20Is this not the failure of the party?
24:22Is this not the failure of the party?
24:23Is this not the failure of the party?
24:24Is this not the failure of the party?
24:25Is this not the failure of the party?
24:26Is this not the failure of the party?
24:27Is this not the failure of the party?
24:28Is this not the failure of the party?
24:29Is this not the failure of the party?
24:30Is this not the failure of the party?
24:31Is this not the failure of the party?
24:32Is this not the failure of the party?
24:33Is this not the failure of the party?
24:34Is this not the failure of the party?
24:35Is this not the failure of the party?
24:36Is this not the failure of the party?
24:37Is this not the failure of the party?
24:38Is this not the failure of the party?
24:39Is this not the failure of the party?
24:40Is this not the failure of the party?
24:41Is this not the failure of the party?
24:42Is this not the failure of the party?
24:43Is this not the failure of the party?
24:44Is this not the failure of the party?
24:45Is this not the failure of the party?
24:46Is this not the failure of the party?
24:47Is this not the failure of the party?
24:48Is this not the failure of the party?
24:49Is this not the failure of the party?
24:50Is this not the failure of the party?
24:51Is this not the failure of the party?
24:52Is this not the failure of the party?
24:53Is this not the failure of the party?
24:54Is this not the failure of the party?
24:55Is this not the failure of the party?
24:56Is this not the failure of the party?
24:57Is this not the failure of the party?
24:58Is this not the failure of the party?
24:59Is this not the failure of the party?
25:00Is this not the failure of the party?
25:01Is this not the failure of the party?
25:02Is this not the failure of the party?
25:03Is this not the failure of the party?
25:04Is this not the failure of the party?
25:05Is this not the failure of the party?
25:06Is this not the failure of the party?
25:07Is this not the failure of the party?
25:08Is this not the failure of the party?
25:09Is this not the failure of the party?
25:10Is this not the failure of the party?
25:11Is this not the failure of the party?
25:12Is this not the failure of the party?
25:13Is this not the failure of the party?
25:14Is this not the failure of the party?
25:15Is this not the failure of the party?
25:16Is this not the failure of the party?
25:17Is this not the failure of the party?
25:18Is this not the failure of the party?
25:19Is this not the failure of the party?
25:20Is this not the failure of the party?
25:21Is this not the failure of the party?
25:22Is this not the failure of the party?
25:23Is this not the failure of the party?
25:24Is this not the failure of the party?
25:25Is this not the failure of the party?
25:26Is this not the failure of the party?
25:27Is this not the failure of the party?
25:28Is this not the failure of the party?
25:29Is this not the failure of the party?
25:30Is this not the failure of the party?
25:31Is this not the failure of the party?
25:32Is this not the failure of the party?
25:33Is this not the failure of the party?
25:34Is this not the failure of the party?
25:35Is this not the failure of the party?
25:36Is this not the failure of the party?
25:37Is this not the failure of the party?
25:38Is this not the failure of the party?
25:39Is this not the failure of the party?
25:40Is this not the failure of the party?
25:41Is this not the failure of the party?
25:42Is this not the failure of the party?
25:43Is this not the failure of the party?
25:44Is this not the failure of the party?
25:45Is this not the failure of the party?
25:46Is this not the failure of the party?
25:47Is this not the failure of the party?
25:48Is this not the failure of the party?
25:49Is this not the failure of the party?
25:50Is this not the failure of the party?
25:51Is this not the failure of the party?
25:52Is this not the failure of the party?
25:53Is this not the failure of the party?
25:54Is this not the failure of the party?
25:55Is this not the failure of the party?
25:56Is this not the failure of the party?
25:57Is this not the failure of the party?
25:58Is this not the failure of the party?
25:59Is this not the failure of the party?
26:00Is this not the failure of the party?
26:01Is this not the failure of the party?
26:02Is this not the failure of the party?
26:03Is this not the failure of the party?
26:04Is this not the failure of the party?
26:05Is this not the failure of the party?
26:06Is this not the failure of the party?
26:07Is this not the failure of the party?
26:08Is this not the failure of the party?
26:09Is this not the failure of the party?
26:10Is this not the failure of the party?
26:11Is this not the failure of the party?
26:12Is this not the failure of the party?
26:13Is this not the failure of the party?
26:14Is this not the failure of the party?
26:15Is this not the failure of the party?
26:16Is this not the failure of the party?
26:17Is this not the failure of the party?
26:18Is this not the failure of the party?
26:19Is this not the failure of the party?
26:20Is this not the failure of the party?
26:21Is this not the failure of the party?
26:22Is this not the failure of the party?
26:23Is this not the failure of the party?
26:24Is this not the failure of the party?
26:25Is this not the failure of the party?
26:26Is this not the failure of the party?
26:27Is this not the failure of the party?
26:28Is this not the failure of the party?
26:29Is this not the failure of the party?
26:30Is this not the failure of the party?
26:31Is this not the failure of the party?
26:32Is this not the failure of the party?
26:33Is this not the failure of the party?
26:34Is this not the failure of the party?
26:35Is this not the failure of the party?
26:36Is this not the failure of the party?
26:37Is this not the failure of the party?
26:38Is this not the failure of the party?
26:39Is this not the failure of the party?
26:40Is this not the failure of the party?
26:41Is this not the failure of the party?
26:42Is this not the failure of the party?
26:43Is this not the failure of the party?
26:44Is this not the failure of the party?
26:45Is this not the failure of the party?
26:46Is this not the failure of the party?
26:47Is this not the failure of the party?
26:48Is this not the failure of the party?
26:49Is this not the failure of the party?
26:50Is this not the failure of the party?
26:51Is this not the failure of the party?
26:52Is this not the failure of the party?
26:53Is this not the failure of the party?
26:54Is this not the failure of the party?
26:55Is this not the failure of the party?
26:56Is this not the failure of the party?
26:57Is this not the failure of the party?
26:58Is this not the failure of the party?
26:59Is this not the failure of the party?
27:00Is this not the failure of the party?
27:01Is this not the failure of the party?
27:02Is this not the failure of the party?
27:03Is this not the failure of the party?
27:04Is this not the failure of the party?
27:05Is this not the failure of the party?
27:06Is this not the failure of the party?
27:07Is this not the failure of the party?
27:08Is this not the failure of the party?
27:09Is this not the failure of the party?
27:10Is this not the failure of the party?
27:11Is this not the failure of the party?
27:12Is this not the failure of the party?
27:13Is this not the failure of the party?
27:14Is this not the failure of the party?
27:15Is this not the failure of the party?
27:16Is this not the failure of the party?
27:17Is this not the failure of the party?
27:18Is this not the failure of the party?
27:19Is this not the failure of the party?
27:20Is this not the failure of the party?
27:21Is this not the failure of the party?
27:22Is this not the failure of the party?
27:23Is this not the failure of the party?
27:24Is this not the failure of the party?
27:25Is this not the failure of the party?
27:26Is this not the failure of the party?
27:27Is this not the failure of the party?
27:28Is this not the failure of the party?
27:29Is this not the failure of the party?
27:30Is this not the failure of the party?
27:31Is this not the failure of the party?
27:32Is this not the failure of the party?
27:33Is this not the failure of the party?
27:34Is this not the failure of the party?
27:35Is this not the failure of the party?
27:36Is this not the failure of the party?
27:37Is this not the failure of the party?
27:38Is this not the failure of the party?
27:39Is this not the failure of the party?
27:40Is this not the failure of the party?
27:41Is this not the failure of the party?
27:42Is this not the failure of the party?
27:43Is this not the failure of the party?
27:44Is this not the failure of the party?
27:45Is this not the failure of the party?
27:46Is this not the failure of the party?
27:47Is this not the failure of the party?
27:48Is this not the failure of the party?
27:49Is this not the failure of the party?
27:50Is this not the failure of the party?
27:51Is this not the failure of the party?
27:52Is this not the failure of the party?
27:53Is this not the failure of the party?
27:54Is this not the failure of the party?
27:55Is this not the failure of the party?
27:56Is this not the failure of the party?
27:57Is this not the failure of the party?
27:58Is this not the failure of the party?
27:59Is this not the failure of the party?
28:00Is this not the failure of the party?
28:01Is this not the failure of the party?
28:02Is this not the failure of the party?
28:03Is this not the failure of the party?
28:04Is this not the failure of the party?
28:05Is this not the failure of the party?
28:06Is this not the failure of the party?
28:07Is this not the failure of the party?
28:08Is this not the failure of the party?
28:09Is this not the failure of the party?
28:10Is this not the failure of the party?
28:11Is this not the failure of the party?
28:12Is this not the failure of the party?
28:13Is this not the failure of the party?
28:14Is this not the failure of the party?
28:15Is this not the failure of the party?
28:16Is this not the failure of the party?
28:17Is this not the failure of the party?
28:18Is this not the failure of the party?
28:19Is this not the failure of the party?
28:20Is this not the failure of the party?
28:21Is this not the failure of the party?
28:22Is this not the failure of the party?
28:23Is this not the failure of the party?
28:24Is this not the failure of the party?
28:25Is this not the failure of the party?
28:26Is this not the failure of the party?
28:27Is this not the failure of the party?
28:28Is this not the failure of the party?
28:29Is this not the failure of the party?
28:30Is this not the failure of the party?
28:31Is this not the failure of the party?
28:32Is this not the failure of the party?
28:33Is this not the failure of the party?
28:34Is this not the failure of the party?
28:35Is this not the failure of the party?
28:36Is this not the failure of the party?
28:37Is this not the failure of the party?
28:38Is this not the failure of the party?
28:39Is this not the failure of the party?
28:40Is this not the failure of the party?
28:41Is this not the failure of the party?
28:42Is this not the failure of the party?
28:43Is this not the failure of the party?
28:44Is this not the failure of the party?
28:45Is this not the failure of the party?
28:46Is this not the failure of the party?
28:47Is this not the failure of the party?
28:48Is this not the failure of the party?
28:49Is this not the failure of the party?
28:50Is this not the failure of the party?
28:51Is this not the failure of the party?
28:52Is this not the failure of the party?
28:53Is this not the failure of the party?
28:54Is this not the failure of the party?
28:55Is this not the failure of the party?
28:56Is this not the failure of the party?
28:57Is this not the failure of the party?
28:58Is this not the failure of the party?
28:59Is this not the failure of the party?
29:00Is this not the failure of the party?
29:01Is this not the failure of the party?
29:02Is this not the failure of the party?
29:03Is this not the failure of the party?
29:04Is this not the failure of the party?
29:05Is this not the failure of the party?
29:06Is this not the failure of the party?
29:07Is this not the failure of the party?
29:08Is this not the failure of the party?
29:09Is this not the failure of the party?
29:10Is this not the failure of the party?
29:11Is this not the failure of the party?
29:12Is this not the failure of the party?
29:13Is this not the failure of the party?
29:14Is this not the failure of the party?
29:15Is this not the failure of the party?
29:16Is this not the failure of the party?
29:17Is this not the failure of the party?
29:18Is this not the failure of the party?
29:19Is this not the failure of the party?
29:20Is this not the failure of the party?
29:21Is this not the failure of the party?
29:23Is this not the failure of the party?
29:24Is this not the failure of the party?
29:25Is this not the failure of the party?
29:26Is this not the failure of the party?
29:27Is this not the failure of the party?
29:28Is this not the failure of the party?
29:29Is this not the failure of the party?
29:30Is this not the failure of the party?
29:31Is this not the failure of the party?
29:32Is this not the failure of the party?
29:33Is this not the failure of the party?
29:34Is this not the failure of the party?
29:35Is this not the failure of the party?
29:36Is this not the failure of the party?
29:37Is this not the failure of the party?
29:38Is this not the failure of the party?
29:39Is this not the failure of the party?
29:40Is this not the failure of the party?
29:41Is this not the failure of the party?
29:42Is this not the failure of the party?
29:43Is this not the failure of the party?
29:44Is this not the failure of the party?
29:45Is this not the failure of the party?
29:46Is this not the failure of the party?
29:47Is this not the failure of the party?
29:48Is this not the failure of the party?
29:49Is this not the failure of the party?
29:50Is this not the failure of the party?
29:51Is this not the failure of the party?
29:52Is this not the failure of the party?
29:53Is this not the failure of the party?
29:54Is this not the failure of the party?
29:55Is this not the failure of the party?
29:56Is this not the failure of the party?
29:57Is this not the failure of the party?
29:58Is this not the failure of the party?
29:59Is this not the failure of the party?
30:00Is this not the failure of the party?
30:01Is this not the failure of the party?
30:02Is this not the failure of the party?
30:04Is this not the failure of the party?
30:05Is this not the failure of the party?
30:06Is this not the failure of the party?
30:07Is this not the failure of the party?
30:08Is this not the failure of the party?
30:09Is this not the failure of the party?
30:10Is this not the failure of the party?
30:11Is this not the failure of the party?
30:12Is this not the failure of the party?
30:13Is this not the failure of the party?
30:14Is this not the failure of the party?
30:15Is this not the failure of the party?
30:16Is this not the failure of the party?
30:17Is this not the failure of the party?
30:18Is this not the failure of the party?
30:19Is this not the failure of the party?
30:20Is this not the failure of the party?
30:21Is this not the failure of the party?
30:22Is this not the failure of the party?
30:23Is this not the failure of the party?
30:24Is this not the failure of the party?
30:25Is this not the failure of the party?
30:26Is this not the failure of the party?
30:27Is this not the failure of the party?
30:28Is this not the failure of the party?
30:29Is this not the failure of the party?
30:30Is this not the failure of the party?
30:31Is this not the failure of the party?
30:32Is this not the failure of the party?
30:33Is this not the failure of the party?
30:34Is this not the failure of the party?
30:35Is this not the failure of the party?
30:36Is this not the failure of the party?
30:37Is this not the failure of the party?
30:38Is this not the failure of the party?
30:39Is this not the failure of the party?
30:40Is this not the failure of the party?
30:41Is this not the failure of the party?
30:42Is this not the failure of the party?
30:43Is this not the failure of the party?
30:45Is this not the failure of the party?
30:46Is this not the failure of the party?
30:47Is this not the failure of the party?
30:48Is this not the failure of the party?
30:49Is this not the failure of the party?
30:50Is this not the failure of the party?
30:51Is this not the failure of the party?
30:52Is this not the failure of the party?
30:53Is this not the failure of the party?
30:54Is this not the failure of the party?
30:55Is this not the failure of the party?
30:56Is this not the failure of the party?
30:57Is this not the failure of the party?
30:58Is this not the failure of the party?
30:59Is this not the failure of the party?
31:00Is this not the failure of the party?
31:01Is this not the failure of the party?
31:02Is this not the failure of the party?
31:03Is this not the failure of the party?
31:04Is this not the failure of the party?
31:06Is this not the failure of the party?
31:07Is this not the failure of the party?
31:08Is this not the failure of the party?
31:09Is this not the failure of the party?
31:10Is this not the failure of the party?
31:11Is this not the failure of the party?
31:12Is this not the failure of the party?
31:13Is this not the failure of the party?
31:14Is this not the failure of the party?
31:15Is this not the failure of the party?
31:16Is this not the failure of the party?
31:17Is this not the failure of the party?
31:18Is this not the failure of the party?
31:19Is this not the failure of the party?
31:20Is this not the failure of the party?
31:21Is this not the failure of the party?
31:22Is this not the failure of the party?
31:23Is this not the failure of the party?
31:24Is this not the failure of the party?
31:25Is this not the failure of the party?
31:27Is this not the failure of the party?
31:28Is this not the failure of the party?
31:29Is this not the failure of the party?
31:30Is this not the failure of the party?
31:31Is this not the failure of the party?
31:32Is this not the failure of the party?
31:33Is this not the failure of the party?
31:34Is this not the failure of the party?
31:35Is this not the failure of the party?
31:36Is this not the failure of the party?
31:37Is this not the failure of the party?
31:38Is this not the failure of the party?
31:39Is this not the failure of the party?
31:40Is this not the failure of the party?
31:41Is this not the failure of the party?
31:42Is this not the failure of the party?
31:43Is this not the failure of the party?
31:44Is this not the failure of the party?
31:45Is this not the failure of the party?
31:46Is this not the failure of the party?
31:48Is this not the failure of the party?
31:49Is this not the failure of the party?
31:50Is this not the failure of the party?
31:51Is this not the failure of the party?
31:52Is this not the failure of the party?
31:53Is this not the failure of the party?
31:54Is this not the failure of the party?
31:55Is this not the failure of the party?
31:56Is this not the failure of the party?
31:57Is this not the failure of the party?
31:58Is this not the failure of the party?
31:59Is this not the failure of the party?
32:00Is this not the failure of the party?
32:01Is this not the failure of the party?
32:02Is this not the failure of the party?
32:03Is this not the failure of the party?
32:04Is this not the failure of the party?
32:05Is this not the failure of the party?
32:06Is this not the failure of the party?
32:07Is this not the failure of the party?
32:08Is this not the failure of the party?
32:09Is this not the failure of the party?
32:10Is this not the failure of the party?
32:11Is this not the failure of the party?
32:12Is this not the failure of the party?
32:13Is this not the failure of the party?
32:14Is this not the failure of the party?
32:15Is this not the failure of the party?
32:16Is this not the failure of the party?
32:17Is this not the failure of the party?
32:18Is this not the failure of the party?
32:19Is this not the failure of the party?
32:20Is this not the failure of the party?
32:21Is this not the failure of the party?
32:22Is this not the failure of the party?
32:23Is this not the failure of the party?
32:24Is this not the failure of the party?
32:25Is this not the failure of the party?
32:26Is this not the failure of the party?
32:27Is this not the failure of the party?
32:28Is this not the failure of the party?
32:29Is this not the failure of the party?
32:30Is this not the failure of the party?
32:31Is this not the failure of the party?
32:32Is this not the failure of the party?
32:33Is this not the failure of the party?
32:34Is this not the failure of the party?
32:35Is this not the failure of the party?
32:36Is this not the failure of the party?
32:37Is this not the failure of the party?
32:38Is this not the failure of the party?
32:39Is this not the failure of the party?
32:40Is this not the failure of the party?
32:41Is this not the failure of the party?
32:42Is this not the failure of the party?
32:43Is this not the failure of the party?
32:44Is this not the failure of the party?
32:45Is this not the failure of the party?
32:46Is this not the failure of the party?
32:47Is this not the failure of the party?
32:48Is this not the failure of the party?
32:49Is this not the failure of the party?
32:50Is this not the failure of the party?
32:51Is this not the failure of the party?
32:52Is this not the failure of the party?
32:53Is this not the failure of the party?
32:54Is this not the failure of the party?
32:55Is this not the failure of the party?
32:56Is this not the failure of the party?
32:57Is this not the failure of the party?
32:58Is this not the failure of the party?
32:59Is this not the failure of the party?
33:00Is this not the failure of the party?
33:01Is this not the failure of the party?
33:02Is this not the failure of the party?
33:03Is this not the failure of the party?
33:04Is this not the failure of the party?
33:05Is this not the failure of the party?
33:06Is this not the failure of the party?
33:07Is this not the failure of the party?
33:08Is this not the failure of the party?
33:09Is this not the failure of the party?
33:10Is this not the failure of the party?
33:11Is this not the failure of the party?
33:12Is this not the failure of the party?
33:13Is this not the failure of the party?
33:14Is this not the failure of the party?
33:15Is this not the failure of the party?
33:16Is this not the failure of the party?
33:17Is this not the failure of the party?
33:18Is this not the failure of the party?
33:19Is this not the failure of the party?
33:20Is this not the failure of the party?
33:21Is this not the failure of the party?
33:22Is this not the failure of the party?
33:23Is this not the failure of the party?
33:24Is this not the failure of the party?
33:25Is this not the failure of the party?
33:26Is this not the failure of the party?
33:27Is this not the failure of the party?
33:29Is this not the failure of the party?
33:30Is this not the failure of the party?
33:31Is this not the failure of the party?
33:32Is this not the failure of the party?
33:33Is this not the failure of the party?
33:34Is this not the failure of the party?
33:35Is this not the failure of the party?
33:36Is this not the failure of the party?
33:37Is this not the failure of the party?
33:38Is this not the failure of the party?
33:39Is this not the failure of the party?
33:40Is this not the failure of the party?
33:41Is this not the failure of the party?
33:42Is this not the failure of the party?
33:43Is this not the failure of the party?
33:44Is this not the failure of the party?
33:45Is this not the failure of the party?
33:46Is this not the failure of the party?
33:47Is this not the failure of the party?
33:48Is this not the failure of the party?
33:49Is this not the failure of the party?
33:50Is this not the failure of the party?
33:51Is this not the failure of the party?
33:52Is this not the failure of the party?
33:53Is this not the failure of the party?
33:54Is this not the failure of the party?
33:55Is this not the failure of the party?
33:56Is this not the failure of the party?
33:57Is this not the failure of the party?
33:58Is this not the failure of the party?
33:59Is this not the failure of the party?
34:00Is this not the failure of the party?
34:01Is this not the failure of the party?
34:02Is this not the failure of the party?
34:03Is this not the failure of the party?
34:04Is this not the failure of the party?
34:05Is this not the failure of the party?
34:06Is this not the failure of the party?
34:07Is this not the failure of the party?
34:08Is this not the failure of the party?
34:09Is this not the failure of the party?
34:10Is this not the failure of the party?
34:11Is this not the failure of the party?
34:12Is this not the failure of the party?
34:13Is this not the failure of the party?
34:14Is this not the failure of the party?
34:15Is this not the failure of the party?
34:16Is this not the failure of the party?
34:17Is this not the failure of the party?
34:18Is this not the failure of the party?
34:19Is this not the failure of the party?
34:20Is this not the failure of the party?
34:21Is this not the failure of the party?
34:22Is this not the failure of the party?
34:23Is this not the failure of the party?
34:24Is this not the failure of the party?
34:25Is this not the failure of the party?
34:26Is this not the failure of the party?
34:27Is this not the failure of the party?
34:28Is this not the failure of the party?
34:29No, no, Gaurav, I think it is too premature now to reach to a conclusion that it's a failure
34:38of Devendra Patnavi's government.
34:40Like I said, and like we maintain communal harmony, peace, security, stability of our
34:45citizens and our places has been one of the most topmost priority.
34:49The activism, the promptness with which the Devendra Patnavi's government has acted, we
34:53are witnessing on your, as we debate, I can see on your television screen as well.
34:58It is very much visible that the state government and the state police have been overactive.
35:03They are, they have identified people, over 60 individual arrests have already been made
35:07since yesterday, since last night, we have seen curfew section 144 already being imposed.
35:12But the fact of the matter is something else, which respected Mr. Vaidya has also indicated.
35:17We have to reach to the root cause of the problem.
35:19There is a community demanding historical accountability and on that note, on that evening,
35:25we see a different protest and that protest becoming automatically as an uncontrollable mob.
35:31Now, who is going to give answers for that?
35:33The problem is, like I said, and I maintain it very strongly, you cannot hold a government,
35:38you can definitely ask question, what happened in 1984?
35:42It happened at the National Capital.
35:44It happened on the streets of Delhi.
35:46It was the failure of Congress government.
35:47But we have to ask ourselves that the government, which have committed itself to peace, the
35:52government, which has a track record of stability, the government, which has repeatedly shown
35:57that we have seen what's happened in Uttar Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh was once very notorious
36:02for communal clashes, Muzaffarnagar happened in Uttar Pradesh.
36:05You tell me, since 2017, when Yogi Adityanath has become the chief minister of Uttar Pradesh,
36:09one incident of communal violence, absolutely zero.
36:12Whatever has happened in Nagpur has been very unfortunate.
36:16And the government, the chief minister, that the entire system and the entire machinery
36:20is proactive.
36:21They're on their toes.
36:2260 arrests have been made.
36:23And we will ensure strictest action, Gaurav.
36:26On your show, I can say this.
36:27Ek aise nazir pesh ki jayegi, koi aage aisa karne ka himmat nahi karega.
36:32But last point, Gaurav, why do you think, I asked you a question, the incident happened
36:37in the Mahal area of Nagpur, which is the headquarter of the RSS.
36:41Did we ever question this?
36:42Was there a message?
36:44Did the writers come up with an intention to send a message nationally?
36:48Why did they choose a place which is the national headquarter of the Sangh, the Mahal
36:52area of Nagpur?
36:53So you have to ask, there are very serious questions out in the open, Gaurav.
36:57No, sir, explain what is your explanation?
36:59What is the message that's being sent out?
37:02What is your understanding?
37:03Give me 15 seconds.
37:04Oh, absolutely, sir.
37:05The moment Mr. Paswan completes.
37:06There is a...
37:07Gaurav, haath kangan ko RC kya, padhe likhe ko Farsi kya?
37:08There is a very serious question.
37:09The moment Mr. Paswan completes.
37:10There is a...
37:11Gaurav, haath kangan ko RC kya, padhe likhe ko Farsi kya?
37:17There is a very popular saying in Hindi, and as we are debating the live, the show which
37:23is there running on your screen, we can see who are the writers, but the Congress leaders,
37:27the Congress politicians, they don't have the moral courage.
37:31They don't have the moral courage of identifying who are the writers.
37:33When we can see it in front of our eyes, that who are the writers, but the Congress party
37:38in their naked rays of minority appeasement will not name the writers, will not name the
37:44accused because they have to do the politics of minority appeasement, particularly Muslim
37:48appeasement because they have to stand with the atrocities of Aurangzeb.
37:54Sanjay Jha wants to respond to this point of appeasement politics.
37:59That's one part of it.
38:00But the second part, Sanjay Jha, when Guru Prakash Paswan or when the BJP says that they
38:05did everything possible, one to control, contain the situation, ensure it doesn't
38:10spread out.
38:11And now, as Mr. Paswan says, 60 people have already been taken into custody.
38:15The guilty will not be spared.
38:18Does that send out a message of reassurance that the riots will not spread?
38:22Or as some argue, the real apprehension is this fire that's been lit could singe other
38:28parts of Maharashtra and the country now.
38:31Gaurav, I think your program has hit it right.
38:34What you have called is Maharashtra in the box.
38:37And it's a tragedy that the party is in power here.
38:41This is a double-engined Sarkar apparently.
38:44And look at the conflagration they are encouraging.
38:46Is it for the Bihar elections?
38:47I don't know.
38:48But they are preparing the ground for further division of our society.
38:52Since my friend here talked a lot about incidents that happened, Gaurav, I will take 30 seconds
38:58to wrap this up.
39:0030 seconds is all I need.
39:02Look at the last five big riots that have happened in this country.
39:06Babri Masjid, 1992-93, Gujarat riots, 2002, Muzaffarnagar, 2013, Delhi riots, 2020, Manipur
39:17is still burning, and the hand of the BJP and the hand of the Saffron party is deep
39:24in all the violence that has happened.
39:27So I would request Mr. Paswan, know your history.
39:30Do not come on a program and try and spread conspiracy theories where there are none.
39:38And let me leave Gaurav.
39:39How conveniently you have forgotten 1984, Mr. Sanjay Jha.
39:43How conveniently you have forgotten 1984.
39:46This is the embarrassment of the Congress party.
39:48Paswan, do not interrupt me.
39:49I am just taking five seconds.
39:51A 15-year-old boy, a 15-year-old boy is arrested and a fire is bursting in his name.
39:56There is a name, sir.
39:57I respect you.
39:59Please have that level of respect, Sanjay ji.
40:01Please have that level of respect, Sanjay ji.
40:03Please have that level of respect.
40:05I don't understand.
40:06I think he is feeling insecure.
40:07I want to bring in Mr. Sandeep Singh for the last 30 seconds.
40:11You must learn some manners before calling me.
40:13You must learn some manners, Sanjay ji.
40:15Okay, okay.
40:16I can learn manners from anybody from the BJP.
40:19Okay, hold on.
40:20We are staying on the substantive issue of riots.
40:23Yes, 1984.
40:25Of riots in Maharashtra, in Nagpur.
40:29Sandeep Singh, is there an apprehension that this fire could now singe, God forbid, other
40:35parts of Maharashtra or other parts of the country?
40:40No, I don't think so that this riot is going to spread.
40:43The government will control it because the central government and the state government,
40:46wherever BJP are, they are very effective.
40:48Yes, I am not sure where opposition rule states are, how it can be blown out of proportion.
40:54And just to make one correction, Sanjay Jha, the biggest riots were not the ones you named,
40:58but much before and all during Congress rule.
41:01Just go and check.
41:02It was in Jamshedpur.
41:03It was in Rautkela in 1971.
41:05Those are the called biggest riots.
41:06We just can't whitewash them, saying that the Godhra is the biggest riot.
41:10Find out who triggered them, Singh.
41:15Jha, you must learn to behave.
41:17That's the first thing, Jha.
41:18Who triggered 1984?
41:20You behave as if you are not in Bombay before 2014.
41:25My name is Sandeep Singh.
41:27Why you get offended, Jha?
41:29I will address you by Jha henceforth.
41:31Everybody will address you by Jha.
41:36But you know, this is on the substantive issue.
41:39This is on the substantive issue.
41:42Mr. Vaid, Mr. Vaid.
41:44I want to give the last word to Mr. Vaid.
41:47Mr. Vaid, those who are against our country
41:50and interests of our country
41:52would actually be celebrating
41:54in case riots can be triggered so easily in our country
41:58and some people can be triggered so easily just with rumours.
42:01What message needs to go across
42:04irrespective of what the rumour is?
42:07There should not be a riot.
42:09You can only follow the rule of law.
42:13If you are aggrieved by something,
42:15go to courts of law, go to the police.
42:18There is no right to riot.
42:20Mr. Vaid.
42:23Gaurab, you know, America has been
42:26identifying illegal immigrants
42:29and picking them up and sending them.
42:32You have seen this happen with India also.
42:34Now, in India, there is an effort
42:37to identify illegal infiltrators
42:39like Bangladeshis and Rohingyas.
42:44That is one issue which is actually raising these tempers.
42:47Another issue, you know,
42:50the buck-up will which we saw yesterday.
42:54Okay.
42:55How Jantar Mantar,
42:59the kind of slogans which were coming there.
43:03Now, I think instead of showing steep bar,
43:08this should have been contested in the parliament.
43:11You talk of many of our political parties
43:14talk of democracy and all these issues.
43:16These should be handled in the parliament.
43:19And if you feel that you are not able to
43:22stop a particular thing
43:25and show a steep violence,
43:28that this country will not tolerate.
43:31It will be punished very, very swearly
43:34whoever resorts to this kind of violence.
43:36And message will go all across the country
43:39and even outside the country
43:42that Bharat is not going to tolerate
43:45this kind of display of street violence.
43:48I will let that be the last word on this part of the show.
43:51Very clearly, the Devendra Fadnavis government
43:54is on notice on this issue.
43:57The Yogi Adityanath government has handled
44:00rioters in a certain way.
44:02Will the Devendra Fadnavis government ensure
44:05that it's rule of law, that it's a democracy
44:08and not a mobocracy?
44:10Mobs will not decide how this country
44:13is governed or run.
44:15Rumor or no rumor, there can be no riots.
44:18We'll be tracking this story very closely.
44:20To all my guests, many, many thanks for joining me.
44:23Will there be peace between Russia and Ukraine?
44:26US President Donald Trump has dialed the Russian President
44:29Vladimir Putin. White House says Trump and Putin are speaking.
44:33As the US seeks the Russians
44:37to sign off on a plan to end the war
44:40against a sceptical Ukraine,
44:43reports the Associated Press.
44:46Now sources are saying that the phone call
44:49between the two heads of state,
44:51the President of the United States of America
44:54and the President of Russia,
44:56the conversation is going well.
44:59So they are to speak from now
45:02likely to last a couple of hours
45:05or maybe an hour and we will know
45:08if there is a breakthrough.
45:10Will peace prevail? Will peace return to the region?
45:13We'll track that story closely.
45:15But I want to move forward to the other story.
45:18In less than seven hours from now,
45:20Sunita William, the US astronaut,
45:23will be back on Earth.
45:25She's been stranded in space for nearly 10 months.
45:28NASA has said that the astronaut
45:31is finally Earth bound.
45:33SpaceX Falcon 9 undocked,
45:36the rocket undocked from the International Space Station
45:38earlier this morning.
45:40Here's wishing Sunita Williams a safe journey
45:43back to Earth.
45:55Sunita Sunny Williams is on her way back to Earth.
45:58SpaceX Dragon spacecraft successfully undocked
46:01on Tuesday morning to start its journey
46:04with four astronauts on board.
46:10It's been close to nine months since Sunita and Butch
46:13left Earth on their space mission.
46:15Sunita Williams was the captain
46:17for the International Space Station for all these months.
46:20Once the crew 10 reached,
46:22she handed over her responsibility to the next crew
46:25on Sunday and started to prepare for her return.
46:28With warm hugs, Butch and Sunny bid farewell
46:31to the International Space Station on Tuesday morning.
46:34It was their home for the last few months.
46:39In the phase one, the Dragon capsule detached from ISS
46:42and started its journey back to Earth.
46:45The trunk and capsule separates in phase two.
46:48The trunk then de-orbits and burns up in the atmosphere.
46:52Thrusters ignite for 15 minutes,
46:55de-orbit, burn in the phase three.
46:58Next, the spacecraft repositions itself to enter atmosphere.
47:02Parachutes are deployed in the phase five
47:04to stabilize the capsule.
47:06And in the final phase, it splashes down
47:08for 50 kilometers of Florida.
47:11Fast boats extract astronauts and bring them to the shore.
47:15You start feeling this gentle push on your back
47:18and that is the deceleration forces
47:20building up the G-forces.
47:22But it comes on quite rapidly
47:23and they're going to feel up to about four,
47:25maybe five Gs of deceleration,
47:28which is quite punishing
47:29after that length of time in zero gravity.
47:31And then it gets very warm in the spacecraft as well.
47:33It's about 1600 Celsius outside the spacecraft.
47:37You can see the plasma enveloping
47:40the whole spacecraft out the windows.
47:42So it gets very warm inside.
47:44And then probably the most aggressive part
47:46is about six or seven minutes later,
47:48once you're through most of the atmosphere
47:50and then the parachutes open
47:52and that you're still probably going
47:53just over the speed of sound.
47:55So when the parachutes start to slow you down
47:57and start opening,
47:58the capsule is swung around quite violently underneath.
48:01Nearly 8,500 miles away from Florida
48:05in the native village of Sunita Williams' father,
48:08Gujarati people are praying for her safe return.
48:11In the ancient Dolodevi Mandir
48:13in Julsana village of Mehsana,
48:16a Khand Jyoti was lit since she got stuck in space.
48:20Since the time she was to return earlier in June 2024,
48:25since then they have been praying for Sunita Williams' safety.
48:29Dola Ma's picture was taken along by Sunita Williams
48:33when she had gone to space earlier.
48:35And these villagers are confident
48:38and they have full faith on Ma
48:40that Sunita Williams will be returning home safe and sound.
48:45The whole village is waiting for her safe return.
48:49The children are very excited that I have become like this.
48:53This is a precious gem of our village.
48:56It has made our village famous all over the world.
49:00So we will be very happy.
49:02Sunita Williams visited Julsana village twice,
49:05in 2007 and then in 2013.
49:09These children are praying for her safe return on Earth.
49:13This is Julsana village in Mehsana
49:15where you can see this school
49:17which is inspiring these children
49:20to become like Sunita Williams
49:22and make India proud in the world.
49:24You can see the pictures of Sunita Williams
49:26that have been put up in this particular school
49:28in Julsana village of Mehsana in Gujarat.
49:31The children are very excited to hear about her.
49:34They want to become like her.
49:36But how will they become like her?
49:38When Sunita comes and we hear from her,
49:42it will be great.
49:44The children are very excited to meet her
49:47and are preparing to become like her.
50:14We are here today, stay with us.