• 7 months ago
During a House Rules Committee hearing last week, Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ) spoke against noncitizen voting in Washington, DC.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00for the House's consideration of H.R. 192, an act to prohibit individuals who are not
00:04citizens of the United States from voting in elections in the District of Columbia.
00:08Reporting out H.R. 192, the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability holds that Congress
00:12must act to exert its constitutional responsibility to oversee the District of Columbia and make
00:17certain necessary amendments to the District's law. Since the voters entrusted Republicans with
00:22control of the House on 1-18, the Oversight Committee has conducted long overdue oversight
00:26of our nation's capital city, including holding hearings on the District of Columbia.
00:30Specifically to the topic we're discussing today, the Oversight Committee held a joint hearing
00:34with the Committee on House Administration on Election Integrity in the District.
00:38At that hearing, both committees examined the District Government's Local Resident Voting
00:43Rights Amendment Act, allowing non-citizen residents to vote in D.C. local elections.
00:48This act includes illegal immigrants and even foreign diplomats,
00:52whose interests may be opposed to the interests of Americans and, as others pointed out,
00:56even visiting students. This radical change to our election laws upsets lawmakers on both sides
01:02of the aisle. D.C. Mayor Bowser withheld her signature on the act, something she has done
01:07only a handful of times. On February 9, 2023, 260 members in the House voted to overturn the D.C.
01:13Act through a resolution of disapproval. In that vote, 42 House Democrats voted to block this D.C.
01:18law. However, the bipartisan resolution of disapproval was not considered in the Senate,
01:23so D.C.'s non-citizen voting law went into effect. This is unacceptable. The primary factor
01:29that differentiates American citizens from non-citizens is the right to vote. D.C. residents
01:33should be confident that their local government vote is not being diluted by lawful non-citizen
01:37residents or illegal immigrants. Article 1 of the Constitution grants Congress exclusive
01:42jurisdiction over the nation's capital, and the rules of the U.S. House charged the Committee
01:46on Oversight, Committee and Accountability with the duty to oversee the municipal affairs
01:50of the District of Columbia. I urge my colleagues to support Representative Pfluger's common-sense
01:55bill to ensure that only U.S. citizens have the right to vote in local D.C. elections and repeal
02:00D.C.'s radical law. Since 1973's Limited Home Rule Act, four times the D.C. legislature has
02:06been nullified and seven times disapproval resolutions have received floor consideration
02:12in at least one House. I thank the Rules Committee for convening today
02:17to discuss this bill, and I look forward to the conversation. I yield back.

Recommended