During a House Rules Committee hearing last week, Rep. Michael Burgess (R-TX), Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) & Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ) discussed Washington, DC voting rules for diplomats.
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00 Chair, thanks.
00:01 General Jones yields back.
00:02 Mr. Binks, let me just ask you, I think you referenced in your comments that a diplomat,
00:11 that would be a citizen of a foreign country who is residing in D.C. doing their diplomatic
00:16 work would be eligible to vote in the D.C. election.
00:19 Did I understand you correctly?
00:20 Yes, sir.
00:21 It would.
00:22 Even the Washington Post agrees with that assessment and so noted, which is why the
00:26 Washington Post opposed the D.C. Act.
00:29 So there would be no requirement that there be a non-adversarial diplomat.
00:34 An adversarial diplomat could vote just the same as a friendly diplomat.
00:38 Yes, sir, that's correct.
00:40 And that's why, what makes D.C. a little bit more pernicious than some of the others is
00:44 Maryland has certain restrictions, California has restrictions on non-citizens who are voting,
00:51 who are residents, but D.C. does not.
00:57 The D.C. law says that you cannot be voting in any other country.
01:02 So if somebody were voting in another country, they would not be allowed to vote in the Advisory
01:06 Neighborhood Commission elections in D.C. or for the D.C. Council.
01:10 If I may respond to that, that's interesting because some nations that are authoritarian
01:16 in nature, you would question, for instance, whether they're actually voting in another
01:22 jurisdiction, and how are we going to monitor that?
01:26 Well, that was going to be my—how do you monitor that?
01:30 If you read the D.C. law, what it says is that you can't be voting in another country,
01:34 and this is punishable by five years in prison for fraud.
01:38 So if it meant that much to you, I suppose you could be voting in Russia or China and
01:44 then sign up to vote in the D.C. school board elections.
01:47 But if you did and you were found out, you could be prosecuted and sent to jail for five
01:52 years.
01:53 So I doubt that any of those 512 people who signed up are agents of foreign governments.
01:59 In any event, federally and across the country, people who are registered foreign agents under
02:07 FERA can vote.
02:10 And people who've been convicted of offenses involving foreign agents like Michael Flynn
02:14 or Paul Manafort, they still vote.
02:17 And maybe we should reconsider that, but that strikes me as a bigger threat and something
02:22 we could do something about in elections that means something to the country.
02:26 Well, it means—if I may—I mean, it does—that means 512 people have their votes canceled
02:32 out, perhaps, at least theoretically.
02:35 So it should mean something to the voters of the city, should it not?
02:39 Mr. Chairman, I think it does.
02:41 I think it says something about the integrity of the entire election and the foundation
02:44 of it.
02:45 But more so, the argument would be made and could be made that there's dilution of your
02:51 vote.
02:52 Now, 512, if that's the actual number, that's not much dilution, which is what the court
02:56 actually held here in D.C.
02:58 But the reality is, we're not—I'm not sure we're sure.
03:04 I mean, I'm looking at the postcard that was sent out by the Elections Commission here
03:10 in D.C.
03:11 If you want to register to vote, you just do the QR code.
03:16 And so that makes it very interesting on who's registering to vote as well, Mr. Chairman.