'It's Embarrassing': Glenn Grothman Slams Biden Admin Labor Rule He Says Infringes On Workers Rights

  • last month
During a House Oversight Committee hearing prior to the Congressional recess, Rep. Glenn Grotham (R-WI) questioned witnesses about the impacts new labor rules put forth by the Biden Administration.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00Thank you. Um, I'd like to apologize, although sometimes members of the other party, they
00:04get so used to talking about union jobs, it implies nobody in Congress cares about non-union
00:10jobs. Uh, I've got a lot of good friends in the unions, but, uh, I, I, uh, I think it's
00:16embarrassing that we're getting to the point, the hatred of diversity is so intense that
00:21they can't say we want to expand the government by all jobs. They just, you're not a union,
00:26they don't count. But, uh, I got a, got a question here for you. A new Biden administration,
00:32this is for Dr. or for Mr. Brubeck, a new Biden administration rule mandates the contractors
00:37and subcontractors sign under a project labor agreement to be eligible to perform work on
00:42large scale federal projects, 35 million and up. This discriminates against merit shop
00:47contractors in what ways to PLAs potentially infringe on the freedom of choice for workers
00:53who may prefer not to join a union. Yeah, like I mentioned before, typical PLAs will
00:59force contractors to hire most or all their labor from union hiring halls and leave their
01:03own employees who are non-union workers, um, on the sidelines and they can't work on those
01:08projects. Um, they have to follow union work rules and they have to pay into union pension
01:11and benefits programs. So, um, it's effectively telling non-union workers you can't participate
01:17on the projects. And if there is a exception that allows them to participate, the non-union
01:22workers have to pay into these pension and benefit plans and they will never receive
01:26the benefits that they pay into those plans unless they join a union and become vested
01:29in those programs. Some of these PLAs are in, are in non-right to work states. They
01:33may require union membership, uh, but ones in, in right to work states typically do not
01:38require union membership, but they do require the payment of agency shop fees and other
01:41support of the union programs that may, they may disagree with as a condition of working
01:45on a taxpayer funded project. You talk about work rules and this is kind of going off script
01:50here a little, but you talk about work rules and I think there's a perception that the
01:54only difference between union and non-union is maybe how much people are paid. Could you
01:58elaborate on how work rules may raise the cost of a project or make it more inefficient?
02:04Sure. Um, a number of contractors that are union are signatory to their collective bargaining
02:09agreements with specific unions. What that means is that they have to follow the work
02:13rules outlined in those collective bargaining agreements for any of the work they perform.
02:16For example, if they are building a sidewalk, um, they have to hire a carpenter to do the
02:21car, to do the carpentry forms around the sidewalk. They'll have to bring in someone
02:24from a different trade to do other aspects of that sidewalk. On the non-union side, a
02:29lot of contractors are able to do something called multi-skilling, where they're able
02:32to bring in one or two people who can do the job tasks across multiple trades and that'll
02:38allow them to be more efficient and have more skills overall in the life of the project
02:41and for the careers of the actual construction workers too.
02:44Okay. Um, Mr. Dreher, since 2009 under policy initiated by the Obama administration, federal
02:51agencies have been encouraged to consider mandating PLAs on federal construction projects,
02:57but they've rarely done it. Why do you think that's so?
03:02Because it was the contractor's choice, right? I, I, um, you know, 12 out of 3,210 contracts
03:10had PLAs, so I think that that tells us that there, there wasn't a lot of interest during
03:14that 14 year period. Left to their own devices.
03:16Correct. People wouldn't do them.
03:17Let the people decide. Let the contractor decide. Create fair and open competition.
03:23Okay. Any, uh, any studies indicating PLAs increased the overall cost of public construction
03:30projects? Yes. Yeah. The overall cost increased 12 to
03:3415 percent. I think that's statistics day. And, and, and the result then of course is
03:40more infrastructure undone, not as good infrastructure.
03:44Yeah. Yeah. We're slowing up projects and, and right now the, the industry is so saturated.
03:50Um, we're short workers. There's a lot of projects to do and this is just adding again
03:55another hurdle that's, that's going to prevent us from achieving that mission.
03:58Okay. Final question for Mr. Brubeck. The IRS and Treasury Department have finalized
04:03prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements for certain incentives contained in the Inflation
04:08Reduction Act, which is a big climate bill that President Biden signed into law in 2022.
04:14Will the administration characterize the rule as rule as a win for labor unions? Uh, they
04:20will, uh, for blue collar workers, they will most likely give a significant advantage to
04:25labor unions. Can you explain to me this weaponization of the IRS to push labor policies and project
04:32labor agreements on the Inflation Reduction Act, clean energy tax credits? Is, is this
04:38in the statute?
04:39The prevailing wage and registered apprenticeship requirements on these clean energy projects
04:44seeking enhanced tax credits, that is in the statute. What's not in the statute is a new
04:48provision by the IRS that says developers would be exempt or get a get out of free jail
04:54card for the willful and extreme penalties in the new statute if they sign a project
05:00labor agreement, if they require all the contractors to sign a PLA. So they're getting
05:05an exemption through regulation to the actual statute if they sign a PLA. And this is going
05:10to create a lot of problems. A lot of developers and a lot of, um, people seeking these tax
05:15credits are trying to understand the confusing rules behind prevailing wage and registered
05:19apprenticeship requirements. And so they're going to be basically pushed and coerced into
05:22requiring project labor agreements. So this is they're weaponizing the IRS and the tax
05:27system to develop, uh, more union jobs and unionized contractors get in.
05:31And hatred of non-union jobs. It might be hatred is too strong, but they don't want
05:35people having non-union jobs.
05:37We're not welcome.
05:38Yep. Okay. Thank you.
05:39All right. I would now like to recognize Mr. Fitzgerald for five minutes.
05:43I want to thank the Chairwoman for allowing me to, to wave on to the committee. It's an
05:48important topic and when I saw it was coming up in, in the subcommittee, uh, definitely
05:54wanted to participate, uh, as my, uh, many years in the Wisconsin State Senate, along
05:59with Congressman Grothman, by the way, um, we did do some PLA reforms and I think, uh,
06:06one of the things that was always missed, and I'm glad you're reiterating again and
06:10again that, um, you know, what you're talking about

Recommended