Who is Mustafain Kazmi, the person issuing threats to the Supreme Court? | Barrister Ali Zafar's Analysis
#MustafainKazmi #supremecourt #qazifaezisa #breakingnews #qazifaezisa #kashifabbasi #offtherecord #barristeralizafar
Who is Mustafain Kazmi, the person issuing threats to the Supreme Court? | Barrister Ali Zafar's Analysis
Who is Mustafain Kazmi, the person issuing threats to the Supreme Court? | Barrister Ali Zafar's Analysis
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00The world is watching the decision of 63A in the Supreme Court and as soon as this decision comes, if that old decision is changed, then you know what will happen for the reform of the constitution.
00:11As everyone is saying, we will be out of the way.
00:14I was objecting on the bench. Let me ask Mr. Ali Zafar. Today, Mr. Ali Zafar looked very angry.
00:20I read somewhere that Mr. Ali Zafar was speaking in a very harsh tone and the bench was also not happy with this.
00:33You objected on the bench. Sir, do you have any objection on listening to the case of Qazi Faisal's Tariq-e-Insaf?
00:43The first thing is that my argument was valid because I challenged the bench's constitution and its validity.
00:58But my tone of speech was not bad and I argued in the context of the constitution and the law.
01:09So, I thought that the reporter might have reported you wrongly.
01:14Sir, who was this Qazimi sir who was threatening the Supreme Court? He is your party's lawyer, right?
01:22No, I don't know him. He came to the rostrum and said something which was sent him out.
01:29Anyway, it was an incident and it is better to ignore it.
01:32Do you agree with him?
01:35On whom?
01:38Did he correct you?
01:39No, I don't agree with him at all. I am 100% against this kind of case.
01:48I am saying that it is not the job of a lawyer to do this.
01:51Anyway, the court did not give him action. This is the graciousness of the court.
01:57But my point was valid and I would like to present it to you.
02:03Because it was such a point that if the proceedings were live, you might have seen it.
02:11It was hardly live.
02:15Yes, yes.
02:16And it was that the committee under the practice and procedure act, which is a three-member committee,
02:25in which there is a Chief Justice, a Senior Puni Judge and another nominated judge,
02:30that committee did not sit at all.
02:32Only two people sat in the committee and they made the decision that the three people had to make.
02:39And made a bench.
02:41But Mr. Ali Zafar, the law is based on this.
02:43A layman like me thinks that tomorrow a judge will refuse to sit and say that I do not sit in this committee
02:49and there is no way to remove him because he is a Senior Puni Judge.
02:53Assumption.
02:54See, such a chance can come.
02:55Then this committee will never sit.
02:56Then the Supreme Court will not work.
02:58No bench will be made.
02:59This is a deadlock.
03:01This is a very good question of yours that it is a deadlock.
03:05Now what is the method of the deadlock?
03:07The method of the deadlock is that there is a whole procedure of the Supreme Court
03:12in which the whole Supreme Court sits and makes its own rules.
03:15Today I said that what is the hurry in this case?
03:19You have to listen to this review today and make a decision tomorrow.
03:22Sir, what do you think?
03:23What do you think?
03:24Such an innocent question.
03:25Your Waseem Badami must also have been shocked today.
03:27What an innocent question you asked.
03:29What is the hurry?
03:30You also know what the hurry is.
03:32We also know.
03:33The whole world knows what the hurry is.
03:35And you don't know.
03:36Minister Ali Zafar doesn't know what the hurry is.
03:38Sir, this has been pending for two and a half years.
03:40For two and a half years.
03:41He read Justice Muneeb Akhtar's letter.
03:42He said that the committee was formed 10 months ago.
03:44You didn't think about it.
03:45Suddenly, why is it so early?
03:46Look at that too.
03:47When the letters were written, it was also found in those letters that how much work he used to do.
03:51How much he used to sit in the court.
03:52He didn't sit in the court.
03:53But Qazi Sahib also believes one thing about him.
03:55That he used to come to every meeting of the committee.
03:57See, this is the thing.
03:58See, it is understood that you say that you don't sit in the court.
04:01I will not give you court work.
04:03But he comes to the meeting of the committee and never misses it.
04:06How is this possible?
04:07I will not give you the work that you do.
04:09And if he says that I don't want to sit on the bench, then other members say that I don't want to sit on this committee.
04:14No, this is irrelevant.
04:15But Qazi Sahib, look, it is political.
04:16Let's be honest.
04:17Politics is happening.
04:18The Supreme Court is doing politics.
04:19Of course.
04:20Judges are political.
04:21We used to see this in the last 10 years.
04:23We are still seeing it.
04:24The same letters have started.
04:25They are making each other dirty.
04:26This is our Supreme Court.
04:27This is Pakistan.
04:28They should take care of themselves.
04:30The whole country sees that this is the Supreme Court of Pakistan.
04:33They have made a joke.
04:34I apologize to the Supreme Court.
04:36This should not happen.
04:37They should handle themselves in a better way.
04:39If we do politics, this happens in the world.
04:43Someone is hitting the mic, someone is fighting in the parliaments.
04:45Of course.
04:46But the Supreme Courts are the Supreme Courts.
04:48They are the judges of the Supreme Court of Pakistan.
04:50But this has been overly politicized.
04:52Petty cases.
04:53And petty cases.
04:54And they have politicized this whole institution.
04:56But sir, you also brought it up in practice and procedure.
04:59Earlier you used to explain what democracy is.
05:01Democracy is that one person has the power and three people have the power.
05:04Then you said, no, democracy is not in power.
05:07You told the Chief of Police to put up his will.
05:11That means you have given two votes to the Chief Justice of Pakistan.
05:13No.
05:14We have not given two votes to the Chief Justice of Pakistan.
05:16He can put any member in it.
05:18If a member is not available, which is the situation now.
05:20There is a deadlock.
05:22Yes, there is a deadlock.
05:23Let's put it in this situation.
05:24But when the members were available, you passed this ordinance.
05:28That Qazi, who is against the ordinances, did not constitute a foreign committee.
05:32Neither are people's cases being filed, nor is there a hearing.
05:34Neither is justice being served.
05:36The institution has been overly politicized.