#OffTheRecord #SupremeCourt #QaziFaezIsa #JusticeMansoorAliShah #JusticeMunibAkhtar #KashifAbbasi #ImranKhan #PMShehbazSharif
#pti #raufhassan #aliamingandapur
(Current Affairs)
Host:
- Kashif Abbasi
Guests:
- Hasnaat Malik (Court Reporter)
- Munir A Malik (Lawyer)
- Raoof Hasan PTI
'Constitutional Amendments' - Kashif Abbasi Raises Important Questions
Kya ab PTI bandook uthayegi? | Rauf Hassan alarming statement
What is going on in the Supreme Court? - Court Reporter Hasnaat Malik Reveals Insiders
Follow the ARY News channel on WhatsApp: https://bit.ly/46e5HzY
Subscribe to our channel and press the bell icon for latest news updates: http://bit.ly/3e0SwKP
ARY News is a leading Pakistani news channel that promises to bring you factual and timely international stories and stories about Pakistan, sports, entertainment, and business, amid others.
#pti #raufhassan #aliamingandapur
(Current Affairs)
Host:
- Kashif Abbasi
Guests:
- Hasnaat Malik (Court Reporter)
- Munir A Malik (Lawyer)
- Raoof Hasan PTI
'Constitutional Amendments' - Kashif Abbasi Raises Important Questions
Kya ab PTI bandook uthayegi? | Rauf Hassan alarming statement
What is going on in the Supreme Court? - Court Reporter Hasnaat Malik Reveals Insiders
Follow the ARY News channel on WhatsApp: https://bit.ly/46e5HzY
Subscribe to our channel and press the bell icon for latest news updates: http://bit.ly/3e0SwKP
ARY News is a leading Pakistani news channel that promises to bring you factual and timely international stories and stories about Pakistan, sports, entertainment, and business, amid others.
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00Assalam-o-Alaikum, dear viewers, you are watching the program with Kashif Abbasi.
00:17Today, we would like to start our program with the story of a woman.
00:24This woman's name is Roshan Bibi.
00:27If we can show her on the screen, this is Roshan Bibi.
00:32Age, 80 years.
00:34Crime, political protest.
00:38Time, terrorism.
00:41She was accused of terrorism.
00:44What was done? She was arrested.
00:48A judge gave her bail and she was sent to jail.
00:54This happens to women aged 80 years in this country.
00:59In this country, only those are allowed to protest,
01:03whom the government considers worthy of protest,
01:07or who can protest in their opinion.
01:10In the last few days, there has been a lot of talk about women's dignity.
01:15There should be no need for statements on this.
01:18People should be brought up from home.
01:21But our country is unfortunate that we have to tell the basic things.
01:25Respect women.
01:27Mothers and sisters are partners.
01:29The examples of our politics are something like this.
01:32How a daughter was arrested in front of her father.
01:35How a sister was arrested on a moonlit night.
01:39Where is the respect for women?
01:41These are people who are coming from morality.
01:44This is true.
01:46But now I have realized that this respect is only for important and powerful women.
01:53It is everyone's duty to respect them.
01:55If we arrest them, there will be a ruckus in the parliament.
01:58There will be headlines in the newspapers.
02:00It will be a shame.
02:01In society, self-respect is for these important and rich political women.
02:06Because the rest of this country, which we have seen in the past two years,
02:10is a cause for shame.
02:11How women, Roshan Bibi, is a fresh example.
02:14Who was arrested on a weekday while protesting.
02:18We have seen before how women were misbehaved in their homes.
02:22They were abused.
02:24I remember the day when a police officer pointed a gun at a woman on the street.
02:29But if she is not the daughter or wife of a rich man,
02:34then no one says anything.
02:36If this woman was also the mother or sister of an important person,
02:41then there would be a lesson in morality in the country.
02:43There would be dozens of press conferences on the importance of women and especially mothers.
02:48Someone would shout at someone and be disrespectful.
02:51He would taunt that if you want to fight, come and fight with men.
02:54But there is a strange silence in the city.
02:57There is a great silence because she is not our mother or sister.
03:01The constitutional amendment was carried out a few days ago.
03:05The government sat down because Maulana was standing.
03:08And because of Maulana, this matter was postponed.
03:12Threats were being made again and again that the amendment will be brought back in a few days.
03:16The question is, is the amendment really coming?
03:19A few days ago, it was reported that the president of the Muslim League,
03:23Mian Nawaz Sharif, is going to London for treatment.
03:26When this news was going on, I was thinking that the rulers of this union are very eager to bring the constitutional amendment.
03:32They are ready to fight.
03:34At such a time, Mian Nawaz Sharif's departure to London,
03:37will Mian Nawaz Sharif go to London before the constitutional amendment?
03:42I am taking you to the night when this amendment was to be carried out.
03:4515th September, Sunday.
03:47That night, when Mian Nawaz Sharif went to Lahore at night,
03:51it was clear to everyone that the constitutional amendment would not be carried out.
03:55Does Mian Nawaz Sharif know something that we do not know?
03:58Or will this amendment be carried out before Mian Nawaz Sharif's departure?
04:01That is why I am saying this.
04:02I also saw Maulana's press conference.
04:05He said that this parliament does not deserve such a big amendment.
04:10This parliament does not have the mandate to amend.
04:14Getting such a big amendment from this fake parliament,
04:19would be an injustice in itself.
04:21Listen to what Maulana says.
04:24This parliament does not deserve such a big amendment.
04:27This parliament does not have the mandate to amend.
04:30We believe that there should be an election.
04:32The true representatives of the people should come to the field.
04:35Getting such a big amendment from this fake parliament,
04:38would be an injustice in itself.
04:40So, Maulana, what does he say?
04:42He says that this is the government of Form 47.
04:44A party that came third in the election,
04:48whose legal status is questionable.
04:51Whoever wants to, calls this election fake.
04:54If a caretaker Prime Minister, Anwar ul Haq,
04:57asks a question of the Muslim League,
05:00instead of answering, he taunts Form 47.
05:03And he also taunts that he will open your boxes.
05:07This is that government.
05:09Getting such a big amendment from this government,
05:13in which the fundamental structure of the judicial system is being changed,
05:17Maulana says this is wrong.
05:19This is a conspiracy.
05:20Such an amendment should not be made.
05:22Three or four days ago,
05:24we had the opportunity to meet Maulana.
05:27We were called.
05:28If he had said in the press conference yesterday,
05:31that this government is not capable of amendment,
05:35then all of us would have come out and said,
05:38that Maulana was standing and is standing.
05:41If he had mentioned the fake mandate at that time,
05:44then we would have also believed,
05:46that Maulana Fazlur Rahman would have stood in front of this amendment as a wall.
05:51But after listening to the conversation of that day,
05:54I felt that Maulana's position is closer to that of the government,
05:57in comparison to the opposition.
05:59Anyway, if Maulana's position is that this assembly is illegal,
06:03this assembly has been made a majority,
06:06and it does not have the means of amendment,
06:09then two questions arise.
06:11Will Maulana Fazlur Rahman,
06:13in the future, support any amendment worthy of the government?
06:18This is the first question.
06:19Because if this is Maulana's position,
06:21then he cannot support any amendment.
06:24And the second,
06:25the one whom he is calling a fake mandate,
06:27does he want to start any movement against the government?
06:30Is Mian Nawaz Sharif's London news and Maulana's statement,
06:34telling that the future of amendment is in some danger?
06:37Because without Maulana, the numbers are not complete.
06:40If the future of amendment is in danger,
06:43then what will happen to the future of the government?
06:46We will talk about this later.
06:48This problem will be solved.
06:50But there is another big issue,
06:52which raises questions on the basis of amendment.
06:55Article 63, you must have heard it today.
06:58A bench has been made on it.
07:00A second case has been filed.
07:02What is the market thinking?
07:05What are you thinking?
07:06What are you seeing?
07:07I will come to what the market is doing.
07:09But from this perspective,
07:11if this decision is made in the way it is being said,
07:16that obstacle will also be removed.
07:19That is, it will be easier to make lots.
07:22Earlier, the vote for the lot was not to be counted.
07:26Now a bench has been made.
07:28If this bench says that making lots is an act of democracy,
07:34and it is a matter of virtue to vote for them,
07:36then that number will be completed by making lots,
07:39which is short.
07:40We heard that day on Sunday,
07:42that a few people from Tariq-e-Insaaf were in the Punjab House that day.
07:45Now lots will be made.
07:47Amendment will also be made.
07:48A new court will also be made.
07:50Someone will also be appointed as its Chief Justice.
07:52Its terms will also be extended in employment.
07:55But what will be the basis of such amendment,
07:58to which a questionable mandate and opposition,
08:04that is, by breaking the people of the opponents,
08:07you will complete its numbers and two-thirds of the majority.
08:11Now I think that no one in this country is concerned about these things.
08:16These words are as important as international law for Israel today.
08:25It doesn't matter.
08:27Yesterday you saw that now it is considered very difficult to protest in this country.
08:32But in this protest, one thing about Ali Amin Gandapur has to doubt.
08:37I want you to listen.
08:39Then we will talk about the letter of Justice Muneeb Akhtar around Article 63A.
08:44He has raised questions on legality.
08:46We will talk about that.
08:47But what did Ali Amin Gandapur say about firing bullets?
08:51Listen.
08:53If someone fires a bullet, it will be fired.
08:57If you fire one bullet, we will fire ten.
08:59If you fire a tear gas, we will fire ten.
09:01If you fire a stick, we will fire ten.
09:03All the tribes should unite and decide.
09:06If there is someone else today, you can also be tomorrow.
09:08All the united people should come together.
09:10And someone thinks that Punjab is ours.
09:12Someone thinks that if he kills us, we will be ready to die.
09:15This is my message.
09:16And this is not a threat.
09:17This is the last warning of Islam.
09:19I am officially announcing a revolution today.
09:22So the revolution has been announced.
09:24Mr. Rauf Hassan is with us.
09:25Mr. Rauf, I want to talk about legal matters.
09:27Then I will also come to political matters.
09:29Mr. Muneer Malik and Mr. Hassan Malik are with us.
09:31Mr. Muneer Malik, you are reading the letters.
09:34Judges are writing letters against each other.
09:37We are sitting outside and watching what is happening in the Supreme Court.
09:42One judge writes a letter and tells the first senior judge to talk about legality.
09:48The second judge writes an answer.
09:50There is no legality in it.
09:52But the opposition judge says that the workers are thieves.
09:55They don't come.
09:56They finish at 11 o'clock and go on leave.
09:59What is happening, sir?
10:02This is unfortunate.
10:05But if a judge recuses himself from a bench, then there is no legality in it.
10:14Sir, but he did not recuse himself technically.
10:17You tell me, what is his irony position?
10:21Look, if we go back in time,
10:25Do you remember the murder trial of Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto in the past?
10:30Yes.
10:31Justice Waheeduddin wrote a letter to the Supreme Court.
10:37That I am sick.
10:39This case should be postponed for a while.
10:48Okay.
10:49That case was not postponed, right?
10:51Okay.
10:54The case went to the Supreme Court.
10:57Okay.
10:58Sir, but they were against each other's intentions.
11:01Please tell me your viewpoint.
11:05Yes, sir.
11:06Okay.
11:07That case went on.
11:10Okay.
11:11And a decision was made.
11:14That was during the middle of the hearing.
11:20So that is not the viewpoint of the new case.
11:26Okay?
11:27Okay, sir.
11:28At this time,
11:32Respected Justice Muneeb Akhtar did not recuse himself.
11:39And he is also a part of the bench.
11:43He is so learned that he will be able to make this contradiction himself.
11:55A small legislator like me cannot make it.
12:02Sir, we are waiting for him.
12:05But my question is a big one.
12:07But there cannot be a single paralysis of the Supreme Court.
12:11There cannot be a single paralysis of the Supreme Court.
12:14What I have read is that the Supreme Court shall consist of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court
12:24and such other judges as may be appointed under law.
12:31This is my viewpoint, right?
12:35Yes, sir.
12:36But listen to my question.
12:38In this case, it was also said that the committee has been formed for 9 months.
12:41The CRP that you suddenly had to put on the committee agenda in the 17th meeting,
12:48on 18-07-2024,
12:51you put this thing in the committee meeting for the first time.
12:55And when there was no bench, you said that the senior jury judge will lead it.
13:00Now you have assumed the command of this case yourself.
13:04This is the case of 63A, which will have a great impact in the coming politics
13:09for reasons that are unknown.
13:11Now, this is not a direct accusation against each other, but indirectly.
13:17You realize that?
13:19The man who thinks that the judgments of the Supreme Court are only judicial and not political,
13:29he lives in another world.
13:33Everything in the world,
13:36when you wake up in the morning,
13:38that I have to take breakfast from this shop or from another shop,
13:43that is also a political act.
13:46Okay?
13:47Sir, I thought that children and judges are non-political.
13:51No, no, no.
13:53Judges and people should come down from the sky.
13:57When you go to get breakfast from a shop,
14:02you prefer one shop, someone prefers another shop.
14:06Okay?
14:07Sir, but in this, it is possible that politically I am close to a shop,
14:11but I will go to the shop whose taste is better.
14:13The problem is that the one who improves the law should do it.
14:16Now this is the second thing,
14:18that which breakfast tastes better.
14:21So which letter tastes better in this, sir?
14:24There are two kinds of views in it.
14:28One is the view that people say,
14:32that what is written on the menu of breakfast,
14:37it is written in it, dal, chana, four pieces.
14:41Okay?
14:42Okay, sir.
14:44One will say that dal and chana should be mixed.
14:48The other person will say,
14:51chana also has onions.
14:55This is another point of view.
14:58Okay?
14:59Okay.
15:00So this is a legal debate.
15:05Sir, but this is a legal debate, but it has become a personal debate.
15:09At the end of the day,
15:12the decision of the Supreme Court,
15:15I am always very fond of Justice Jackson.
15:20Okay.
15:21It is not that we are right because we are final.
15:30It is because we are final, that's why we are right.
15:33We are final.
15:52So who says,
15:55who says,
15:57who says,
15:59who can say that
16:02judicial decisions
16:05do not have political undertones?
16:09This is a thought-provoking thing, isn't it?
16:13Sir, you are saying that there are political undertones.
16:15Sir, thank you very much.
16:16Sir, I just wanted to ask,
16:18you are saying that there are political undertones.
16:20I have Hasnaat with me.
16:22Hasnaat, what is happening in your Supreme Court?
16:25Look, Mr. Raghupat Hassan is also ready
16:28to tell Hasnaat the news inside.
16:30Yes, of course, of course, of course.
16:32Hawaaz.
16:34Inside, the news is coming out.
16:37And you have seen how the situation has become.
16:40And at this time, it is very clear,
16:43that there is no difference between the Supreme Court
16:47and other departments.
16:49And today, if you see,
16:51Justice Muneeb Akhtar raised this question.
16:55Firstly, because Justice Mansoor Ali Shah
16:57raised the question in the letter
16:59that the Supreme Court is being held through Alimax.
17:01You did not answer this.
17:03Secondly, on July 18,
17:06which was proposed by the bank
17:08after the decision of the specific parties.
17:10That was different.
17:12And now you have changed it
17:14and are presenting it to the bank.
17:15Without reason, you have changed the bank.
17:18So, these were the things that needed to be said.
17:21And furthermore,
17:22we will again request Justice Muneeb Akhtar.
17:25It has become very unusual
17:26that if a judge is not available,
17:28then four judges came to the bank
17:30and one seat was vacant.
17:32And he, I did not think that he was a bad judge.
17:36But Hasnaat, has the fight intensified?
17:39Yes, of course.
17:41The fight has intensified.
17:43As Mr. Chand says, the fight has intensified.
17:46The point is that
17:48Justice Muneeb Akhtar has written another letter
17:50in which he has raised further questions.
17:53But now these things are not going to stop with the letter.
17:56Chief Justice Rani Bhai,
17:58it is clear that he has a book
18:00which seems that the judicial package
18:02has been written by someone.
18:04And there is no movement from the Supreme Court.
18:06If five judges of the Supreme Court
18:08come together,
18:09it seems that the Supreme Court
18:11has a 144th case.
18:13There will be no case
18:15in which a majority of the judges
18:19are members of more than five banks.
18:21Although you see,
18:22in the review of the reserve seat,
18:24Justice Rani Bhai himself was saying
18:26that the case should be filed.
18:28Now the holidays are over.
18:30The bail judgment has also come.
18:32What is the reason?
18:33Why is the case not being filed?
18:34The reason is that
18:35when more than ten judges
18:36sit in any bank,
18:38first they will raise the question
18:40that the Supreme Court
18:41is running internal work
18:42through the ordinance.
18:43Is this legal?
18:44Is it okay?
18:45And the issue is that
18:47a lot of things will open up.
18:49So now this is ...
18:50So you are saying that
18:51there will not be a 13-member bank
18:52in the near future?
18:54It seems that
18:55as long as the judicial package
18:57does not come,
18:58and they are looking at the
19:00Christmas Day in the same context,
19:01and in fact,
19:02after January 13,
19:03all the decisions made today,
19:04you see them
19:05with the judicial package.
19:07For the transition amendment,
19:08for two terms,
19:09what has not been done?
19:10Here, three MNA,
19:13the Noor League,
19:15they have won three BDIs
19:18in recounting.
19:19Although the case
19:20should have gone to the election tribunal.
19:22In addition,
19:23if you see,
19:24the case of the Punjab election tribunal ...
19:26There are many decisions
19:27that have a political fallout
19:31or a political consequence.
19:33They are against each other.
19:35This is something
19:36that you keep raising
19:37in your vlogs.
19:38And it is happening today too.
19:39Tell me,
19:40what will happen in the next step 2?
19:42Will the bench start working tomorrow
19:44or do you have any more
19:46expectations of an earthquake,
19:48that there will be an earthquake,
19:49that some letters will be written?
19:52So now,
19:53I think that the fifth judge
19:55in the committee,
19:56the current committee,
19:57I think,
19:58like Aminuddin Khan
19:59and like Qazi Faisal,
20:00he is a judge.
20:01And the next four judges,
20:02apparently,
20:03they will not defend
20:04Mr. Qazi Faisal
20:05in any case.
20:06And I think
20:07that the decision
20:08will be reversed
20:09in one or two hearings.
20:11And if you see,
20:13there are questions
20:14in the decision too.
20:15But the question arises
20:16about the timing.
20:17The real problem
20:18is about the timing.
20:20The real thing is,
20:21they say,
20:22good things
20:23don't work
20:24at the wrong time.
20:25At the right time,
20:26bad things
20:27also come out.
20:28It works.
20:29Thank you very much.
20:30Asnad Malik was with us.
20:31Let's keep an eye on it.
20:32I say,
20:33interesting what's going on
20:34in this country.
20:35Oh yes, very interesting.
20:36Fascinating events
20:37and developments
20:38that we see every day.
20:39After a break,
20:40I would like to ask you
20:41about the statement
20:42that Mr. Gandapur gave
20:43in the first sentence.
20:44Do you agree
20:45or disagree?
20:46Explain,
20:47I will ask you later.
20:48The statement that he gave
20:49that you will fire one bullet
20:50and we will fire ten.
20:51You will hit one stick
20:52and we will hit ten.
20:53And he even came
20:54to hit tear gas.
20:55In this context,
20:56it has been given.
20:57I agree.
20:58So, you mean,
20:59Punjab and KP government
21:00can come forward?
21:01I hope not.
21:02But in the context…
21:03But when you say,
21:04I hope not,
21:05it means that
21:06this possibility exists.
21:07Let's discuss
21:08the context in which
21:09it has been given.
21:10I will talk about it
21:11after the break.
21:12Let's take a break
21:13and then I will tell you.
21:18I acknowledge
21:19that Mr. Raghupasan
21:20is present with us
21:21in the program.
21:22Mr. Raghupasan,
21:23you said that
21:24I agree with
21:25the context
21:26in which the statement
21:27was given.
21:28In which context
21:29can this statement
21:30be given?
21:31This is the very
21:32definition
21:33of a civil war.
21:34I will define
21:35the context.
21:36The PTI
21:37that has been
21:38going on
21:39for the past
21:40two and a half years
21:41and especially
21:42after the
21:439th of May
21:44and especially
21:45in the past
21:46few days,
21:47the way
21:48our public
21:49protest
21:50has been
21:51sabotaged,
21:52the way
21:53it has been
21:54sabotaged,
21:55you can see
21:56in Sanjani,
21:57in Islamabad,
21:58in Lahore,
21:59in Pindi,
22:00the whole
22:01city
22:02is in
22:03lockdown,
22:04sir.
22:05Now,
22:06tell me,
22:07any other
22:08political party,
22:09you tell me,
22:10Mr. Kashid,
22:11with whom
22:12this kind of
22:13treatment
22:14is being
22:15done.
22:16Sir,
22:17I will tell you
22:18something,
22:19sir.
22:20After that,
22:21you…
22:22Give me
22:2320 seconds,
22:24sir.
22:25I have
22:26always
22:27stood for
22:29civil rights,
22:30personal rights,
22:31political rights,
22:32right to form
22:33a political
22:34party and
22:35everything.
22:36Sir,
22:37tell me,
22:38how can
22:39anyone say
22:40yes,
22:41this is right?
22:42Who will say
22:43that this is
22:44right,
22:45civil war?
22:46You are
22:47fighting,
22:48usually
22:49you have
22:50to fight
22:51with such
22:52governments,
22:53there is
22:54a whole
22:55struggle.
22:56How
22:57can
22:58anyone
22:59say
23:00yes,
23:01this is
23:02right?
23:03How
23:04can
23:05anyone
23:06say
23:07yes,
23:08this is
23:09right?
23:10How
23:11can
23:12anyone
23:13say
23:14yes,
23:15this is
23:16right?
23:17How
23:18can
23:19anyone
23:20say
23:21yes,
23:22this is
23:23right?
23:24How
23:25can
23:26anyone
23:27say
23:28yes,
23:29this is
23:30right?
23:31How
23:32can
23:33anyone
23:34say
23:35yes,
23:36this is
23:37right?
23:38How
23:39can
23:40anyone
23:41say
23:42yes,
23:43this is
23:44right?
23:45How
23:46can
23:47anyone
23:48say
23:49yes,
23:50this is
23:51right?
23:52How
23:53can
23:54anyone
23:55say
23:56yes,
23:57this is
23:58right?
23:59How
24:00can
24:01anyone
24:02say
24:03yes,
24:04this is
24:05right?
24:06How
24:07can
24:08anyone
24:09say
24:10yes,
24:11this is
24:12right?
24:13How
24:14can
24:15anyone
24:16say
24:17yes,
24:18this is
24:19right?
24:20How
24:21can
24:22anyone
24:23say
24:24yes,
24:25this is
24:26right?
24:27How
24:28can
24:29anyone
24:30say
24:31yes,
24:32this is
24:33right?
24:34How
24:35can
24:36anyone
24:37say
24:38yes,
24:39this is
24:40right?
24:41How
24:42can
24:43anyone
24:44say
24:45yes,
24:46this is
24:47right?
24:48How
24:49can
24:50anyone
24:51say
24:52yes,
24:53this is
24:54right?
24:55How
24:56can
24:57anyone
24:58say
24:59yes,
25:00this is
25:01right?
25:02How
25:03can
25:04anyone
25:05say
25:06yes,
25:07this is
25:08right?
25:09How
25:10can
25:11anyone
25:12say
25:13yes,
25:14this is
25:15right?
25:16How
25:17can
25:18anyone
25:19say
25:20yes,
25:21this is
25:22right?
25:23How
25:24can
25:25anyone
25:26say
25:27yes,
25:28this is
25:29right?
25:30How
25:31can
25:32anyone
25:33say
25:34yes,
25:35this is
25:36right?
25:37How
25:38can
25:39anyone
25:40say
25:41yes,
25:42this is
25:43right?
25:44How
25:45can
25:46anyone
25:47say
25:48yes,
25:49this is
25:50right?
25:51How
25:52can
25:53anyone
25:54say
25:55yes,
25:56this is
25:57right?
25:58How
25:59can
26:00anyone
26:01say
26:02yes,
26:03this is
26:04right?
26:05How
26:06can
26:07anyone
26:08say
26:09yes,
26:10this is
26:11right?
26:12How
26:13can
26:14anyone
26:15say
26:16yes,
26:17this is
26:18right?
26:19How
26:20can
26:21anyone
26:22say
26:23yes,
26:24this is
26:25right?
26:26How
26:27can
26:28anyone
26:29say
26:30yes,
26:31this is
26:32right?
26:33How
26:34can
26:35anyone
26:36say
26:37yes,
26:38this is
26:39right?
26:40How
26:41can
26:42anyone
26:43say
26:44yes,
26:45this is
26:46right?
26:47How
26:48can
26:49anyone
26:50say
26:51yes,
26:52this is
26:53right?
26:54How
26:55can
26:56anyone
26:57say
26:58yes,
26:59this is
27:00right?
27:01How
27:02can
27:03anyone
27:04say
27:05yes,
27:06this is
27:07right?
27:08How
27:09can
27:10anyone
27:11say
27:12yes,
27:13this is
27:14right?
27:15How
27:16can
27:17anyone
27:18say
27:19yes,
27:20this is
27:21right?
27:22How
27:23can
27:24anyone
27:25say
27:26yes,
27:27this is
27:28right?
27:29How
27:30can
27:31anyone
27:32say
27:33yes,
27:34this is
27:35right?
27:36How
27:37can
27:38anyone
27:39say
27:40yes,
27:41this is
27:42right?
27:43How
27:44can
27:45anyone
27:46say
27:47yes,
27:48this is
27:49right?
27:50How
27:51can
27:52anyone
27:53say
27:54yes,
27:55this is
27:56right?
27:57How
27:58can
27:59anyone
28:00say
28:01yes,
28:02this is
28:03right?
28:04How
28:05can
28:06anyone
28:07say
28:08yes,
28:09this is
28:10right?
28:11How
28:12can
28:13anyone
28:14say
28:15yes,
28:16this is
28:17right?
28:18How
28:19can
28:20anyone
28:21say
28:22yes,
28:23this is
28:24right?
28:25How
28:26can
28:27anyone
28:28say
28:29yes,
28:30this is
28:31right?
28:32How
28:33can
28:34anyone
28:35say
28:36yes,
28:37this is
28:38right?
28:39How
28:40can
28:41anyone
28:42say
28:43yes,
28:44this is
28:45right?
28:46How
28:47can
28:48anyone
28:49say
28:50yes,
28:51this is
28:52right?
28:53How
28:54can
28:55anyone
28:56say
28:57yes,
28:58this is
28:59right?
29:00How
29:01can
29:02anyone
29:03say
29:04yes,
29:05this is
29:06right?
29:07How
29:08can
29:09anyone
29:10say
29:11yes,
29:12this is
29:13right?
29:14How
29:15can
29:16anyone
29:17say
29:18yes,
29:19this is
29:20right?
29:21How
29:22can
29:23anyone
29:24say
29:25yes,
29:26this is
29:27right?
29:28How
29:29can
29:30anyone
29:31say
29:32yes,
29:33this is
29:34right?
29:35How
29:36can
29:37anyone
29:38say
29:39yes,
29:40this is
29:41right?
29:42How
29:43can
29:44anyone
29:45say
29:46yes,
29:47this is
29:48right?
29:49How
29:50can
29:51anyone
29:52say
29:53yes,
29:54this is
29:55right?
29:56How
29:57can
29:58anyone
29:59say
30:00yes,
30:01this is
30:02right?
30:03How
30:04can
30:05anyone
30:06say
30:07yes,
30:08this is
30:09right?
30:10How
30:11can
30:12anyone
30:13say
30:14yes,
30:15this is
30:16right?
30:17How
30:18can
30:19anyone
30:20say
30:21yes,
30:22this is
30:23right?
30:24How
30:25can
30:26anyone
30:27say
30:28yes,
30:29this is
30:30right?
30:31How
30:32can
30:33anyone
30:34say
30:35yes,
30:36this is
30:37right?
30:38How
30:39can
30:40anyone
30:41say
30:42yes,
30:43this is
30:44right?
30:45How
30:46can
30:47anyone
30:48say
30:49yes,
30:50this is
30:51right?
30:52How
30:53can
30:54anyone
30:55say
30:56yes,
30:57this is
30:58right?
30:59How
31:00can
31:01anyone
31:02say
31:03yes,
31:04this is
31:05right?
31:06How
31:07can
31:08anyone
31:09say
31:10yes,
31:11this is
31:12right?
31:13How
31:14can
31:15anyone
31:16say
31:17yes,
31:18this is
31:19right?
31:20How
31:21can
31:22anyone
31:23say
31:24yes,
31:25this is
31:26right?
31:27How
31:28can
31:29anyone
31:30say
31:31yes,
31:32this is
31:33right?
31:34How
31:35can
31:36anyone
31:37say
31:38yes,
31:39this is
31:40right?
31:41How
31:42can
31:43anyone
31:44say
31:45yes,
31:46this is
31:47right?
31:48How
31:49can
31:50anyone
31:51say
31:52yes,
31:53this is
31:54right?
31:55How
31:56can
31:57anyone
31:58say
31:59yes,
32:00this is
32:01right?
32:02How
32:03can
32:04anyone
32:05say
32:06yes,
32:07this is
32:08right?
32:09How
32:10can
32:11anyone
32:12say
32:13yes,
32:14this is
32:15right?
32:16How
32:17can
32:18anyone
32:19say
32:20yes,
32:21this is
32:22right?
32:23How
32:24can
32:25anyone
32:26say
32:27yes,
32:28this is
32:29right?
32:30How
32:31can
32:32anyone
32:33say
32:34yes,
32:35this is
32:36right?
32:37How
32:38can
32:39anyone
32:40say
32:41yes,
32:42this is
32:43right?
32:44How
32:45can
32:46anyone
32:47say
32:48yes,
32:49this is
32:50right?
32:51How
32:52can
32:53anyone
32:54say
32:55yes,
32:56this is
32:57right?
32:58How
32:59can
33:00anyone
33:01say
33:02yes,
33:03this is
33:04right?
33:05How
33:06can
33:07anyone
33:08say
33:09yes,
33:10this is
33:11right?
33:12How
33:13can
33:14anyone
33:15say
33:16yes,
33:17this is
33:18right?
33:19How
33:20can
33:21anyone
33:22say
33:23yes,
33:24this is
33:25right?
33:26How
33:27can
33:28anyone
33:29say
33:30yes,
33:31this is
33:32right?
33:33How
33:34can
33:35anyone
33:36say
33:37yes,
33:38this is
33:39right?
33:40How
33:41can
33:42anyone
33:43say
33:44yes,
33:45this is
33:46right?
33:47How
33:48can
33:49anyone
33:50say
33:51yes,
33:52this is
33:53right?
33:54How
33:55can
33:56anyone
33:57say
33:58yes,
33:59this is
34:00right?
34:01How
34:02can
34:03anyone
34:04say
34:05yes,
34:06this is
34:07right?
34:08How
34:09can
34:10anyone
34:11say
34:12yes,
34:13this is
34:14right?
34:15How
34:16can
34:17anyone
34:18say
34:19yes,
34:20this is
34:21right?
34:22How
34:23can
34:24anyone
34:25say
34:26yes,
34:27this is
34:28right?
34:29How
34:30can
34:31anyone
34:32say
34:33yes,
34:34this is
34:35right?
35:04How
35:05can
35:06anyone
35:07say
35:08yes,
35:09this is
35:10right?
35:11How
35:12can
35:13anyone
35:14say
35:15yes,
35:16this is
35:17right?
35:18How
35:19can
35:20anyone
35:21say
35:22yes,
35:23this is
35:24right?
35:25How
35:26can
35:27anyone
35:28say
35:29yes,
35:30this is
35:31right?
35:32How
35:33can
35:34anyone
35:35say
35:36yes,
35:37this is
35:38right?
35:39How
35:40can
35:41anyone
35:42say
35:43yes,
35:44this is
35:45right?
35:46How
35:47can
35:48anyone
35:49say
35:50yes,
35:51this is
35:52right?
35:53How
35:54can
35:55anyone
35:56say
35:57yes,
35:58this is
35:59right?
36:00How
36:01can
36:02anyone
36:03say
36:04yes,
36:05this is
36:06right?
36:07How
36:08can
36:09anyone
36:10say
36:11yes,
36:12this is
36:13right?
36:14How
36:15can
36:16anyone
36:17say
36:18yes,
36:19this is
36:20right?
36:21How
36:22can
36:23anyone
36:24say
36:25yes,
36:26this is
36:27right?
36:28How
36:29can
36:30the court for a while after that.