Former Secretary ECP Kanwar Dilshad gives big news regarding Sikandar Sultan Raja

ARY NEWS

#Khabar #ImranKhan #PTI #ReservedSeats #ElectionCommission #SupremeCourt #QaziFeazIsa #JusticeMansoorAliShah   Follow the ARY News channel on WhatsApp: https://bit.ly/46e5HzY  Subscribe to our channel and press the bell icon for latest news updates: http://bit.ly/3e0SwKP  ARY News is a leading Pakistani news channel that promises to bring you factual and timely international stories and stories about Pakistan, sports, entertainment, and business, amid others.  Official Facebook: https://www.fb.com/arynewsasia  Official Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/arynewsofficial  Official Instagram: https://instagram.com/arynewstv  Website: https://arynews.tv  Watch ARY NEWS LIVE: http://live.arynews.tv    Listen Live: http://live.arynews.tv/audio  Listen Top of the hour Headlines, Bulletins & Programs: https://soundcloud.com/arynewsofficial #ARYNews  ARY News Official YouTube Channel. For more videos, subscribe to our channel and for suggestions please use the comment section.

Transcript

00:00What is the Election Tarbimi Act 2024?

00:03Which is given by the Election Commission of Pakistan on the decision of the Supreme Court.

00:08After the decision of the Supreme Court on July 12,

00:12Parliament made two fundamental amendments to the Election Act 2017 on August 7.

00:18The first amendment was made in Section 66.

00:21According to this, no Rukmin Assembly can change the party certificate of its political party.

00:27The second amendment was made in Section 104.

00:30According to this, it is necessary that a party has submitted a list on time to get the specific seats.

00:36During this time, we saw that this matter is still limited to the clarifications between the Election Commission and the Supreme Court.

00:42On July 12, 2024, the decision of the Supreme Court on the specific seats came forward,

00:48in which it was said in the balance of 8-5 that the PTI as a party is entitled to the specific seats.

00:54On August 7, 2024, a second amendment was issued on the decision of the Supreme Court by the Election Commission,

01:01in which it was stated that the Supreme Court should withdraw its decision on July 12.

01:05The election commission's position was that the law gives free candidates three days to make their decision.

01:11So why did the Supreme Court give 15 days in its decision?

01:14The second position was adopted that how can candidates who do not submit party tickets to returning officers be of the movement of justice?

01:22The election commission raised the third position that the Supreme Court cannot interfere in the election commission's bill.

01:29On September 14, 2024, the Supreme Court issued a clarification on the first request of the election commission,

01:36stating that the request of the election commission against the decision of the specific seats is a delay.

01:42And after many days of deliberation, after 7-8 sessions,

01:47today the election commission of Pakistan has asked for further clarification and they are standing with their previous stance,

01:53which aligns very closely with the stance of the government union.

01:58At the beginning of the program, Mr. Kumar Dalshad, the former secretary of the election commission is present with us.

02:02Mr. Shibaz Khosla is an expert in law.

02:04Quickly, let's get a technical reaction on the response of the election commission today.

02:10Mr. Kumar, the election commission of Pakistan has again turned to the Supreme Court.

02:15All the legal experts I spoke to say that there is implementation on short judgment.

02:21Clarification has also come, detailed judgment has also come, but there is no implementation on it.

02:25So, does the election commission of Pakistan have the legal scope to not implement?

02:30Are you asking me this question?

02:35Yes, sir, from you.

02:37Absolutely right, you have told all the background in your introductory remarks.

02:42But the situation has gone like this, the Supreme Court of Pakistan has also been divided.

02:47And at the time of the Supreme Court of Pakistan, Justice Mansoor Shah issued his first statement on the website.

02:56On that, Chief Justice of Pakistan raised nine questions.

02:59So, in our opinion, there was no reason to raise these nine questions.

03:03If such a technical thing had happened, or it had come on the website,

03:08or if such a problem had arisen under the conduct of the Supreme Court of Pakistan,

03:14then the Chief Justice of Pakistan should have discussed all this by brainstorming among themselves.

03:20Now, the nine questions have been collected by the star.

03:23On top of that, a lot of confusion has arisen.

03:26The election commission of Pakistan could not reach any conclusion in its eight hearings.

03:31So, what came to their mind was that one, the Parliament has refused us to accept the decision of the Supreme Court of Pakistan.

03:38Secondly, they have delisted the movement of justice from their National Assembly.

03:44And along with that, the Trump party has come in the middle.

03:47While asking all these matters, they thought that we should go to the Supreme Court of Pakistan and question it.

03:54But the answers to these questions are present in page 75.

03:59Now, the Supreme Court of Pakistan will ask,

04:02Sir, the four questions you have asked us, they are present in our decision.

04:07But in any case, in my opinion, in order to protect yourself from the law,

04:10the answer that we have submitted to the court,

04:13in my opinion, according to our experience,

04:16Chief Justice of Pakistan, sorry, Mr. Mansoor Shah, Honorable Judge,

04:21he will accept the election commission.

04:24He will say that you are right.

04:26And we will answer your questions in front of you.

04:30He will answer in such a way that I can see that he will ask the election commission of Pakistan

04:37and will say that we will answer all your questions in front of you.

04:40So, this is not an easy task.

04:43The election commission of Pakistan will have to be presented in front of the Supreme Court of Pakistan.

04:47Do it now and present it later.

04:49So, Mr. Kumar, do you think that the matter can go to the court of insult

04:54or can the Supreme Court take some extreme action?

04:56Because first, a short judgment came, a detailed judgment came.

05:00The matter will also go under review.

05:02But will the court give more time, give more clarification?

05:06Do you think this is the next step?

05:08The court of insult will not go to the side.

05:16The members of the election commission can call them.

05:22If you have answered the question with us,

05:25before we write a judgment or a decision,

05:28we will give you the answer to that one question.

05:31They will call the election commission in the Supreme Court of Pakistan

05:34and will give their explanation.

05:36When the decision will come,

05:38the election commission of Pakistan will decide the Supreme Court of Pakistan

05:42about the special institutions.

05:45But the decision will have to be that they will call the Supreme Court of Pakistan.

05:50The answer to this will be written.

05:52One more thing is that the way Justice Fahim Issa Sahib

05:55and Justice Mansoor's trial have been going on,

05:59questions have started, threats have started.

06:02This is weakening the structure of the Supreme Court.

06:05The head of the Supreme Court is weakening.

06:07There is a lot of objection in the public.

06:09The election commission is also looking at the facts

06:15and will be able to implement its decision.

06:21But you said that the answers to these questions are in the detailed judgment.

06:25The answers are there.

06:28We know and see all the cases of the Supreme Court of Pakistan very closely.

06:34So what is the need of writing letters?

06:37My question is a little precise.

06:40My question is that in the detailed judgment,

06:42the four questions raised by the election commission of Pakistan,

06:45the four points raised,

06:47is there a satisfactory answer to them?

06:50Or is there any room for improvement?

06:52No, there is a little improvement in it.

06:55In every case, there is a little improvement.

06:58For example, in the judgment of Honorable Justice Mansoor Shah,

07:03he did not mention Article 224.

07:06In Article 224, there is a detailed judgment

07:10as to how the special sessions are organized.

07:13The election commission of Pakistan did not mention it.

07:16But they mentioned Article 51,106.

07:19They mentioned Article 104.

07:21They mentioned the letter of the Speaker of the Nation.

07:24But all the cases are there.

07:27But the answers to all these questions are in the 70 pages.

Category

Transcript

Recommended