"Bilawal Bhutto Apne Nana Sey Hi Kuch Seekh Lete" | Rauf Hasan Criticize Bilawal Bhutto
#constitutionalamendments #bilawalbhutto #supremecourt #pti #imrankhan #waseembadami #11thhour #raufhassan
"Bilawal Bhutto Apne Nana Sey Hi Kuch Seekh Lete" | Rauf Hasan Criticize Bilawal Bhutto
"Bilawal Bhutto Apne Nana Sey Hi Kuch Seekh Lete" | Rauf Hasan Criticize Bilawal Bhutto
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00Mr. Bilawal's speech should not have any doubt that he wants to make a political court, which he wants to use for political advancement.
00:13He talks about the struggle of his three generations, the constitutional struggle.
00:20He should have at least learned a lesson from his grandfather.
00:23When he brought the constitution, he worked very hard for it to be unanimously adopted by the National Assembly.
00:32You must remember, Mr. Waseem Badami, he had to struggle a lot.
00:37There were many people in that parliament who did not see eye to eye with him, who had very strong political differences with him.
00:45Despite this, he thought it was appropriate to bring the constitution through consensus, which was a very good step.
00:53Today, the way our political leadership has implemented the constitution, which the ANP leader himself said in his own language.
01:03He called it a super court out of innocence.
01:05I was surprised.
01:07Super Supreme Court, this is also our criticism.
01:11In the constitution, the Supreme Court is supreme.
01:16And the interpretation of legislation is its exclusive right.
01:21This is in our constitution.
01:23I did not say it, Mr. Waseem Badami is not saying it.
01:25No one else is saying it.
01:27And he wants to bring a super Supreme Court, which will be highly politicized.
01:32And from that, political objectives will be achieved.
01:35We, as members of Pakistan Tariq-e-Insaf, feel that at this time, all these constitutional amendments are being talked about.
01:49This is only to establish its political dominance and supremacy in the parliament.
01:56It is a party-focused amendment.
02:00It is a person-specific amendment.
02:02And we do not even consider it as a judicial process.
02:06In response to your question, I will take half a minute.
02:09We want to talk about every amendment.
02:14If the requirements to bring that amendment, which are enshrined in the constitution, are fulfilled.
02:23There are ways to bring amendments.
02:26Follow them.
02:27Send them to the committees.
02:29First present it.
02:30Send it to the committees.
02:31Let there be a discussion.
02:34Let the pluses and minuses come.
02:36After that, we will see if we want to support it or not.
02:39See, whatever work is done by any party, frankly, no party can say as such that I oppose it.
02:46Or I am not in favor of it.
02:48But it is very important to look at the objectives behind it.
02:55The way it is being piloted through the parliament, it is also very important to look at it.
03:02Since you are a member of the parliament, has anyone from the government sections contacted your party?
03:10That sir, we want to make some amendments.
03:13Let's talk about it.
03:15Has this happened?
03:16Look, a committee was formed when 9-10 of our MNAs were arrested.
03:23Do you remember that a committee was formed through the Speaker National Assembly?
03:28That she will collaborate to prevent such things in the future and make proposals.
03:37So they played a fast one on us.
03:39They also raised the case of Ahini Tarah Meem through the same committee.
03:44So no, in response to your question, they did not contact us at all.
03:49In the context of a political party, they did not even have a draft.
03:54What do they give us? What do they present to us?
03:56They had 3-4 drafts circulating.
03:58You also know, Mr. Vadami.
04:00Yes, yes, yes.
04:01Because the committee you are talking about is actually related to running the parliament.
04:06Yes, yes, absolutely.
04:07And at the same time, they put up this drama that she will also look into it.
04:11So, you know, obviously, the answer to your question, sir, is in the negative.
04:15No.
04:16Correct. And sir, responding to my earlier question,
04:18you are saying that you are against the very idea of formation of a constitutional court.
04:23Or, after 2 months, after 4 months, if there is a discussion on this,
04:26or if there is a discussion in a better environment,
04:28or if some guarantees are obtained that this person is not specific,
04:31then there can be a discussion on this idea.
04:34Yes, absolutely.
04:35Like I said, Mr. Vadami,
04:37when a constitutional amendment is brought,
04:39as a political party,
04:41we should definitely attend to it.
04:44We should consider it.
04:45And we will definitely be able to consider it,
04:47if the requirements to bring such amendments can be met.
04:51See, 63A.
04:53One of its many objectives is the annulment of 63A.
04:57Why?
04:58Because they want votes, 6, 7, 8, additional votes,
05:01which even if Maulana Sahib is included,
05:05then despite that, he is short of 7, 8 votes.
05:08They want to complete it from us.
05:10So, for that, first, they will annul 63A.
05:14What will be the benefit of annulling 63A?
05:16That the vote,
05:17by crossing the floor,
05:19across the floor,
05:20across the division,
05:21if our people convince them to vote,
05:24then they will get their vote counted.
05:26The law at present says that their vote will not be counted.
05:29This is the judgment of the Supreme Court.
05:30So, our doubts are very well-founded.
05:33The PTI is being targeted through these amendments.
05:36So, obviously, in those circumstances,
05:38it is very difficult for us to consider them.