IANS Exclusive: Waqf Board Amendment Bill पर IANS से खुलकर बोले Salman Khurshid
केंद्र सरकार के गुरुवार को लोकसभा में वक्फ बोर्ड संशोधन बिल पेश करने के बाद से ही इस मुद्दे पर सियासत गर्म है। पूर्व केंद्रीय मंत्री और कांग्रेस के वरिष्ठ नेता सलमान खुर्शीद ने आईएएनएस से खास बातचीत में कहा कि वक्फ बोर्ड बिल ज्वाइंट पार्लियामेंटरी कमेटी के पास है और वहां जिसको अपनी बात रखनी होगी वो रख सकता है इस बिल को लेकर आपस में गुफ्तगू होगी, चर्चा होगी और फिर सही सुझाव संसद में भेजा जाएगा। लेकिन ये एक पब्लिक इंटरेस्ट का मामला है और मैं यह समझता हूं कि इन पर गौर पार्लियामेंट में होगा। वहीं भारत में वक्फ बोर्ड के पास सबसे ज्यादा ताकत होने के सवाल पर सलमान खुर्शीद ने कहा कि क्यों पाकिस्तान की बात करें हम हर चीज में पाकिस्तान से सीखेंगे ? पाकिस्तान को हमसे सीखना चाहिए हम क्यों किसी और देश की बात करें हम अपने देश की बात करें कि क्या हमारे देश में क्या हमारे बुजुर्गों ने सही समझा और क्या किया।
#salmankhurshid #congress #modigovernment #waqfboardact #ucc #salmankhurshidinterview
#salmankhurshid #congress #modigovernment #waqfboardact #ucc #salmankhurshidinterview
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00Look, there are two things that should be kept in mind.
00:04The first thing is that when something is in front of the Parliament
00:08or the procedures of the Parliament, there will be a focus on it.
00:12So, if we sit outside and keep commenting on it,
00:15then maybe that is not the right thing.
00:18Anyway, now it will go in front of the Joint Parliamentary Committee.
00:21There, whoever has to keep their point, they can keep it.
00:24There will be a discussion among them.
00:29And then the right suggestions and proposals will come in front of the Parliament.
00:34There will be a discussion again in the Parliament and then a decision will be made.
00:39But, because it is a matter of public interest,
00:43and I think these things will be discussed in the Parliament as well,
00:46let me tell you that the situation in the country is such that
00:51the specific institutions that have a special relationship with minorities,
00:57whether it is one minority or another,
01:00it seems that there is a constant effort to intervene in it.
01:05Who is right and who is wrong is a matter of debate.
01:08A lot of things are going on at the moment,
01:11like the UCC is being discussed,
01:13the Madrasas are being discussed,
01:15and a lot of other issues of the minority,
01:19like the issue of the scholarships of the Maulana Azad Foundation,
01:23a lot of decisions are being made,
01:25which give some indication that
01:29the effort here is to impose some restrictions on the rights of minorities.
01:43This is a general impression, which is not a good impression.
01:47The proposals of the Waqf Bill are related to this.
01:53Till now, the world knows what the Waqf is,
01:56that law is a very old law,
01:58the world knows what the Waqf is,
02:00but the decision of which property is Waqf or has been Waqf,
02:06was made by the Waqf Board.
02:09Now the decision will be made by the collector,
02:12that is, a government official will decide whether it is Waqf or not,
02:17whether it is a government land or a land of Waqf.
02:20Like in Delhi, there is an issue of 123 Waqf,
02:23so the government says that the collector will decide,
02:26and the tribunal will not decide.
02:28So that would be wrong.
02:29Why has the tribunal been made?
02:31The tribunal has been made to decide.
02:33You used to make a tribunal of one judge,
02:35now you have made a tribunal of two judges,
02:37and no one can complain about that.
02:39Two judges are better than one judge.
02:41No one can complain about that.
02:43But taking this matter from the tribunal,
02:45you are giving this matter to a collector,
02:48a government official.
02:50This can be a big issue.
02:52Secondly, Waqf is by user, Waqf is for children.
02:56These are all concepts that have been around for a long time,
03:00and to show that we are doing this so that women also get a chance,
03:05this is completely wrong.
03:07Women will have to give a chance to any Mutawalli.
03:11If a Waqf wants his wife to benefit from this,
03:19then this is a fundamental question,
03:22and no one can say that we are doing this for the betterment of the people.
03:29There will be a discussion on this,
03:31and there should be.
03:33Right now, the primary issue is that
03:37this is interfering in the institutions that are considered to be of the minority.
03:45It is interfering in the rights of the minority in the constitution.
03:49This is the opinion of the people.
03:51Now there will be a discussion on this,
03:53there will be a debate on this,
03:55everyone will present their arguments,
03:57and then it will be decided what should happen.
03:59Why should we talk about Pakistan?
04:01Why should we talk about Pakistan?
04:03We will learn everything from Pakistan.
04:05Why should we talk about any other country?
04:07We should talk about our own country,
04:09what our elders thought was right in our country,
04:11and what they did.
04:13Ultimately, the courts are in charge of this.
04:17Tribunal is a court,
04:19and the court is in charge of this.
04:21Don't you trust the court?
04:23Say openly that you don't trust the court,
04:25you only trust your collector.
04:27Say this.
04:29Don't talk about here and there.
04:31If you want to talk, do what we can see in front of us.
04:35I have also been a minority minister,
04:37I have also made amendments,
04:39and my amendments were also opposed.
04:41And it was an illegal opposition.
04:43Because people do oppose.
04:45Sometimes in ignorance,
04:47sometimes on purpose.
04:49So there was opposition in my time as well.
04:51But the Act of 1995 has been going on for so many days,
04:54and it has been successful.
04:56Now if you want to make some changes,
04:58if you want to make some changes,
05:00then give us the data and tell us why we are doing it.
05:03Say that people are taking advantage of it,
05:05people are taking advantage of it.
05:07So let the tribunal say to someone
05:09that people are taking wrong advantage of it,
05:11and we don't have powers,
05:13we lack powers.
05:15But why do you want to give it to the collector?
05:17And these useless things that are being said
05:19that in other countries,
05:21in Pakistan, this happens, that happens,
05:23what do we have to do with it?
05:25What happens in India,
05:27we should concentrate on this.
05:29And what happens in India,
05:31what is lacking in it,
05:33you tell us.
05:35Today you will intervene in time,
05:37tomorrow you will intervene in temples,
05:39after that you will intervene in trusts,
05:41what all things will you intervene in?
05:43This is the question.
05:45See, whoever gets bail,
05:47the court gives it after thinking about it.
05:49The court has given bail after 17 months,
05:51so the court must have understood
05:53that 17 months is a lot,
05:55and in 17 months,
05:57if you could not move the case forward,
05:5917 months have passed,
06:0117 months will pass,
06:03so it is the responsibility of the government,
06:05of the prosecution,
06:07to move the case forward as soon as possible.
06:09As far as I understand,
06:11the court has said that
06:13Manish Trasodia did not intervene
06:15in this delay,
06:17because of him it was not delayed,
06:19that is why the bail was given.
06:21Now the bail has been given,
06:23neither does the bail say
06:25that the allegations against him are wrong,
06:27the bail has been given,
06:29so that this case can be decided
06:31as soon as possible.