"Jab Awam inse Puchegi Hamare Liye Kiya Kia To ye keh Deinge Hamaray Pas Ikhtiyar Nahi tha..."
"Jab Awam inse Puchegi Hamare Liye Kiya Kia To ye keh Deinge Hamaray Pas Ikhtiyar Nahi tha..."
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00Do you think Mian Nawaz Sharif's decision to take over the government was right?
00:28I have heard Mian Javed Lateef say many times that he should not have taken over the government.
00:34He has more understanding of the party than I do.
00:39And if you look at his statement two minutes ago, he said that there is no power.
00:44And since when is there no power? Since 2022.
00:47He is doing a lot of injustice to the people of Pakistan.
00:50He is doing a lot of injustice. He is enjoying himself.
00:53There is no shortage of perks and privileges.
00:56Helicopters, planes, big cars, trips abroad.
01:00There is no shortage of all that. There is no restriction in that.
01:03If there is a restriction in making decisions, then it is a lot of injustice to the people of Pakistan.
01:08With 24-25 crore people, you can say that we cannot make decisions.
01:14We had to make decisions for the betterment of the people.
01:16That is being stopped. There is no decision-making.
01:18Then there should have been a new government.
01:20It should not have been taken on the basis of 16 months of experience.
01:23And after the election results of February 24, it should not have been taken at all.
01:28Because you did not have a mandate.
01:30And the second thing is that I will believe Javed Lateef's words more that if there is no power,
01:36then there is a lot of injustice to the people of Pakistan.
01:39And who is doing injustice? Those who are sitting in the cabinet and sitting in big offices.
01:43They are sitting as governors and as chief ministers.
01:46You tell yourself that this is justice to the people of Pakistan.
01:49You are saying, let me enjoy. Let me do foreign tours.
01:53Give me a plane, a helicopter and big cars.
01:56But do not ask me why I am not making good decisions because I do not have the power.
02:01And in this way, you will spend the next four years, four and a half years.
02:05And when you look back and see the people, they will say, who was responsible for our downfall?
02:10You will say that we had already told you that we do not have the power.
02:13I think there is more injustice than this.
02:16Sir, the big reason for this, Mr. Zubair, is not that there are two forms of politicians.
02:21One is for power. Even if there is no power, we will take power.
02:26And one is the power itself, which is a very big thing for which all this is.
02:32The second thing is that my opponent, who is perhaps more accepted than me at the moment,
02:38if this is said, then perhaps it will not be wrong.
02:41My politics is based on the fact that my opponents should first put him in jail,
02:47keep him in jail, do not let him get out.
02:50There is only one way for my survival.
02:52Mr. Zubair, a quick response, are these the two reasons for which the possibility of a coup has increased?
02:57Yes, absolutely.
02:58I agree 100% with your analysis that the overall objective is to finish your opponent,
03:07to destroy him.
03:09Generations to come will ask, what was PTI?
03:14Who was Imran Khan?
03:16When your objective is this, then you are ready to make that sacrifice.
03:21Since I do not have the power in that way, because you are obviously someone else's deceased.
03:26You are not on the basis of the votes of the public.
03:28You know how you can decide by putting someone in your eyes.
03:34But along with that, your number one objective is to put Imran Khan in jail,
03:41or destroy him, or not give him a mandate, or put a ban on him.
03:45Which means that the majority of Pakistanis are traitors,
03:48because the majority of Pakistanis think that Imran Khan is not a traitor.
03:52The majority of Pakistanis think that PTI is not a traitor.
03:55Then you are saying that the majority is wrong.
03:58The same mistake that you say, do not take the name of East Pakistan,
04:01but this is the same classic example.
04:03It is a classic example.
04:04And along with that, there is a lot of work.
04:07On 9th May, there was an election campaign,
04:10that we have a competition with the people of 9th May.
04:13People have voted.
04:15Mr. Javed Latif, I do not know whether you will be able to give a fair answer to this or not.
04:20You will have political constraints.
04:22Should the government of Form 47 have taken this?
04:25Should the big leaders have come to this assembly through Form 47?
04:32Why have these decisions been made?
04:34Are there no leaders in this country who make principled decisions,
04:38instead of political compulsions?
04:42Look Kashif, you said that if I have a political constraint,
04:47then I may be able to answer it in that way or not.
04:50This does not matter to me.
04:53What matters to me is that the reality,
04:56if someone wants to express the whole reality,
04:59then it is the duty of the other person to also express the whole reality.
05:03If you want to hear the reality or do the reality,
05:06then I will answer in the same way.
05:08The matter is simple.
05:10As long as Mohammad Zubair was in the Jamaat,
05:14especially till 2024,
05:17I remember that he was completely in agreement with the Jamaat.
05:21If someone wants to ask about 2022, 2023 or 2017,
05:27then Mr. Zubair is equally responsible to answer as I am today.
05:32Secondly, if you break the agreements with the world powers and financial institutions,
05:47then the people who come and make agreements,
05:50then they do it on strict conditions,
05:52then you will have to think about who is guilty in this.
05:55It should be seen that the person who broke the agreement should also be investigated,
06:00and the person who made the new agreements should also be investigated.
06:03Look, Mr. Zubair is sitting and talking in the wrong place.
06:05He has started laughing now.
06:07Look, he was inside at the time when all these agreements were broken at different times.
06:12Imran Khan sir also broke it.
06:14Yes.
06:15You people broke it.
06:16Now come.
06:17And I, wait a second.
06:19Mr. Zubair, you have to answer in 20 seconds.
06:21We sacrificed politics to save the state.
06:23How much of this statement is based on a lie in the Muslim League?
06:28I will not say such a strong word, but it was not right.
06:30There was no reality to it.
06:32If Imran Khan did not increase the prices at the end of February,
06:36then in the middle of April, the PMLN government did not increase the prices.
06:40April 30th was not increased again.
06:42May 15th was not increased again.
06:44These were all IMF conditions.
06:46You came.
06:47Imran Khan did not increase the prices at the end of February.
06:50So who was stopping you?
06:51Did you increase the prices on April 15th, 2022?
06:54Did you increase the prices on April 30th?
06:56So how do you classify breaking the agreement?
07:01And then we got the 8th tranche in August.
07:06So what was the problem after that?
07:08What was the problem after that?
07:09In August 2022, two years ago,
07:11so now we will keep crying there.
07:13We will be stuck there.
07:14Why did that happen at that time?
07:15So I said, Mr. Zubair will tell.
07:17I will say and then you will say.
07:19Because the problem is that the argument that should be used in politics should also be factual.
07:24But my question was completely different.
07:26You went to the financial institutions.
07:27I agreed with you.