#sunniittehadcouncil #PTI #reservedseats #supremecourt #Cjp #qazifaezisa #pmlngovt #kashifabbasi #offtherecord #bilalazharkiyani #pmln #imrankhan #ecp
Kiya Hukumat Cases kay Decisions main Takheer ki wajah ban rahi hai? Bilal Azhar Kayani's Statement
Kiya Hukumat Cases kay Decisions main Takheer ki wajah ban rahi hai? Bilal Azhar Kayani's Statement
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00It seems that the government doesn't want justice to be served.
00:03You don't want a decision to be made on the cases as soon as possible.
00:06You have changed the laws of the tribunals.
00:08You are sending the names of the sitting High Court judges.
00:12You have issued such an ordinance that the High Court judges,
00:16instead of the law that you had made,
00:18the retired judges can be brought here,
00:21as Mr. Salman is saying, for six, eight months, a year, two years.
00:24Do you want these cases to end or do you want a decision to be made on these cases?
00:29Thank you, Mr. Kashif, for inviting me to your show.
00:32Just to make sure we are factually correct,
00:35I had understood from Mr. Salman's statement that
00:37under this ordinance, there will be additional judges.
00:40I don't think it's meant to replace them.
00:42So, if anything, it should...
00:44The reservation that Mr. Salman has,
00:47it seems that he doesn't think that the judges should be on the contract.
00:51But that doesn't replace them.
00:52Before the election, you also had this opinion.
00:54No, but this is an addition.
00:55This is not...
00:56Why do you need this addition?
00:58You got the first chance in Islamabad.
01:00Sir, you say that there is a lot of load on the judges,
01:03there are a lot of cases, there is case load management.
01:05Then why did you make the law?
01:06The number of judges is the same.
01:08Look, if you are getting a facility in that,
01:10as a result of which you can do more disposal of cases.
01:13Sitting High Court judges also have their own case load.
01:15You said that the Chief Justice of Lahore High Court had sent the name of non-judges.
01:19The Election Commission did not notify the nominees.
01:21Look, the Election Commission can respond.
01:23The Election Commission is ruling.
01:25Anyway, it is the Election Commission's prerogative.
01:27That has nothing to do with us.
01:28So, look, that is why these cases are in the Deelgar Courts.
01:31You are only its beneficiary.
01:32No, sir.
01:33If you look at the beneficiary in 2018,
01:37they say that Form 45 does not match.
01:40Form 45 was not found at that time.
01:42The way RTS was down, it was in front of you.
01:44So, anyway, we say that...
01:46Two wrongs make a right.
01:47No, no, I am just telling you that
01:49these cases are now going on between the Supreme Court,
01:51the Higher Courts and the Election Commission.
01:55The other cases are sub-judices.
01:57The case of special sessions is a sub-judice.
01:59We have always said,
02:00whether it is this case or the case of six judges,
02:03the Federal Government remains available where it has a role.
02:06Rest, the matters are in the court and let's see how they play out.
02:09Yes, but the problem is, sir,
02:10that a tribunal is formed,
02:12like the Judge of Islamabad High Court,
02:15on whom your members accuse of bias.
02:17Today, there was a very interesting argument.
02:19Mr. Salman, I would like you to listen to it.
02:21It was a very interesting debate.
02:23You were in the Supreme Court.
02:24Just like Amir Farooq, the Judge of Islamabad High Court,
02:27submitted it.
02:28The court instructed Mr. Anjum Aqeel
02:30to read the statement submitted by him
02:32to the Election Commission.
02:35The question was asked,
02:36you have to explain what nepotism is.
02:39This sentence was written,
02:40this word was used by Mr. Anjum Aqeel.
02:42Please explain to me its meaning.
02:44Mr. Amir Farooq said this to Mr. Anjum Aqeel.
02:47He said, these are legal words.
02:49I don't know.
02:50I am not familiar with the court.
02:51I apologize.
02:52Mr. Anjum Aqeel apologized later.
02:57Mr. Amir Farooq said,
02:58nepotism is not a legal word.
03:00Then he said,
03:01explain the meaning of bias.
03:02He said, this is also a legal term.
03:03He said, this is not a legal term.
03:04This is an English word.
03:06Please explain to me its meaning.
03:08Did you sign it without reading it?
03:11He said,
03:12you asked for it,
03:13the judge was familiar with it.
03:14How was he familiar with it?
03:16Then finally,
03:17the Islamabad High Court
03:18issued a shocker notice
03:19against the Tauheen court.
03:21And,
03:22the tribunal dismissed it.
03:24The tribunal of the Election Commission
03:25suspended the change of order.
03:27This is what happened in Islamabad.
03:29And these three circles of Islamabad,
03:31you must have seen,
03:32they have filed a form 45.
03:33And many opponents of Noon League
03:35have taken their own form 45.
03:37Mustafa Nawaz Khokhar,
03:38Jamaat-e-Islami.
03:39In some cases,
03:40the TLP has taken their form 45
03:42and said,
03:43this is the real form 45.
03:44Which matches the rules
03:45of the Noon League.
03:46This is the situation.
03:47This is the ground.
03:48Look, Mr. Kashid,
03:49as I am saying,
03:50these cases are in the courts.
03:52As we often discuss in these shows,
03:55and we have seen in the past,
03:56especially,
03:57because nowadays,
03:58it seems that the national politics
03:59is happening in the courts.
04:01And the daily news is
04:02about the court proceedings.
04:04Whether it is a special case,
04:06whether it is tribunals,
04:07whether it is a case of audio leaks,
04:08whether it is a case of six judges.
04:10Nowadays,
04:11the news of your reporters
04:12is on the tickers
04:13of the court rooms.
04:14So, look,
04:15when the country is running
04:16according to the law,
04:17then this does not happen.
04:18When we do not run the country
04:19according to the law,
04:20then this happens.
04:21We both know it is more
04:22complicated than this.
04:23It is as simple as that.
04:24No, no, look.
04:25Do you know,
04:26even in your time,
04:27the case used to go to the court
04:28when you used to fight
04:29about the law.
04:30And the Supreme Court
04:31had to decide
04:32that this is not the law.
04:33And the Supreme Court
04:34had to decide
04:35that this is not the law.
04:36And the Supreme Court
04:37had to decide
04:38that this is not the law.
04:39And the Supreme Court
04:40had to decide
04:41that this is not the law.
04:42And the Supreme Court
04:43had to decide
04:44that this is not the law.
04:45And the Supreme Court
04:46had to decide
04:47that this is not the law.
04:48And the Supreme Court
04:49had to decide
04:50that this is not the law.
04:51And the Supreme Court
04:52had to decide
04:53that this is not the law.
04:54And the Supreme Court
04:55had to decide
04:56that this is not the law.
04:57And the Supreme Court
04:58had to decide
04:59that this is not the law.
05:00And the Supreme Court
05:01had to decide
05:02that this is not the law.
05:03And the Supreme Court
05:04had to decide
05:05that this is not the law.
05:06And the Supreme Court
05:07had to decide
05:08that this is not the law.
05:09And the Supreme Court
05:10had to decide
05:11that this is not the law.
05:12And the Supreme Court
05:13had to decide
05:14that this is not the law.
05:15And the Supreme Court
05:16had to decide
05:17that this is not the law.
05:18And the Supreme Court
05:19had to decide
05:20that this is not the law.
05:21And the Supreme Court
05:22had to decide
05:23that this is not the law.
05:24And the Supreme Court
05:25had to decide
05:26that this is not the law.
05:27And the Supreme Court
05:28had to decide
05:29that this is not the law.
05:30And the Supreme Court
05:31had to decide
05:32that this is not the law.
05:33And the Supreme Court
05:34had to decide
05:35that this is not the law.
05:36And the Supreme Court
05:37had to decide
05:38that this is not the law.
05:39And the Supreme Court
05:40had to decide
05:41that this is not the law.
05:42And the Supreme Court
05:43had to decide
05:44that this is not the law.
05:45And the Supreme Court
05:46had to decide
05:47that this is not the law.
05:48And the Supreme Court
05:49had to decide
05:50that this is not the law.
05:51And the Supreme Court
05:52had to decide
05:53that this is not the law.
05:54And the Supreme Court
05:55had to decide
05:56that this is not the law.
05:57And the Supreme Court
05:58had to decide
05:59that this is not the law.
06:00And the Supreme Court
06:01had to decide
06:02that this is not the law.
06:03And the Supreme Court
06:04had to decide
06:05that this is not the law.
06:06And the Supreme Court
06:07had to decide
06:08that this is not the law.
06:09And the Supreme Court
06:10had to decide
06:11that this is not the law.
06:12And the Supreme Court
06:13had to decide
06:14that this is not the law.
06:15And the Supreme Court
06:16had to decide
06:17that this is not the law.
06:18And the Supreme Court
06:19had to decide
06:20that this is not the law.
06:21And the Supreme Court
06:22had to decide
06:23that this is not the law.
06:24And the Supreme Court
06:25had to decide
06:26that this is not the law.
06:27And the Supreme Court
06:28had to decide
06:29that this is not the law.
06:30And the Supreme Court
06:31had to decide
06:32that this is not the law.
06:33And the Supreme Court
06:34had to decide
06:35that this is not the law.
06:36And the Supreme Court
06:37had to decide
06:38that this is not the law.
06:39And the Supreme Court
06:40had to decide
06:41that this is not the law.
06:42And the Supreme Court
06:43had to decide
06:44that this is not the law.
06:45And the Supreme Court
06:46had to decide
06:47that this is not the law.
06:48And the Supreme Court
06:49had to decide
06:50that this is not the law.
06:51And the Supreme Court
06:52had to decide
06:53that this is not the law.
06:54And the Supreme Court
06:55had to decide
06:56that this is not the law.
06:57And the Supreme Court
06:58had to decide
06:59that this is not the law.
07:00And the Supreme Court
07:01had to decide
07:02that this is not the law.