• 6 months ago
#faisalvawda #pressconference #supremecourt #qazifaezisa #PunjabGovernment #LahoreHighCourt #judgesappointment

Why is Punjab govt not appointing judges approved by Lahore High Court?

Faisal Vawda Ke Press Conference per Az Khud Notice Case Ke Samat,

Follow the ARY News channel on WhatsApp: https://bit.ly/46e5HzY

Subscribe to our channel and press the bell icon for latest news updates: http://bit.ly/3e0SwKP

ARY News is a leading Pakistani news channel that promises to bring you factual and timely international stories and stories about Pakistan, sports, entertainment, and business, amid others.
Transcript
00:00 [AUDIO OUT]
00:10 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
00:11 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
00:31 Thank you very much for joining everybody.
00:33 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
00:34 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
00:51 Basically, contempt of court.
00:53 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
00:54 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
01:24 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
01:25 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
01:27 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
01:29 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
01:48 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
01:50 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
01:51 Not just that.
01:58 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
02:00 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
02:05 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
02:16 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
02:17 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
02:19 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
02:20 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
02:21 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
02:22 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
02:23 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
02:25 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
02:27 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
02:28 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
02:52 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
03:01 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
03:02 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
03:10 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
03:19 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
03:27 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
03:28 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
03:36 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
03:38 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
03:39 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
03:48 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
04:06 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
04:08 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
04:09 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
04:10 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
04:11 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
04:17 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
04:32 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
04:33 Who will have to face the music, Chaudhary sahib?
04:50 Those who are indulging into contempt of court.
04:55 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
04:58 Whosoever is this, I cannot say [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
05:02 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
05:03 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
05:07 I've just asked question.
05:16 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
05:17 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
05:21 Contempt of court.
05:22 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
05:23 What music are they going to face?
05:32 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
05:33 They're going to face the music.
05:34 What music?
05:35 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
05:36 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
05:37 Chief Justice, Istanbul High Court,
05:53 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
05:54 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
05:59 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
06:00 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
06:05 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
06:10 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
06:27 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
06:28 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
06:34 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
06:44 What does that mean?
06:47 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
06:49 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
06:50 Attorney General.
07:12 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
07:14 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
07:15 Completely 180 degree--
07:34 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
07:36 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
07:37 180 degree different point of view.
07:46 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
07:47 These are completely opposite point of view.
07:50 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
07:51 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
07:59 Am I right, Chaudhary sir?
08:03 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
08:05 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
08:06 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
08:13 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
08:14 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
08:31 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
08:39 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
08:41 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
08:43 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
08:44 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
08:46 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
08:47 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
08:49 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
08:51 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
08:53 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
08:55 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
08:56 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
09:02 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
09:29 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
09:31 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
09:33 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
09:35 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
09:37 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
09:38 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
09:40 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
09:42 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
09:43 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
09:45 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
09:47 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
09:49 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
09:51 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
09:52 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
09:53 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
09:54 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
09:55 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
09:56 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
09:57 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
09:58 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
09:59 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
10:00 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
10:01 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
10:02 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
10:03 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
10:04 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
10:05 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
10:06 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
10:07 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
10:08 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
10:09 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
10:10 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
10:11 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
10:12 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
10:13 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
10:14 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
10:15 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
10:43 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
10:44 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
10:45 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
10:46 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
10:47 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
10:48 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
10:49 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
10:50 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
10:51 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
10:52 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
10:53 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
10:54 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
10:55 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
10:56 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
10:57 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
10:58 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
10:59 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:00 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:01 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:02 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:03 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:04 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:05 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:06 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:07 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:08 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:14 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:15 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:16 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:17 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:18 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:19 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:20 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:21 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:22 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:23 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:24 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:25 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:26 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:27 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:28 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:29 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:30 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:31 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:32 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:33 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:34 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:35 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:36 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:37 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:38 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:39 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:40 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:41 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:42 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:43 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:44 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:45 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:46 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:47 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:48 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:49 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:50 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:51 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:52 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:53 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:54 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:55 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:56 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:57 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:58 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
11:59 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:00 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:01 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:07 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:08 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:09 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:10 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:11 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:12 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:13 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:14 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:15 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:16 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:17 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:18 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:19 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:20 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:21 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:22 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:23 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:24 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:25 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:26 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:27 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:28 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:29 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:30 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:31 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:32 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:33 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:34 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:35 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:36 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:37 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:38 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:39 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:40 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:41 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:42 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:43 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:44 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:45 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:46 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:47 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:48 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:49 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:50 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:51 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:52 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:53 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
12:54 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:00 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:01 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:02 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:03 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:04 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:05 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:06 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:07 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:08 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:09 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:10 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:11 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:12 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:13 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:14 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:15 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:16 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:17 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:18 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:19 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:20 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:21 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:22 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:23 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:24 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:25 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:26 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:27 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:28 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:29 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:30 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:31 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:32 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:33 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:34 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:35 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:36 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:37 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:38 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:39 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:40 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:41 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:42 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:43 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:44 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:45 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:46 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:52 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:53 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:54 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:55 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:56 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:57 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:58 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
13:59 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
14:00 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
14:01 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
14:02 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
14:03 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
14:04 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
14:05 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
14:06 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
14:07 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
14:08 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
14:09 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
14:10 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
14:11 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
14:12 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
14:13 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
14:14 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
14:15 Everyone has their own views. If someone criticizes someone, they have a right to give an opinion.
14:20 But, here we have to talk about the law.
14:22 George sir, the law that I was talking about is very clear.
14:26 But, the moral authority thing, or the argument becomes very vague. What should we do about that?
14:32 George sir?
14:39 There is no moral authority. There are laws according to the law.
14:45 Either they are being violated or not.
14:50 If they are being violated, sooner or later, the law will take its own course.
14:55 Number two, there is a high moral ground.
14:58 There is a high moral authority, whose hands are clean.
15:02 You tweet about a certain person every day.
15:07 He is corrupt, he is a certified fraud.
15:11 What is your job? You should mind your own business.
15:14 You don't even get tired of supporting people.
15:18 What charges are there against them? You never discuss that.
15:22 He is a convict.
15:23 That's why I want to...
15:24 I am talking about conviction.
15:26 The court has given him a right to be punished and a criminal.
15:29 The court has given him a right to be punished. I haven't given him a right to be punished.
15:32 The courts have given him a right. I am talking about the respect of the courts.
15:34 You don't want the program to go ahead.
15:38 You don't...
15:40 Mr. Chaudhary, let's move the program forward.
15:42 Let's go to Haider.
15:44 I wanted to say something.
15:46 I wanted to say something.
15:47 Let's not talk about moral authority.
15:49 Let's not talk about the law.
15:51 Let's not talk about a certain community.
15:53 Let's not talk about a certain person.
15:55 Let's talk about a small thing.
15:56 The whole of Pakistan is listening right now.
15:58 Let's talk about a small thing.
16:00 Should all people have equal rights?
16:04 Should all people have equal rights?
16:06 Should all citizens of Pakistan have equal rights?
16:09 If they should, then those rights should be given to all people.
16:15 Just like judges have rights, so do the people.
16:18 Yesterday, a person was brought to the court.
16:21 So, how many prisoners have requested today that they have equal rights as citizens of Pakistan?
16:27 So, giving them equal rights is their responsibility.
16:34 If they keep taking rights for themselves and the people don't get anything, then this is not justice.
16:42 But Haider, one right is what the poor get and one right is what the rich get.
16:49 You know, not one, but two Pakistans, not two, but one Pakistan.
16:53 There is that situation.
16:55 That is the ground reality and we cannot deny that.
16:58 The thing is that whoever doesn't get the right, no matter how rich he is, he says he is poor.
17:03 The thing is that it is very important for our court to see that Pakistan's...
17:10 This is the responsibility of the court.
17:12 You are talking about the constitution, right?
17:14 We just talked about the constitution.
17:16 You are talking about the constitution.
17:18 It is written in the constitution that it is the responsibility of the court that every citizen of Pakistan has equal rights.
17:21 Under the constitution, no matter what the case may be.
17:24 So, we can say that the rich and poor are right.
17:28 We have to see that our different circles, whether they are in Aglia or somewhere else,
17:33 that these poor people who are in so many, if one day they come out on the streets and their houses reach your house,
17:41 then where will you go?
17:42 So, it is better that you do justice before this time comes.
17:45 Let's go.
17:46 Okay, let's go.
17:47 Look, a small...
17:48 Quickly, I have to go to the break.
17:50 Look, Islam is called Musawwat and our country's name is Islamic Republic of Pakistan.
17:55 The mirror of Pakistan is made on Islamic teachings and the Holy Quran.
18:00 And the Holy Quran also says that equality is important.
18:03 So, the point is that the principle should be one.
18:05 If a prisoner has all the special facilities,
18:09 you tell me, which one prisoner of Pakistan has got a treadmill,
18:14 has got a dumbbell, has got this facility, has got a local chicken,
18:18 basically, and has got mutton,
18:20 then these things are not available, right?
18:22 He can talk to his children overseas.
18:25 If these facilities are not available, then all those prisoners,
18:28 they also expressed their concern that they should also be provided with those facilities.
18:32 So, will the government or this court provide these facilities to all those prisoners?
18:37 Mr. Chaudhary, I have to go to the break, but I cannot go without your answer.
18:42 You would like to respond to this discussion that everyone should get equal rights,
18:47 one should get full VIP treatment and not everyone else.
18:51 Does this comparison make sense to you?
18:54 What sense does it make?
18:57 The leaders of this country should also be gathered there.
19:02 They have been eating the keema naan in the services of the government.
19:05 Whose words are they talking about?
19:07 Sir, we don't have any leader.
19:09 I said leave him and move ahead.
19:11 They have said, Mr. Chaudhary, that they don't have any leader.
19:16 We are all journalists sitting here, we don't have any leader.
19:19 You are our leader, sir.
19:21 Yes, Hassan.
19:22 The day I meet Mr. Chaudhary in person, I will say, sir, good to see you.
19:27 I am listening to the issue of prisoners, because I am in this program today.
19:33 I heard that someone has a prisoner, Hassan?
19:35 Mr. Khawer Ghoman says that he has a prisoner, he says his name.
19:39 Mr. Chaudhary also says that he does not have a prisoner.
19:41 Mr. Nawaz Sharif says that he has a prisoner.
19:44 He adds my name, I say that I don't have a prisoner.
19:47 So my prisoners are our leaders.
19:50 Our leaders are Mr. Chaudhary Ghulam Hussain.
19:52 Whenever he sits in our transition, he has the power to veto.
19:56 Mr. Chaudhary, you have also withdrawn this matter.
19:59 Mr. Kashi Babashi also gives up.
20:01 You have been made a leader by consensus.
20:03 So with this consensus, sometimes there is consensus on this program.
20:07 I resign as a leader.
20:09 You declined as a leader?
20:11 I have...
20:12 Resigned?
20:13 You have not even given you the permission, you have resigned earlier.
20:17 I don't want to.
20:20 He is taking it.
20:21 Okay, fine.
20:22 Whether you agree or not, you are our leader.
20:25 No, brother, it is your grace.
20:27 May God keep you happy.
20:29 Okay, Mr. Chaudhary, we are talking about the judges, so we have to talk about the judges' decision.
20:32 I have to go to the break.
20:33 We will come back after the break and we will continue the program.
20:35 Welcome back after the break.
20:41 We are talking about the judges.
20:43 We are talking about the contempt of court.
20:46 If there is a court, there will be judges.
20:49 Then there will be contempt of court.
20:51 I am talking about the judges' decision.
20:53 Generally, it is said that the story is short.
20:55 This story is not short, this story is long.
20:57 Because judges have been waiting for a long time that the judges' decision will be made.
21:01 But this is not happening in Punjab.
21:03 Now let me put it in front of you, what is the situation?
21:05 The hearing on 16th.
21:07 The court is a special court in which there is a court of contempt of court.
21:14 It is a very important court, especially at this time.
21:17 Where there is a wave of new terrorism in Pakistan.
21:20 Where things are happening fast.
21:22 What is happening there?
21:23 From tomorrow's hearing, you will realize what the court is feeling.
21:28 A difference of opinion on the way.
21:33 Or call it a tug of war.
21:35 That is going on at this time.
21:37 Chief Justice Lahore High Court, Justice Malik Shahzad Ahmed Khan, heard yesterday.
21:41 Advocate General, you should not be a party.
21:44 Why are you afraid to talk openly in court?
21:47 Chief Justice's AG Punjab, Khalid Ishaq, has a court record.
21:53 You assured that judges' decisions will be made soon.
21:57 Chief Justice said this.
21:59 And despite writing dozens of letters, there are no decisions.
22:03 Your style of action is clearly a court of contempt.
22:07 Here too, the court of contempt has come.
22:09 Chief Justice Malik Shahzad Ahmed Khan's advocate general, Punjab.
22:12 Expressing anger, anger, anger.
22:15 The law officers present in the court have a big responsibility.
22:20 Basically, Chief Justice Shahzad Malik said.
22:23 You changed the statement again and again.
22:26 First assured that judges will be appointed.
22:29 Now you are saying that the judges are for consultation.
22:32 People have been in jail since 2015.
22:35 And judges are not being appointed.
22:37 Chief Justice said this to AG.
22:39 Registered Lahore High Court,
22:41 Registered Lahore High Court sent a request again and again.
22:44 But it was not appointed.
22:46 Is this not a cause of delay in justice?
22:50 If the system has to run like this, then amend it once and finish everything.
22:56 Chief Justice Lahore High Court said this.
22:59 And Justice Malik Shahzad's AG, Punjab, Khalid Ishaq.
23:03 The conversation that has been going on,
23:05 Lahore High Court has requested the committee to appoint judges.
23:11 And on further delay, the Prime Minister had to be called.
23:16 So he will be called.
23:18 Then what happened today?
23:19 Listen to today's story.
23:20 This was yesterday's story.
23:21 Today's story is in front of you.
23:22 Chief Justice Lahore High Court has concluded.
23:24 Everything is written clearly in the law.
23:27 There is no confusion.
23:28 I have given you names.
23:30 Appoint them.
23:31 Chief Justice said this to the Minister of Justice.
23:34 Minister of Justice, you have come from outside.
23:37 Tell me, what will happen other than what is written in the law and constitution?
23:42 This is the discussion that is taking place.
23:44 And what is there other than this?
23:46 Basically, if in the past it was wrong, then it should be corrected.
23:51 Chief Justice said this too.
23:52 You will also benefit from being a good judge.
23:54 Set new examples instead of going on the old way.
23:58 The cases that have passed 14 years, are coming while watching the same spectacle.
24:03 You are not ours, but have mercy on yourself and everyone.
24:07 Chief Justice said this.
24:09 It is decided that you will not cooperate with the court.
24:12 If this attitude remains, then the court will give its decision.
24:15 Chief Justice said this to the Minister of Justice.
24:18 The court is being forced to be strict for no reason.
24:21 It will also have to be written in the decision that the government is not fulfilling its legal responsibility.
24:26 Judges will not be able to make decisions without permission.
24:29 And the accused are locked up in the jails.
24:31 At this time, this remark came.
24:33 The court gave a chance to the judges to decide on the request of the Punjab Law Committee.
24:39 Now, not to talk in a verbal way, but to take practical steps.
24:43 The court has approved the case on 20th May.
24:50 Now, there is another issue here.
24:53 The issue of judges' decision-making is being raised.
24:56 We have with us Abid Khan, a representative of ARY News.
25:00 Abid Khan, tell us why the government is not taking a decision at this time?
25:08 What is the reason for the fight and the dispute?
25:12 Why do you want to hold a meeting in secret?
25:15 Why are you not talking in front of the court?
25:17 Basically, the issue is that there is a lack of judges from 2nd to 9th of January.
25:25 In terrorism courts, as you said, the issue is terrorism in Pakistan.
25:31 And for the justice of the terrorist incidents in Pakistan, the courts should be fully active.
25:39 But here too, there is a lack of judges.
25:42 Now, the court has sent a request to the government to name the judges.
25:47 The government has asked for the names of the judges.
25:52 But after that, the court has not decided.
25:55 Now, it seems that the government is scared.
25:58 Maybe they want to appoint judges as soon as possible.
26:02 In this regard, the judges of the Lahore court also gave a remark.
26:06 They said that they want to hold a meeting to bring their favorite people.
26:12 Last week, we saw Khalid Asad, who is the advocate of General Punjab.
26:16 And today, there was a request from Maryam Aurangzeb to give an in-camera briefing.
26:21 Meet them in the chamber and listen to them.
26:24 But the Lahore court has completely refused.
26:27 And their open court, whatever happened, it is not an open court.
26:31 What was the demand that was to be in-camera, which could not be done in person?
26:37 Did the government want something?
26:40 Is the government trying to change the way judges are appointed?
26:43 Are you listening to the panel?
26:45 Is there something else in the law?
26:47 What is going on?
26:49 The government, as the advocate general and Maryam Aurangzeb said,
26:55 repeatedly requested that they meet in the chamber.
26:58 So, there are certainly some things that the Chief Justice of the Lahore court wants to tell.
27:04 As far as the panel is concerned, Khalid Asad said,
27:08 today the Minister of Justice also said that the panel should be given.
27:11 So, the Chief Justice of the Lahore court said that the names that I had to give,
27:14 it is not written in the law that the Chief Justice will give the panel
27:18 and the names will be taken out from the panel and they will be appointed.
27:22 In the case of the briefing, the meeting in the chamber,
27:26 and if all the matters are heard from them,
27:29 the Chief Justice said that when did the Minister express that she wants to present
27:33 and wants to inform the court on this whole matter.
27:37 The Chief Justice has said that you are sitting in the open court.
27:39 Whatever we have to say in the open court, do it in front of everyone.
27:42 This is merit and this is the transparency.
27:44 And we have to listen to the talks in the open court.
27:46 So, even today we are seeing that they tried to talk in the chamber.
27:50 And they are not allowed to speak in the open court.
27:52 Right, right.
27:53 Mr. Abhishek, thank you very much.
27:54 You have told us the complete details.
27:56 Mr. Chaudhary, you are sitting in Lahore.
27:58 Let's start with you.
27:59 There are so many cases in one place and the cases are delayed in the appointments.
28:04 Our judiciary is sitting on the 139th position in the entire international ranking
28:09 and the judges are not being appointed here.
28:11 Why?
28:12 Why?
28:13 I mean, at one place, the court is being accused.
28:15 At the other place, where the requirement of judges is there,
28:17 that is not being fulfilled.
28:19 Now, the Chief Justice of Lahore High Court,
28:22 in his own opinion, from his own branch of the registrar,
28:25 from his own judges, the advice of his administrative committee,
28:29 he gives that this will be of the anti-terrorism court,
28:33 this will be of the accountability court,
28:36 this will be of this court.
28:38 He says that when we have given the names of our suitable people,
28:43 then there is no reason for your administration to sit on this.
28:47 This is his, what you have told and what I have heard, this is his position.
28:52 I think the administration should avoid this kind of debate.
28:58 This is delaying their justice.
29:02 And secondly, pick and choose is not a healthy sign in the judges.
29:08 Interesting.
29:09 Interesting.
29:10 But why are they asking for a panel, Hassan?
29:12 Asking for a panel means that they are talking about pick and choose,
29:16 Mr. Chaudhary, that pick and choose should not be done.
29:18 Whatever has been said, that is what is applied.
29:20 It has been like this for a long time.
29:22 Whether it is right or not, that is a separate debate.
29:24 But asking for a panel, choosing from that, of the government, is it right?
29:28 Actually, this practice has been going on since the past.
29:31 It has been more than 10 years and this practice has been kept.
29:36 And the governments are always appointing judges of their own choice.
29:42 But for the first time, the Chief Justice, Malik Shahzad Ahmed Khan,
29:46 has taken a good stand and I will support him in this.
29:50 Okay, why?
29:51 Because he is the opponent in the special courts.
29:53 Is it a good thing to choose from the judges?
29:55 See, he spoke very fairly.
29:57 He said that those who have given names, should be appointed.
30:01 And if you do not want to do it, if you do not like this practice,
30:05 then change the law.
30:07 But the way is, what does the law say at this time?
30:10 The law says that there is no scope for the government's advice in this.
30:17 So if the government wants its advice or consent, then change the law.
30:24 So the law that is present, they have no role in it.
30:26 So the government does not know this?
30:27 No, they know it completely.
30:29 Then why are they making such demands?
30:31 So, the meeting that was supposed to be held in the chamber,
30:35 what was the matter?
30:37 In this, apart from the anti-terrorist court,
30:39 you can say that there will be anti-corruption, banking courts, etc.
30:44 So, among all these, there are some random people who have gone,
30:47 on whom you have an objection.
30:49 Supposedly, if there are 50 courts, then if you have an objection on 5 of them,
30:53 then at least give the rest of the judges.
30:55 I have less time.
30:56 So, today they have a fair talk, I would like to talk last.
30:58 Even now, in the presence of Mariam Nawaz,
31:01 a meeting is going on on this matter.
31:04 In which the law ministers, who are temporarily made law ministers,
31:09 they are not permanent law ministers, they are also present.
31:11 And in that, your Advocate General Punjab, Khalid-e-Ishaq, is also present.
31:16 So, Bharat is also there, and I believe Mariam Aurangzeb is also sitting there.
31:19 Okay, Mr. Haider, Judge Tayanati,
31:21 Judge Tayanati comes later,
31:23 first, the Minister of Law, Tayanati,
31:25 whom we are looking forward to,
31:27 work was going on temporarily,
31:28 the government also did not work temporarily, so what will we do?
31:31 But the government, the law,
31:33 it is necessary and obligatory to know,
31:35 because they sit in the Parliament.
31:36 There is a legislation in the Parliament,
31:38 that is, the people who are in the government and opposition have to make laws.
31:42 And then, if someone talks away from the law,
31:44 then this strange logic, do you understand?
31:47 Look, Anika, neither you, nor I, nor Mr. Hassan Ayyub,
31:51 nor Mr. Chaudhary Ghulam Hussain,
31:53 have to decide who will be the judge,
31:55 who will be in which office,
31:57 who understands what, and who does not.
31:59 The thing is that the 50% issues in Pakistan,
32:03 are arising because of the news of the courts.
32:06 So, from 2007 to today, it has been 17 years,
32:09 That is a long debate, isn't it?
32:11 Let me answer what I wanted to say.
32:14 I want to bring it to you, Mr. Tayanati,
32:16 I have very little time, actually.
32:18 What should you talk about, Mr. Tayanati?
32:20 I am directly asking you,
32:22 does the government know what the law is?
32:24 Change the law, if they have made it in a different way.
32:27 If you take a government official,
32:28 he will tell you what the law is, how would we know?
32:30 Whether they know or not.
32:32 How would we know whether they know or not?
32:34 If you take a government official, he will tell you.
32:36 Wait a minute, Haider, is this even a question?
32:38 Whether the government official knows or not?
32:40 They are sitting on the chairs, they don't know.
32:42 They should know, that's why you said whether they know or not,
32:44 so I said they can tell whether they know or not.
32:46 Mr. Pujyaji is telling.
32:48 I just wanted to say,
32:50 I respect the video, I just wanted to say,
32:52 that the cases of these judges,
32:54 have taken our nation in a very bad way.
32:56 In their cases,
32:58 it is very difficult to get the nation out of it.
33:00 Yes.
33:02 Thank you very much.
33:04 We will go to the third topic after the break.
33:07 Whether the government knows or not.
33:09 Many people don't know,
33:11 that the government is sitting on a chair,
33:13 where they should know what the law is.
33:15 They have to make the law, if they don't know the law,
33:17 we will go to the break,
33:19 and then we will go forward to our third and last story.
33:21 Welcome back after the break.
33:27 In the political arena,
33:29 Maulana Fazlur Rahman's speech,
33:31 is being heard very loudly.
33:33 He has started talking very harshly.
33:35 At one place, obviously he is not meeting with the PTI,
33:37 but at the other place,
33:39 he is being heard talking against the government.
33:41 He has given a statement.
33:43 After that statement,
33:45 many questions are being raised.
33:47 We will talk about those questions,
33:49 but first, listen to the statement.
33:51 There is only one Jamaat,
33:53 which is talking about one thing.
33:55 In the 2018 elections,
33:57 we said that we have given a statement.
33:59 It is not that,
34:01 Noon League has become my friend,
34:03 People Party has become my friend,
34:05 we have started a movement together.
34:07 If their government comes,
34:09 then I will be quiet.
34:11 If a statement has been given here,
34:13 then we will have to make sacrifices.
34:15 Whether we have to go to jail,
34:17 or to the grave,
34:19 we will have to make sacrifices.
34:21 Mr. Chaudhary,
34:23 we have to be quiet and make sacrifices.
34:25 He has also talked about 2018,
34:27 and also about the present.
34:29 He is saying that,
34:31 whether PTI won,
34:33 or this government won,
34:35 we are raising the voice of Dhandli.
34:37 Against what?
34:39 Nowadays,
34:41 there are many people
34:43 who have become like this.
34:45 This happened in 1947 also.
34:47 This happened in 1958 also.
34:49 Leave it.
34:51 Talk about today.
34:53 This is about 8th February yesterday.
34:55 Elections have been held.
34:57 Results of that have been made.
34:59 If Dhandli has won,
35:01 then we will have to do something.
35:03 If not, then let them go.
35:05 And this is a pending matter in the courts.
35:07 And whatever it is,
35:09 the tribunal will decide.
35:11 Then, whatever is there,
35:13 the thing is that,
35:15 what Fazl-ur-Rehman is saying,
35:17 he is saying that,
35:19 if I was against Dhandli in 2018,
35:21 then how can I be in his favour today?
35:23 This is what I have understood.
35:25 And he has said something harsh.
35:27 That we are ready for
35:29 all types of sacrifices.
35:31 And the PTI,
35:33 the amount of allowance
35:35 that they had to give, they have given.
35:37 Okay.
35:39 Obviously, one thing is very clear.
35:41 They have given the PTI the allowance.
35:43 But on the other hand, if they are doing it,
35:45 they were doing it earlier also,
35:47 in 30 seconds,
35:49 you are the next Julaimal of Maulana.
35:51 In which he is saying that,
35:53 sacrifices had to be made.
35:55 So, it is very difficult to make sacrifices.
35:57 How do you see this?
35:59 Maulana is the most powerful politician of Pakistan.
36:01 Now, his purpose and objective is
36:03 to put Pakistan's justice behind him.
36:05 And although, in terms of numbers,
36:07 PTI is in a very big position
36:09 compared to them.
36:11 But despite this, Maulana will lead.
36:13 And that will become the strength of PTI Maulana.
36:15 And later, in politics, you know that
36:17 nothing is the last thing.
36:19 So, wait and see.
36:21 I think, politics has just started.
36:23 Now, politics has started,
36:25 so where will it end, Haider?
36:27 No, brother Ahsan has said the right thing.
36:29 Look, if a strong-minded politician like Maulana Fazlur Rahman
36:31 is the opposition leader of Pakistan,
36:33 then this is a very good thing for Pakistan.
36:35 He should become the front-line leader
36:37 of Pakistan's central opposition.
36:39 Look.
36:41 Right. Haider, thank you very much.
36:43 Ahsan, thank you very much for joining us.
36:45 And Mr. Chaudhary, thank you very much.
36:47 With this, we will move towards the end of the program.
36:49 As Ahsan has said,
36:51 now, the issues have just started.
36:53 Where will it end? The real question now is
36:55 that if the end is towards positivity
36:57 and towards political optimism,
36:59 which automatically leads to
37:01 economic stability,
37:03 then it is fine.
37:05 Otherwise, then obviously,
37:07 it will remain a state of confusion.
37:09 I will take your leave now. Take care of yourself.
37:11 Allah Hafiz.

Recommended