Comentaritas analisam gol anulado do Botafogo contra o Atlético

No Ataque

Durante o programa Alterosa Esporte desta terça-feira (19/09), Nadine Bastos e Fael Lima analisaram o polêmico lance que gerou muita reclamação por parte dos dirigentes e jogadores do Botafogo. Para Nadine, o gol foi bem anulado e a arbitragem acertou no lance.   Leia mais: https://noataque.com.br/futebol/brasileirao-serie-a/time/atletico-mg/noticia/2023/09/17/impedimento-comentaristas-analisam-gol-de-diego-costa-em-atletico-x-botafogo/  A vitória do Atlético sobre o Botafogo por 1 a 0 no sábado (16/9), na Arena MRV, pela 23ª rodada do Brasileiro, rendeu uma grande polêmica nas redes sociais: Diego Costa empatou o jogo aos 43 do segundo tempo, mas a arbitragem anulou o gol do líder da Série A. Veja abaixo a opinião de três comentaristas de arbitragem.  Em posição irregular, o atacante, que passou pelo Galo em 2021, finalizou e marcou o gol de empate. A discussão pela anulação correta ou não do gol se deu pelo movimento de Maurício Lemos, que poderia ter gerado um novo lance, o que não configuraria em impedimento de Diego Costa.  Porém, mesmo com os inúmeros debates nas redes sociais, os comentaristas de arbitragem foram unânimes em relação à marcação do impedimento. Para Paulo César de Oliveira, Nadine Bastos e Carlos Eugênio Simon, o gol de Diego Costa foi bem anulado.  Acesse o site: https://noataque.com.br / https://uai.com.br  SE INSCREVA EM NOSSO CANAL NO YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/@PortalUai  Siga o Portal UAI nas redes sociais:  Instagram - https://instagram.com/estadodeminas/  Twitter -  https://twitter.com/em_com/ Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/EstadodeMinas /  #Atlético #Botafogo #DiegoCosta

Transcript

00:00 Let's talk about it.

00:02 We have Fael and Nadine commenting on the match.

00:06 It's clear that Diego Costa is in the position of impediment.

00:11 There are differences in relation to the interference of the opponent and to gain advantage in the position.

00:19 In this case, the impediment was marked by gaining advantage in the position.

00:23 It would be a player who is clearly in the position of impediment.

00:27 He returns and participates in the play.

00:30 Mauricio Lemos, when he tries to dispute this ball,

00:33 remembering that there was a recent change in the game rule,

00:36 to be considered a free pass, he needs to have total control.

00:40 Nadine's audio.

00:46 Just a minute.

00:48 So, Fael, Nadine, we are reestablishing the connection with her.

00:53 What did you think of this until she returned, Fael?

00:56 What I always say is that when Diego Costa leaves the position of impediment and comes,

01:02 I think it interferes with Lemos' behavior in the play.

01:07 I think that the fact that Diego Costa is there passing the ball at the moment,

01:12 it interferes with the play because Lemos doesn't know if he will share the ball with him or not.

01:16 So I think that the impediment is very clear in this regard.

01:19 About Abate...

01:20 Nadine is back, just to put her in the conversation.

01:23 In the Fluminense match, Abate managed to disintegrate both teams,

01:26 he kicked out Diniz, his performance in the Fluminense match was very bad.

01:31 I think he is very similar, he wants to be more like the players,

01:35 he does a lot of caricature, a lot of face.

01:37 And just to finish, there was a move, not specifically very similar,

01:41 but between Athletic and Bragantino in 2022...

01:43 Let Nadine comment on this move, Silgão, so we can make the analogies.

01:48 Nadine, just to finish this move, we couldn't hear you 100%.

01:54 Diego Costa's position is clearly impeded.

01:59 Remembering that there is a difference in the infraction of impediment

02:03 by interference in the opponent and infraction of impediment

02:05 by gaining the advantage of the position, which was the case.

02:07 When the player is in a clear position of impediment, he is returning,

02:11 Mauricio Lemos tries to dispute the ball,

02:13 but there was also a change in the recent rule in relation to the play,

02:17 the deliberate play and the deviation.

02:19 In this case, it is considered a deviation because he has no total control of his movements,

02:22 he has more players close, he has no time and reaction to do anything else,

02:26 let's say, unlike that Richard Hughes move,

02:29 where he was alone and had time and reaction to dominate the ball.

02:33 Here, in Mauricio Lemos' case, he jumps, he tries to dispute the ball,

02:36 but this is considered a deviation with the change in the rule and as a surplus.

02:40 The ball that Diego Costa has left,

02:43 which would be gaining the advantage of the position of impediment,

02:46 is considered an infraction.

02:48 I saw so many complaints, and I said, "But this is such a clear move,

02:54 that's why these complaints about arbitration,

02:57 it seems that the assistants tried to explain to the people of Botafogo

03:01 the concept of the rule of the game,

03:03 but by the rule, the move was really well canceled.

03:07 I started a course of arbitration once, Nadine,

03:10 I didn't have a hair to finish,

03:12 but there was a speech of the referee, who was very interesting,

03:15 he said, "The player leaves figure A to figure B."

03:19 And I'm going to put a situation here, which was an Atlético and Bragantino,

03:22 which was a play more or less similar,

03:24 in which Faial at the time said, and it had been the goal of Atlético,

03:27 and Faial said, "I'm disputing because of this."

03:29 And I said, "No, but the player of Atlético takes advantage."

03:32 And the player of Bragantino intercepts the ball,

03:34 he has no total control of the ball.

03:36 So this interception is not considered a pass,

03:39 because the guy has no control.

03:40 I'm not defending Atlético here,

03:42 I'm talking about the value of the rule, what the rule really says.

03:45 So in this situation, at the time that Faial criticized,

03:47 and said, "Look, I think it was Theo Vargas in the situation,

03:50 Vargas's goal had to be validated."

03:52 And I said, "No, it didn't, because it was figure A to figure B,

03:55 and the player of Bragantino doesn't dominate the ball,

03:58 he intercepts to cut, because if the defender heads the ball,

04:01 if he tries to cut the ball and there's always a stop,

04:03 it's considered a pass, and then all the interception ends up being valid."

04:07 But, Isabel Guimarães, sometimes I receive different requests here,

04:11 last week from the Colombian people regarding Daronco,

04:14 and today, although I don't like any team from Rio Grande do Sul,

04:17 my biggest complaint here is with Mr. Emerson de Almeida Ferreira

04:20 for what he did yesterday.

04:21 Feels good.

04:21 (bell dings)

Category

Transcript

Recommended