Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • 2 days ago
At today's Senate Finance Committee hearing, Sen. Mike Crapo (R-ID) questioned U.S. Trade Rep. Jamieson Greer about President Trump's tariffs.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00Thank you, Ambassador. Yesterday, Secretary Besant stated that you and he
00:05both will lead trade negotiations with Japan. I'm very pleased that President
00:11Trump has decided to press for market access in this case. I hope we'll see
00:17more negotiations that press for zero-to-zero barriers, but could you
00:20explain a little bit what is the scope of these negotiations?
00:25Certainly. Thank you, Chairman. So, as you know, yesterday the President directed
00:30Secretary Besant and myself to interact with the Japanese. We've already been
00:34having several conversations with them over past weeks, so this is not a new
00:38development, but we are taking it to a new level. Obviously, we want to have more
00:42market access in Japan. For us, we feel like we could have more and better
00:46agricultural market access. There are also structural impediments to some of our
00:50industrial goods in terms of standards and regulations and that kind of thing. I
00:54also think that there are things we can do with our trading partners, things
00:58that aren't always purely in the trade sector with respect to economic
01:01security, whether it's export controls alignment or investment screening
01:04alignment or energy, making sure that our partners are tied up with us with
01:09respect to liquefied natural gas and other resources, as opposed to being
01:14dependent on other countries that may not be as friendly. And so, I think all of
01:18these factors will go into these discussions with Japan in the coming
01:21weeks. Well, thank you. And as you indicated in your testimony, you've been
01:25approached, the administration, or you have been approached by about 50 other
01:30countries already. I assume that the objective in these approaches, and I assume
01:38that there will be discussions and negotiations with them, but first, could you
01:41verify that? Is the objective here to engage in market access negotiations with
01:48these countries? Chairman, as these countries approach us, the idea is that
01:54we've had years and years of non-reciprocal access, and it's
01:57contributed to these trade deficits. As the countries come to approach us, what
02:01we've told them is, if you have a better idea to achieve reciprocity and to
02:06get our trade deficit down, we want to talk to you. We want to negotiate with you. And
02:11it goes both ways. Sometimes they have exports to us that are driven by
02:14subsidies and unfair trading practices. And then, obviously, they have non-reciprocal
02:19treatment on their end, where they block our exports, sometimes through
02:22prohibitive tariffs, quotas that are not administered in the appropriate way, or
02:26other unfair trading practices. So these are the kinds of things that should be
02:29targeted. And I don't want to prejudge the negotiations, but if they're able to
02:33provide an alternative plan that can further these objectives, I think we're open to
02:37that. Well, thank you. The America First Trade Policy Memorandum rightly tasked the USTR to
02:44review China's compliance with the Phase One Agreement. Under the agreement, China is
02:50obligated to purchase more U.S. goods and change basic practices and laws, the
02:56so-called structural commitments. The prior administration refused to discuss
03:01whether China complied with its structural commitments. And, by the way, these were
03:04commitments made in response to tariffs in President Trump's first presidency, correct?
03:09That's right. What is your analysis of China's compliance with the
03:14structural commitments that it made in Phase One so far? Our assessment, Chairman,
03:19is that in the initial stages of implementing the agreement, China made
03:23significant movement to make these structural changes, whether it was with
03:26respect to agricultural rules, financial services, or IP. We found during the
03:31Biden administration there was little enforcement and little communication, and
03:35that the Chinese did not comply with this agreement in large part. I've had a
03:41call with my counterpart. I've communicated to him our feeling on this, that they have
03:44not complied with the agreement, and I think we're disappointed by this. It's not
03:49surprising, but we are certainly disappointed by that. And now you're
03:53engaged to, again, see if we can get compliance. We will see, right? The
04:00Chinese obviously have agency in this. It's not just a matter of U.S. policy. We,
04:05of course, welcome and we hope that foreign countries will change their
04:08practices to make sure that they're fair, and we look forward to continue to
04:12monitor that situation. Thank you. The administration has announced it's
04:17negotiating an agreement also with India, and it appears already to be yielding
04:22results, such as India dropping its digital services tax. Although India has
04:28high tariffs, its non-tariff barriers are just as significant, if not more so. Will
04:35you try to include commitments on matters such as intellectual property,
04:38technical barriers to trade, and science-based agricultural rules to take
04:42on those barriers? Yes, and I have a standing call with my Indian counterpart to
04:47address these very issues. All right, thank you. Senator Wyden. Thank you.
04:52Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. I saw

Recommended