Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • 4/9/2025
During Tuesday’s House Administration Committee hearing, Rep Terri Sewell (D-AL) questioned Alabama Secretary of State Wes Allen about efforts to purge voters.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Thank you, Madam Chair. I'd like to welcome to the nation's capital my
00:04Secretary of State, Wes Allen. Sir, you mentioned in your testimony that the
00:09foundation of election integrity is voter maintenance and I know that you
00:15mentioned that you withdrew Alabama from the ERIC organization and replaced it
00:21with AVID, a vote Alabama voter integrity database to partner with state
00:29agencies to identify individuals to purge from the rolls. Last year, you led an
00:34effort to clean the rolls in Alabama by directing the Department, the Board of
00:38Registrar, to remove registered voters that were, quote, non-citizen identification
00:43number, end quote, by the Department of Homeland Security. Shortly after
00:49implementing this purge, a group of civil rights organizations challenged Sir, your
00:53voter purging program in court. And do you know, sir, what percentage of voters that
01:01you purge were actually U.S. citizens and should be eligible to vote versus not being
01:06eligible? Well, we're extremely proud that, I'm extremely proud of my staff who work
01:10to implement this program and I will say that... Sir, it was 93%, 93.8% of the 3,251
01:20voters that were purged from the rolls were actually U.S. citizens and should have
01:25been eligible to vote. Federal courts have acknowledged that relying solely on
01:30databases like the State Department of Homeland Security, state DMV databases, and
01:36the federal systemic alien verification for entitlement database can, quote, have a
01:42very high rate of inaccuracy. How will you ensure, sir, first of all, is the programs, the
01:49voter purge program still ongoing and how do you ensure that you're actually
01:53capturing voters that should be ineligible? Well, I will say that our
01:59staff is working extremely hard to make sure the voter file maintenance is top of
02:02mind each and every day when we come into the office and we will continue to
02:06make sure that only United States citizens are on Alabama voter files. Yeah, you
02:10know, that's the law that only American citizens can vote. How much did it cost to
02:17defend that program in court? Do you know? I don't have that number. All I can say is
02:23that Alabama taxpayers shouldn't be paying for a program that has shown such
02:27a high rate of inaccuracy and while I totally understand the importance of
02:32making sure that every person who is on the voter roll is eligible, I think that
02:37there are better ways to do that than voter purging. Mr. Allen, Secretary Allen, you
02:43also mentioned in your written testimony that the state banned ballot harvesting
02:47last year. The state legislature passed an initiative that would criminalize
02:52people for assisting others with their absentee ballots. For example, if someone
02:56pays their family member to actually take their ballot, to deliver their ballot, that
03:01person would be, that assistance would be criminally charged and I'm not sure if that
03:08was the intent, but I can tell you that several of my constituents called me in fear of voting
03:14absentee because they were afraid of being, it being rejected for simple reasons like, you
03:20know, not being able to provide the ballot themselves but actually having a family member
03:24deliver it. Can you give us assurances that we in Alabama can actually, you know, have,
03:31make it easier for voters to access the ballot box? I mean, we're one of three states that
03:36don't have early voting, so I think it's really important that we get it right.
03:39Yes, ma'am. The right to vote is sacred and what that bill did was to protect
03:44absentee voting. Paid political activists should not be involved in manipulating the
03:50absentee process. I hear what you're saying, but these are family members who are
03:54trying to help their elderly parents actually vote and they shouldn't be in
03:58fear of, you know, of actually turning in a ballot if they have to borrow money from
04:04their mother to actually get to the, get to the post office or to get to the, to, to
04:11the agency, to the voting registration. There's no, no need to fear. You know, we
04:15mimic federal law. If anybody's disabled, they can have anybody that they choose to
04:19help them with the application. It doesn't pertain to the ballots themselves. It's
04:23already illegal in Alabama for anyone to return a ballot for anyone else. SB 1
04:28specifically talked about the application portion of the absentee ballot process and
04:33it did that. It protected the absentee process. I think that both of us, given
04:37the great history, the amazing history that occurred in our state, we really owe
04:41it to every Alabamian to make sure that not only are they eligible to vote, they
04:45have access to the ballot box. Having said that, Secretary Thomas, I note that you
04:51all passed a voter, a state-level voting rights act in 2023. I know I'm about to run
04:58out of time. I wanted to ask if she could just answer one question with respect to
05:02that. Sure. Can you talk just a little bit about this initiative and how it will
05:07make it easier for folks to vote, your new law? Sure. So the Connecticut Voting Rights
05:13Act passed last session to codify some of the elements of the National Voter Rights
05:20Act, such as free clearance, making sure that materials related to voting were provided in
05:30languages and communities that were majority in certain languages. It also
05:36provides a great transparency for members of the public. They can access statistics
05:43and data about voting in their communities via GIS system. So in Connecticut, anyway, it
05:53passed handily and many... And implemented in 2024 election? Not the Voting Rights Act, other
06:02than the language access, but we did implement early voting in 2024. Thank you, Madam Chair, for
06:09indulging me. I also would ask unanimous consent to submit several articles to the
06:15record. Without objection, so ordered.

Recommended