SC nullifies previous verdict regarding Article 63A of Constitution | Waseem Badami's Report
#supremecourt #article63a #pti #pmlngovt #breakingnews #constitutionalamendment
SC nullifies previous verdict regarding Article 63A of Constitution | Waseem Badami's Report
SC nullifies previous verdict regarding Article 63A of Constitution | Waseem Badami's Report
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00In the name of Allah, the most Gracious, the most Merciful.
00:01Peace be upon you.
00:02Today, a very important decision has come from the Supreme Court of Pakistan, which
00:05will certainly have an impact on the politics of Pakistan.
00:08It is possible that the effects of this decision will be seen in the near future.
00:12This decision has given rise to a debate.
00:14We will talk about this.
00:16The various questions that are arising as a result of this decision.
00:19Someone says, Sir, what was the hurry in making this decision?
00:22If you had made it a few days later, then this would not have happened.
00:25Who knows, the government might benefit from using this decision.
00:27So, it was said from the front that, Brother, hurry?
00:29It has been going on for two years.
00:31Where is 2022?
00:32Where is 2024?
00:33The decision had come then.
00:34The debate is taking place now.
00:35So, what is the hurry?
00:36How much longer will it take?
00:37There are many more things.
00:38The second thing, when we are talking to you, the Pakistan Delegation has announced
00:41a protest on D-Chowk on October 4th.
00:43Khan Sahib has told Ali Ibn Ghandapur Sahib that you have to definitely reach.
00:46And there have been press conferences of the highest level that this should not be done.
00:49International activities are going on in Islamabad.
00:51The Shingai Coordination Organization has to be declared.
00:53The head of the country has to come.
00:55The head of Malaysia has come.
00:57There are still news that the PTA is being communicated that it should not be done for you.
01:00To what extent will the protest be held?
01:02If it will not happen, then what will happen?
01:04If it will not happen, then what will happen?
01:05We will talk about this in the second part of the program.
01:07First of all, you see this.
01:08This was the case of Article 63A.
01:10We have already told you its background yesterday.
01:12It is a shikh of the Mirror of Pakistan.
01:14According to which, if a member crosses the floor,
01:18votes against the policy of his party,
01:21then that member washes his hands of his party.
01:25But the Supreme Court of Pakistan gave this decision about two years ago.
01:28No, sir.
01:29He will wash his hands of his party.
01:31His vote will also not be counted.
01:33When this decision came at that time,
01:35that decision immediately had a political effect.
01:37Just like a decision has come today,
01:39and it is not surprising that this decision has a political effect immediately.
01:41At that time, a decision had come,
01:43which had a political effect.
01:45Hamza Shahbaz Sahib, the Prime Minister of Punjab, had been elected.
01:48With the help of a few PTI agents.
01:52And when this decision came,
01:54then that help was returned.
01:56When the help was returned,
01:58then the balance was lost.
02:00They missed the number.
02:02Hamza Shahbaz Sahib said that the government has fallen.
02:04Then Parveer Dalali became the Prime Minister.
02:06So even at that time, this decision had a political effect.
02:08Even today, this decision can have a political effect.
02:10A brief summary of today's hearing.
02:12And then we will talk to the relevant guests
02:14about this case.
02:16The representative of the Chief Justice, Mr. Barrister Ali Zafar,
02:18said again today,
02:20that the formation of this bench is not correct.
02:22That is why we cannot be a part of the judicial process.
02:24That is why he did not agree with the formation of this bench.
02:28On this, the Chief Justice said,
02:30Mr. Ali Zafar,
02:32you are making a baseless claim.
02:34You are a senior lawyer.
02:36You are a former president of the Bar.
02:38Mr. Ali Zafar said,
02:40I want to say something on behalf of Bani PTI.
02:42Mr. Ali Zafar was allowed to meet yesterday.
02:44He had come today with instructions from Mr. Imran Khan.
02:46Mr. Ali Zafar said,
02:48I want to say something.
02:50The thing is that the government wants to bring some reform.
02:52When he said this,
02:54the Chief Justice said,
02:56you are having a political discussion
02:58so that there is a headline tomorrow.
03:00Mr. Ali Zafar said,
03:02I think he said it in a sarcastic way,
03:04that the headline is still there.
03:06And today's headline is that
03:08a constitutional reform is necessary before October 25.
03:10On October 25, the Chief Justice will retire.
03:12Mr. Ali Zafar said,
03:14we do not know about this.
03:16After that, Mr. Ali Zafar,
03:18the lawyer of Bani Tehrik-e-Insaf,
03:20boycotted the hearing.
03:22The Supreme Court appointed Mr. Ali Zafar
03:24as a legal assistant.
03:26Today, on social media,
03:28some people of PTI,
03:30in fact, many people,
03:32have criticized Mr. Ali Zafar
03:34for being a legal assistant.
03:36When our leader said it was a boycott,
03:38it should have been boycotted.
03:40A constitutional reform,
03:42a judicial package is being brought for you.
03:44If you give this decision,
03:46which you later gave,
03:48then it will be the permission of horse trading.
03:50On this, the Chief Justice replied,
03:52Mr. Ali Zafar,
03:54now you are crossing the limits.
03:56We can give you a notice of insulting the court.
03:58This is a very big statement.
04:00We will not give you permission for such a thing.
04:02Another judge,
04:04Justice Jamal Mandukhil,
04:06said, how can you say
04:08that the decision came
04:10that if a person votes,
04:12then the vote will not be counted,
04:14but the seat will go as a punishment.
04:16The Chief Justice said,
04:18a person just keeps thinking
04:20that I will kill such and such,
04:22but if he does not do it,
04:24will there be a punishment?
04:26Should I just think of breaking the red mark?
04:28Will I be punished?
04:30Justice Jamal said,
04:32it is the right of the parliament to vote.
04:34How can this be the right of the political community?
04:36It is the right of the parliament
04:38to vote.
04:40If you do not follow the guidelines,
04:42the party can send a reference
04:44of the headless person.
04:46According to this,
04:48voting against the party
04:50will be counted.
04:52The vote will not be counted,
04:54but the seat will go.
04:56Mr. Ali Zafar said,
04:58referring to the original decision,
05:00it was written in the article 361
05:02that horse trading is a cancer.
05:04The Chief Justice said,
05:06these words were misused
05:08in the decision.
05:10The judge can only decide
05:12whether something is legal or not.
05:14He is not a medical officer
05:16who can tell what is cancer
05:18and what is not.
05:20Justice Naeem said,
05:22why didn't the PTI
05:24legislate against
05:26not counting votes in its time?
05:28Justice Naeem said,
05:30there was going to be
05:32a reference in the Supreme Court.
05:34At that time,
05:36the reference was issued
05:38and the court was tried to use it.
05:40Justice Naeem also said,
05:42the amendment that you could not
05:44do through the parliament,
05:46you got it done through the judges.
05:48Isn't it enough to rewrite
05:50the constitution?
05:52Finally, this decision came today.
05:54The situation is in front of us.