• last month
#constitutionalamendment #constitutionalcourt #khabar #mohammadmalick

Follow the ARY News channel on WhatsApp: https://bit.ly/46e5HzY

Subscribe to our channel and press the bell icon for latest news updates: http://bit.ly/3e0SwKP

ARY News is a leading Pakistani news channel that promises to bring you factual and timely international stories and stories about Pakistan, sports, entertainment, and business, amid others.

Official Facebook: https://www.fb.com/arynewsasia

Official Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/arynewsofficial

Official Instagram: https://instagram.com/arynewstv

Website: https://arynews.tv

Watch ARY NEWS LIVE: http://live.arynews.tv

Listen Live: http://live.arynews.tv/audio

Listen Top of the hour Headlines, Bulletins & Programs: https://soundcloud.com/arynewsofficial
#ARYNews

ARY News Official YouTube Channel.
For more videos, subscribe to our channel and for suggestions please use the comment section.
Transcript
00:00I want to say something, Bilal. It is such a serious issue. You people insist that we are bringing judicial reforms for the nation and the people.
00:09Not that anybody is buying it. Everybody knows that there is a power game going on, to be very honest. I am not buying it also. It is a power game.
00:15But it is not better to at least minimize the controversies. If these people say that the bench is not legal, etc.
00:22If the full court is held once and these 3-4 big things are done, and you are doing judicial reforms for the nation,
00:29then what difference does it make? You people are raising two questions.
00:33What is the hurry to do this in the first week of October?
00:36And today is the 1st of October. 24 days are left for the Chief Justice to retire.
00:43When he was coming, there was a notification 3 months ago.
00:46Remove the notification of Justice Mansoor Ali Shah so that this debate ends.
00:50That you don't want to bring him, you want to hang him, you want to make it long.
00:54Why are you putting controversy on everything?
00:56Sir, controversy, PTI makes everything.
00:59Look, it is not possible that PTI is saying, do this, do that.
01:02Okay, I am also saying, people are also saying, do it.
01:04Sir, look.
01:05Why did you remove his notification 3 months ago?
01:07Because Mr. Bandyal was going and you didn't like him.
01:10So, it was your wish that you were removing his notification.
01:12No, tell me, if you removed Justice Faiz Isa's notification 3 months ago, why?
01:18And now, 24 days ago, you are not doing anything for the Chief Justice.
01:22Again, why?
01:23Because both things are legal and the government has the choice and it can do it.
01:27There is always a reason for a choice.
01:29No, no, but Mr. Malik, the thing is, with apologies, an ordinance exists.
01:33And today, I am also very happy about this.
01:35That all those people, including Justice Muneeb Akhtar,
01:38who at that time used to not only oppose the practice and procedure bill,
01:42used to attack the judiciary.
01:44Today, most of them are advocating for it.
01:46And the second thing is that at that time, not only was there opposition to it,
01:50it was stopped at the time of legislation.
01:52There was a stay order.
01:53I always take exception to this.
01:55How can anyone stop Parliament from legislating?
01:58You can later on decide on the constitutionality of a law,
02:01but how can you stop Parliament from legislating?
02:03You are saying this is our way or the highway.
02:04No, no, I am saying this is the legal way.
02:06And you, this is not possible.
02:08You liked the 63A judgment at that time because,
02:11I am talking about PTI, because you deprived Hamza Shahbaz Sharif of the Chief Ministership.
02:16And today, the review of 63A,
02:18it is wrong to be under the influence of this review for more than two years.
02:22Ali, tell me one thing, very quickly.
02:24I see it from a different angle.
02:26Why don't you see it this way, that they get the judicial amendments done by trickery.
02:3163A is removed.
02:33Isn't it possible that their own people go against them in the judiciary?
02:39They will also get the freedom of vote.
02:42See, their problem is that,
02:44what they want is exactly this,
02:47that it should be reopened,
02:49the lootism that was there,
02:51the money laundering that was happening,
02:53it should be reopened.
02:55So, they want the same position to come back,
02:57so that they have more money,
02:59power, and authority.
03:01All these powers, power and money,
03:03can be snatched from us.
03:05We have no power, no power,
03:07no money,
03:09that we can snatch their people.
03:11We want to go in this direction.
03:13We think that there should be a clear policy.
03:17But tell me one thing,
03:19the judiciary that you are banking on,
03:24when the Supreme Court gave a verdict yesterday,
03:27they said that the issues have been amicably resolved,
03:30the issues of the Chief Justice of Lahore High Court,
03:33and of the Election Commission.
03:35So, the judiciary backed off in Punjab.
03:41The election case that you are talking about,
03:45the way the verdict was right or wrong,
03:47the verdict was given by the Supreme Court,
03:49and the implementation started quickly.
03:51On the other hand,
03:53the verdict came from the Reserve Seats,
03:55that too came from the Supreme Court,
03:57in fact, it was a verdict of the full court,
04:00in which 8, in fact 12 judges,
04:02made a verdict on one side.
04:04You did not implement that,
04:06because that was not your choice.
04:08So, you are going against the law,
04:12when it is your choice,
04:14and you say that we are followers of the law,
04:18when it is your choice,
04:20that it is a very good decision for you.
04:23What will you get,
04:25by doing so much steamroll,
04:28by bulldozing,
04:30that no one is ready to believe
04:32that you want to do it for the nation,
04:34everyone says that it is in power games,
04:36because if someone thinks that,
04:38yesterday Mr. Dars was in the show,
04:40he said that everything is on the table,
04:42that whether to increase the age or not,
04:44who has to apply where, what has to be applied,
04:46Mr. Malik, we see,
04:48we want to work according to the law,
04:50Article 63 should be restored,
04:52because the article has been rewritten,
04:54it should be corrected,
04:56the way the framers of that article wanted,
04:58that way it should remain,
05:00if there is to be any amendment in this,
05:02only the Parliament can do it,
05:05now the second thing,
05:07that you are saying,
05:09whatever the constitutional amendment will be,
05:11it will be in the National Assembly and Senate,
05:13in two separate volumes,
05:15this is as broad a consensus as one needs,
05:17in this country,
05:19I have to close it down,
05:21thank you very much,
05:23one thing is written on the wall,
05:25it is written on the wall,
05:27that Article 63 will be restored,
05:29as far as the law is concerned,
05:31I think it should be done,
05:33but the way it is happening,
05:35the reason it is happening,
05:37it is neither right nor non-controversial,
05:39and the controversial government has made it,
05:41I wish the things that happen in our name,
05:43were done according to our will,
05:45so that there is no controversy in everything,
05:47and we hope that the decorum of the Supreme Court
05:49is also restored,
05:51so that our faith also remains,

Recommended