#constitutionalamendments #supremecourt #pmlngovt #ppp #pti #nationalassembly #pmlngovt #khawarghumman #imrankhan #hassanayub #chaudhryghulamhussain
Shahida Ali's Revelations Related to Draft of the Constitutional Amendments | Haider Naqvi Analysis
Shahida Ali's Revelations Related to Draft of the Constitutional Amendments | Haider Naqvi Analysis
Category
đź—ž
NewsTranscript
00:00Shahida Akhtar Ali Sahiba from JUIF, when we were asked yesterday, initially we were told that we need to talk about a few recommendations
00:13and it was told verbally, but when it came in front of us, it was not just a few, 8, 10, 12, 15, 14, it was more than 50.
00:23We have to see a lot of things in it, so exactly if you are bringing it here, which roughly told us that there are a few points, we tell you the content verbally,
00:35so it did not cross 10, 20, 30, 40, even 50, so how is it possible that we do it in an hour?
00:44And viewers, the interesting thing is that this is not one draft, reportedly 2 to 3 drafts are circling in the market
00:53and Shahida Sahiba told us during this interview that we had a different draft and Bilawal Bhutto Daddari had a different draft.
01:01Is it true that the draft you had was different from the draft that Bilawal Sahib had?
01:08In the committee meeting, it was said that he had a different draft and our lawyer had a different draft.
01:15We did not see the draft. We did not see any draft, nor did we see any working paper. We heard it verbally.
01:24Mr. Negri, can you explain this issue? What was the reason?
01:32Yes, it was made. 25 amendments have already been made in Pakistan and you have to make the 26th amendment.
01:39You have the power, the parliament has the power.
01:42So, we do not understand this secrecy. Believe me, we do not understand it either.
01:46When we ask big people, they say, let's just laugh from now on.
01:50Let's solve this issue.
01:53Look, politics has become a game of statements all over the world, not a game of performance.
01:58Who is the biggest loser in the game played in the name of this amendment?
02:03Obviously, it seems that the government is the biggest loser.
02:06But the biggest loser is Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaf.
02:10Now I will prove how Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaf is the biggest loser.
02:14Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaf is the biggest opposition party in Pakistan.
02:18Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaf is running a very big opposition movement.
02:21And the opposition of Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaf sometimes becomes very much against the state.
02:27Now, the game that was played in the name of this amendment, which had no existence.
02:31We were the ones who sat in this show and said again and again that no such amendment is coming.
02:35You are a witness to this.
02:36Finally, when the government called for a meeting and the minister also started talking about it,
02:40then we had to accept that perhaps such an amendment was coming.
02:43But the thing is that we said that no such amendment is coming.
02:46The game that was played in its name.
02:47Now what happened?
02:48Today, on September 17, the biggest opposition leader of Pakistan,
02:53especially in the parliament, is Maulana Fazlur Rehman.
02:56And that Maulana Fazlur Rehman is related to Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
02:59Khyber Pakhtunkhwa is the playground of PTI.
03:02Which used to be the playground of Maulana Fazlur Rehman.
03:05Now, if a central leader has risen from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa,
03:08who has become the biggest opposition leader of Pakistan,
03:11then tell me, PTI is also carrying him on its shoulders, right?
03:15So tell me, who is the loser? Government or PTI?
03:19By the way, if you are saying that the loser is PTI, then what is your understanding?
03:25I have proved it.
03:26Look, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, I have proved it.
03:28I understand what you are saying.
03:29Do you have a counter-argument for this?
03:31Look, the counter-argument is that it is a magic figure, number 224, okay?
03:36Nothing can happen without Maulana.
03:38There is no need for the government to amend the law.
03:40The government is very happy with its specials.
03:42Okay, okay, this is again an argument of yours.
03:45No, there is no need.
03:46What do you know?
03:47There was a need for amendment.
03:48Listen to me.
03:49Khabar Lahariya, Khabar Lahariya.
03:50Mr. Naqvi, I will come in a minute.
03:51Mr. Naqvi, if you…
03:52The meeting was called because there was a need for amendment.
03:54Mr. Naqvi, if you were in Islamabad…
03:55There was no need for amendment in the parliamentary calendar.
03:57Absolutely right.
03:58Look, the thing is that you should understand the game of statements in politics.
04:01You will understand, Mr. Naqvi.
04:03But I am saying that I wish you were in Islamabad.
04:08I wish you were in Islamabad.
04:10I wish you were in Islamabad and you would have seen the condition of the senators and MNAs.
04:14Then you would have come to know that there is no need.
04:16There is no need to amend the government.
04:17Statements are made.
04:18Statements are made in an organized style.