• 2 months ago
#TheReporters #PAKvsBAN #QaziFaezIsa #KhawarGhumman

Follow the ARY News channel on WhatsApp: https://bit.ly/46e5HzY

Subscribe to our channel and press the bell icon for latest news updates: http://bit.ly/3e0SwKP

ARY News is a leading Pakistani news channel that promises to bring you factual and timely international stories and stories about Pakistan, sports, entertainment, and business, amid others.

Official Facebook: https://www.fb.com/arynewsasia

Official Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/arynewsofficial

Official Instagram: https://instagram.com/arynewstv

Website: https://arynews.tv

Watch ARY NEWS LIVE: http://live.arynews.tv

Listen Live: http://live.arynews.tv/audio

Listen Top of the hour Headlines, Bulletins & Programs: https://soundcloud.com/arynewsofficial
#ARYNews

ARY News Official YouTube Channel.
For more videos, subscribe to our channel and for suggestions please use the comment section.
Transcript
00:00Asalam-o-Alaikum viewers, welcome to the program. I am your host Khawar Gumman.
00:23We are not able to get out of the sadness that our leaders are going to London for treatment.
00:30We talked about this issue yesterday as well.
00:34That we should definitely go to London but we should come back soon because we cannot live without them.
00:39And today we saw that something happened.
00:43That in our Twin Cities Rawalpindi, another historical event has happened.
00:51For the first time, Bangladesh defeated Pakistan in a test match.
00:56Not only did they defeat Pakistan in a test match but they also lost the second test match as well.
01:03So, on the home ground, Bangladesh has whitewashed Pakistan.
01:10And I am not able to understand anything.
01:13The matches that people are watching since morning, believe me, the whole of Pakistan is shell-shocked.
01:18Pakistan is known as a one-sport nation.
01:21Most of the Pakistanis are emotionally attached to cricket.
01:27We have been associated with cricket for 12 months.
01:30And the cricketers are not allowing us to be associated with them.
01:34What is the reason behind this?
01:35We will try to find that out in our first story.
01:38Raja Mohsin is our sports correspondent.
01:41He was on the ground and he saw everything.
01:45The problem is that you might remember that we went to America to play the World Cup.
01:50And when we went to America to play the World Cup, America learned to play cricket for the first time.
01:56We lost to America.
01:58After that, we started losing in such a way that we were defeated in the league itself.
02:03In the first round itself, we said goodbye to the tournament.
02:06When the Pakistan team came back, Mohsin Naqvi, who is the spirit of Pakistan Cricket Board,
02:13He is a doer.
02:14Our Hassan Ayub, who is here every day, reminds us of Mohsin Speed.
02:22What did he say?
02:24This is the news.
02:25He keeps it in front of you.
02:26He said it somewhere.
02:28I know what's going on in the team.
02:29Mohsin Naqvi came into action.
02:31He announced a major surgery in the team.
02:36You might remember that two days ago, Rana Sinaullah was asked.
02:44He is with the Inter-Provincial Ministry in Pakistan.
02:50Rana went to see the Olympics in Paris for the first time.
02:53He won a gold medal from there.
02:55You know that Pakistan has made a record in the javelin throw.
02:58He was asked that the position of the Inter-Provincial Ministry is very important.
03:03Pakistan Cricket Board is the most followed sport in Pakistan.
03:09The whole of Pakistan is associated with it.
03:11Both are full-time jobs.
03:13Don't you think the government should think about it?
03:17Let's listen to Rana's answer.
03:19In Balochistan, on one hand, the cricket environment is deteriorating.
03:24And then the Minister of Internal Affairs.
03:26Isn't it time to do this?
03:29It's up to you.
03:30It's not up to you.
03:31It's your government.
03:32No, no, no.
03:33What I have seen is that sports are played by federations, associations and boards.
03:39There is a boss everywhere.
03:43There is no solution to sports.
03:46Will you take a stand on this?
03:48No.
03:49There are so many powerful people sitting there.
03:52If there is a stand there, the stand will be lost.
03:57Rana talked about the various sports federations in Pakistan.
04:01I will know Rana's assessment from Hassan.
04:06But Raja Mohsin is our representative.
04:08He was present in the stadium.
04:11Mohsin is apparently not there.
04:14We have the world's best batsman in the form of Babur Azam.
04:19Rizwan is present.
04:21The bowlers are good.
04:22Shaheen Shah Afridi is there.
04:24Naseem Shah is there.
04:25Khurram bowled very well.
04:28Ameer Hamza bowled well.
04:33We played the first match so well that we didn't declare.
04:39We played the second match and scored 6 out of 26.
04:42It felt like Bangladesh would be defeated.
04:44We took both the matches in the grift.
04:46And then we put them in their lap as a gift.
04:51Tell us what happened.
04:53Every Pakistani is asking this question.
04:56What was the reason for Pakistan's defeat?
05:02There are many reasons.
05:05But if we talk about some important things.
05:09World Cup started in 2023.
05:12We exited in the first round of the World Cup in the subcontinent.
05:16We lost to Afghanistan.
05:18Then World T20 started in 2024.
05:21We lost to the Associate Team USA.
05:24They were playing the tournament on Wild Card Entry.
05:27This has never happened before.
05:30Pakistan played 13 test matches with Bangladesh.
05:33Out of which 12 were won.
05:35Pakistan never lost to Bangladesh.
05:38Bangladesh won the first test match convincingly with 10 wickets.
05:45They comfortably won the second test match.
05:47The problem is that we have the best batsmen in the world.
05:53But in the match, we dropped a lot of catches.
06:01If you look at the bowlers.
06:04We were not able to all out Bangladesh.
06:09We out them in the first test match.
06:12But they had scored 565 runs.
06:16We were not able to out any of them in the second test match.
06:20In this test match, Bangladesh recovered so much that they won the test match.
06:26The chairman said that surgery is needed.
06:31Surgery is very much needed.
06:33But the most terrible thing that I saw.
06:36Even in the domestic circuit, the chairman said that there is no backup.
06:42The entire system needs to be improved.
06:45So that we have good backup bowlers.
06:47I remember that in Pakistan, even if you go to a club to play netball.
06:52You can see 140-145 ballers.
06:54Now everyone is playing in the 130s.
06:57It is a matter of grouping in the team.
07:00Obviously, defeat is victory.
07:03How much do you feel about the effect of grouping?
07:08Today, the captain of our test team, Shahan Masood, held a press conference.
07:13He addressed some of the questions related to this.
07:16We saw some visuals.
07:18We saw that Shaheen Shafri, in the first test match.
07:22In a video, he was shaking the hand of his captain, Shahan Masood.
07:27Today, he was also explained by the captain that he had an injury.
07:31And I put my hand in the same place.
07:33In the pre-series press conference, I also asked him this question.
07:38At that time, he said that we need to address this issue.
07:43Because the atmosphere of the dressing room will reflect our performance on the ground.
07:52A lot of things are going on.
07:54You may remember that Mickey Arthur used to be the head coach in the 2023 World Cup.
07:57This is not a very old thing.
07:58It has not even been a year.
07:59He wrote a report.
08:01He wrote a lot of things about this.
08:03After that, our Australia tour.
08:06We do not expect Chairman PC to take any action on this issue.
08:12Like we won a gold medal.
08:15The morale of the whole of Pakistan has increased.
08:18When there is such a defeat in cricket.
08:20Defeat is a part of the game.
08:22But the way you play and lose.
08:25It makes a lot of difference.
08:27I wanted to ask this question to Mohsin.
08:31We talk about our best players.
08:35Our best bowler.
08:36Our best batsman.
08:37Number one batsman.
08:39Do we have to put the pickle of these batsmen or these good bowlers?
08:42When you are losing in matches in such an amazing way.
08:45You are losing on your home ground.
08:46You are getting whitewashed.
08:47What are the reasons for this?
08:50If you have domestic cricket.
08:52You are saying that there is not enough backup.
08:54Does this mean that blackmail continues through them?
08:57I think domestic players should get chances.
09:00So that their monopoly ends.
09:02What Mr. Hassan said.
09:05He summed up the whole issue of Pakistan cricket in a few sentences.
09:09Maybe someone can sum up the issues of Pakistan cricket with this beauty.
09:12You are absolutely right.
09:15If we do not have backup.
09:17We can ignore bad performance.
09:19We can ignore a bad performance.
09:24There can also be a bad form.
09:26But other than that.
09:27The news that comes in front of us.
09:29And the videos that come in front of us.
09:31That cannot be tolerated.
09:33You are right.
09:35If you want to lose to a team like Bangladesh.
09:37No disrespect to them.
09:38They played very good cricket and won.
09:40But you should give youngsters a chance.
09:42Give respect to your domestic.
09:44And you are absolutely right.
09:46If they are winning matches in Pakistan.
09:48What should we do with them?
09:50We glorified these players so much.
09:55We made them bigger than their performance.
10:00We glorify them.
10:03Okay.
10:05Mr. Chaudhary, you can comment on this issue.
10:09His name is Mohsin and he is also a fan.
10:15I am very much worried.
10:17I have given him a lot of credit.
10:20Hassan and Mohsin.
10:22But now tell me, which country is it in the world that our team has played against and won?
10:31See, we have lost to the Soviet team, we have lost to the Bangladesh team on our home ground.
10:36Usually in test matches, the home team, the big teams, all their bad performances, they perform very well on their home ground.
10:43Raja Mohsin, you didn't hear the question, you understood it.
10:46Mr. Chaudhary has asked us to name a team that we have played against and won.
10:52Can you explain it to us?
10:55The team's performance at the moment, continuously losing to Bangladesh on their home ground and losing one-sidedly,
11:01Mr. Chaudhary, you have told us that this is a very difficult task.
11:04Okay, this is your responsibility. Mr. Chaudhary has fulfilled this responsibility of yours.
11:08First of all, justice must be served.
11:11And ask Babar Azam that you have a lot of data, use the data and bring some facts and figures.
11:18The people of Pakistan tolerate a lot of questions.
11:22Because we love our cricket team, our cricketers.
11:25Obviously, all the sports stars in the world, people like them, love them.
11:31So the hope is that in the coming days, the performance of the Pakistani cricket team will improve.
11:36Viewers, let's move on to the second story.
11:38Yesterday, the bill was presented in the Senate that the number of judges of the Supreme Court should be increased in Pakistan.
11:47Today, the bill of the same intention is in the National Assembly.
11:51Mr. Daniyal Chaudhary, the M.N.O. of the Pakistan Muslim League, presented it.
11:56What explanations did he give?
11:59What is the reason that we need more judges in Pakistan on the Supreme Court level?
12:05I wish to move, leave to introduce a bill further to amend the Supreme Court Number of Judges Act 1997.
12:11Supreme Court Number of Judges Amendment Bill 2024.
12:14When this last bill was introduced, our population was about 16 crores.
12:19And today, as we speak, the number has increased from 25 crores to 25 crores.
12:25The pending cases in the Supreme Court, more than 54,000 cases, as we speak, are pending in the Supreme Court.
12:33This is a very big backlog on judges.
12:36As time goes on, we need more specialized judges.
12:41And this bill is coming as needed at this time when it is needed.
12:46Mr. Gohar, the Chairman of the National Assembly for Justice in Pakistan, is present as an M.N.O.
12:53He presented some counter-arguments that he referred to the countries of the world,
12:59the population, the number of judges, the issue of penancy, especially in India.
13:05How serious is the issue of penancy? Is it necessary to increase the number of judges because of this?
13:10The bill that is being introduced can be a private member bill or it can be allowed.
13:17Increasing the number of judges is only a reward from the government to the extent of the Supreme Court and Islamabad High Court.
13:23Let me give you an example of India, Mr. Speaker.
13:25They are saying that their population has increased.
13:27Compare the number of judges in India with the number of judges in Pakistan.
13:30The population of India is 1.45 crores.
13:34In India, the number of judges in the High Court is 1114.
13:37The Supreme Court sitting on the 1114 judges is made up of only 23 judges.
13:42In the Supreme Court, their cases will be pending for 80,221.
13:46Increasing the number of judges will not reduce the number of cases.
13:49There will be a big burden on this issue.
13:51Mr. Speaker, if you will move this bill, it will be a violation of Article 74, Article 81, Article 9, Rule 118,
13:58Judgment of the Supreme Court, Sunday Court and Mustapha Imtiaz Court.
14:02Therefore, it is not allowed to move this bill.
14:05Hassan, one of the questions that is being raised is that there is a need for agreed judges.
14:11There is an issue of agreed penalty.
14:13In Pakistan, there is a need for actions to get cheap and immediate justice.
14:19Why is there a need for a private member bill?
14:22Why not in the middle of the day?
14:24This is a genuine issue.
14:26Let's move ahead with this concern.
14:28Let's talk to him.
14:30He is a brilliant brainwave.
14:33Our young barrister, Mr. Daniyal Jodi, came to his senses at night.
14:39He prepared the bill and presented it.
14:42This is a one-page amendment.
14:45Sir, I agree with you.
14:48The bill cannot be passed without a government vote.
14:51He is a government member.
14:53He is the MNA of Pakistan Muslim League Noon.
14:55Why a private member bill?
14:57Why not a government bill?
14:59Can't a private member bill be brought by an independent parliamentarian?
15:04We should appreciate this.
15:09A private member should appreciate the work of the government.
15:18We should appreciate the work of the government.
15:23The government is afraid of the Supreme Court.
15:26The government is afraid of some other pressures.
15:28If an individual has taken this bold step,
15:31and he is a young man,
15:33and he is becoming a parliamentarian for the first time,
15:35then you and I should appreciate him.
15:38This is my opinion.
15:40Okay.
15:42Mr. Jodi,
15:44Mr. Jodi,
15:46If a young man sits with me, he will laugh.
15:49I am not laughing.
15:51Another bill has come today.
15:53He is a member of the National Assembly of the JUIF.
15:58He is from Peshawar.
16:00He is a member of the People's Party.
16:02He is from Peshawar.
16:04He is a member of the National Assembly of Peshawar.
16:09He is a member of the National Assembly of Peshawar.
16:12He has presented two or three bills there.
16:14One bill is that the civilians in Pakistan should not have dual nationality.
17:23There are some dark clouds in this. What is the reason? Why do people think like this?
17:29Hassan thinks that this is not the case.
17:31Your comments on this. What is the reason?
17:34Private member bill, like PTI's chairman also questioned there.
17:38Is this a consensus? Can a bill come? Why not?
17:42No, a bill can come or not. What do they want to achieve?
17:47Actually, their problem is that they see their personal death.
17:53Because the people have not voted for them.
17:56Now they are sitting on the throne.
18:00Sometimes they do something to justify it.
18:03Sometimes Supreme Court, sometimes High Court.
18:05Sometimes some judge, sometimes something.
18:07They will be stuck in this. They can't get out of this.
18:11Why? When Fazl-ur-Rehman, whom your colleagues also praise a lot,
18:17did he ever say that the only honorable way for you was to sit in the opposition?
18:21No. You have to be strong-hearted and stay in this country.
18:25When this is your way, then they will suffer the consequences.
18:30Okay, now let me tell you the contempt of court.
18:34Right now, right now, there is no law.
18:37I don't know which law has been used under the contempt of court.
18:43Because in 2012, when Yusuf Raza Ghulani's contempt of court case was going on,
18:50at that time, he had drafted a law which was struck down by the Supreme Court.
18:54So, Ayn-e-Pakistan says, I guess Article 264,
18:58when you strike down a law, the old law is not automatically enforced.
19:07So, I believe that this issue of contempt of court,
19:11why was it needed to be clarified?
19:13Or what is it? I don't understand.
19:15And which laws have been used?
19:17On Friday, you know, when it happened,
19:20Faisal Bawda-sahib had made a conference.
19:23Yes, Faisal Bawda-sahib.
19:26Okay.
19:27Dear viewers, we have with us the former president of the Supreme Court.
19:32We know from him that all these cases,
19:34regarding increasing the number of judges,
19:36and the bill that is being presented to end the law of contempt of court.
19:41Dear viewers, please tell us,
19:44that in routine, if the number of judges has to increase,
19:49and that too in the Supreme Court,
19:51then this opinion, this suggestion, this demand,
19:55this generates normally, in the tradition,
19:59or what has been there,
20:01the Supreme Court's Chief Justice,
20:03Judicial Commission, who says?
20:05Of course, the law has to be passed by the government,
20:07has to come through the Parliament,
20:09but there is an institution,
20:10the head of that institution will demand,
20:12that I want more judges, or something like that.
20:14What has been the custom in the past?
20:16In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Ever Merciful.
20:18Dear viewers, the custom has always been,
20:20the tradition has always been,
20:21that if in the matter of judiciary,
20:23if you want to change anything,
20:25or bring a law,
20:27then always, from the Superior Judiciary,
20:29the Chief Justice of Pakistan,
20:30or from his colleagues,
20:32the changes were always brought.
20:36Now look here,
20:37we are talking about increasing the number,
20:39and the same old things,
20:41that justice, justice for all,
20:43and these things,
20:45and the cases are very pending.
20:46In the Supreme Court,
20:47there is no Court of First Instance,
20:48except for Article 184,
20:50where there are appeals,
20:51there is no trial in the Supreme Court, as such.
20:54So to say,
20:55that there is so much pendency,
20:56and justice is not being given,
20:57and an example is given,
20:59that a criminal case was delayed,
21:01and the deceased person was killed.
21:04So these things,
21:05these are all excuses.
21:07The point is that,
21:08you yourself saw,
21:09there are 17 judges present this time,
21:10so let the 19th judge work this time,
21:11there are 2 ad hoc judges,
21:12and suppose,
21:13if you think,
21:14that if you want more judges,
21:16then the Judicial Commission,
21:17appoints more ad hoc judges,
21:19and 2 more.
21:20What does this mean?
21:21What is the point of increasing the number of judges?
21:23That too a private member bill,
21:24that too a person who was previously in PTI,
21:26now he is in JUI,
21:27and I have heard,
21:28he has also been given a show-call notice,
21:29from that party.
21:30So now look,
21:31the government,
21:32this Gauhar,
21:33which Gauhar spoke about,
21:34Barrister Gauhar Ali Khan,
21:35who is the chairman of PTI,
21:36he said,
21:37look,
21:38this cannot be done with a private member bill,
21:40because in this,
21:41there is Article 74,
21:42which says,
21:43that where there is money coming out,
21:44from the Federal Consolidated Fund,
21:45the salary will come out,
21:46for that,
21:47the Federal Government,
21:48has to move the bill.
21:49Then Article 81,
21:50clearly says,
21:51that salary will be given,
21:52from the Consolidated Fund,
21:53to the Supreme Court judges,
21:54and Islamabad High Court.
21:55So that is also present.
21:56All these things are happening,
21:57and a private member bill has come,
21:58if the government was serious,
21:59and the people were in so much pain,
22:00then why didn't the government move it?
22:01This private member bill,
22:02has to be moved.
22:03Now,
22:04Hassan will also ask you a question,
22:05that,
22:06if the government is serious,
22:07and the people are in so much pain,
22:08then why didn't the government move it?
22:09This private member bill,
22:10has to be moved.
22:11Now,
22:12Hassan will also ask you a question,
22:13that,
22:14I don't know,
22:15if it is necessary or not,
22:16whatever it is,
22:17this Contempt of Court Law,
22:18can you tell us about it?
22:19Does it exist?
22:20Yes,
22:21it exists,
22:22it is with the court,
22:23it is under the authority of the court,
22:24under which article,
22:25any court,
22:26this article,
22:27see,
22:28whether this law exists,
22:29or not,
22:30this Contempt of Court Ordinance,
22:31of 2003,
22:32and it has been upholded,
22:33by the Supreme Court,
22:34the full bench,
22:35has upholded it,
22:36and the Supreme Court,
22:37has upholded it,
22:38and the Supreme Court,
22:39has upholded it,
22:40this law,
22:41and in 2003,
22:42and the Supreme Court,
22:43has upholded it,
22:44and the Supreme Court,
22:45has upholded it,
22:46and the Supreme Court,
22:47has upholded it,
22:48and the Supreme Court,
22:49has upholded it,
22:50and the Supreme Court,
22:51has upholded it,
22:52and the Supreme Court,
22:53has upholded it,
22:54and the Supreme Court,
22:55has upholded it,
22:56and the Supreme Court,
22:57has upholded it,
22:58and the Supreme Court,
22:59has upholded it,
23:00and the Supreme Court,
23:01has upholded it,
23:02and the Supreme Court,
23:03has upholded it,
23:04and the Supreme Court,
23:05has upholded it,
23:06and the Supreme Court,
23:07has upholded it,
23:08and the Supreme Court,
23:09has upholded it,
23:10and the Supreme Court,
23:11has upholded it,
23:12and the Supreme Court,
23:13has upholded it,
23:14and the Supreme Court,
23:15has upholded it,
23:16and the Supreme Court,
23:17has upholded it,
23:18and the Supreme Court,
23:19has upholded it,
23:20and the Supreme Court,
23:21has upholded it,
23:22and the Supreme Court,
23:23has upholded it,
23:24and the Supreme Court,
23:25has upholded it,
23:26and the Supreme Court,
23:27has upholded it,
23:28and the Supreme Court,
23:29has upholded it,
23:30and the Supreme Court,
23:31has upholded it,
23:32and the Supreme Court,
23:33has upholded it,
23:34and the Supreme Court,
23:35has upholded it,
23:36and the Supreme Court,
23:37has upholded it,
23:38and the Supreme Court,
23:39has upholded it,
23:40and the Supreme Court,
23:41has upholded it,
23:42and the Supreme Court,
23:43has upholded it,
23:44and the Supreme Court,
23:45has upholded it,
23:46and the Supreme Court,
23:47has upholded it,
23:48and the Supreme Court,
23:49has upholded it,
23:50and the Supreme Court,
23:51has upholded it,
23:52and the Supreme Court,
23:53has upholded it,
23:54and the Supreme Court,
23:55has upholded it,
23:56and the Supreme Court,
23:57has upholded it,
23:58and the Supreme Court,
23:59has upholded it,
24:00and the Supreme Court,
24:01has upholded it,
24:02and the Supreme Court,
24:03has upholded it,
24:04and the Supreme Court,
24:05has upholded it,
24:06and the Supreme Court,
24:07has upholded it,
24:08and the Supreme Court,
24:09has upholded it,
24:10and the Supreme Court,
24:11has upholded it,
24:12and the Supreme Court,
24:13has upholded it,
24:14and the Supreme Court,
24:15has upholded it,
24:16and the Supreme Court,
24:17has upholded it,
24:18and the Supreme Court,
24:19has upholded it,
24:20and the Supreme Court,
24:21has upholded it,
24:22and the Supreme Court,
24:23has upholded it,
24:24and the Supreme Court,
24:25has upholded it,
24:26and the Supreme Court,
24:27has upholded it,
24:28and the Supreme Court,
24:29has upholded it,
24:30and the Supreme Court,
24:31has upholded it,
24:32and the Supreme Court,
24:33has upholded it,
24:34and the Supreme Court,
24:35has upholded it,
24:36and the Supreme Court,
24:37has upholded it,
24:38and the Supreme Court,
24:39has upholded it,
24:40and the Supreme Court,
24:41has upholded it,
24:42and the Supreme Court,
24:43has upholded it,
24:44and the Supreme Court,
24:45has upholded it,
24:46and the Supreme Court,
24:47has upholded it,
24:48and the Supreme Court,
24:49has upholded it,
24:50and the Supreme Court,
24:51has upholded it,
24:52and the Supreme Court,
24:53has upholded it,
24:54and the Supreme Court,
24:55Welcome back, Zubair ji,
24:56Welcome back, Zubair ji,
24:57Welcome back, Zubair ji,
24:58Welcome back, Zubair ji,
24:59Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:00Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:01Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:02Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:03Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:04Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:05Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:06Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:07Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:08Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:09Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:10Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:11Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:12Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:13Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:14Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:15Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:16Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:18Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:19Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:20Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:21Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:22Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:23Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:24Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:25Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:26Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:27Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:28Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:29Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:30Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:31Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:32Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:33Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:34Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:35Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:36Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:37Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:38Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:39Welcome back, Zubair ji,
25:40This will not collapse?
25:42No, this is a very simple thing,
25:44Article 204,
25:48that you can punish a person for content,
25:52who interferes,
25:53scandalizes the court,
25:54and does anything else,
25:56these things are given in Article 204,
25:581, 2, and 3,
26:003 is very important,
26:013 says,
26:02the exercise of power
26:03conferred on a court by this article
26:04may be regulated by law,
26:06regulated by law,
26:07as the contempt of court
26:09is 2000,
26:10it regulates,
26:11power, inherent power,
26:12is with the Supreme Court,
26:13Article 204,
26:14and,
26:15subject to law,
26:16by rules made by the court,
26:18now here, subject to law,
26:19subject to law,
26:20which is the 2003 law,
26:21now if it is terminated,
26:23then the Supreme Court
26:24can make its own rules,
26:25and the rules are already there,
26:26of contempt,
26:27so see,
26:28this law was giving us
26:29so much benefit,
26:30that if there was any order,
26:31we would have appealed for it,
26:32now if this law is terminated,
26:34the power is the same,
26:35they have the power
26:36to abuse,
26:37obstruct the process of court,
26:38this way any order
26:39of the court
26:40will be dead,
26:41this constitution
26:42is giving them power,
26:43they are not dependent on it,
26:44Zubair sir,
26:45Zubair sir,
26:46thank you very much
26:47for your time,
26:48and,
26:49there are legal points,
26:50please explain them,
26:51viewers,
26:52let's move to the next story,
26:53in Pakistan,
26:54you know,
26:55these days,
26:56there are discussions
26:57that there should be
26:58discussions in Pakistan,
26:59there should be such
27:00things in politics,
27:01without this,
27:02we cannot move forward,
27:03this is also right,
27:04our friendly country,
27:05they are also talking to us,
27:06from outside,
27:07international organizations,
27:08they are also giving us
27:09advice,
27:10today,
27:11viewers,
27:12a big news
27:13developed,
27:14in National Assembly,
27:15Sardar Akhtar Mengal,
27:16you know,
27:17he is an old politician
27:18from Balochistan,
27:19he resigned,
27:20and,
27:21when he resigned,
27:22after that,
27:23what reason did he
27:24explain,
27:25what is the reason,
27:26why he does not want
27:27to be a part of
27:28the current system
27:29of this parliament,
27:30it is better than
27:31this,
27:32that I do not speak
27:33any nonsense,
27:34it is better
27:35than this,
27:36that I do not speak
27:37any nonsense,
27:38it is better
27:39than this,
27:40that I do not speak
27:41any nonsense,
27:42it is better
27:43than this,
27:44that I do not speak
27:45any nonsense,
27:46it is better
27:47than this,
27:48that I do not speak
27:49any nonsense,
27:50it is better
27:51than this,
27:52that I do not speak
27:53any nonsense,
27:54it is better
27:55than this,
27:56that I do not speak
27:57any nonsense,
27:58it is better
27:59than this,
28:00that I do not speak
28:01any nonsense,
28:02it is better
28:03than this,
28:04that I do
28:05not speak
28:06any nonsense,
28:07it is better
28:08than this,
28:09that I do
28:10not speak
28:11any nonsense,
28:12it is better
28:13than this,
28:14that I do
28:15not speak
28:16any nonsense,
28:17it is better
28:18than this,
28:19that I do
28:20not speak
28:21any nonsense,
28:22it is better
28:23than this,
28:24that I do
28:25not speak
28:26any nonsense,
28:27it is better
28:28than this,
28:29that I do
28:30not speak
28:31any nonsense,
28:32it is better
28:33than this,
28:34that I do
28:35not speak
28:36any nonsense,
28:37it is better
28:38than this,
28:39that I do
28:40not speak
28:41any nonsense,
28:42it is better
28:43than this,
28:44that I do
28:45not speak
28:46any nonsense,
28:47it is better
28:48than this,
28:49that I do
28:50not speak
28:51any nonsense,
28:52it is better
28:53than this,
28:54that I do
28:55not speak
28:56any nonsense,
28:57it is better
28:58than this,
28:59that I do
29:00not speak
29:01any nonsense,
29:02it is better
29:03than this,
29:04that I do
29:05not speak
29:06any nonsense,
29:07it is better
29:08than this,
29:09that I do
29:10not speak
29:11any nonsense,
29:12it is better
29:13than this,
29:14that I do
29:15not speak
29:16any nonsense,
29:17it is better
29:18than this,
29:19that I do
29:20not speak
29:21any nonsense,
29:22it is better
29:23than this,
29:24that I do
29:25not speak
29:26any nonsense,
29:27it is better
29:28than this,
29:29that I do
29:30not speak
29:31any nonsense,
29:32it is better
29:33than this,
29:34that I do
29:35not speak
29:36any nonsense,
29:37it is better
29:38than this,
29:39that I do
29:40not speak
29:41any nonsense,
29:42it is better
29:43than this,
29:44that I do
29:45not speak
29:46any nonsense,
29:47it is better
29:48than this,
29:49that I do
29:50not speak
29:51any nonsense,
29:52it is better
29:53than this,
29:54that I do
29:55not speak
29:56any nonsense,
29:57it is better
29:58than this,
29:59that I do
30:00not speak
30:01any nonsense,
30:02it is better
30:03than this,
30:04that I do
30:05not speak
30:06any nonsense,
30:07it is better
30:08than this,
30:09that I do
30:10not speak
30:11any nonsense,
30:12it is better
30:13than this,
30:14that I do
30:15not speak
30:16any nonsense,
30:17it is better
30:18than this,
30:19that I do
30:20not speak
30:21any nonsense,
30:22it is better
30:23than this,
30:24that I do
30:25not speak
30:26any nonsense,
30:27it is better
30:28than this,
30:29that I do
30:30not speak
30:31any nonsense,
30:32it is better
30:33than this,
30:34that I do
30:35not speak
30:36any nonsense,
30:37it is better
30:38than this,
30:39that I do
30:40not speak
30:41any nonsense,
30:42it is better
30:43than this,
30:44that I do
30:45not speak
30:46any nonsense,
30:47it is better
30:48than this,
30:49that I do
30:50not speak
30:51any nonsense,
30:52it is better
30:53than this,
30:54that I do
30:55not speak
30:56any nonsense,
30:57it is better
30:58than this,
30:59that I do
31:00not speak
31:01any nonsense,
31:02it is better
31:03than this,
31:04that I do
31:05not speak
31:06any nonsense,
31:07it is better
31:08than this,
31:09that I do
31:10not speak
31:11any nonsense,
31:12it is better
31:13than this,
31:14that I do
31:15not speak
31:16any nonsense,
31:17it is better
31:18than this,
31:19that I do
31:20not speak
31:21any nonsense,
31:22it is better
31:23than this,
31:24that I do
31:25not speak
31:26any nonsense,
31:27it is better
31:28than this,
31:29that I do
31:30not speak
31:31any nonsense,
31:32it is better
31:33than this,
31:34that I do
31:35not speak
31:36any nonsense,
31:37it is better
31:38than this,
31:39that I do
31:40not speak
31:41any nonsense,
31:42it is better
31:43than this,
31:44that I do
31:45not speak
31:46any nonsense,
31:47it is better
31:48than this,
31:49that I do
31:50not speak
31:51any nonsense,
31:52it is better
31:53than this,
31:54that I do
31:55not speak
31:56any nonsense,
31:57it is better
31:58than this,
31:59that I do
32:00not speak
32:01any nonsense,
32:02it is better
32:03than this,
32:04that I do
32:05not speak
32:06any nonsense,
32:07it is better
32:08than this,
32:09that I do
32:10not speak
32:11any nonsense,
32:12it is better
32:13than this,
32:14that I do
32:15not speak
32:16any nonsense,
32:17it is better
32:18than this,
32:19that I do
32:20not speak
32:21any nonsense,
32:22it is better
32:23than this,
32:24that I do
32:25not speak
32:26any nonsense,
32:27it is better
32:28than this,
32:29that I do
32:30not speak
32:31any nonsense,
32:32it is better
32:33than this,
32:34that I do
32:35not speak
32:36any nonsense,
32:37it is better
32:38than this,
32:39that I do
32:40not speak
32:41any nonsense,
32:42it is better
32:43than this,
32:44that I do
32:45not speak
32:46any nonsense,
32:47it is better
32:48than this,
32:49that I do
32:50not speak
32:51any nonsense,
32:52it is better
32:53than this,
32:54that I do
32:55not speak
32:56any nonsense,
32:57it is better
32:58than this,
32:59that I do
33:00not speak
33:01any nonsense,
33:02it is better
33:03than this,
33:04that I do
33:05not speak
33:06any nonsense,
33:07it is better
33:08than this,
33:09that I do
33:10not speak
33:11any nonsense,
33:12it is better
33:13than this,
33:14that I do
33:15not speak
33:16any nonsense,
33:17it is better
33:18than this,
33:19that I do
33:20not speak
33:21any nonsense,
33:22it is better
33:23than this,
33:24that I do
33:25not speak
33:26any nonsense,
33:27it is better
33:28than this,
33:29that I do
33:30not speak
33:31any nonsense,
33:32it is better
33:33than this,
33:34that I do
33:35not speak
33:36any nonsense,
33:37it is better
33:38than this,
33:39that I do
33:40not speak
33:41any nonsense,
33:42it is better
33:43than this,
33:44that I do
33:45not speak
33:46any nonsense,
33:47it is better
33:48than this,
33:49that I do
33:50not speak

Recommended