KHABAR Meher Bokhari Kay Saath | ARY News | 24th July 2024
#ImranKhan #PTI #MuhammadMalik #muhammadmalick #pmlngovt #court #analysis #kashifabbasi #Khabar #meherbukhari
(Current Affairs)
Host:
- Meher Bokhari
Guests:
- Muhammad Malik (Senior Analyst)
- Kashif Abbasi (Analyst)
Justice Athar Minallah addresses in New York Bar | Kashif Abbasi's Bold Analysis
"Imran Khan tou Chahe gay Sara Nizam Gir Jaye..."Muhammad Malik Revealed Big Secrets
Khusoosi Adalaton Ki Zaroorat Kyun Mehsoos Hui ? " Mujhe Ab Khauf Araha Hai. .. . " Muhammad Malik
Follow the ARY News channel on WhatsApp: https://bit.ly/46e5HzY
Subscribe to our channel and press the bell icon for latest news updates: http://bit.ly/3e0SwKP
ARY News is a leading Pakistani news channel that promises to bring you factual and timely international stories and stories about Pakistan, sports, entertainment, and business, amid others.
(Current Affairs)
Host:
- Meher Bokhari
Guests:
- Muhammad Malik (Senior Analyst)
- Kashif Abbasi (Analyst)
Justice Athar Minallah addresses in New York Bar | Kashif Abbasi's Bold Analysis
"Imran Khan tou Chahe gay Sara Nizam Gir Jaye..."Muhammad Malik Revealed Big Secrets
Khusoosi Adalaton Ki Zaroorat Kyun Mehsoos Hui ? " Mujhe Ab Khauf Araha Hai. .. . " Muhammad Malik
Follow the ARY News channel on WhatsApp: https://bit.ly/46e5HzY
Subscribe to our channel and press the bell icon for latest news updates: http://bit.ly/3e0SwKP
ARY News is a leading Pakistani news channel that promises to bring you factual and timely international stories and stories about Pakistan, sports, entertainment, and business, amid others.
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00Assalam-o-Alaikum and Good Evening, I am Meher Bukhari.
00:14The court's verdict, the court's verdict, the court's verdict, the court's verdict,
00:17the court's verdict, the court's verdict, the court's verdict, the court's verdict,
00:20the court's verdict, the court's verdict, the court's verdict, the court's verdict,
00:23the court's verdict, the court's verdict, the court's verdict, the court's verdict,
00:26the court's verdict, the court's verdict, the court's verdict, the court's verdict,
00:30you walk into the world of terrorism, you realise that the most powerful crate in this
00:32country does not come from terrorism, the most powerful board member's brain DOESN'T
00:36come from terrorism, Niraj Singh, that's the case….
00:39Supposing we call some part of this regime, the appeal board of the CBI, and bury it
00:49alive and that everyone else is suffering, is that the
00:58DGISPR, Digital Terrorist, PM Shabaz Sharif has called Tehrik-e-Insaf a terrorist group
01:05and Muslim League Noon's senior minister Mariam Aurangzeb has called Tehrik-e-Insaf a terrorist group.
01:10PM Shabaz Sharif said in a statement that propaganda against Army Chief and Ahle Khana is unbearable.
01:21Unfortunately, the party that created chaos in this country on 9th May,
01:26did not leave any stone unturned in spreading the roots of Pakistan.
01:29Today, the same party is using new tactics and is carrying out new attacks against Pakistan,
01:34against the army of Pakistan.
01:35The way they are using the name of General Asim Munir, the official website of PTI,
01:41the way they are speaking against him and his family,
01:45In any case, we will not tolerate any such action against the motherland and the army of Pakistan.
01:52We will have to build a wall against this. We will not back down at any cost.
01:58They are a terrorist group.
02:00And they have taken advantage of the political party.
02:03We do not want any political party to be restricted.
02:05There is a clear difference between a democratic political party and a terrorist party.
02:10I am sad to say that it is a political party.
02:13Mariam Aurangzeb said while criticizing the judiciary and the judiciary,
02:17that the 9th May accused is so lazy to give punishment.
02:20Is it a revolution to attack the state?
02:24The accused said that he made a trust of 190 million pounds.
02:27He made a trust with the money he stole.
02:29You say no, no.
02:30He made a trust to give Islamic education to the youth.
02:33This is what the system of justice says.
02:34You spread papers and say that this is a cipher.
02:37I did this conspiracy.
02:38The system of justice says no, no.
02:40This was just a piece of paper.
02:42The system of justice says, yes, your watch, your wish.
02:45He says, yes, I did it on 9th May.
02:47He is called in Mercedes, in the Supreme Court.
02:49He is told, good to see you.
02:51He is told, on 9th May, I burnt the bodies of the martyrs.
02:53I attacked the organizations.
02:55I attacked the GHQ.
02:56I attacked the Corps Commander.
02:58He is told, wishing you good luck.
03:00He is called a political party.
03:02He is so lazy.
03:03He is so lazy to give punishment.
03:05He keeps confessing in front of the court every day.
03:08And he is said to be a revolutionary.
03:09This is not the time to confess crime or sin.
03:12This is the time to give punishment.
03:14I request the Supreme Court of India
03:17that today you will have to punish the criminal.
03:20If you don't, then tomorrow you will have to give certificates to all terrorist political parties.
03:29Today, Imran Khan has said that a special agenda is being prepared in the media
03:34that I have incited people to go to the GHQ and protest.
03:37But the reality is that in the three decades of Tehreek-e-Insaf,
03:40there is no example of full protest.
03:43Khan said in one post that the entire Pakistani nation is being called terrorist
03:48and hatred is being instilled in the nation.
03:50Some people living in the 70s,
03:51who are completely unaware of the way social media works,
03:55those people who have no understanding of social media,
03:58they are putting up a label of digital terrorism.
04:01Khan further said that if everyone who supports his community is considered a digital terrorist,
04:06then there will be a gap between the army and the people.
04:09And once again, Imran Khan, giving an example of 1971, said that
04:14on March 25, 1971, when Yahya Khan operated against a large number of people in Dhaka,
04:19the results were not good for the country.
04:21The former Prime Minister said that the demand for the adoption of the constitution
04:24and the real freedom is not treachery.
04:27This is the story of the past three days.
04:29Whereas in the next three days, the deadline for action on specific sessions is coming to an end.
04:34The Supreme Court gave a verdict on July 12 on specific sessions.
04:37On July 19, the Prime Minister of Punjab, Maryam Nawaz,
04:39filed a lawsuit against her for selling her conscience.
04:41She threatened to kill those who put the country's development at risk.
04:45Even Mr. Mian, who has learned a lesson from the past,
04:47rejected the court's decision.
04:49On the same day, the Election Commission issued a press release on the court's decision
04:53and also clearly refuted the Supreme Court's decision.
04:56The Election Commission also said that if there is any obstruction,
04:58the Supreme Court will take a vote.
05:00However, while adhering to the Supreme Court's decision on specific sessions,
05:0438 members of the National Assembly have submitted their names in support of their involvement with Tehrik-e-Insaf.
05:09Tehrik-e-Insaf has 9 MPAs in Sindh,
05:11whereas more than 100 members from Punjab have submitted certificates to join the party.
05:16Tehrik-e-Insaf has prepared a list of 35 women's names for the specific sessions of the National and Provincial Assemblies.
05:22Tehrik-e-Insaf has also finalized 14 names for the specific sessions of women in the National Assembly.
05:28However, the Election Commission has asked for two consecutive sessions in the past 12 days,
05:33after which a press release was issued.
05:35Three days are left.
05:36However, Tehrik-e-Insaf has not been notified.
05:39Political and non-political quarters have given their decision on the specific sessions.
05:44Now, the country's autonomous body, the Election Commission,
05:47has to decide whether the court's decision should be followed or the case will once again be addressed by a dictator.
05:52The case is about the demand of democracy more than the survival of the political party.
05:57The two narratives are completely contrary to each other.
06:01While addressing the New York Bar,
06:03Justice Atar Minnalla is expressing his desire for a judicial role in the preservation of democracy.
06:08He says that he wants the courts to remain open whenever there is a threat of martial law.
06:13He also referred to the removal of Prime Minister Imran Khan on 5th July and 12th October.
06:28ARY, you see, I don't want to name them.
06:31They created a situation as if martial law is going to be imposed.
06:35I wish every time there is a threat of martial law, the courts remain open.
06:41They were open on 5th July when General Ziaudah was removing an elected Prime Minister.
06:48I wish they were open on 12th October
06:53when General Pervez Musharraf had thrown out an elected Prime Minister.
06:57If anyone had attempted to remove unconstitutionally an elected Prime Minister till then, Mr. Imran Khan,
07:08then it would have been a test of the Islamabad High Court
07:12whether it stands up to uphold the constitution or not.
07:18Mr. Atar Minnalla further said that a situation was being created on the channels
07:22as if martial law is going to be imposed at the time when a vote of no confidence movement was being launched against Prime Minister Imran Khan.
07:30Was the situation like martial law at that time or not?
07:33Let's look at the newspapers and commentators of that time.
07:36On 3rd April, while talking to Al Jazeera,
07:38journalist Benazir Shah said that the country is now facing a threat of unconstitutionality.
07:43There was a threat that the ruling party, i.e. Tehreek-e-Insaf,
07:47will not hesitate to take any unconstitutional action to avoid the vote of no confidence.
07:51Tehreek-e-Insaf's clear message is that if we cannot govern, then no one can.
07:56The severity of the situation can be guessed from the tweet of the then Prime Minister, Fawad Chaudhry,
08:01which he tweeted on 9th April, 2022 at 11.02pm.
08:04Fawad Chaudhry tweeted that the government is completely in awe of the army chief and the Pakistani administration.
08:10Such rumours are being spread that there is a plan to change the leadership of the army.
08:13These rumours are completely baseless and are being spread according to a plan.
08:18The government condemns these rumours and completely refutes them.
08:22On the same day, Pakistan People's Party Senator Mustafa Nawaz Khokhar
08:25told Chief of Army Staff General Kamal Javed Bajwa
08:28that if the government does not take a vote of no confidence, then play a role.
08:31Senator Khokhar wrote on Twitter that if today's speaker and government do not follow the clear orders of the Supreme Court,
08:37then General Bajwa should play his role in this storm.
08:39Yes, he should also make a statement that he stands with the Supreme Court's decision as a professional soldier.
08:47If we look at the headlines of the international media at that time,
08:50then the British newspaper The Guardian wrote on 9th April that
08:53Khan met with senior and senior military personnel every week.
08:57Many people were afraid that he would try to bring the powerful army of Pakistan into power.
09:03And instead of handing over the power to the party,
09:05he will announce martial law.
09:07This will return Pakistan to the dark days of the past of military intervention.
09:12In the era of political instability, the threat of insecurity spread.
09:16And security was increased around the residence of the Prime Minister.
09:19While on 10th April 2022, The Guardian gave a follow-up to the story and put a headline
09:24Imran Khan threatened to impose martial law.
09:26Documents suggest that a specific article was also published on this topic.
09:30The United Times on its website on 9th April,
09:33reported that the prisoner van has been taken out of the Parliament House.
09:36This is all documented recorded history.
09:38It is surprising that the Noon League is proud to admit that
09:41today's establishment told Mr. Mian to go back to London and take control of the government.
09:47They have cheated and they are cheating.
09:49Let's do one thing, let's catch Mr. Nawaz Sharif's horses.
09:52Yes, we will catch the horses of the army that will take him to London.
09:55Then Pakistan will start crying.
09:57Imran's hands are killing Pakistan. Mr. Nawaz Sharif, you come.
10:01Then Nawaz Sharif came.
10:02Then the forces that wanted Nawaz Sharif not to become the Prime Minister for the fourth time,
10:07they made a plan and announced at 5 o'clock that Nawaz Sharif lost to Mansara.
10:14That is, Mr. Mian was called and then defeated.
10:18Justice Sattar bin Allah says that if someone had tried to remove the then Prime Minister Imran Khan,
10:23then this test would have been of Islamabad High Court,
10:25whether he would have stood up for the removal of the constitution or not.
10:27It is surprising that at a time when the decision of the Supreme Court on specific sessions is in the air,
10:34and the Government and the Election Commission of Pakistan are equally uncomfortable with this decision,
10:38are opposing it.
10:39In such a situation, how and when can the court stand up for the removal of the constitution?
10:44We have tested the strength of the court on the time of election.
10:48There is information that even if an insult is made to the Speaker of the National Assembly,
10:51he will not issue a notification related to specific sessions.
10:54Two narratives, two statements.
10:56Which team will take the game in the contradiction of the two statements?
10:59It is too early to say.
11:00But this atmosphere of tension is becoming more intense.
11:03Islamabad High Court has issued a written decision,
11:06declaring the Chief Commissioner's order to withdraw permission from the Jalsa of Tehreek-e-Insaf.
11:11The decision states that the request of the NoC of Tehreek-e-Insaf Jalsa
11:15will be considered in front of the Islambad administration.
11:18According to the law, the Islambad administration should decide on the request with other reasons.
11:22According to the order of 5 July, due to the situation of law and order in Muharram,
11:26the NoC was withdrawn.
11:28Before withdrawing the NoC, the Chief Commissioner did not inform any representative of Tehreek-e-Insaf.
11:32This is the second aspect of the picture.
11:35The Minister of Law was giving a statement today that the material on the ban on Tehreek-e-Insaf is fully available.
11:41This is being taken seriously.
11:45The loyal government has to decide on the basis of material.
11:49Then the reference is sent to the Supreme Court.
11:51This is the material that is being discussed.
11:54And this is being taken seriously.
11:57Today, the case of ban on Tehreek-e-Insaf did not come under consideration
12:01in the meeting of the Minister of Justice of the Loyal Cabinet.
12:04It is possible that the government is not in favour of the ban on Tehreek-e-Insaf.
12:07This is the corruption of every era of politics.
12:10We learn lessons.
12:11We learn about democracy.
12:16We sit together.
12:17Then we forget about it and start writing new chapters of old politics.
12:20We have with us senior journalist Kashif Abbasi and Mohammad Malik.
12:23Thank you both very much.
12:25Kashif, I will start with you.
12:26First of all, you said that you had monologued for 2.5 to 4 hours
12:31the night you had to take the vote of confidence.
12:34No confidence.
12:35You had to take no confidence.
12:37It was happening.
12:38It was a martial law environment.
12:40What kind of panic were you creating on TV?
12:42If you allow me, I will tell you a long story.
12:45We finished the program at 9.
12:47Me and one of our senior friends had to play a cricket match.
12:49Both of us used to play in the same team.
12:51So, we kept talking on the phone all day
12:53about what to do, whether to go or not.
12:55The situation was such.
12:56At 9, we decided that the meeting would be postponed.
12:59If it goes on till tomorrow, we will go to play a cricket match.
13:01At 10.30, I got a call from our President, Ahmad Yusuf, that the courts had opened.
13:05I think it was around 10.15 in the morning.
13:08I remember that I was alone.
13:10Arshad and Sabir were both in the Prime Minister's House.
13:13So, I was sitting on the TV for 4 hours continuously till 2.30.
13:17I was very surprised to hear that
13:19Mr. Kathir Minnala was saying that
13:21we had created an environment where a martial law was going to be imposed.
13:23Absolutely wrong.
13:24If this report is made on other channels,
13:28if they say so, I will send them the footages
13:31to denotify someone.
13:33This is not the news that Imran Khan has started denotifying.
13:36The news at that time was that the courts had opened.
13:38After that, Mr. Athar Minnala,
13:40Honorable Chief Justice of Islamabad High Court,
13:43when one Arshad Sharif, may Allah grant him a place in heaven,
13:46went to take bail,
13:48he repeatedly mentioned me.
13:50At that time, Mr. Kashid said that the courts had opened.
13:52What kind of courts had opened that day?
13:54What kind of things were they saying?
13:55Then once, I also went there.
13:57Our channel was closed.
13:58He again addressed me directly
14:00and said that you keep saying that the courts have opened.
14:02Which Islamabad High Court had opened?
14:04Today, he is saying that the Islamabad High Court had opened.
14:06It was being said that Maulvi Iqbal Haider's petition had come
14:10and that General Wajahat should not be denotified.
14:13This is why the Islamabad High Court had opened.
14:15We were worried that what kind of environment is this
14:18in which all this is happening day and night.
14:20And this is happening.
14:22I still remember the words.
14:23In fact, today we went to the archives and checked again.
14:26When it was told that the anchor had asked a question,
14:29Wasim Adami and I were two people.
14:31Wasim was in Karachi and I was here.
14:33He said that the courts had opened.
14:35The Supreme Court had opened.
14:36Of course, it was a one-off.
14:37Still, we can wait for the next day.
14:39But when it was said that the Islamabad High Court had opened,
14:41I said that I don't have words.
14:43Why is there so much compulsion in Islamabad at this time?
14:46What is happening that you have to open all the courts?
14:49What was the atmosphere?
14:50This was the news of the prison van.
14:52The convicts were standing.
14:54Yes, yes.
14:55These vans were standing
14:56These things were brought to put pressure on justice.
14:59At that time, many of the most important people
15:01when they were talked to
15:03that sir, this is because to put pressure on them
15:05You must have seen that the speaker also backed off.
15:08The decision was also made at 12 o'clock at night.
15:10And Ayaz Sadiq was also given.
15:12This pressure was being put that if they do not do this,
15:14then there will be contempt.
15:15You will also be arrested.
15:16This will also happen.
15:17That will also happen.
15:18We knew all this was happening.
15:19That the pressure is being put.
15:20Is there any fear of Marshallah?
15:23What was happening that there was a fear of Marshallah?
15:25The Supreme Court had given an order last night.
15:27If there was no confidence that night,
15:31it would have happened the next day.
15:32Yes, but that's why I showed you all the newspapers of the whole date.
15:35The headlines were there.
15:36There was definitely an atmosphere.
15:37But you are saying that you did not contribute to this atmosphere.
15:40This was definitely there.
15:41Yes.
15:42This was definitely there that if it is denotified.
15:45This is also the news of some channels.
15:46If Mr. Asad Minala, the Honorable Chief Justice
15:50of then Islamabad High Court
15:52I send them videos.
15:54We saw it all today.
15:55Did the ARY really do something
15:58in which we are saying that
15:59Marshallah will be imposed here?
16:00Nothing.
16:01So, Master,
16:02the four-hour long monologue of Kashif Kabbasi.
16:05And I told you that
16:07spreading such fears
16:09and inviting Amriyat
16:10or endorsing it is not possible.
16:12But I remember, Master,
16:13you and I were definitely on the streets.
16:15We left the assembly.
16:16Then we were on the streets outside.
16:17Shuttling between PM House outside.
16:19Going back to office.
16:20There was definitely a atmosphere of desperation and panic.
16:22But today, the Chief Justice admits
16:24that the court was open
16:25of the Islamabad High Court.
16:26And on the way to martial law,
16:28his prayers and hope
16:29that the courts will always be open.
16:31What is the guarantee
16:32of the then very strong courts
16:35and today of the equally
16:36or much stronger courts today?
16:38God forbid.
16:39You know, the situation
16:40ever came out of hand.
16:42Look, the first thing is
16:43that where Kashif will be,
16:44there will be chaos.
16:46In this, I am with the judge.
16:48But
16:51But look at one thing,
16:52when it was a critical time that day,
16:54the judge was watching BRY, Master.
16:56Remember this.
16:57In his pyjamas.
16:58In his pyjamas.
16:59Yes.
17:00He was looking for the source of the problem.
17:02He was identifying it.
17:04No, look,
17:06I was listening to Atta Sahib's speech.
17:08He did two things.
17:09One, he
17:11caused a lot of damage
17:12to PTI's statement
17:13in this speech.
17:14Because PTI's statement was that
17:16the army had opened it
17:19and the intelligence agency
17:20had opened the courts.
17:21He was saying that he had
17:22opened it after seeing the army.
17:23So, that statement was given.
17:25The second one is very
17:26admirable.
17:27He is a progressive man.
17:28I like him a lot.
17:30But when I was listening to his speech,
17:32I was listening to him with
17:33great enthusiasm.
17:35When Musharraf removed it,
17:36the courts should have been open
17:37at that time as well.
17:39And he forgot himself
17:40that when Musharraf was in power,
17:42he was also a law minister
17:43in KP's government.
17:45And I wish he had not gone there
17:47when he was in power.
17:48That would have been better.
17:49So, there are a lot of contradictions
17:50in his statements.
17:52But the issue is not of the past.
17:55The issue is of the future.
17:56Look, the situation at the moment
17:58is very, very,
18:00very much
18:01a conflict situation.
18:04Everywhere,
18:05now on Friday,
18:06there will be a strike,
18:07a nationwide strike.
18:08No matter what PTI says,
18:10I was in the show
18:11with Zain Qureshi Sahib.
18:12I asked him again and again,
18:13who are you protesting against?
18:16Is it against the government
18:17or against the army?
18:19Because you say
18:20that this government is irrelevant.
18:21It has no power or anything.
18:23We don't even talk to them,
18:24that's why we do it.
18:25So, does this mean
18:26that you are protesting against the army?
18:29The fact is that
18:30the army is at a great stake.
18:33There are massacres happening every day.
18:36Our 22-23-year-old children
18:37are being martyred every day.
18:39Officers, soldiers.
18:41But even after that,
18:42people are angry that
18:43the situation in Balochistan and PTI
18:44is not getting better.
18:45The issue of Azmi Ashtakam
18:47has also become a military issue
18:50because the government
18:51has not taken care of it.
18:53They come to explain,
18:54DG Ashtakam has to be explained.
18:56The misunderstanding of the operation
18:58was also created by the government.
19:00In everything,
19:01now there is a firewall.
19:04So, sir,
19:05this government keeps the decision
19:06of the country's biggest court
19:08strict,
19:09to keep the balance,
19:10to overlook,
19:12and what legal evidence will be given?
19:15Three days are left.
19:16I think the decision here
19:17should be made by the military leadership.
19:19It is not a government issue.
19:21The confrontation that is going on,
19:23can the army keep a confrontation
19:25with both Imran Khan and Azmi Ashtakam?
19:28I don't think that
19:29it can work like this.
19:31Because if they have
19:32popular power,
19:33Imran Khan,
19:34then they have legal power.
19:37And when these two powers
19:39can't work together,
19:43you can't do bulldoze.
19:46One of the two places
19:48where their relations can be fixed,
19:50that is Adliya.
19:51And this can be done very easily
19:52behind the scenes.
19:53Press the reset button,
19:55and those relationships get fixed.
19:57But it seems that
19:58even that is not happening there.
20:00Okay, it's a very important point
20:01that Mr. Malik has raised.
20:03The fact that two fronts
20:04cannot be opened.
20:06Will the court make a decision or not?
20:07Mr. Kashyap,
20:08the president was present
20:09in the Kakar formula.
20:10Will the courts be taken on board this time?
20:12Will everybody be willing
20:13to take one step back?
20:15It seems difficult at this time.
20:17Let me add one thing.
20:18The cricket story that I told you,
20:19I told you to go to the match at 9pm.
20:21It meant that
20:22there was no such atmosphere in Islamabad at that time.
20:24When the courts opened,
20:25we got panic calls
20:26that let's do it live again.
20:27Anyways,
20:28Mr. Malik,
20:29let's understand one thing.
20:30There is a poker game of cards.
20:32It is called all-in.
20:34At this time,
20:35everyone is all-in.
20:37At this time,
20:38I don't see any way
20:39to back off.
20:40Which entity
20:41will be able to back off?
20:44At this time,
20:45the establishment is also
20:46obviously
20:47at every place
20:48that Imran Khan has been cut.
20:50They will not come out.
20:51Imran Khan also said
20:52that no,
20:53I will not agree.
20:54This is a fight between the law and the law.
20:55Those who will fight,
20:56I will stay inside.
20:57I am not ready to deal.
20:58I don't see both backing off.
20:59Now,
21:00during that time,
21:01this decision,
21:02now in this decision,
21:03see,
21:04you have to decide
21:05on the principle.
21:06Is it possible
21:07that you have made a court?
21:09There is a Supreme Court.
21:1013 of its judges
21:11give a decision
21:12and there is a person
21:13sitting on top of it.
21:14There is no person sitting
21:15on top of it,
21:16I am sorry.
21:17There is an outsider.
21:18He said,
21:19I will make this decision
21:20looking at the Supreme Court's decision
21:21that I have to act on it
21:22or not.
21:23The government is making
21:24this decision
21:25and I have to make this decision
21:26because it is written in the constitution
21:27that there is a reflection of power
21:28there.
21:29I don't want to accept
21:30the government's decision.
21:31I don't want to pay taxes.
21:32I don't want to do this.
21:33We run the country
21:34according to our constitution.
21:35We don't run it
21:36according to our wishes.
21:37We have decided
21:38to run the country
21:39according to our wishes
21:40because I want this
21:41and if the Supreme Court
21:42has given a decision
21:43against me,
21:44I will not act on it.
21:45This is not
21:46something that can be acted on.
21:47We have to see
21:48what the election commission
21:49will do
21:50in the remaining
21:512-3 days
21:52given to the election commission.
21:53Will the election commission
21:54act on this?
21:55If not,
21:56then what will the Supreme Court
21:57do?
21:58See,
21:59the problem at this time
22:00was that
22:01the government
22:02did not get
22:03the majority vote.
22:04This is a larger issue.
22:05If the PTI got the seats,
22:06then it's fine.
22:07If not,
22:08then the PTI
22:09has no benefit.
22:10But,
22:11they do still become
22:12the largest party
22:13in the parliament.
22:14There is no material change.
22:15Even if there is no material change,
22:16the strength is very big
22:17and banning such a party
22:18won't be difficult.
22:19See,
22:20do they need
22:21special seats
22:22in the assembly
22:23to ban them?
22:24The election
22:25that took place
22:26on 8th February
22:27and the way
22:28people
22:29took out
22:30bangles,
22:31found signs
22:32and voted,
22:33isn't that enough
22:34to tell
22:35which is
22:36an acceptable
22:37political party
22:38in Pakistan
22:39whose seats
22:40have been reduced
22:41and in which
22:42in place of
22:43form 47
22:44results,
22:45you brought
22:46a government
22:47of your choice.
22:48Now,
22:49someone will have to
22:50tell that
22:51acceptance
22:52is on 8th February.
22:53What happens
22:54if there is no
22:55material change?
22:56What happens?
22:57See,
22:58then the Supreme Court
22:59will determine
23:00whether
23:01the court
23:02will follow
23:03its decision.
23:04If someone
23:05goes with
23:06contempt and
23:07says,
23:08sir,
23:09you gave this
23:10decision,
23:11you have to
23:12follow it
23:13for 15 days
23:14and the
23:15election
23:16commission
23:17didn't do it,
23:18if the
23:19contempt
23:20goes,
23:21what will
23:22the Supreme
23:23Court
23:24do?
23:25If they
23:26go with
23:27contempt
23:28proceedings
23:29and
23:30the
23:31Supreme
23:32Court
23:33doesn't
23:34do it,
23:35what will
23:36the Supreme
23:37Court
23:38do?
23:39If the
23:40Supreme
23:41Court
23:42doesn't
23:43do it,
23:44what will
23:45the Supreme
23:46Court
23:47do?
23:48If the
23:49Supreme
23:50Court
23:51doesn't
23:52do it,
23:53what will
23:54the Supreme
23:55Court
23:56do?
23:57If the
23:58Supreme
23:59Court
24:00doesn't
24:01do it,
24:02what will
24:03the Supreme
24:04Court
24:05do?
24:28the
24:29Supreme
24:30Court
24:31doesn't
24:32do it,
24:33what will
24:34the
24:35Supreme
24:36Court
24:37do?
24:38If the
24:39Supreme
24:40Court
24:41doesn't
24:42do it,
24:43what will
24:44the Supreme
24:45Court
24:46do?
24:47If the
24:48Supreme
24:49Court
24:50doesn't
24:51do it,
24:52what will
24:53the Supreme
24:54Court
24:55do?
24:56If the
24:57Supreme
24:58Court
24:59doesn't
25:00do it,
25:01what will
25:02the
25:03Supreme
25:04Court
25:05do?
25:06If the
25:07Supreme
25:08Court
25:09doesn't
25:10do it,
25:11what will
25:12the Supreme
25:13Court
25:14do?
25:15If the
25:16Supreme
25:17Court
25:18doesn't
25:19do it,
25:20what will
25:21the
25:22Supreme
25:23Court
25:24do?
25:25If the
25:26Supreme
25:27Court
25:28doesn't
25:29do it,
25:30what will
25:31the
25:32Supreme
25:33Court
25:34do?
25:35If the
25:36Supreme
25:37Court
25:38doesn't
25:39do it,
25:40what will
25:41the
25:42Supreme
25:43Court
25:44do?
25:45If the
25:46Supreme
25:47Court
25:48doesn't
25:49do it,
25:50what will
25:51the
25:52Supreme
25:53Court
25:54do?
25:55If the
25:56Supreme
25:57Court
25:58doesn't
25:59do it,
26:00what will
26:01the
26:02Supreme
26:03Court
26:04do?
26:05If the
26:06Supreme
26:07Court
26:08doesn't
26:09do it,
26:10what will
26:11the
26:12Supreme
26:13Court
26:14do?
26:15If the
26:16Supreme
26:17Court
26:18doesn't
26:19do it,
26:20what will
26:21the
26:22Supreme
26:23Court
26:24do?
26:54If the
26:55Supreme
26:56Court
26:57doesn't
26:58do it,
26:59what will
27:00the
27:01Supreme
27:02Court
27:03do?
27:04If the
27:05Supreme
27:06Court
27:07doesn't
27:08do it,
27:09what will
27:10the
27:11Supreme
27:12Court
27:13do?
27:14If the
27:15Supreme
27:16Court
27:17doesn't
27:18do it,
27:19what will
27:20the
27:21Supreme
27:22Court
27:23do?
27:53If the
27:54Supreme
27:55Court
27:56doesn't
27:57do it,
27:58what will
27:59the
28:00Supreme
28:01Court
28:02do?
28:03If the
28:04Supreme
28:05Court
28:06doesn't
28:07do it,
28:08what will
28:09the
28:10Supreme
28:11Court
28:12do?
28:13If the
28:14Supreme
28:15Court
28:16doesn't
28:17do it,
28:18what will
28:19the
28:20Supreme
28:21Court
28:22do?
28:23If the
28:24Supreme
28:25Court
28:26doesn't
28:27do it,
28:28what will
28:29the
28:30Supreme
28:31Court
28:32do?
28:33If the
28:34Supreme
28:35Court
28:36doesn't
28:37do it,
28:38what will
28:39the
28:40Supreme
28:41Court
28:42do?
28:43If the
28:44Supreme
28:45Court
28:46doesn't
28:47do it,
28:48what will
28:49the
28:50Supreme
28:51Court
28:52do?
28:53If the
28:54Supreme
28:55Court
28:56doesn't
28:57do it,
28:58what will
28:59the
29:00Supreme
29:01Court
29:02do?
29:03If the
29:04Supreme
29:05Court
29:06doesn't
29:07do it,
29:08what will
29:09the
29:10Supreme
29:11Court
29:12do?
29:13If the
29:14Supreme
29:15Court
29:16doesn't
29:17do it,
29:18what will
29:19the
29:20Supreme
29:21Court
29:22do?
29:23If the
29:24Supreme
29:25Court
29:26doesn't
29:27do it,
29:28what will
29:29the
29:30Supreme
29:31Court
29:32do?
29:33If the
29:34Supreme
29:35Court
29:36doesn't
29:37do it,
29:38what will
29:39the
29:40Supreme
29:41Court
29:42do?
29:43If the
29:44Supreme
29:45Court
29:46doesn't
29:47do it,
29:48what will
29:49the
29:50Supreme
29:51Court
29:52do?
29:53If the
29:54Supreme
29:55Court
29:56doesn't
29:57do it,
29:58what will
29:59the
30:00Supreme
30:01Court
30:02do?
30:03If the
30:04Supreme
30:05Court
30:06doesn't
30:07do it,
30:08what will
30:09the
30:10Supreme
30:11Court
30:12do?
30:13If the
30:14Supreme
30:15Court
30:16doesn't
30:17do it,
30:18what will
30:19the
30:20Supreme
30:21Court
30:22do?
30:47Supreme
30:48Court
30:49doesn't
30:50do it,
30:51what will
30:52the
30:53Supreme
30:54Court
30:55do?
31:17the
31:18Supreme
31:19Court
31:20doesn't
31:21do it,
31:22what will
31:23the
31:24Supreme
31:25Court
31:26do?
31:27If the
31:28Supreme
31:29Court
31:30doesn't
31:31do it,
31:32what will
31:33the
31:34Supreme
31:35Court
31:36do?
31:37If the
31:38Supreme
31:39Court
31:40doesn't
31:41do it,
31:42what will
31:43the
31:44Supreme
31:45Court
31:46do?
32:16the
32:17Supreme
32:18Court
32:19doesn't
32:20do it,
32:21what will
32:22the
32:23Supreme
32:24Court
32:25do?
32:26The
32:27Supreme
32:28Court
32:29doesn't
32:30do it,
32:31what will
32:32the
32:33Supreme
32:34Court
32:35do?
32:36The
32:37Supreme
32:38Court
32:39doesn't
32:40do it,
32:41what will
32:42the
32:43Supreme
32:44Court
32:45do?
32:46The
32:47Supreme
32:48Court
32:49doesn't
32:50do it,
32:51what will
32:52the
32:53Supreme
32:54Court
32:55do?
32:56The
32:57Supreme
32:58Court
32:59doesn't
33:00do it,
33:01what will
33:02the
33:03Supreme
33:04Court
33:05do?
33:06The
33:07Supreme
33:08Court
33:09doesn't
33:10do it,
33:11what will
33:12the
33:13Supreme
33:14Court
33:15do?
33:16The
33:17Supreme
33:18Court
33:19doesn't
33:20do it,
33:21what will
33:22the
33:23Supreme
33:24Court
33:25do?
33:26The
33:27Supreme
33:28Court
33:29doesn't
33:30do it,
33:31what will
33:32the
33:33Supreme
33:34Court
33:35do?
33:36The
33:37Supreme
33:38Court
33:39doesn't
33:40do it,
33:41what will
33:42the
33:43Supreme
33:44Court
33:45do?
33:46The
33:47Supreme
33:48Court
33:49doesn't
33:50do it,
33:51what will
33:52the
33:53Supreme
33:54Court
33:55do?
33:56The
33:57Supreme
33:58Court
33:59doesn't
34:00do it,
34:01what will
34:02the
34:03Supreme
34:04Court
34:05do?
34:06The
34:07Supreme
34:08Court
34:09doesn't
34:10do it,
34:11what
34:12will
34:13the
34:14Supreme
34:15Court
34:16do?
34:17The
34:18Supreme
34:19Court
34:20doesn't
34:21do it,
34:22what will
34:23the
34:24Supreme
34:25Court
34:26do?
34:27The
34:28Supreme
34:29Court
34:30doesn't
34:31do it,
34:32what will
34:33the
34:34Supreme
34:35Court
34:36do?
34:37The
34:38Supreme
34:39Court
34:40doesn't
34:41do it,
34:42what will
34:43the
34:44Supreme
34:45Court
34:46do?
34:47The
34:48Supreme
34:49Court
34:50doesn't
34:51do it,
34:52what will
34:53the
34:54Supreme
34:55Court
34:56do?
34:57The
34:58Supreme
34:59Court
35:00doesn't
35:01do it,
35:02what will
35:03the
35:04Supreme
35:05Court
35:06do?
35:07The
35:08Supreme
35:09Court
35:10doesn't
35:11do it,
35:12what will
35:13the
35:14Supreme
35:15Court
35:16do?
35:17The
35:18Supreme
35:19Court
35:20doesn't
35:21do it,
35:22what will
35:23the
35:24Supreme
35:25Court
35:26do?
35:27The
35:28Supreme
35:29Court
35:30doesn't
35:31do it,
35:32what will
35:33the
35:34Supreme
35:35Court
35:36do?
35:37The
35:38Supreme
35:39Court
35:40doesn't
35:41do it,
35:42what will
35:43the
35:44Supreme
35:45Court
35:46do?
35:47The
35:48Supreme
35:49Court
35:50doesn't
35:51do it,
35:52what will
35:53the
35:54Supreme
35:55Court
35:56do?
35:57The
35:58Supreme
35:59Court
36:00doesn't
36:01do it,
36:02what will
36:03the
36:04Supreme
36:05Court
36:06do?
36:07The
36:08Supreme
36:09Court
36:10doesn't
36:11do it,
36:12what will
36:13the
36:14Supreme
36:15Court
36:16do?
36:17The
36:18Supreme
36:19Court
36:20doesn't
36:21do it,
36:22what will
36:23the
36:24Supreme
36:25Court
36:26do?
36:27The
36:28Supreme
36:29Court
36:30doesn't
36:31do it,
36:32what will
36:33the
36:34Supreme
36:35Court
36:36do?
36:37The
36:38Supreme
36:39Court
36:40doesn't
36:41do it,
36:42what will
36:43the
36:44Supreme
36:45Court
36:46do?
36:47The
36:48Supreme
36:49Court
36:50doesn't
36:51do it,
36:52what will
36:53the
36:54Supreme
36:55Court
36:56do?
36:57The
36:58Supreme
36:59Court
37:00doesn't
37:01do it,
37:02what will
37:03the
37:04Supreme
37:05Court
37:06do?
37:07The
37:08Supreme
37:09Court
37:10doesn't
37:11do it,
37:12what will
37:13the
37:14Supreme
37:15Court
37:16do?
37:17The
37:18Supreme
37:19Court
37:20doesn't
37:21do it,
37:22what will
37:23the
37:24Supreme
37:25Court
37:26do?
37:27The
37:28Supreme
37:29Court
37:30doesn't
37:31do it,
37:32what will
37:33the
37:34Supreme
37:35Court
37:36do?
37:37The
37:38Supreme
37:39Court
37:40doesn't
37:41do it,
37:42what will
37:43the
37:44Supreme
37:45Court
37:46do?
37:47The
37:48Supreme
37:49Court
37:50doesn't
37:51do it,
37:52what will
37:53the
37:54Supreme
37:55Court
37:56do?
37:57The
37:58Supreme
37:59Court
38:00doesn't
38:01do it,
38:02what will
38:03the
38:04Supreme
38:05Court
38:06do?
38:07The
38:08Supreme
38:09Court
38:10doesn't
38:11do it,
38:12what will
38:13the
38:14Supreme
38:15Court
38:16do?
38:17The
38:18Supreme
38:19Court
38:20doesn't
38:21do it,
38:22what will
38:23the
38:24Supreme
38:25Court
38:26do?
38:27The
38:28Supreme
38:29Court
38:30doesn't
38:31do it,
38:32what
38:33will
38:34the
38:35Supreme
38:36Court
38:37do?
38:38The
38:39Supreme
38:40Court
38:41doesn't
38:42do it,
38:43what will
38:44the
38:45Supreme
38:46Court
38:47do?
38:48The
38:49Supreme
38:50Court
38:51doesn't
38:52do it,
38:53what will
38:54the
38:55Supreme
38:56Court
38:57do?
38:58The
38:59Supreme
39:00Court
39:01doesn't
39:02do it,
39:03what will
39:04the
39:05Supreme
39:06Court
39:07do?
39:08The
39:09Supreme
39:10Court
39:11doesn't
39:12do it,
39:13what will
39:14the
39:15Supreme
39:16Court
39:17do?
39:18The
39:19Supreme
39:20Court
39:21doesn't
39:22do it,
39:23what will
39:24the
39:25Supreme
39:26Court
39:27do?
39:28The
39:29Supreme
39:30Court
39:31doesn't
39:32do it,
39:33what will
39:34the
39:35Supreme
39:36Court
39:37do?
39:38The
39:39Supreme
39:40Court
39:41doesn't
39:42do it,
39:43what will
39:44the
39:45Supreme
39:46Court
39:47do?
39:48The
39:49Supreme
39:50Court
39:51doesn't
39:52do it,
39:53what will
39:54the
39:55Supreme
39:56Court
39:57do?
39:58The
39:59Supreme
40:00Court
40:01doesn't
40:02do it,
40:03what will
40:04the
40:05Supreme
40:06Court
40:07do?
40:08The
40:09Supreme
40:10Court
40:11doesn't
40:12do it,
40:13what will
40:14the
40:15Supreme
40:16Court
40:17do?
40:18The
40:19Supreme
40:20Court
40:21doesn't
40:22do it,
40:23what will
40:24the
40:25Supreme
40:26Court
40:27do?
40:28The
40:29Supreme
40:30Court
40:31doesn't
40:32do it,
40:33what will
40:34the
40:35Supreme
40:36Court
40:37do?
40:38The
40:39Supreme
40:40Court
40:41doesn't
40:42do it,
40:43what will
40:44the
40:45Supreme
40:46Court
40:47do?
40:48The
40:49Supreme
40:50Court
40:51doesn't
40:52do it,
40:53what will
40:54the
40:55Supreme
40:56Court
40:57do?
40:58The
40:59Supreme
41:00Court
41:01doesn't
41:02do it,
41:03what will
41:04the
41:05Supreme
41:06Court
41:07do?
41:08The
41:09Supreme
41:10Court
41:11doesn't
41:12do it,
41:13what will
41:14the
41:15Supreme
41:16Court
41:17do?
41:18The
41:19Supreme
41:20Court
41:21doesn't
41:22do it,
41:23what will
41:24the
41:25Supreme
41:26Court
41:27do?
41:57the
41:58Supreme
41:59Court
42:00doesn't
42:01do it,
42:02what will
42:03the
42:04Supreme
42:05Court
42:06do?
42:07The
42:08Supreme
42:09Court
42:10doesn't
42:11do it,
42:12what will
42:13the
42:14Supreme
42:15Court
42:16do?
42:17The
42:18Supreme
42:19Court
42:20doesn't
42:21do it,
42:22what will
42:23the
42:24Supreme
42:25Court
42:26do?
42:27The
42:28Supreme
42:29Court
42:30doesn't
42:31do it,
42:32what will
42:33the
42:34Supreme
42:35Court
42:36do?
42:37The
42:38Supreme
42:39Court
42:40doesn't
42:41do it,
42:42what will
42:43the
42:44Supreme
42:45Court
42:46do?
42:47The
42:48Supreme
42:49Court
42:50doesn't
42:51do it,
42:52what will
42:53the
42:54Supreme
42:55Court
42:56do?
42:57The
42:58Supreme
42:59Court
43:00doesn't
43:01do it,
43:02what will
43:03the
43:04Supreme
43:05Court
43:06do?
43:07The
43:08Supreme
43:09Court
43:10doesn't
43:11do it,
43:12what will
43:13the
43:14Supreme
43:15Court
43:16do?
43:17The
43:18Supreme
43:19Court
43:20doesn't
43:21do it,
43:22what will
43:23the
43:24Supreme
43:25Court
43:26do?
43:27The
43:28Supreme
43:29Court
43:30doesn't
43:31do it,
43:32what will
43:33the
43:34Supreme
43:35Court
43:36do?
43:37The
43:38Supreme
43:39Court
43:40doesn't
43:41do it,
43:42what will
43:43the
43:44Supreme
43:45Court
43:46do?
43:47The
43:48Supreme
43:49Court
43:50doesn't
43:51do it,