• 4 months ago
During a House Science Committee hearing prior to the Congressional recess, Rep. Sean Casten (D-IL) questioned Dept. of Energy Deputy Secretary, David Turk, about the pause on liquefied natural gas exports.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00Member for UC request. Thank you Mr. Chairman. I'd ask unanimous consent to put into the record
00:05April 2024 Fusion Industry Association bold decadal vision paper. Seeing no opposition so
00:15ordered. The chair would note for the record that the next in order be Mr. Kasten and then
00:20Mr. Fleshman. Gentleman from Illinois is recognized for five minutes. Thank you very much Mr. Chair.
00:26Always a pleasure to go out to my friend Mr. Weber not least because I'd like to continue
00:29the conversation about the LNG pause. I talked about this with Secretary Granholm a few months
00:35ago and was kind enough to submit some responses to questions for the record. I want to just
00:40remind this committee of a couple of numbers. In the last decade there has been a 24 percent growth
00:44in U.S. consumption of natural gas. There has been a 53 percent increase in U.S. production of
00:50natural gas and there has been a 384 percent increase in the export of natural gas. We are
00:58having no problem with any of those exports. Right now we're exporting about 15
01:02billion cubic feet per day. Projects currently under construction are going to double that to
01:0830 billion cubic feet per day. The projects that are permitted but not yet under construction will
01:14increase that almost another 15 to 41 billion cubic feet a day. I see you nodding because I
01:19got all this from DOE websites and the pause affects an additional 15 that would take us to
01:2866 billion cubic feet per day. So there is no question but that we are exporting a massive
01:32amount of natural gas and are going to export a massive amount more long before we ever get to
01:37this question about the pause. What I would like to understand and I'd like to have as much
01:44precision on these as you can, as the DOE under the Natural Gas Act fulfills your obligation to
01:52consider whether these additional projects are in the national interest, number one,
01:56are you treating climate change as a matter to be considered under the national interest?
02:01I mean, just yes or no, is that one of the factors?
02:03Yes.
02:04Okay. And will that consider both the methane emissions from leaks to other countries and the
02:11CO2 emissions associated with combustion?
02:12Yes, both.
02:14For the purposes of the methane combustion, what are you using for the global warming
02:18potential as you evaluate those impacts?
02:20So we'll look at the 20 year but also the 100 year and we'll make sure that we look at it a
02:24variety of different ways. And as you know, methane is a super pollutant when it comes to
02:28climate change and an area that we've spent a lot of time in this administration on the regulatory
02:33side but also on the funding side and the R&D side to get our act together to reduce those
02:38emissions as much as we possibly can. It's a big deal.
02:41I ask that because, you know, I think President Biden has appropriately said this is the
02:46decisive decade for climate and 100 year global warming potential is interesting but a rather
02:52academic question when we have a very narrow period of time to right the ship.
02:57And so I would hope you would take a more aggressive view as we're looking at those.
03:01Well, on the methane reduction side, we just came out with our MERP program, which is a
03:05terrible acronym, but it's a bunch of money focused on reducing methane emissions,
03:09complementary to what the EPA is doing. So this is a big, big deal.
03:13But of course, that doesn't affect like on the exports, we're going to other markets
03:16overseas. And so we have less degrees of freedom there, but it matters on the export.
03:21Well, and frankly, we have responsibility for those exports as well. Like just the fact
03:25that we're exporting and it's up to now about half of our production for natural gas is
03:30authorized to be exported.
03:33Understand. And I want to move on. I just want to make sure because the leak rates downstream
03:36in some of those countries are bigger. The Secretary Granholm in her response to QFRs
03:41said that the forward economic impacts on domestic prices were based on EIA estimates.
03:46My understanding is that EIA makes price forecasts based on a status quo regulatory
03:50environment. But this is asking the question, what would happen if the regulation changed?
03:55How do you square that circle for us?
03:57Yeah, so this is why we have several of our national labs involved to come at this from
04:00a variety of different ways. And right now, American consumers pay five to six times less
04:05than those and companies as well in Asia and Europe. So right now we have a and as
04:11we export more and more, what does that mean for American consumers in terms of what they
04:15pay? So we need to come at that with a variety of different modeling analysis and different
04:19assumptions.
04:20So I guess the gas industry is not going to like this, but we know that when the Freeport
04:23terminal shut down, the price of gas fell by 30 percent.
04:25It was remarkable how much it fell.
04:27So so we I think objectively, we know that the less we export at current production levels,
04:32the lower the prices are going to be for basic economics.
04:34And we're seeing a lot of experts who've looked at this. And this is one of the reasons
04:38to do the study and to make sure that we've got the good data to inform what our public
04:42interest.
04:42OK, last last question. Those statistics that I shared, 24 percent demand growth in the
04:46last decade. The U.S. economy has grown by over 50 percent in the same period of time.
04:52Oil use is flat. Coal use is down 40 percent. We have successfully managed to decouple economic
04:58growth from fossil fuel consumption for the benefit of our climate, for the benefit of
05:01consumers. As the U.S. as the DOE thinks about our national interest, is it in the
05:06United States national interest to export the technologies that have allowed us to decouple
05:11from fossil fuel use? Or is it in the U.S.'s national interest to export the fossil fuel
05:14we're decoupling from?
05:16So these are the clean energy technologies of the future. There's a remarkable competition
05:20going on right now. And we either step up with the kinds of incentives that are in the
05:24bill and the IRA and do everything we can to win those markets. And that's exactly what
05:28we're doing.
05:28OK, well, I would
05:29We've actually reduced our emissions in 2023 over 4 percent at the same time that we had
05:34one of the most robust GDP growths all around the world. So we are decoupling.
05:38True, but that's only if you don't include scope 3 emissions. We can't take credit for
05:42that while simultaneously exporting fossil fuel. And as we think about the national interest,
05:47I hope we'll think about making sure that the rest of the world won't take advantage
05:50of where we've gone. Yield back.

Recommended