The Ukraine war escalates as Russia’s Lavrov declares Moscow "will not be cornered," while Trump calls Zelensky "incompetent" and Hungary threatens military action if NATO sends troops. Alex Christoforou breaks down the explosive developments:
🔍 Key Highlights:
✅ Lavrov’s Defiance – "No amount of sanctions or threats will trap Russia!"
✅ Trump’s Blunt Take – "Zelensky’s leadership is a disaster for Ukraine."
✅ Hungary’s Ultimatum – Ready to block NATO troops in Ukraine, calling it a "red line."
✅ Troop Deployment Risks – Is NATO pushing for WW3?
⚠️ "The West is playing with fire—and Putin holds the matches." – Christoforou
#Lavrov #Russia #Trump #Zelensky #Hungary #UkraineWar #NATO #WW3 #RedLine #Christoforou #Geopolitics #NoMoreWar #PeaceDeal #Putin #Biden #Orban #MilitaryEscalation #WarCrimes #DiplomaticFail #GlobalCrisis
🔍 Key Highlights:
✅ Lavrov’s Defiance – "No amount of sanctions or threats will trap Russia!"
✅ Trump’s Blunt Take – "Zelensky’s leadership is a disaster for Ukraine."
✅ Hungary’s Ultimatum – Ready to block NATO troops in Ukraine, calling it a "red line."
✅ Troop Deployment Risks – Is NATO pushing for WW3?
⚠️ "The West is playing with fire—and Putin holds the matches." – Christoforou
#Lavrov #Russia #Trump #Zelensky #Hungary #UkraineWar #NATO #WW3 #RedLine #Christoforou #Geopolitics #NoMoreWar #PeaceDeal #Putin #Biden #Orban #MilitaryEscalation #WarCrimes #DiplomaticFail #GlobalCrisis
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00But that's a war that should have never been allowed to start, and Biden could have stopped it, and Zelensky could have stopped it, and Putin should have never started it. Everybody's to blame.
00:14Have you spoken to President Zelensky, sir, about his offer to purchase more Patriot missile batteries?
00:19Or I don't know. He's always looking to purchase missiles, you know. He's against... Listen, when you start a war, you've got to know that you can win the war, right? You don't start a war against somebody that's 20 times your size, and then hope that people give you some missiles.
00:33This is my video update on this Tuesday afternoon, April the 15th. Coming to you from Limassol, Cyprus. Let's talk about some news.
00:53And let's start things off with Sergei Lavrov, the Russian Foreign Minister, who gave an interview to the Russian media outlet Comersant.
01:10And I talked about this a bit in my video update yesterday, but I believe the full interview has been published this morning, or will be published very soon.
01:25And Lavrov, as always, said some very interesting things, especially about Project Ukraine and the Green Goblin.
01:38So, Lavrov, he said in this interview that Macron and Stammer, they are looking for a new Green Goblin.
01:53They are looking for someone to replace Zelensky, according to Lavrov.
02:01Oh, what has the world come to when 008 and little Napoleon turn their back on you?
02:11Poor Zelensky.
02:14So, Poroshenko, he was featured on the Washington Post, an article on the Washington Post with Poroshenko,
02:24claiming that the former president of Ukraine, the post-coup d'etat president of Ukraine, is very upset with the Green Goblin.
02:37He would like Zelensky to go.
02:40Poroshenko is arguing that Zelensky really screwed things up when it comes to Trump and Ukraine's relationship with the United States.
02:50And it's time for Zelensky to go.
02:54And, of course, Poroshenko is positioning himself as the Zelensky replacement.
03:00The Russians would never go for Poroshenko.
03:04The Europeans would go for Poroshenko.
03:07Certain factions in the Trump administration, the neocon factions, would absolutely go for Poroshenko.
03:14But the Kremlin would never accept Poroshenko as an Zelensky replacement.
03:26The Chocolate King goes up against the Green Goblin.
03:31It writes itself.
03:34The Chocolate King goes up against the Green Goblin.
03:38I like it.
03:40I like it.
03:41Is that not a Marvel superhero's title?
03:46The Chocolate King takes on the Green Goblin.
03:51So, that is one thing that Lavrov said.
03:56Lavrov also was asked by the journalist at Kommersant
04:02as to whether the key components of the agreement on Ukraine
04:09have been settled with the United States.
04:15And Lavrov's answer to that question was that the key components are hard to agree on.
04:22And discussions continue.
04:24A very diplomatic answer from Lavrov.
04:27What he is saying is that the Alensky regime, the UK, the EU, Kellogg,
04:38certain neocon groups in the Trump administration,
04:42they continue to prevent a deal between the United States and Russia on Project Ukraine.
04:52So, discussions continue.
04:55If it was Witkoff, then we would have a deal with Project Ukraine.
05:02But, we still have the Europeans and Stalmer and the Kelloggs and Waltzes of this world
05:12who are preventing a deal on Project Ukraine.
05:16But, as Lavrov said, negotiations continue.
05:20Top Russian diplomat explains why Moscow trusts Trump.
05:25The U.S. president's common-sense approach is a positive departure from the Biden years,
05:33Sergei Lavrov said.
05:34So, he was asked about the differences between the Trump administration
05:39and the Biden administration when it comes to Project Ukraine.
05:42And, the simple answer from Lavrov is that the Trump administration is willing to listen.
05:51We can talk to the Trump administration.
05:54That is what Lavrov said.
05:55Where, with Biden, there was no talking.
05:59There was just escalation.
06:02So, let me read you what Lavrov said.
06:05Unlike the U.K. and EU countries, the Trump administration is trying to get to the bottom of the issue
06:12and, most importantly, understand the root cause of the Ukraine conflict,
06:16Lavrov told the newspaper Kommersant in an interview published Monday evening.
06:20Okay, so it's already been published.
06:22The U.S. and the EU organized and funded the anti-constitutional coup in Kiev in 2014,
06:29which triggered the confrontation with Russia.
06:31The minister stated,
06:33Trump has repeatedly said that the colossal mistake which led to the current events in Ukraine
06:38was the Biden administration's decision to drag Ukraine into NATO, Lavrov added.
06:46So, does Lavrov trust the Trump administration?
06:54Does he fully trust the Trump administration
06:57as they are trying to negotiate a Project Ukraine deal?
07:03Here is what Lavrov said.
07:05Lavrov said the message Moscow heard from Washington
07:08was that when their national interests don't align,
07:12Russia and the U.S. as responsible players on the world stage
07:16must do everything possible to prevent those contradictions
07:19from escalating into confrontation.
07:22In areas where their interests do align,
07:25both sides should not waste an opportunity to pursue joint initiatives.
07:30He added,
07:31We know perfectly well what a mutually beneficial deal looks like,
07:36something we have never rejected,
07:38and what a deal designed to lure us into another trap looks like,
07:44Lavrov said.
07:44Lavrov used the words lure.
07:48We will not be lured
07:49into another trap.
07:55Lavrov's a smart guy.
07:57Very smart guy.
07:59Putin's a very smart guy.
08:01Most of the Putin administration
08:04is very, very smart,
08:06so they understand what's going on.
08:08They're not going to be lured into another ministry.
08:10They're going to negotiate with the Trump administration
08:14and they're going to try to get to the Trump White House
08:20to move towards Istanbul Plus.
08:25Witkoff is already there.
08:27Now it's just about getting Trump there.
08:29And if you can't get Istanbul Plus,
08:32then the Trump administration can say,
08:35we tried.
08:37We tried to get a deal.
08:39Didn't work out.
08:42We're moving on.
08:45And then Russia's going to do what they need to do.
08:51And the UK and the Europeans
08:53are not going to be able to do anything about it.
08:56Let's get real.
08:57Without the United States,
08:59the Europeans
08:59and 008 Stalmer
09:03are not going to be able to
09:06to keep Ukraine,
09:07to keep the Olenski regime afloat.
09:11Which is why there are rumors,
09:14more than rumors,
09:15that Macron and the French
09:18are working with
09:20with forces on the ground in Romania
09:23and they're planning,
09:26these are the rumors,
09:27they're planning some sort of
09:29of a French force
09:31to move into
09:33into Ukraine
09:34and make a dash towards Odessa.
09:36If Trump walks away from
09:38from Project Ukraine,
09:40if and when
09:41Russia advances towards Odessa,
09:45then the French are planning
09:46to try and beat Russia
09:48to Odessa,
09:49the French military.
09:50These are rumors,
09:51but
09:51believable.
09:57I don't know
09:58if Macron
09:59would actually do such a thing
10:01or if he's just posturing,
10:04but this is what some
10:05outlets
10:07are saying.
10:12It would explain
10:13why
10:13the Europeans,
10:16why the EU
10:16and NATO
10:17made such a big deal
10:21of not allowing
10:23Giorgescu
10:24to stand
10:27in the Romanian elections,
10:30fearing that Giorgescu
10:31would not allow
10:32a French contingent
10:33to use Romanian territory
10:35to make a run
10:37for Odessa
10:37if the United States
10:39decided to walk away
10:40from Project Ukraine
10:41and the Russians
10:42quickly advanced
10:43towards Odessa
10:45and along the Black Sea.
10:46they wanted
10:48to make sure
10:48that they did not
10:49have Giorgescu
10:51there blocking
10:52the French plans.
10:54That would make sense.
10:56So that's Lavrov.
10:58That is what he said
10:59to
10:59Commerzant,
11:01published on Monday evening.
11:02So the
11:03full article
11:03is available
11:05if you can
11:07access
11:08Russian media.
11:10let's
11:12let's now
11:13talk about
11:14Trump
11:16and
11:17what he said
11:18in the Oval Office
11:20as he was meeting
11:21with
11:22Bukaleh
11:23of
11:24El Salvador
11:25and
11:27the questions
11:28that
11:30Trump answered
11:31on Project Ukraine
11:32very interesting
11:34very interesting
11:36responses
11:37from
11:39the U.S.
11:40President
11:41where should
11:42we start
11:44where should
11:45we begin
11:46he was asked
11:47to clarify
11:48the statement
11:50that he made
11:50on Air Force One
11:51about
11:52the
11:53the missile
11:55strike
11:56in Sumi
11:56where he was
11:58asked
11:59he was asked
11:59to comment
12:00on the missile
12:00strike in Sumi
12:01and Trump
12:02said
12:02it was a mistake
12:04and then he blamed
12:05the war on Biden
12:06but he left it there
12:08he just said
12:09it's a mistake
12:10and he didn't get
12:12into into it
12:13any further
12:13and
12:15he was asked
12:15to
12:15to clarify
12:16what he meant
12:17by
12:17by a mistake
12:18and
12:19and that
12:20that was another
12:21gotcha question
12:22from the reporter
12:23and you know
12:23Trump did not
12:25fall for it man
12:26he did not
12:27fall for it
12:27he said
12:28he said
12:29look
12:29it was
12:29it was a mistake
12:30and
12:32and the mistake
12:33what I meant
12:34by saying mistake
12:36was that
12:36this entire
12:37conflict
12:37was a mistake
12:39this entire
12:39war
12:40was a mistake
12:40he didn't
12:42fall for the
12:42gotcha question
12:43the reporter
12:44wanted Trump
12:45to
12:45just to
12:46call Putin
12:47a thug
12:47and to
12:49say Putin
12:49is evil
12:50and
12:51we're going
12:52to place
12:5310,000%
12:54sanctions
12:55on Russian
12:56oil
12:56and stuff
12:56like that
12:57we're going
12:58to send
12:58US troops
12:59to
13:00Ukraine
13:00and give
13:01Alinsky
13:02500 gazillion
13:03dollars
13:03that's what
13:04the reporter
13:04was hoping
13:04Trump
13:05was going
13:05to say
13:05but that's
13:06not what
13:07Trump
13:07said
13:07he
13:07completely
13:08dodged
13:09the question
13:10right
13:11he weaved
13:11in and out
13:12and dodged
13:12that
13:13that gotcha
13:13question
13:14and he
13:15then went
13:15on to
13:15say that
13:16that
13:16Alinsky
13:16is
13:17incompetent
13:18Biden
13:18was
13:19incompetent
13:21he did
13:21say that
13:22Putin
13:22should have
13:22never
13:23invaded
13:23Ukraine
13:24and then
13:24he went
13:24on to
13:25say
13:25if I
13:25was
13:25president
13:25this
13:26would
13:26have
13:26never
13:26have
13:27happened
13:28let me
13:29get you
13:30his exact
13:30quote
13:30it was
13:31a mistake
13:31to let
13:32this war
13:32start
13:33if Biden
13:33was competent
13:34and if
13:34Alinsky
13:35was competent
13:36and I have
13:38no confidence
13:38in that
13:39we had
13:40a tough
13:40meeting here
13:41with him
13:42he kept
13:43asking for
13:43more and
13:44more
13:44this war
13:45should never
13:46have happened
13:47I was president
13:48for four years
13:48and Putin
13:49didn't even
13:49raise the
13:50issue
13:50that's not
13:51the full
13:52quote
13:52of what
13:53Trump said
13:53he did
13:54say that
13:54Putin
13:54should have
13:55never
13:55invaded Ukraine
13:56and then
13:56he went
13:57on to
13:57talk about
13:58how this
13:58would have
13:59never happened
13:59if I was
13:59president
14:00but yeah
14:01he called
14:01Biden
14:02competent
14:02true
14:04incompetent
14:05true
14:05he called
14:06Alinsky
14:07incompetent
14:08very true
14:09and
14:11and then
14:13he was
14:13asked
14:13about
14:14about
14:17Alinsky
14:17offering
14:1815
14:19billion
14:20dollars
14:21to
14:22purchase
14:23American
14:23Patriot
14:25systems
14:25where is
14:27Alinsky
14:28getting the
14:28money
14:28allegedly
14:29he's
14:30getting
14:30the
14:30money
14:30from
14:31the
14:31European
14:31Union
14:32but
14:32I'll
14:33get to
14:33that
14:33later
14:33on
14:34in
14:34the
14:35video
14:35he
14:35doesn't
14:35have
14:36the
14:36money
14:36if it's
14:37not given
14:37to him
14:37by the
14:38EU
14:38if it's
14:39not given
14:39to him
14:39by the
14:40United
14:40States
14:41Alinsky
14:42does not
14:42have
14:4215
14:43billion
14:43dollars
14:44well
14:45maybe if
14:47he sells
14:47some
14:48homes
14:48or some
14:49property
14:49maybe he
14:50could come
14:51up with
14:51the 15
14:51billion
14:52dollars
14:52but he's
14:53not going
14:53to do
14:54that
14:54anyway
14:55Alinsky
14:56he said
14:58that he'll
14:58purchase
14:59Patriot
14:59Systems
15:00for 15
15:02billion
15:02dollars
15:02he has
15:0215
15:03billion
15:03dollars
15:03to purchase
15:04US
15:05Patriot
15:05Systems
15:05he wants
15:06to get
15:0610
15:07Patriot
15:08Systems
15:08that's what
15:09he wants
15:09to get
15:09for 15
15:10billion
15:11dollars
15:11and what
15:12was
15:13Trump's
15:13response
15:14Trump's
15:15response
15:15was
15:16and I
15:17quote
15:18he's
15:18always looking
15:19to purchase
15:19missiles
15:20when you
15:21start a
15:22war
15:22you got
15:23to know
15:23that you
15:23can win
15:24the war
15:24he said
15:25of Alinsky
15:26you don't
15:26start a
15:27war against
15:27somebody
15:28that's
15:2920 times
15:30your size
15:31and then
15:32hope that
15:33people give
15:33you some
15:34missiles
15:34man
15:36boy did
15:38that statement
15:39from
15:39Trump
15:40anger
15:41the
15:42Alinsky
15:42regime
15:43it
15:44angered
15:44Bezulaya
15:45who I
15:46talked about
15:47yesterday
15:48who was
15:48part of
15:49Alinsky's
15:50administration
15:50from what
15:51I understand
15:51she's no
15:52longer part
15:53of Alinsky's
15:53administration
15:54I'm not
15:55quite sure
15:55if she's
15:56a member
15:56of parliament
15:57I think
15:57she is
15:58a member
15:58of parliament
15:59but anyway
15:59she
16:00was plenty
16:03mad
16:03with this
16:04statement
16:04from Trump
16:05the Ukraine
16:06media
16:06is very
16:08upset
16:08with what
16:09Trump said
16:10basically
16:10saying
16:11that
16:11Alinsky
16:12started
16:12the war
16:13that is
16:14basically
16:15what he
16:15is saying
16:16in this
16:17answer
16:19you do
16:20not
16:20start
16:20a war
16:21with
16:21someone
16:2120
16:22times
16:22your
16:22size
16:23yeah
16:26so
16:26Bezulaya
16:26she is
16:28calling
16:28on
16:29Ukraine
16:29to
16:31sever
16:32its
16:32diplomatic
16:33relations
16:33with the
16:34United
16:34States
16:34Rada
16:35deputy
16:36okay
16:36she is
16:37part of
16:37the
16:37parliament
16:37Rada
16:38deputy
16:38Bezulaya
16:39called
16:39for severing
16:40diplomatic
16:40relations
16:41with the
16:42United
16:42States
16:42in the
16:43wake
16:43of
16:44Trump's
16:44latest
16:45comments
16:45yeah
16:49that's
16:50that's
16:51probably
16:51not
16:52a good
16:52idea
16:52if
16:53you're
16:53Ukraine
16:54to
16:54sever
16:54your
16:55relations
16:56with
16:56the
16:56United
16:57States
16:57but again
16:58who knows
16:58maybe
16:59the United
16:59States
16:59is going
16:59to walk
17:00away
17:00anyway
17:00so
17:01who
17:02knows
17:02but
17:03that's
17:04Bezulaya
17:04sever relations
17:07with the
17:08United
17:08States
17:08that's
17:10going to
17:10help
17:10that's
17:12not a
17:13solution
17:13Bezulaya
17:15but she's
17:16mad
17:16she's
17:17very mad
17:17at the
17:18fact that
17:18Trump
17:18is saying
17:19that
17:19Alinsky
17:20started
17:20this
17:20conflict
17:21do not
17:23start
17:24something
17:24with
17:25someone
17:2620
17:26times
17:26your
17:27size
17:27and
17:28then
17:29hope
17:29that
17:29people
17:30give
17:31you
17:31some
17:31missiles
17:31that's
17:32what he
17:32said
17:33after
17:33that
17:33and
17:33then
17:33hope
17:34that
17:34people
17:34give
17:34you
17:34some
17:34missiles
17:35man
17:39Trump
17:40a lot
17:41of
17:41anger
17:42in
17:42Kiev
17:42a lot
17:43of
17:43anger
17:43in
17:43Brussels
17:44over
17:46that
17:46statement
17:47from
17:47Trump
17:48what
17:50else
17:50did
17:50he
17:51say
17:51in
17:51the
17:52Oval
17:52Office
17:52he
17:52was
17:53also
17:53asked
17:53about
17:54placing
17:55more
17:56sanctions
17:56on
17:57Russia
17:57and
17:59tariffs
18:00and
18:00sanctions
18:00on
18:00Russia
18:01and
18:02Trump
18:02said
18:03look
18:03I've
18:03already
18:03placed
18:04sanctions
18:05we've
18:05already
18:05as
18:05the
18:06United
18:06States
18:06we've
18:06already
18:06placed
18:07sanctions
18:07on
18:07Russia
18:08they've
18:08already
18:09been
18:09sanctioned
18:10568
18:11thousand
18:11times
18:12how many
18:13more
18:13sanctions
18:14or tariffs
18:15can we
18:15possibly
18:15place
18:16on
18:16Russia
18:16he
18:16didn't
18:17say
18:17that
18:17but
18:17that's
18:17what he
18:18was
18:18implying
18:18we've
18:18already
18:19sanctioned
18:19Russia
18:20and then
18:20he went
18:20on to
18:20say
18:21that
18:21I think
18:22he went
18:22on to
18:22talk about
18:23the
18:23javelins
18:24stuff like
18:25that
18:26I gave
18:27them the
18:27javelin
18:27missiles
18:28I don't
18:28know why
18:28he keeps
18:29on saying
18:29that
18:29but
18:29he keeps
18:30saying
18:31that
18:31and
18:32and
18:32then
18:32he
18:33he
18:34went
18:35on
18:35to
18:35say
18:35that
18:36that
18:37he
18:37was
18:37the
18:37guy
18:37that
18:39stopped
18:39Nord Stream
18:402
18:40I
18:42already
18:42sanctioned
18:42Russia
18:43remember
18:43Nord Stream
18:442
18:44biggest
18:45pipeline
18:45ever
18:45maybe
18:46in the
18:47world
18:47I
18:47stopped
18:48it
18:48went
18:48to
18:48Germany
18:49I
18:49stopped
18:50it
18:50yeah
18:53he was
18:53asked
18:54why
18:54no
18:54more
18:54sanctions
18:55on
18:55Russia
18:56after
18:56the
18:56Sumi
18:57missile
18:57strike
18:58that
18:58was
18:58the
18:58question
18:59that
18:59he
18:59got
18:59from
18:59the
19:00reporter
19:00they're
19:02really
19:03trying
19:03to
19:03get
19:03him
19:03on
19:04this
19:04on
19:04the
19:05Sumi
19:05missile
19:05strike
19:05they're
19:06really
19:06trying
19:06to
19:06get
19:08Trump
19:09to
19:09say
19:09something
19:10that
19:10would
19:12jeopardize
19:12the
19:13negotiations
19:14with
19:15Russia
19:15that's
19:15what
19:15they're
19:15trying
19:15to
19:16do
19:16that's
19:17why
19:17they
19:17keep
19:17on
19:17asking
19:18him
19:18about
19:18Sumi
19:19yeah
19:22Nord Stream
19:232
19:23I
19:27got
19:27them
19:27to
19:27stop
19:28Nord Stream
19:28I'm
19:29waiting
19:29I'm
19:30waiting
19:31for
19:31Trump
19:31one
19:31of
19:32these
19:32days
19:32and
19:32you
19:32know
19:32he's
19:32going
19:33to
19:33say
19:33it
19:34I
19:34just
19:34have
19:34a
19:34feeling
19:34he's
19:34going
19:35to
19:35say
19:35it
19:35some
19:36reporters
19:37can
19:37ask
19:37him
19:37some
19:37question
19:38about
19:39sanctions
19:39or tariffs
19:40on
19:40Russia
19:41and
19:41Trump
19:42is
19:42then
19:42going
19:42to
19:42say
19:43I
19:43got
19:44them
19:44to
19:44stop
19:45Nord Stream
19:472
19:47or
19:48I
19:49sanctioned
19:49Nord Stream
19:492
19:50I
19:50believe
19:50he
19:50sanctioned
19:50Nord Stream
19:512
19:51or
19:51something
19:51like
19:51that
19:52and
19:54Biden
19:54blew
19:54it
19:54up
19:54you
19:55know
19:55he's
19:56not that
19:57Biden
19:57blew
19:57it
19:57up
19:58not that
19:58Biden
19:58blew
19:59it
19:59up
19:59that's
20:00that's
20:00fake
20:00news
20:00we
20:02already
20:02know
20:02that
20:02it
20:03was
20:03Gilligan
20:03and
20:04the
20:04skipper
20:04on the
20:06Andromeda
20:06yacht
20:07I
20:08showed
20:08you
20:08the
20:08Andromeda
20:09I
20:09found
20:09the
20:09Andromeda
20:10yacht
20:10it's
20:11in
20:11Iyanapa
20:11I've
20:12already
20:12showed
20:12it
20:12so
20:13we
20:13have
20:14all
20:14the
20:14evidence
20:14we
20:14need
20:14it's
20:15all
20:15there
20:15it's
20:16all
20:16in
20:16Iyanapa
20:16sitting
20:17there
20:17the
20:18Andromeda
20:18yacht
20:19the
20:20scuba
20:20gear
20:20is
20:21still
20:21in
20:21the
20:22Andromeda
20:22yacht
20:23as well
20:24as
20:24the
20:25red bull
20:25and
20:26beer
20:26that
20:27Gilligan
20:27and
20:27the
20:28skipper
20:28were
20:28drinking
20:29because
20:29you
20:29have
20:30to
20:30get
20:30your
20:30energy
20:30up
20:31if
20:31you're
20:31going
20:31to
20:31go
20:32deep
20:33into
20:33the
20:33sea
20:33and
20:33blow
20:34up
20:34a
20:35big
20:35pipeline
20:36but
20:36anyway
20:37I'm
20:42sooner
20:43or
20:43later
20:43you
20:44know
20:44it
20:45oh
20:46man
20:46so
20:49Whitcoff
20:49was
20:49on
20:50I
20:50believe
20:50he
20:50was
20:51on
20:51Hannity
20:51on
20:52Fox
20:52News
20:52and
20:53he
20:54was
20:54asked
20:54about
20:54the
20:54negotiations
20:55with
20:56Russia
20:57and
20:59Whitcoff
20:59said
21:00that
21:00it's
21:01difficult
21:01it's
21:03difficult
21:04but
21:04we
21:05could
21:05be
21:05looking
21:05at
21:05a
21:06very
21:06big
21:07deal
21:07a
21:08deal
21:08that
21:08will
21:08be
21:09very
21:10good
21:10for
21:11the
21:11entire
21:11world
21:12is
21:12what
21:12Whitcoff
21:13said
21:13I
21:15was
21:15listening
21:15to
21:15what
21:16Whitcoff
21:16was
21:16saying
21:17and
21:17it
21:18does
21:18seem
21:18as if
21:19Whitcoff
21:19is
21:19starting
21:20to
21:20really
21:21get
21:21an
21:22understanding
21:22on
21:23the
21:25history
21:25of
21:26Ukraine
21:28Project
21:28Ukraine
21:29and
21:30he
21:31started
21:31to
21:31understand
21:31the
21:32root
21:32causes
21:32and
21:34in
21:35his
21:35statement
21:36you
21:37could
21:37tell
21:38that
21:38Whitcoff
21:38is
21:39starting
21:39to
21:39understand
21:40Russia's
21:41position
21:41in
21:42that
21:42yes
21:43we
21:43want
21:43to
21:44get
21:45to
21:45the
21:45root
21:45causes
21:45of
21:46Project
21:46Ukraine
21:46but
21:47in
21:47getting
21:48to
21:48the
21:48root
21:48causes
21:49of
21:49Project
21:50Ukraine
21:51we
21:51also
21:51have
21:51to
21:51address
21:52a
21:54new
21:54security
21:55architecture
21:55in
21:56Europe
21:57one
21:58which
21:58takes
21:58our
21:59interests
21:59as
22:00Russia
22:00into
22:00consideration
22:01you
22:02can
22:02tell
22:02from
22:03from
22:03Whitcoff's
22:04answer
22:05to
22:05Hannity
22:05that
22:06he's
22:07starting
22:07to
22:08get
22:09it
22:09and
22:09it
22:09looks
22:09like
22:09he's
22:10very
22:10positive
22:10in
22:11that
22:12the
22:12US
22:12and
22:13Russia
22:13can
22:14reach
22:15a deal
22:16a big
22:17deal
22:18he also
22:20said
22:20that
22:20the
22:22United
22:22States
22:22and
22:23Russia
22:23can
22:24work
22:25together
22:25to
22:26create
22:26compelling
22:27commercial
22:28opportunities
22:29according
22:32to
22:32Whitcoff
22:32the
22:33Ukrainian
22:33settlement
22:33is on
22:34the verge
22:34of
22:34something
22:35important
22:35for the
22:36entire
22:36world
22:36that's
22:37a direct
22:37quote
22:37he was
22:39also
22:39asked
22:39about
22:39Iran
22:40as well
22:41and
22:42he also
22:44he also
22:45made it
22:45seem as
22:47if the
22:47negotiations
22:48are
22:49are moving
22:50in a
22:50positive
22:50direction
22:51the
22:52United
22:52States
22:53is
22:53looking
22:53to
22:54prevent
22:55Iran
22:55from
22:56developing
22:56a
22:56nuclear
22:57weapon
22:57he
22:57said
22:57there's
22:58two
22:58components
22:59to
23:00that
23:00the
23:00first
23:01component
23:01is
23:01the
23:02enrichment
23:02and
23:04the
23:04other
23:04component
23:05is
23:06the
23:06actual
23:07weaponization
23:07of
23:08any
23:08type
23:08of
23:08missile
23:10so
23:11if
23:11he
23:12can
23:12get
23:12Iran
23:12to
23:13agree
23:13to
23:14not
23:14do
23:14any
23:14of
23:15those
23:15two
23:15things
23:15then
23:17it
23:17looks
23:17like
23:17Iran
23:17could
23:18get
23:18some
23:18sort
23:18of
23:19sanctions
23:19relief
23:20and
23:20we
23:20could
23:20have
23:21a
23:21deal
23:21but
23:21Whitcoff
23:22said
23:22that
23:23those
23:24are
23:24the
23:24two
23:24components
23:25that
23:25the
23:25United
23:25States
23:25is
23:25looking
23:25for
23:26and
23:26it
23:27does
23:27appear
23:27that
23:27it's
23:27going
23:28to
23:28to
23:30be
23:30a
23:30long
23:30process
23:31a
23:31long
23:31negotiation
23:32but
23:33it
23:33is
23:33on
23:34the
23:34right
23:35track
23:35at
23:35least
23:35that's
23:36what
23:36I
23:36got
23:37from
23:37Whitcoff's
23:38statement
23:38to
23:40Hannity
23:41listening
23:42to
23:42Alexander
23:43on
23:44his
23:46channel
23:47talking
23:47about
23:48the
23:49Iran
23:49negotiations
23:50with
23:51Whitcoff
23:52you
23:53basically
23:53do
23:54have
23:54the
23:55JCPOA
23:56so
23:58you're
23:58looking
23:58at
23:58the
23:59JCPOA
23:59with
23:59one
24:00big
24:01difference
24:02from what
24:02I
24:02understand
24:02could
24:03be
24:03wrong
24:03about
24:04this
24:04but
24:04from
24:05what
24:05I
24:05understand
24:05the
24:05big
24:06difference
24:06from
24:07the
24:07JCPOA
24:08and
24:08what
24:09the
24:10Trump
24:10administration
24:10is
24:11discussing
24:12with
24:12Iran
24:12is
24:13that
24:13with
24:14the
24:14JCPOA
24:15there
24:15was
24:15a
24:1510
24:15year
24:16limit
24:17on
24:18the
24:18JCPOA
24:19deal
24:19and
24:20what
24:20Trump
24:21is
24:21looking
24:21to
24:21do
24:22is
24:22he's
24:22looking
24:22to
24:22make
24:22this
24:23permanent
24:24the
24:25enrichment
24:25and
24:26not
24:26being
24:26able
24:27to
24:27weaponize
24:29a
24:31missile
24:31he's
24:32looking
24:32to
24:33make
24:33this
24:33a
24:34permanent
24:34solution
24:35that's
24:35my
24:36understanding
24:36of
24:36or at
24:37least
24:37that's
24:37the
24:37key
24:37difference
24:38between
24:39the
24:40JCPOA
24:41and
24:41what's
24:41being
24:41negotiated
24:42now
24:42maybe
24:44it's
24:44a small
24:45difference
24:45maybe
24:45it's
24:45a big
24:46difference
24:46maybe
24:46you
24:46could
24:47argue
24:47that
24:47the
24:47JCPOA
24:48could
24:48have
24:48been
24:48renewed
24:49or
24:49something
24:50like
24:50that
24:50I
24:50don't
24:50know
24:50but
24:51that's
24:52my
24:52sense
24:52of
24:53things
24:53so
24:58in
24:58Kursk
25:00we have
25:02a Sparta
25:04narrative
25:04that is
25:06developing
25:06a 300
25:07Sparta
25:07this is
25:08Sparta
25:09narrative
25:10that is
25:11developing
25:11should we
25:12go for
25:12a walk
25:13let's
25:16go for
25:16a walk
25:17why not
25:18I was
25:21very
25:21comfortable
25:21up here
25:22recording
25:23the video
25:24but
25:24let's
25:26walk a
25:26bit
25:26see what
25:27we find
25:28here in
25:30Limassol
25:31so
25:34Armonia
25:42Beach
25:43Armonia
25:45Municipal
25:46Beach
25:46that's where
25:47we are
25:48everybody
25:48so
25:58what's
25:58going on
25:59with
26:00with
26:01300
26:01what am
26:03I talking
26:03about
26:04Alexander
26:04talked about
26:05this
26:05yesterday
26:06300
26:07about
26:09about
26:09300
26:10Ukrainian
26:12troops
26:13trapped
26:14in
26:15in
26:16Kursk
26:17I believe
26:17yeah
26:18in
26:18Kursk
26:18in
26:19the
26:20Saint
26:21Nicholas
26:23Monastery
26:24on the
26:24eastern
26:25outskirts
26:26of
26:28of
26:29Kursk
26:30of a
26:30village
26:30in
26:31Kursk
26:31in
26:33Gornal
26:34Kursk
26:34region
26:34Gornal
26:35that's
26:35the location
26:36of this
26:37monastery
26:38where
26:39the narrative
26:39is being
26:40spun
26:40that you
26:41have
26:42300
26:43interesting
26:45number
26:45there
26:46of course
26:47300
26:48Ukraine
26:49soldiers
26:49who
26:51have
26:52taken
26:53taken
26:54refuge
26:54decided to
26:56hide in
26:56this monastery
26:57and the
26:58Russian
26:58military
26:58is
27:00telling them
27:00to surrender
27:01surrender
27:03or else
27:04but what are
27:05you going to
27:05do
27:05if they're
27:06in a
27:06monastery
27:06right
27:08you have
27:09to figure
27:09out a
27:10way to
27:10get them
27:11out of
27:11there
27:11wait them
27:12out I
27:13guess
27:13you wait
27:13them out
27:14but
27:15the
27:15media
27:16narrative
27:17now
27:17that is
27:17being
27:17spun
27:18by
27:18the
27:19Aletsky
27:19regime
27:20is
27:20that
27:20of
27:21the
27:22300
27:23soldiers
27:24who
27:25fought
27:25the
27:26thousands
27:27and
27:27thousands
27:27of
27:28Russian
27:28military
27:29refused
27:29to
27:29surrender
27:30and
27:31you
27:31got
27:32a
27:32whole
27:32Sparta
27:34movie
27:37script
27:39that's
27:39being
27:39developed
27:40King
27:41Leonidas
27:42script
27:43that's
27:43being
27:43developed
27:44starring
27:44Alensky
27:46as
27:47Leonidas
27:49and
27:50who
27:52else
27:53is
27:53going
27:53to
27:53star
27:53in
27:54this
27:55is
27:55Sparta
27:55anyway
27:58man
27:58I don't
27:58know
27:59what I'm
27:59talking
27:59about
27:59300
28:01that's
28:02the
28:02number
28:02that
28:02they're
28:02going
28:02with
28:03we
28:03all
28:03know
28:03why
28:04they're
28:04going
28:04with
28:04the
28:04number
28:04300
28:05we
28:05all
28:06know
28:06the
28:06reasoning
28:07behind
28:07this
28:07from what
28:08I've
28:09heard
28:09it's
28:09it's
28:11a little
28:11less
28:11than
28:11300
28:12I've
28:12read
28:13some
28:13reports
28:13which
28:14say
28:14it's
28:14more
28:14like
28:15400
28:16or
28:17450
28:17I've
28:18read
28:18reports
28:18which
28:19say
28:19it's
28:19like
28:19220
28:19or
28:20250
28:20but
28:21they've
28:22settled
28:22on
28:23the
28:23number
28:23300
28:24anyway
28:26that's
28:27an update
28:27on that
28:28story
28:29I imagine
28:29the Russian
28:30military
28:30is just
28:30going to
28:30wait them
28:31out
28:31wait them
28:32out
28:33and eventually
28:33they will
28:35surrender
28:35that would
28:37be my
28:37guess as
28:37to how
28:38this is
28:39going to
28:40play out
28:40that'll be
28:43the reality
28:43of how
28:43this is
28:44going to
28:44play out
28:44how the
28:45collective
28:46West
28:46media
28:46and how
28:46the
28:46Olenski
28:47regime
28:47spin this
28:48I think
28:48that'll
28:48be a
28:48different
28:49story
28:49so
28:53Peter
28:54Searto
28:54the
28:55foreign
28:55minister
28:56of
28:56Hungary
28:57he came
28:59out
28:59strong
29:00yesterday
29:00with a
29:01strong
29:01statement
29:02Searto
29:02and
29:04he said
29:05that
29:06that Hungary
29:08is not
29:08going to
29:08put up
29:08with any
29:09more
29:09project
29:10Ukraine
29:10he said
29:12Hungary
29:12is done
29:13with
29:14project
29:15Ukraine
29:15completely
29:16done
29:16Hungary's
29:18red line
29:18is
29:19troops
29:21Europe
29:22sending
29:24troops
29:24to
29:24Ukraine
29:25he said
29:25Hungary
29:26will
29:26absolutely
29:26veto
29:27any
29:28kind
29:28of
29:28talk
29:29or
29:30vote
29:31about
29:32sending
29:32troops
29:33to
29:33Ukraine
29:34he said
29:35that Hungary
29:36is
29:36against
29:37money
29:38against
29:38weapons
29:39basically
29:41listening
29:42to
29:42Searto
29:42you get
29:43the
29:43sense
29:44that
29:44the
29:45more
29:46the
29:47Trump
29:47administration
29:48for now
29:49because things
29:50can change
29:50I know
29:52I know
29:52what you're
29:52going to
29:52say in the
29:53comments
29:53down below
29:54things could
29:55change
29:55with Trump
29:55you don't
29:56know
29:56but for
29:56now
29:57it does
29:57look like
29:58Trump
29:59is moving
29:59more
30:00towards
30:00towards
30:01Whitcoff's
30:02view
30:03of things
30:04and if
30:05you can't
30:05get
30:05Istanbul
30:06plus
30:06then it
30:06does
30:07look like
30:07Trump
30:07is moving
30:08more
30:08towards
30:09towards
30:10walking
30:10away
30:10but
30:11things
30:11could
30:11change
30:12and
30:13as
30:14Hungary
30:14sees
30:15the
30:15direction
30:15of the
30:16United
30:16States
30:16Hungary
30:17is getting
30:17more
30:17confident
30:18to
30:18also
30:19talk
30:23about
30:23how
30:24they're
30:24done
30:25with
30:25Ukraine
30:26as well
30:26and
30:27they seem
30:27to be
30:28more
30:28confident
30:28in
30:29vetoing
30:29European
30:32EU
30:32initiatives
30:33on money
30:34and weapons
30:34and possibly
30:35troops
30:35into
30:37Ukraine
30:38remember
30:38what I
30:39said
30:39about
30:39the
30:39rumors
30:39with
30:40France
30:40and
30:41Romania
30:41Siarto
30:42said
30:42we
30:43will
30:43not
30:44vote
30:45for
30:45European
30:46troops
30:47to
30:47enter
30:48Ukraine
30:49we
30:50will
30:50block
30:50that
30:50so
30:51that
30:51is
30:52what
30:52Siarto
30:52said
30:53the
30:54Polish
30:54foreign
30:54minister
30:55thank
30:55you
30:56USA
30:56for
30:57blowing
30:58up
30:58Nord Stream
30:59Radislav
31:01Sikorsky
31:02he
31:03said
31:04that
31:04Hungary
31:04stance
31:05on
31:05Russia
31:06Ukraine
31:07Russia
31:07lacks
31:09moral
31:09clarity
31:10Sikorsky
31:13Sikorsky
31:14is saying
31:15that
31:16that
31:19Hungary
31:19lacks
31:20moral
31:20clarity
31:21when it
31:21comes to
31:22Ukraine
31:22and to
31:23Russia
31:23Hungary
31:25wants to
31:25continue
31:25to
31:26escalate
31:26Poland
31:27Sikorsky
31:28being a good
31:29neocon
31:29wants to
31:30continue
31:30to escalate
31:31and Hungary
31:31wants to
31:32de-escalate
31:32and it's
31:33Hungary
31:33that
31:34lacks
31:34moral
31:35clarity
31:36okay
31:37okay
31:38Sikorsky
31:38thank
31:39you
31:39USA
31:40Nord Stream
31:42post
31:44on
31:44X
31:44Sikorsky
31:46which he
31:47deleted
31:47very quickly
31:49five minutes
31:50after
31:51Nord Stream
31:51went
31:52kaboom
31:52Sikorsky
31:54thank
31:54you
31:55USA
31:55with the
31:56photo
31:57of Nord Stream
31:58going kaboom
31:59yeah
32:00it's
32:01it's
32:01Seattle
32:01and Hungary
32:02that lacks
32:03moral
32:03clarity
32:04okay
32:05okay
32:06my man
32:06so the
32:09EU money
32:09the EU
32:10money
32:11Olenski
32:12is talking
32:12about 15
32:13billion
32:13he's ready
32:14to buy
32:14patriot
32:14systems
32:15for 15
32:16billion
32:17where's he
32:17getting this
32:18money
32:18he's either
32:20going to get
32:21this money
32:21from the
32:22funds that
32:23Biden
32:23gave him
32:24if he has
32:25any left
32:26or
32:27man what a
32:30nice day
32:30to be at
32:31the beach
32:31huh
32:31jeez
32:33that's where
32:36I should be
32:36somewhere down
32:37there
32:37anyway
32:39what was I
32:40saying
32:41yeah
32:41he's either
32:42going to
32:42get the
32:43money from
32:44the Biden
32:45piggy bank
32:47the Biden
32:47savings
32:48that was
32:50sent to
32:51Olenski
32:51which I
32:52imagine
32:52there's not
32:53much money
32:53left there
32:54or he's
32:55going to
32:55get it
32:56from the
32:56European
32:56Union
32:56the problem
32:57that Olenski
32:57has
32:58with EU
32:59money
33:00is that
33:00the EU
33:02is promising
33:02a whole lot
33:03of money
33:03but they're
33:05not really
33:05giving much
33:06the UK
33:06is giving
33:07the UK
33:08is giving
33:08money
33:09on loan
33:09I believe
33:10the other
33:10day they
33:11gave Olenski
33:11another billion
33:12it's not
33:1415 billion
33:14type of
33:15money that
33:16we're talking
33:16about
33:16amounts that
33:17we're talking
33:17about
33:17well you know
33:19it's a
33:19billion here
33:19it's a
33:20billion there
33:21Stammer is
33:22his giving
33:23Ukraine
33:24whatever he
33:25can he
33:25can find
33:26lying around
33:27whatever money
33:27he can find
33:28lying around
33:28Stammer is
33:29saying
33:30should I
33:31take this
33:32billion and
33:33use it to
33:34help the
33:35people of
33:35the UK
33:37or should I
33:39take this
33:39billion and
33:40give it to
33:41the Green
33:41Goblin
33:42let's give
33:44it to the
33:45Green Goblin
33:45that is what
33:46Stammer is
33:47saying
33:47but the rest
33:49of the EU
33:50they cannot
33:51agree on
33:53getting a
33:54big package
33:55to Ukraine
33:57so
33:58Kaya
33:59Kalis
33:59she had
34:01this idea
34:01of
34:0240 billion
34:02euros
34:04to Ukraine
34:05and this
34:06would come
34:07out of
34:08the pockets
34:09of member
34:09states
34:10it would be
34:10a percentage
34:11of their
34:12GDP
34:13if I remember
34:13correctly
34:14what her plan
34:15was
34:15a certain
34:16percentage
34:16of their
34:17GDP
34:19would
34:21just be
34:22taken
34:23and given
34:23to
34:24Olenski
34:24and when
34:25you added
34:25it all
34:26up
34:26it would
34:27come
34:27to
34:2740
34:28billion
34:28from
34:29the EU
34:31member states
34:32to Ukraine
34:34and you
34:35know what
34:36what Spain
34:37and Italy
34:38and France
34:40and other
34:41countries
34:41told Kaya
34:42Kalis
34:43about her
34:43plan
34:43when it
34:44came up
34:45for
34:45for a
34:47vote
34:47they said
34:48Puesta
34:50Puesta
34:51Oyster Bar
34:52and Grill
34:53got some
34:56Spanish
34:56vibes
34:56that
34:57Puesta
34:57how you
35:00doing
35:01Limasol
35:03Limasol
35:05Beach Cat
35:05Beach Cat
35:07number two
35:07because Beach
35:08Cat number
35:08one is
35:09probably
35:09somewhere
35:10down there
35:10our favorite
35:12Limasol
35:12Beach Cat
35:13but yeah
35:1540 billion
35:16Italy
35:17Spain
35:18France
35:19said nah
35:20we don't
35:21have the
35:22money
35:22we're
35:23we're in
35:24debt
35:25man
35:25where are
35:26we gonna
35:26come up
35:26with
35:27with another
35:28one percent
35:28of our
35:30GDP
35:30going to
35:31Olenski
35:31we don't
35:32have that
35:33cash lying
35:33around
35:34so they
35:34shot down
35:35her
35:36brilliant
35:36plan
35:37officially
35:38shot it
35:39down
35:39yeah
35:41it was
35:41going to
35:42be
35:42voluntary
35:42as well
35:43that's
35:44how she
35:45she
35:45structured
35:46it
35:47EU
35:48member states
35:48would contribute
35:49voluntarily
35:50so all
35:51the EU
35:51member states
35:52said okay
35:53well if it's
35:53voluntary
35:54and I
35:55volunteer to
35:56not
35:57to not
35:57send money
35:58that's the
35:59thing with
35:59the EU
36:00they talk
36:01about giving
36:01all this
36:02money to
36:02to Olenski
36:03but they
36:05never come
36:05through
36:05which is
36:07why if
36:08the US
36:08goes
36:09project
36:10Ukraine
36:11is
36:11is gonna
36:13end
36:13very quickly
36:15within a
36:16couple of
36:16months
36:17if the
36:18US
36:18walks
36:18away
36:19that's
36:20so
36:20nice
36:21huh
36:21what a
36:32nice
36:32area
36:32oh boy
36:35let's
36:36let's
36:37move on
36:37someone in
36:38telegram
36:39on the
36:40Duran
36:40telegram
36:41channel
36:42actually
36:42created the
36:43meme that
36:43I was
36:43talking about
36:44yesterday
36:44with the
36:45guy sweating
36:46the superhero
36:47whoever he
36:48is sweating
36:48as he
36:49chooses
36:49between
36:49two
36:50buttons
36:50Russian
36:51Putin
36:51gas
36:52or US
36:53Trump
36:53LNG
36:53gas
36:54it says
36:55Kaya
36:55Kalis
36:56which one
36:57do I
36:57press
36:58Reuters
36:59reporting
36:59that
37:00that French
37:01and German
37:02businesses
37:03they want
37:04the EU
37:05to start
37:05to start
37:06bringing in
37:07some
37:07Russian
37:08pipeline
37:08gas
37:09now
37:09they're
37:10like
37:10now
37:10bring in
37:11some
37:11Russian
37:11pipeline
37:11gas
37:12because
37:13the
37:14US
37:15if we
37:18negotiate
37:18with them
37:18over a
37:19tariff
37:19trade
37:20deal
37:20they've
37:22got us
37:22by the
37:23you know
37:23what
37:23right
37:24because
37:24we get
37:25so much
37:25US
37:26LNG
37:26now
37:27if we
37:27don't
37:27bring in
37:27some
37:28Russian
37:28gas
37:28we're
37:28going to
37:28have
37:29zero
37:30leverage
37:31on
37:32the
37:32United
37:32States
37:33because
37:33they're
37:34going to
37:34control
37:34our
37:35energy
37:36funny
37:37how
37:37that
37:37works
37:38huh
37:38and so
37:39they're
37:39saying
37:40to bring
37:40in
37:40some
37:40Russian
37:41LNG
37:42and
37:43Kaya
37:45Kalas
37:46is
37:46talking
37:47about
37:47a
37:4817th
37:48sanctions
37:49package
37:49which
37:50one
37:51which
37:51one
37:52do
37:52I
37:52choose
37:53Putin
37:54and
37:54Russian
37:55gas
37:55or
37:55US
37:56and
37:57Trump
37:57LNG
37:59which
37:59one
38:00do
38:01I
38:01go
38:02with
38:02Trump
38:05or
38:05Putin
38:05sanction
38:07Russia
38:07or
38:08bring
38:09in
38:09Russian
38:11gas
38:11so
38:12we
38:12can
38:12have
38:12some
38:12leverage
38:13over
38:14Trump
38:14oh
38:17man
38:17so
38:18thank
38:18you
38:18for
38:18that
38:19for
38:20that
38:20funny
38:21creating
38:22that
38:22funny
38:22meme
38:23and
38:24and
38:25what
38:26else
38:26should
38:26we
38:26discuss
38:27there
38:28are
38:28reports
38:29that
38:29Biden
38:29is
38:30going
38:30to
38:31speak
38:32to
38:32the
38:32American
38:32people
38:33today
38:33have
38:33you
38:33guys
38:34heard
38:34about
38:34that
38:34Biden
38:35to
38:36deliver
38:36first
38:36public
38:37address
38:37since
38:37leaving
38:37the
38:38White
38:38House
38:38on
38:39Tuesday
38:39today
38:40he's
38:40going
38:41to
38:41deliver
38:41his
38:42first
38:42public
38:43address
38:43does
38:44anyone
38:45care
38:45I
38:46don't
38:46care
38:47what
38:48what
38:49is
38:49Biden
38:49going
38:49to
38:50say
38:50what
38:51could
38:51Biden
38:51possibly
38:52say
38:52at
38:52this
38:53moment
38:53in
38:53time
38:53he's
38:55going
38:55to
38:55talk
38:55about
38:55tariffs
38:56or
38:56something
38:56like
38:56that
38:56if
39:00he's
39:00able
39:01if
39:01he's
39:01capable
39:01about
39:03if he's
39:04capable
39:04to speak
39:04and talk
39:05about
39:05tariffs
39:05who
39:06knows
39:06man
39:06with
39:06Biden
39:06I
39:07don't
39:07know
39:07maybe
39:08they've
39:08got
39:08him
39:08already
39:09they've
39:09pumped
39:09him
39:09up
39:10with
39:10it
39:10whatever
39:10they need
39:10to
39:11pump
39:11him
39:11up
39:11with
39:11and
39:11he's
39:13ready
39:13to
39:13talk
39:13to
39:14the
39:14American
39:14people
39:15for the
39:16first
39:16time
39:16since
39:17he
39:17left
39:17the
39:18White
39:18House
39:18oh my
39:18god
39:19let's
39:23walk
39:24to the
39:24beach
39:24so
39:42there's
39:42that
39:42bit
39:42of
39:42news
39:43and
39:43there's
39:43the
39:44news
39:44that
39:44Blackrock
39:46Mertz
39:46his
39:47first
39:48trip
39:49as
39:50chancellor
39:50is
39:52going
39:53to
39:53be
39:54to
39:54take
39:55a
39:56wild
39:56guess
39:56it's
39:57going
39:58to
39:58be
39:58to
39:58Kiev
39:59I'm
40:00shocked
40:00big
40:01surprise
40:02his
40:03first
40:04trip
40:04once
40:04he
40:05becomes
40:05chancellor
40:05I think
40:05he is
40:06chancellor
40:06now
40:07isn't
40:07he
40:07I think
40:07it's
40:07official
40:08that he
40:08is
40:08chancellor
40:09of
40:09Germany
40:09his
40:10first
40:10trip
40:11international
40:11trip
40:12is
40:12going
40:12to
40:12be
40:12to
40:13visit
40:13the
40:13Green
40:13Goblin
40:14to
40:16pay
40:16homage
40:17to
40:17the
40:18Blackrock
40:20avatar
40:20that is
40:21Olenski
40:22to bow
40:23down
40:23to the
40:24Blackrock
40:24avatar
40:25that is
40:26Olenski
40:26that is
40:28going to
40:28be
40:28Mertz
40:29his
40:29first
40:30trip
40:30did you
40:34guys
40:34read what
40:35Medvedev
40:35posted on
40:37X
40:37about
40:39Mertz
40:39I won't
40:45say it
40:46in this
40:46video
40:46because if
40:47I did
40:47say what
40:48Medvedev
40:49posted
40:49this video
40:50would probably
40:50be taken
40:51down
40:51like right
40:52away
40:52taken
40:52down
40:53but
40:54man
40:54Medvedev
40:55let's just
40:56say that
40:57Medvedev
40:57did not
40:57like the
40:58fact that
40:58Mertz
40:59hinted
41:00at
41:00at the
41:02Taurus
41:02missiles
41:02German
41:03Taurus
41:03missiles
41:03being
41:04used
41:04to
41:05hit
41:05the
41:06the
41:09Kerch
41:11bridge
41:11that's
41:12what he
41:13hinted at
41:13in an
41:14interview
41:14Mertz
41:14said
41:14we'll
41:15give
41:15the
41:15Taurus
41:15missiles
41:16to
41:17Ukraine
41:17and
41:17they
41:18can
41:18hit
41:18the
41:19I
41:20believe
41:20he
41:20said
41:20the
41:21south
41:21or
41:22the
41:22land
41:23corridor
41:24in
41:24the
41:24south
41:24we
41:25can
41:26hit
41:26one
41:27of
41:27the
41:27what
41:29did
41:29he
41:29say
41:29infrastructure
41:30in the
41:31south
41:31or something
41:31like that
41:32he was
41:32hinting at
41:33the
41:33Kerch
41:33bridge
41:33that's
41:34what he
41:34was
41:34hinting at
41:34without
41:34specifically
41:36saying
41:37the
41:38Kerch
41:38bridge
41:38Medvedev
41:41did not
41:41like it
41:42he did
41:43not like
41:43it at
41:43all
41:44because
41:44it was
41:44a threat
41:44from
41:46from
41:46Mertz
41:47he's
41:48threatening
41:49to
41:49give
41:49Taurus
41:49missiles
41:50and
41:51Germany
41:51is
41:51going
41:52to
41:52launch
41:52those
41:52Taurus
41:52missiles
41:53to
41:54hit
41:54the
41:55Crimea
41:55bridge
41:55that's
41:56what
41:56Mertz
41:56was
41:56basically
41:57saying
41:57I
41:59gotta
41:59wrap up
41:59this
41:59video
42:00my
42:00god
42:00I've
42:01been
42:01talking
42:01for a
42:02long
42:02time
42:02all
42:02right
42:03so
42:03yeah
42:04Medvedev
42:05talked
42:05about
42:06Mertz
42:07warned him
42:08not to
42:08threaten
42:08Russia
42:09and then
42:09talked
42:09about
42:10Mertz
42:11his
42:11family
42:12history
42:12I've
42:13got
42:13some
42:14good
42:14clown
42:14worlds
42:14but
42:15I
42:15don't
42:15have
42:16any
42:16time
42:16man
42:17I've
42:21been
42:21rambling
42:21too
42:21long
42:22so
42:23we
42:23have
42:23the
42:24which
42:24clown
42:25world
42:25should
42:25I
42:25do
42:25okay
42:26let's
42:27do
42:27the
42:27let's
42:30do
42:30Bezos
42:30we'll
42:31do
42:31Bezos
42:32and
42:32I'll
42:32save
42:32the
42:32other
42:32clown
42:32world
42:33for
42:33tomorrow
42:34so
42:36yeah
42:36we
42:36had
42:37the
42:37rocket
42:37launch
42:38of
42:38blue
42:38what's
42:39it
42:39called
42:39blue
42:39origin
42:40or blue
42:40horizon
42:40or
42:40whatever
42:41it's
42:41called
42:41and
42:43it
42:43went
42:43into
42:43space
42:44I
42:44don't
42:44know
42:44does
42:44it
42:44did
42:45it
42:45go
42:45into
42:45space
42:46or
42:46did
42:46it
42:46not
42:46go
42:46into
42:47space
42:47someone
42:47who's
42:48an
42:48expert
42:48let
42:48me
42:48know
42:48from
42:49what
42:49I
42:49understand
42:50it
42:50was
42:50kind
42:51of
42:51in
42:51space
42:52for
42:53about
42:5310
42:53minutes
42:53it
42:53kind
42:54of
42:54goes
42:54into
42:54space
42:55not
42:55fully
42:55into
42:55space
42:56but
42:56kind
42:56of
42:56goes
42:56into
42:57space
42:57and
42:58on
42:58this
42:59rocket
43:00ship
43:00was
43:01Bezos
43:02his
43:02fiance
43:03or
43:03wife
43:03and
43:04Katy
43:04Perry
43:05and
43:05some
43:05other
43:06celebrities
43:06were
43:07on
43:08this
43:08ship
43:09female
43:11celebrities
43:12and talk
43:13show hosts
43:13and stuff
43:14like that
43:14and
43:16the New York
43:17Times
43:17called this
43:18a stunt
43:18the New York
43:19Times says
43:19this was
43:20one giant
43:20stunt
43:21for
43:22womankind
43:22Blue Origins
43:23all-female
43:24flight
43:24proves that
43:24women
43:25are now
43:25free to
43:26enjoy
43:26capitalism's
43:28most extravagant
43:29spoils
43:29alongside
43:29rich men
43:30so New York
43:31Times
43:31did not
43:31like this
43:32Katy Perry
43:33got off
43:34the
43:34ship
43:36the capsule
43:36when the
43:37capsule
43:37landed
43:38she
43:39got out
43:40of the
43:40capsule
43:41and said
43:42that she
43:42felt
43:42deeply
43:43connected
43:43to the
43:44strong
43:44divine
43:45feminine
43:45while she
43:47was on
43:47her
43:47space
43:48flight
43:48and
43:50the
43:50best
43:51clown
43:52world
43:52in all
43:52of this
43:52was
43:53Bezos
43:54when
43:55the
43:55capsule
43:55landed
43:57Bezos
43:59was
44:00going
44:01around
44:01the
44:01capsule
44:02trying
44:02to
44:03open
44:03the
44:04door
44:04the
44:04hatch
44:05for
44:05his
44:05wife
44:06or
44:06fiance
44:06to
44:07come
44:08out
44:08and
44:08he
44:09was
44:09running
44:09around
44:09the
44:10capsule
44:10and
44:10then
44:10he
44:10tripped
44:11and
44:11fell
44:11flat
44:12on
44:12his
44:12face
44:12and
44:13I
44:13guess
44:13it's
44:13always
44:13funny
44:13to
44:14watch
44:15a
44:15man
44:15worth
44:16200
44:17or
44:17300
44:18billion
44:18run
44:20around
44:20a
44:21space
44:21capsule
44:21and
44:23fall
44:23on
44:23his
44:23face
44:24as
44:24he's
44:24trying
44:24to
44:25get
44:25to
44:26his
44:26fiancee
44:27I
44:27don't
44:27know
44:28something
44:29funny
44:29about
44:29that
44:30I
44:30don't
44:31know
44:31anyway
44:31that's
44:31the
44:31video
44:32everybody
44:32the
44:33duran.locals.com
44:34we are on
44:34rumble
44:34odyssey
44:35bit you
44:35telegram
44:35rockfin
44:36and x
44:36go to
44:37the duran
44:37shop
44:37pick up
44:38some
44:38merch
44:38like what
44:40I'm
44:40wearing
44:40in this
44:41video
44:41update
44:42a t-shirt
44:42with the
44:43greek
44:43flag
44:43I will
44:46see
44:46everybody
44:46tomorrow
44:49throw