Prince Harry has been "singled out for different, unjustified and inferior treatment", the Court of Appeal has heard. The Duke of Sussex is challenging the dismissal of his High Court legal action against the Home Office over the level of his security in the UK. Report by Brooksl. Like us on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/itn and follow us on Twitter at http://twitter.com/itn
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00The appellant does not accept that bespoke means better. In fact, in his submission it means that
00:09he has been singled out for different, unjustified and inferior treatment. Not only does this bespoke
00:19process not involve the RMB, it also involves Ravec considering the reason why the appellant
00:29is attending a particular event, even though that is plainly irrelevant to the question
00:36of security. This first introductory point is particularly significant because the appellant's
00:45case is not that he should automatically be entitled to the same protection as he was
00:53previously given when he was a working member of the royal family. The appellant's case is
01:02that he should be considered under the terms of reference and subject to the same process
01:09as any other individual being considered for protective security by Ravec unless there is
01:17a cogent reason to the contrary.