• 2 days ago
During the House Republican leadership press briefing on Tuesday, Speaker Johnson discussed imposing limitations on judicial power.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00So, yeah. Nice one. Yeah.
00:02On judicial impeachments, you have a lot of resolutions that are in front of you right now.
00:07I know your focus is on budget reconciliation.
00:09Is your plan to bring up these impeachment resolutions that have been brought forward?
00:12And if you do, are you concerned this will stall any progress that you want to make with regards to budget reconciliation?
00:17We're working with the Judiciary Committee, which is the appropriate area of jurisdiction for that.
00:22I talked to Chairman Jordan this morning about it.
00:24And they'll be having a hearing early next week, I believe, to highlight these abuses.
00:29Let me just say this, and I know that you all have seen the numbers, but this is a serious problem.
00:33I used to be a litigator. I was a constitutional law attorney.
00:35I used to litigate all these cases for 20 years.
00:37Routinely, I would have activist judges issue opinions against me, and I would go get them overturned on appeal.
00:43That is the process.
00:44But something is happening right now that has not happened before.
00:47In the last 100 years—listen to this—67% of the injunctions issued against a president were issued against one president alone, and that's Donald J. Trump.
00:5667% of the injunctions over the last 100 years, okay? That's a problem.
01:0192% of those were issued by judges who were known or accused of being partisan, you know, Democrat appointees to the court.
01:08So something unusual is happening, something that is out of the norm.
01:12It is a dangerous trend, and it violates equal justice under law, that critical principle.
01:17It violates our system itself.
01:20It violates separation of powers when a judge thinks that they can enjoin something that a president is doing that the American people voted for.
01:27That is not what the founders intended.
01:28So there's a natural tension between the branches of the government, and we're working through that.
01:34The Judiciary Committee is looking at alternatives.
01:36One of the bills that I really like that's already been through committee was authored by Representative Daryl Issa,
01:41and that would limit the scope of federal injunctions, the ability of one individual judge to abuse the system in this way.
01:48And it would be, in my view, a dramatic improvement on that.
01:51So we'll be moving, I think, that piece of legislation and some others to address it
01:55because we have an Article I authority under the Constitution to do that.
01:58We do have authority over the federal courts, as you know.
02:01We can eliminate an entire district court.
02:03We have power funding over the courts and all these other things.
02:07But desperate times call for desperate measures, and Congress is going to act.
02:10So stay tuned for that.

Recommended