• 16 hours ago
Ninakaw na, nanakaw pa! Viral ang video ng isang lalaki na isa-isang sinakay ang mga basyo ng softdrinks sa kanyang kariton! Nang mahuli ng pulis, nanakaw din ang ninakaw ng magnanakaw!

Ano ba ang sinasabi ng batas tungkol dito? Alamin ‘yan kasama ang ating #KapusoSaBatas Atty. Gaby Concepcion.

Hosted by the country’s top anchors and hosts, 'Unang Hirit' is a weekday morning show that provides its viewers with a daily dose of news and practical feature stories. Watch it from Monday to Friday, 5:30 AM on GMA Network! Subscribe to youtube.com/gmapublicaffairs for our full episodes.

Category

😹
Fun
Transcript
00:00It was stolen, and it was stolen again.
00:03This is what happened to a man who stole soft drinks bottles in Cebu City.
00:09You can see in the video that the man one by one
00:11put the bottles in the cart and left.
00:15The man was caught sleeping with the authorities of the owner of the store.
00:19When the man went to the barangay to investigate,
00:23he left his cart on the side of the road.
00:26But when he came back, the stolen bottles were gone.
00:30It was stolen by another man.
00:33The man who stole the bottles was also looking for it.
00:36What does the law say about this?
00:38Well, ask me, ask Attorney Gabby.
00:44Attorney, it seems like karma is real when this happened,
00:46but what's really pitiful is the victim who was stolen.
00:50Who is responsible for this?
00:54Actually, the first thief is already liable for the theft.
00:58This is the crime of theft under Article 308 of the Revised Penal Code.
01:03The minute he took and transported the bottles,
01:07we can say that the crime is already consummated.
01:11The so-called taking is already complete.
01:14The owner of the item is also gone.
01:17The first thief is really the reason why the real owner is gone.
01:22So, the first thief is liable criminally and civilly.
01:26He is guilty of the crime of theft and he can be jailed for this.
01:31He also needs to pay his civil liability,
01:34which means he will pay the value of the stolen bottles.
01:38It is not a defense for the first thief that he does not need to pay the value of the bottles
01:43because he did not benefit from this.
01:46But that is not the point.
01:48The point is that the victim needs to be reimbursed for his loss.
01:52The second thief, does he not have a punishment?
01:55Of course, he is also liable for the theft.
01:58He is charged with taking something that is not his.
02:03So, he can also be charged with theft.
02:05But what we also know is that the victim cannot be paid double for the two thieves.
02:12That is an unjust enrichment.
02:14Once he is reimbursed for his loss,
02:19the civil liability that he should be reimbursed for is over.
02:23Double compensation for the victim is prohibited.
02:30Attorney, is it possible that the case of theft is heavier
02:34if the stolen item also came from the theft?
02:37Well, the case does not get heavier like what we said earlier.
02:41The case is still the same.
02:43It is still a theft for both of them.
02:45And the penalty is just the same for both of them.
02:48It does not get heavier.
02:49Unless the second thief also sells the stolen goods,
02:53there will be a possible case of violation of anti-fencing law under PD 1612.
03:00Under this law, it is prohibited to buy, sell, or deal in stolen goods
03:06in a possible additional case.
03:12We will clarify the law for the peace of mind.
03:17Don't think twice.
03:19Ask me, Curly Haired Attorney Gaby.

Recommended