👉 Wanda Nara, acompañada por su abogada Ana Rosenfeld, asiste a una audiencia judicial en el marco de su divorcio con el futbolista Mauro Icardi. La disputa no es económica, sino que se centra en la tenencia de los hijos y la división equitativa de bienes. Se espera que Icardi se presente el día 17 para continuar con las negociaciones.
👉 Seguí en #ElNoticieroDeA24
👉 Seguí en #ElNoticieroDeA24
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00I don't have anything to say, really.
00:02How do you feel?
00:03I feel very good. Thank you.
00:05How was the interview?
00:06How was the interview, Wanda?
00:08It's not an interview, it's a report.
00:10And the only thing Wanda asks for is to be able to reconnect the boys with their father.
00:14And that there is no type of impediment.
00:16How do you feel, Wanda?
00:18Good, good. We are working on trying to be able to solve things.
00:22How are the girls?
00:23Good. They are very good.
00:24Your lawyer told me that there is a perimeter measure that they cannot approach.
00:29No, no, no. I was clear.
00:31I said it's Mauro with Wanda, not with respect to the boys.
00:34But they cannot approach.
00:37Do you think it is possible to have a good dialogue with Mauro?
00:43Especially for the benefit of the children.
00:45Yes, surely. We are working on this. I thank you. I'm leaving.
00:48Tomorrow is your birthday.
00:50A different, difficult year in this fight.
00:54Yes, we all have good things and bad things in life.
00:57Today you celebrate with friends, right?
00:59Today I celebrate with family and friends.
01:01Do you have any kind of contact with Mauro?
01:04Not for now, but surely because of what justice is asking for, we are going to have a good relationship.
01:10Do you think they will go through this process in peace?
01:12Yes, yes, yes. Time heals everything.
01:15Do you have a warrant?
01:17No, I don't have anything.
01:18Who is asking for justice?
01:19Do you have a legal visa from China because you would have gotten angry about the things you did?
01:22No, I don't have anything. It's all a lie.
01:24What about the judicial presentations from China to you?
01:27I presented what I had to present in court.
01:29People have to take care of their actions. Sometimes the truth gets in the way.
01:33If you cross the border with China again, would you talk to them?
01:42Would you do the same thing Pampita did? Show yourself in public with the Chinese?
01:46Last night, didn't Wanda invite you to the toast?
01:49Did you go to the studio to see Tina and the girls?
01:52I didn't go because I had an event to celebrate with my sister and my brother-in-law.
01:58Leo, ask Wanda what justice is asking for.
02:02Now it's impossible.
02:09The second season of Lobby Blind is coming, so I'm very happy.
02:13Wanda, yes.
02:16And there is a proposal in Italy to do Bake Off in Italy.
02:19Did you leave the music?
02:21No, I don't talk to people who don't…
02:24Did justice ask you to do something, Wanda?
02:26Music? Yes, probably.
02:28How are you with Elegante?
02:29Everything is fine, thank you.
02:30Wanda, did justice ask you to do something?
02:35No, it wasn't the first time they saw each other.
02:37You are the ones who sometimes say things that are not true.
02:40And I just live my life.
02:43Have you been to Polo? We didn't know you went to Polo.
02:46Yes, I went to see my brother-in-law several times.
02:48It was a family dinner, all together. How was it?
02:52It was a family dinner at the restaurant they saw.
02:55Then we went with many friends and many people to the disco.
02:58Did justice ask you to do something, Wanda?
03:02How is the party going to be distributed?
03:04The truth is that I don't know.
03:05For now, I think all the guys will be with me.
03:07Did justice ask you to do something?
03:09No, not really.
03:10Did they show you Mauro's decree from the other week?
03:13What happens in justice, I'm going to leave it in justice.
03:16Are you going to deal with the party in justice?
03:19Now I'm going to take my children, the three boys, with my dad.
03:21And I'll probably stay with the girls.
03:23Are you going to do it through the lawyer, especially with Mauro?
03:25The party issue, the organization.
03:27No, no, no. The judge wants us to be able to talk, understand each other.
03:31And solve things between adults.
03:33What do you think is going to happen?
03:35Is it going to happen?
03:36Yes, I have been in a very good relationship with Maxi for many years.
03:39The divorce was tormenting.
03:41But we have been in a very good relationship for many years.
03:43Would you like to share a wish on your birthday with us?
03:46With your people who know that the public loves you?
03:48A wish I'm going to share with you is that you stop telling so many lies.
03:51That I answer, you can ask me and I'll tell you the truth.
03:54What did we tell you?
03:56Sometimes it happens if you don't say anything.
03:58No, they tell a lot of lies.
04:00Now you have to declare 17 for a legal cause.
04:03You know that I was going to lose my daughter's tenancy.
04:05That everything was going to go to Turkey.
04:07All things that are a waste of your time talking about things that are not real.
04:11Do you think that you are going to achieve a peace with Mauro?
04:15That you are going to be able to arrange for Christmas?
04:18Obviously, time heals everything.
04:20According to the priorities, my priority is the happiness of my children.
04:23And I hope that surely his happiness too.
04:25Did you operate last week? Did you speak at that time?
04:27Or did you decide not to speak to calm the waters?
04:30No, I can't speak because there is a contact impediment that I asked for.
04:33And my mother, on my part and my daughters,
04:37to offer our help and also to offer that my daughters can be with him.
04:42Is that reason why you spoke?
04:44That you couldn't be close? Is it because of what happened at the restaurant?
04:46Or some other reason?
04:48No, it was because of a constant harassment of messages and situations.
04:51The truth is that there was this possibility that justice gives you.
04:55To have a little peace too, right?
04:57On Friday, did you talk to Pampita?
04:59Did she tell you anything about the messages that you sent her?
05:02No, we talked to her in private.
05:03And the truth is that we have a very good relationship.
05:05Did she tell you anything about the messages?
05:06No, not at all.
05:07Very good advice.
05:08And she is a great woman.
05:10We have talked about life situations on several occasions.
05:13And I like to talk to her.
05:15Did she tell you anything about the messages?
05:17Of course, we talked about everything.
05:19What did she tell you?
05:21Don't worry.
05:22Are there going to be more messages?
05:24Or are you going to decide to keep them?
05:26The messages that came out are presented.
05:28I left my phone and many things began to be known, not by me.
05:32Were they leaked then?
05:34As if a lot of things that came out in justice were leaked.
05:37That we didn't even have.
05:38I found out for you.
05:39Are you afraid, Wanda?
05:40Are you afraid of the situation?
05:42Yes, there are many more things.
05:43Do you think that the re-link with the guys will be possible?
05:46That they will be able to reach an agreement?
05:48Yes, obviously.
05:49Well, I'm leaving.
05:50Did you send a letter of document to Yanina La Torre?
05:52That she got angry and said that when you told her that she was going to make your life impossible?
05:58Who was going to make my life impossible?
06:00Yes, Yanina.
06:01Did you send a letter of document to Yanina La Torre?
06:03That she got angry and said that when you told her that she was going to make your life impossible?
06:06Well, no problem.
06:07I have a lawyer's study to answer all of them.
06:12In this way, Wanda...
06:13Well, Wanda, who was there, was able to talk about everything.
06:16She finally said what the court asked her, right?
06:18Of course, the court asked her to re-link, to deal with the issue as an adult.
06:22That's why the question we asked her and she transferred it in this case...
06:26There was another tone, Leo, right?
06:28Yes, yes, yes.
06:30And in particular, she couldn't talk about the situation of the boys.
06:33That's why...
06:34That's why they asked me.
06:36But she has a legal voice regarding that.
06:39What she did...
06:40Ana Rosenfeld, who she doesn't have,
06:42did clarify on several occasions,
06:44and that's why I asked her about the re-link,
06:47not directly about the boys,
06:50but she hasn't been seeing them these last days,
06:53these last days.
06:54That's why I asked her about the re-link,
06:57because if she hadn't...
06:58What she did...
06:59Yes, she hasn't been seeing them.
07:01And she said, yes, let's talk about it so that it's possible.
07:04What the judge did,
07:05let's see, it's a hyper-media case,
07:08it's in the media,
07:09the judge must have 449,000 different cases,
07:13to say, let's see, this can be solved between you,
07:16do it, let's find a way.
07:19What they often do in these situations
07:22with two very famous characters, right?
07:26And where a judge has this,
07:29he has to try to mediate in the best way possible.
07:32There is a key word, Leo, Javi, Analia,
07:36which is the re-link.
07:38I think she repeated that word all the time,
07:41that, as Javi explained,
07:43justice said, boys, girls, enough.
07:46Exactly, justice said,
07:47and justice insists that they get along and communicate,
07:50that they have good communication.
07:51It means that there is already an indication
07:53that this issue, which was raised as a violence,
07:55maybe it was not such.
07:56So the words that Javi said are important.
07:59Of course, because if justice had detected
08:00the act of violence, it would have acted in another way, right?
08:02It will not ask you to re-link with a violent person.
08:04In fact...
08:05Exactly.
08:06Of course.
08:07In fact, he asked them almost,
08:08I tell you, very few days from the parties,
08:11that they almost urgently fix this issue,
08:14because they will have to agree
08:16on how the boys are going to spend that period with each one.
08:20So I understand that he asked them
08:23to do it quickly,
08:24and Mauro will do the same.
08:26He asked them to fix things,
08:28to talk,
08:29to try to see it,
08:31because the well-being of the boys is fundamental.
08:33I think it goes in that direction.
08:36He saw it all,
08:37quite well,
08:38I tell you,
08:39and calm at least.
08:41And yes, it is obviously
08:44the one that is taking forward
08:45precisely this issue linked to the judiciary.
08:48I think the main choice there
08:50must be, among other things,
08:52the elegant one,
08:54for Icardi.
08:55He must have had that point,
08:57and the judge must have told him.
08:58I tell you,
08:59as long as she has formed a couple,
09:01that she is in a couple,
09:02that you are adults,
09:03he must have told Icardi too.
09:05Of course, of course.
09:06At the time when he had the interview too,
09:08or the lawyers,
09:09I know they are trying to do it.
09:10She said several times,
09:11things are going to be solved.
09:12No, not at all.
09:13Let's solve things.
09:14Not at all.
09:15And of course,
09:16in favor of the family,
09:17which of course will no longer be together.
09:19Or yes,
09:20or yes.
09:21You never know.
09:22A family that must be reorganized,
09:24and where there are minors in the middle,
09:26that the best thing that can happen to those minors
09:28is that the parents can have,
09:29even if it is minimal communication,
09:31but that there is no complaint for each thing,
09:33because otherwise it is a ...
09:34We have always been saying it
09:35in this program,
09:36like a mountain of snow.
09:37And there is an effect of procedural economy too,
09:39right, Analia?
09:40Of not carrying the justice
09:41with a lot of questions.
09:43It is tremendous,
09:44unnecessary,
09:45because,
09:46I say,
09:47I don't get involved with anyone's suffering.
09:49Maybe the family is suffering,
09:51surely it is suffering,
09:53this disorganization,
09:54but one thing is to suffer to reorganize,
09:57and another is to suffer a serious event
09:59like gender violence, right?
10:00The same.
10:01And also that in the media,
10:02some say anything,
10:03as Wanda says, and so on.
10:04The interesting thing about this interview with Wanda,
10:06I say because Leo is there,
10:08is that there was all the journalistic field,
10:11from shows,
10:13and well,
10:14traditional journalism,
10:16let's say,
10:17although the show is also traditional,
10:19I tell you,
10:20because each one asked what they needed to ask, right?
10:22The subject of the projects,
10:24the subject of the fight with Yanira La Torre,
10:27And she answered with the same face.
10:29The legal.
10:30With the same face she answered.
10:31Everything.
10:32Everything, just like that.
10:33Everything.
10:34I want to add something else.
10:35With the same temperament, everything.
10:36Totally,
10:37and it is also good
10:38that she can talk too.
10:39What happens is that
10:40the family issues also
10:41interpel the person in all their blood.
10:43That's why they live.
10:44Because this has a laboral repercussion too,
10:45that of Wanda, right?
10:46They have the door always open
10:47in their homes for all the media,
10:49let's say,
10:50at the time,
10:51I mean, for the publication.
10:52Let's wait a second, Leo,
10:53because Wanda has to declare
10:55an indictment
10:56on December 17th.
10:57Of course,
10:58that's why we said,
10:59Javi is cornered by justice.
11:01Yes.
11:02In the family field
11:03and in the criminal field.
11:04Exactly.
11:05He has to visit the court.
11:06In this case,
11:07not so grateful,
11:08because he will be investigated
11:09by the Portuguese court,
11:10the prosecutor
11:11of the city of Buenos Aires,
11:12Juan Rosas,
11:13who investigates,
11:14or let's say,
11:15the prosecution
11:16against the illegal game.
11:17Because Wanda
11:18has promoted
11:19in the last few days
11:20an illegal casino.
11:21Illegal,
11:22at least here
11:23in the city of Buenos Aires.
11:24And moreover,
11:25in Argentina,
11:26I would tell you,
11:27because no province
11:28of the Argentine Republic
11:29is legalized
11:30according to what
11:31they told me.
11:32It is a casino
11:33that she promoted
11:34through her Instagram account.
11:35And of course,
11:36we have in the poster
11:37precisely
11:38Wanda's publication
11:39to show it.
11:40So we show
11:41Wanda,
11:42we show
11:44the casino.
11:45There it is.
11:46This is the publication
11:47of the casino,
11:48whose figure
11:49for them
11:50is Wanda Nara,
11:51which is promoted
11:52in different parts
11:53of the world.
11:54The casino
11:55is from Brazil,
11:56but it has it
11:57in different places
11:58in the world,
11:59including Turkey.
12:00Now,
12:01look,
12:02Ariel,
12:03I sent you
12:04the publication
12:05of Wanda's
12:06publication
12:07in Brazil,
12:08but it is in
12:09different places
12:10in the world,
12:11including Turkey.
12:12I sent you
12:13the publication
12:14of Wanda
12:15herself
12:16in her Instagram.
12:17It is there.
12:18It is the one
12:19we are seeing
12:20in the middle,
12:21right?
12:22Yes.
12:23Well,
12:24because of that
12:25publication,
12:26obviously,
12:27the Argentine
12:28justice
12:29took that image,
12:30looked to see
12:31if that casino
12:32was legalized
12:33here in
12:34the city of
12:35Buenos Aires
12:36or in the country
12:37and it is not
12:38legalized.
12:39Therefore,
12:40it is illegal.
12:41Yes, yes.
12:42Analia,
12:43I don't want to take you
12:44to jail.
12:45No,
12:46it's not my thing.
12:47But well,
12:48we can explain
12:49that a crime
12:50can have
12:51authors,
12:52co-authors
12:53or participants,
12:54right?
12:55Necessary participant.
12:56It is processed
12:57as being
12:58supposedly
12:59a necessary participant
13:00who would really
13:01go to this figure.
13:02Why?
13:03Because to promote
13:04this activity
13:05you need someone
13:06who has influence
13:07to attract
13:08clients.
13:09Of course,
13:10it is not possible
13:11to promote
13:12any type of product
13:13that an illegal casino
13:14when it promotes it
13:15has to take
13:16certain precautions.
13:17More,
13:18after what we have seen
13:19with different influencers
13:20in recent times,
13:21who also promoted
13:22casinos that
13:23they did not know
13:24were illegal.
13:25Now,
13:26the more it is known
13:27in these situations,
13:28the more prevention
13:29influencers have to have
13:30because it cannot be
13:31promoted,
13:32it is a crime.
13:33It has happened
13:34with several,
13:35Flor Viña,
13:36it has happened with
13:37Elegante himself,
13:38I had to answer
13:39because it happens
13:40in social networks
13:41and that it is legal
13:42is .bet
13:43B-E-T
13:44.bet
13:45All the rest
13:46that is .com
13:47.com
13:48Illegal
13:49All that
13:50is illegal
13:51because it is not
13:52legalized here
13:53at least in the U.S.
13:54It is good that the influencers
13:55or the celebrities
13:56understand
13:57that the justice
13:58is giving a clear message
13:59of a primary participation,
14:00a necessary participation.
14:01This has to be
14:02legalized,
14:03authorized by
14:04the U.S.
14:05Lottery
14:06and that
14:07it is legal
14:08authorized by
14:09the Lottery
14:10of the city of
14:11Buenos Aires.
14:12Lottery,
14:13the lottery
14:14that governs
14:15us
14:16here
14:17and that is
14:18what is not
14:19in this casino.
14:20Of course,
14:21because if
14:22they have to pay
14:23the cano
14:24to be legalized
14:25for some
14:26obviously
14:27it is not a business
14:28but that is a
14:29decision
14:30of each firm.
14:31The truth is
14:32that WANDA
14:33will have to
14:34respond to this
14:35on December 17
14:36in the prosecution
14:37headed by the
14:38prosecutor
14:39Jose Rosas
14:40here in the city
14:41of Buenos Aires.
14:42Good, good, good.
14:43I close with Leo
14:44and I leave
14:45a last moment
14:46of politics.
14:47Leo,
14:48I close from there.
14:49Yes.
14:50Well,
14:51FACO has finished
14:52this interview
14:53that we
14:54at some point
14:55communicated
14:56as an expertise
14:57where WANDA
14:58was willing
14:59to answer
15:00everything
15:01and well,
15:02the main thing
15:03and what was clear
15:04is that the
15:05objective is
15:06to establish
15:07a dialogue
15:08with their children
15:09and restore
15:10in some way
15:11even if it is
15:12minimally
15:13a dialogue
15:14that at the moment
15:15is totally
15:16cut off.
15:17That is
15:18what was
15:19clearer
15:20with respect
15:21to what happened
15:22here
15:23and that
15:24the judge
15:25and the experts
15:26insisted
15:27on the need
15:28that this
15:29has to
15:30happen
15:31and that
15:32both sides
15:33have to
15:34look for
15:35a way
15:36to do it
15:37as soon as possible.
15:38So, well,
15:39that I think
15:40is the fundamental
15:41conclusion
15:42and well,
15:43this talk
15:44with WANDA
15:45that was
15:46leaving everything
15:47a little,
15:48right?
15:49Good, good.
15:50Leo,
15:51thank you.