#constitutionalamendment #faisalvawda #aniqanisar #pti #pmlngovt
#maulanafazlurrehman #fazalurrehman #breakingnews #imrankhanpti
#imrankhan #juif
Senator Faisal Vawda Give Inside News Related to Constitutional Amendment Bill
#maulanafazlurrehman #fazalurrehman #breakingnews #imrankhanpti
#imrankhan #juif
Senator Faisal Vawda Give Inside News Related to Constitutional Amendment Bill
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00You will get a panel of three judges and a list will be selected from it.
00:07Now, the question of politicization of the judiciary arises in this.
00:11The Prime Minister will choose and he will choose, or the committee will choose.
00:16The Prime Minister will not choose, the committee will choose.
00:18Won't there be a factor of politics in it?
00:20An institution which had nothing to do with politics?
00:23The PTI which is talking about principles today,
00:26then if I follow their principles, then why did they want to appoint Faiz Hameed as the Chief?
00:30Why didn't they appoint him as a seniority?
00:32And why didn't they let it happen?
00:33And for that, there was violence, beating, beating,
00:36Jalsa, Jalooz, protest.
00:38So, which of their points was right?
00:40This point was right or that point was right?
00:41Number one.
00:42That point was right?
00:43No, according to them, they are saying that this principle is wrong.
00:47So, why was this principle being applied at that time?
00:49So, if you think that principle was right at that time, then how is it wrong today?
00:52Look, I respect Salman Qamar Raja a lot.
00:54He is a very good man.
00:55I have a question for him as well.
00:57Today, he is the General Secretary of the party.
00:59When he was defending Mr. Mian in Panama,
01:02he said that Mr. Mian is being harassed.
01:05So, has his stance changed even today?
01:07Is Mr. Mian's case in Panama right or wrong?
01:10So, it has nothing to do with his attitude?
01:11No, absolutely.
01:12How?
01:13If a person is saying something wrong at that time, then he cannot say it right today.
01:16The person who is saying it right today, cannot say it wrong at that time.
01:18This is what I want to make clear to you.
01:19When the PTI was being sued,
01:21they opposed putting a chief on the basis of seniority.
01:25And when they brought in Faiz Hameed,
01:27it meant that he was being sued at that time.
01:29Right?
01:30So, today, they are doing it.
01:31They are denying it.
01:32Flip question, Mr. Sender.
01:34At that time, if PMLN used to say that people should come on the basis of seniority,
01:38then why shouldn't they come on the basis of seniority today?
01:40Look, what did PMLN say at that time?
01:42What didn't PMLN say?
01:44This is neither my lookout nor my concern.
01:46But then the flip question arises.
01:47How did the flip question arise?
01:48Look, the whole thing is so simple.
01:50Look, a person has come with divine help.
01:52Neither mine, nor yours, nor your husband's,
01:54nor anyone else's will.
01:56One thing has been done by Allah.
01:58So, you cannot question Allah.
02:00As for the rest of the world,
02:02who has come and defended them?
02:04No one has defended them.
02:05If you talk about Mr. Munir,
02:07who defended them?
02:08Like divine help,
02:09Allah kept opening things for them.
02:11He kept making a way for them.
02:12Otherwise, who did it?
02:14Someone answered for the protest.
02:16Someone answered for the fight.
02:17Someone answered for the court.
02:19No one did anything.
02:20So, today, there is no one in Pakistan
02:21to make a tall claim.
02:23Including the government?
02:24Of course.
02:25No one has done anything for Asim Munir.
02:28Even if someone thinks so,
02:30he is a fool.
02:31I can only say that
02:32no one has done anything for him.
02:33No one has done anything for him.
02:34And one more thing is very important.
02:36In this reform,
02:39one more thing is very important.
02:40When small people are not in big offices,
02:42even then,
02:43such things will be done for Pakistan.
02:45And there are still many offices
02:47where there are small people.
02:49Who are you pointing to?
02:50I don't know.
02:51I don't know.
02:52But what I am trying to say is
02:53I know what exactly I am saying.
02:54But if small people are not in big offices,
02:56even then,
02:57the development of Pakistan will continue.
02:58And this reform is also for that.
03:00So, you are thinking that
03:02a big office
03:03could have fallen into the hands of a wrong person?
03:06No, I cannot say anything.
03:07I can say as much as you can.
03:08You can say as much as you can,
03:09but you cannot say anything.
03:10I am saying as much as I can.
03:11They say in English,
03:13I want to say many things
03:14and I don't want to say anything,
03:16though I have said everything.
03:17I want to say many things
03:18and I don't want to say anything,
03:19though I have said everything.
03:20So, this is how I talk.
03:21So, who is coming to the big offices, Mr. Sen?
03:22Which big offices?
03:23Big offices.
03:24No, no, I am talking about the past.
03:25I am saying this is possible today
03:26when small people are not in big offices.
03:28I am talking about the present.
03:29I don't see any change in the present.
03:31Will Justice Mansoor come?
03:33But I cannot comment on anyone's personality.
03:36And I am present in front of him.
03:38I find him a thorough gentleman
03:40and a very classy, credible judge.
03:44I have with me Mr. Bandyal,
03:46Ms. Ayesha Malik,
03:47Mr. Justice,
03:48a Chief Justice of Karachi.
03:50There was another one on my bench.
03:55I respect all of them with all my heart.
03:58I don't have a personal agenda with anyone.
04:01I will be very honest.
04:02I did what I thought was best for the country's development.
04:05If I don't like it, I don't do it.
04:07Now, what Mr. Salman Akram Raje was saying,
04:10that by putting it into politics,
04:13you are making it hollow.
04:14For example, let me put two things in front of you.
04:16Article 175, the amendment in it,
04:18two thirds of it was approved by the Senate.
04:21Now, you are saying it will be approved by the Parliament
04:23and the National Assembly as well.
04:25Wait a minute.
04:26You think that when I am sitting with you,
04:28by the will of Allah,
04:29it has been passed in the National Assembly.
04:32It has been passed.
04:33It is not being passed, it has been passed.
04:34It has been passed.
04:35It is a formality.
04:36They will complete it.
04:37Let's put it this way.
04:39Anyway, I would like to move on from this.
04:42The High Court Judges' Statement.
04:43The Judges' Statement will have a 13-member commission.
04:47The Chief Justice of Pakistan will be the head of the commission.
04:50There will be four senior judges,
04:52a loyal minister of law,
04:53an attorney general,
04:54a senior lawyer of the Pakistan Bar Council,
04:56two members of the Assembly,
04:58and two members of the Senate.
05:00Is there no politicization in this?
05:02If I become a senator, then no.
05:04Then it will be very neutral.
05:06And if you don't become a senator?
05:07Then I won't say anything.
05:08I can only talk about myself.
05:10His question was very valid.
05:13I didn't answer him.
05:14I am asking you a question.
05:16On the basis of his concerns.
05:17I didn't answer you.
05:18Today, your and my combination of clothes
05:21is similar to Maulana's color.
05:23The color of his turban,
05:24you and I have mixed it.
05:26You are mixing it in the wrong place.
05:27I am talking to you.
05:28Look,
05:29what comes to my heart,
05:32comes to my mouth.
05:33I am talking to you as a compliment.
05:36Okay, second thing.
05:38Under section 3A of section 175A,
05:41there will be a special parliamentary committee
05:43consisting of 12 members.
05:44And in this special parliamentary committee,
05:47there will be 8 MNAs.
05:49And the remaining 4 will be of the Senate.
05:52Is there no politicization in this?
05:53If I become a senator,
05:54then it will be very neutral.
05:55You can't be 4 senators.
05:57You are one.
05:59I can only be 400.
06:01Maybe my acumen is as good as Fawad's.
06:04Why would I sell short?
06:06Let's go.