FIR Mein Darj Hai Ke Sher Afzal Aur Barrister Gohar Ne Police Walon Ki. .., Walid Iqbal
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00Mr. Waleed Iqbal, this is basically anything.
00:02Of course, holding a Jalsa and holding a political meeting is the right of any Jamaat.
00:07But for a long time, it was interpreted as,
00:09that it will not be possible to ask for forgiveness until the 9th May incident.
00:13But despite that, you held the Jalsa.
00:15You said that there were numbers as well.
00:17But the speech that was given by Ali Ameen Gandapur,
00:21and especially when he is the minister of a province,
00:23the language that he used with the journalists,
00:25the language that he used with the women,
00:27and the words that he used with regards to the army,
00:31it cannot be differentiated that the political speeches are different,
00:34the public speeches are different.
00:36If the public gets agitated, then who will control them?
00:40Bani is present in your jail.
00:43So, who was the beneficiary in your view of this speech,
00:47if we talk about Ali Ameen Gandapur's speech?
00:50Who benefited from it?
00:53I am surprised that the focus or the focus of attention is on the speech.
01:01Why don't you kindly read the FIRs, Mr. Sati?
01:07The FIRs or the FIRs,
01:09on the basis of which, by speaking up in the Parliament,
01:12today morning or last night,
01:14which were arrested,
01:17Barrister Gauhar,
01:19Shehrafzal...
01:20Mr. Minister, I will come to that.
01:22Alhamdulillah, Mr. Barrister has been released.
01:26That is why I am saying,
01:29my question is, what is written in those FIRs,
01:32that by taking the name of Shehrafzal Marwat,
01:34or by taking the name of Barrister Gauhar,
01:37that he placed a pistol on the policeman's shoulder.
01:41This has happened.
01:44Your crew had gone there.
01:46This has happened.
01:47In any case, this is the level in the FIRs.
01:50So, in a country,
01:52in a civilized country,
01:54in a country where there is such an adherence to morals,
01:57as you said,
01:59when all these things are happening,
02:01and you read the newspapers of the last 2, 4, 5, 6 days,
02:06what people are saying.
02:08Shafqat Mahmood and Shahid Qardar had written an article two days ago,
02:12in the newspaper.
02:14They are not political people.
02:15Shafqat Mahmood has said that he has left politics.
02:17Mr. Qardar is the Governor of the State Bank.
02:19He has written that the government which has no legitimacy,
02:23which has no concept of being elected,
02:28which has been imposed,
02:30what can you expect from it,
02:32when people are saying such things.
02:34They are saying that this is happening here,
02:36look at the root cause.
02:38Look at the root cause,
02:40what is this,
02:42why did the police come to the Parliament,
02:44and they came and…
02:46Ok, my question,
02:48my simple question,
02:50I was ready to talk about it further.
02:52Where is the word root cause being used?
02:54I am ready to go further.
02:56The word root cause is being used,
02:58that look at Balochistan,
03:00what is the root cause there?
03:02Why are there protests there?
03:04Why is BYC putting up such big protests there?
03:06Why is there so much killing going on there?
03:08If you want to look at the root cause,
03:10then look at the root cause.
03:12Mr. Sanyal,
03:14I asked you a simple question,
03:16and basically it was that,
03:18let me be very blunt about it,
03:20this speech of his,
03:22first of all,
03:24I asked you the beneficiary of it,
03:26who was it?
03:28Secondly,
03:30did it benefit the party?
03:32Or did it fulfil the purpose of his speech?
03:34Did it achieve its purpose?
03:36What purpose are you talking about?
03:40I am asking you,
03:42there must be some purpose of his speech.
03:44It is a simple question,
03:46there must be some purpose of his speech,
03:48he mentioned the army,
03:50he criticised the people,
03:52he talked about the establishment,
03:54he talked about ten things,
03:56there must be some purpose.
03:58Obviously, the benefit or benefit of the party
04:00is what a person thinks,
04:02if someone is giving a speech,
04:04then what happened?
04:06No, no one can give a lecture
04:08on benefit and loss to the PTI right now.
04:10For the PTI,
04:12what has been happening for the last two years,
04:14one and a half years,
04:16is in front of everyone.
04:18So, there is no issue of benefit or loss here.
04:20Here, the thing is,
04:22which we need to think about,
04:24the question that arises is,
04:26in this country,
04:28what is the supremacy of the constitution,
04:30or rule of law,
04:32the rule of law,
04:34is it there or not?
04:36The position of the PTI is that,
04:38it is not here,
04:40it is the law of the jungle.
04:42And the law of the jungle means that,
04:44might is right,
04:46it is a primitive,
04:48it is an ancient way of thinking,
04:50the one who has a gun,
04:52the one who has a stick,
04:54the one who has a stick,
04:56the one who has a stick,
04:58the one who has a stick,
05:00the one who has a stick,
05:02the one who has a stick,
05:04the one who has a stick.