Lawyer, ex-pilot husband to remain in prison for forgery

Free Malaysia Today

The Court of Appeal ruled that the charge had been properly framed, and were not defective, wrong in law, or illegal.  Read More:  https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2024/08/30/lawyer-ex-pilot-husband-to-remain-in-prison-for-forgery/  Laporan Lanjut:  https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/bahasa/tempatan/2024/08/30/peguam-bekas-juruterbang-suami-kekal-dipenjara-kerana-guna-dokumen-palsu/ BeritaFMT #Lawyer #ExPilot #ForgedDocument #RemainPrison  Free Malaysia Today is an independent, bi-lingual news portal with a focus on Malaysian current affairs.    Subscribe to our channel - http://bit.ly/2Qo08ry   ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check us out at https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com Follow FMT on Facebook: https://bit.ly/49JJoo5 Follow FMT on Dailymotion: https://bit.ly/2WGITHM Follow FMT on X: https://bit.ly/48zARSW  Follow FMT on Instagram: https://bit.ly/48Cq76h Follow FMT on TikTok : https://bit.ly/3uKuQFp Follow FMT Berita on TikTok: https://bit.ly/48vpnQG  Follow FMT Telegram - https://bit.ly/42VyzMX Follow FMT LinkedIn - https://bit.ly/42YytEb Follow FMT Lifestyle on Instagram: https://bit.ly/42WrsUj Follow FMT on WhatsApp: https://bit.ly/49GMbxW  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download FMT News App: Google Play – http://bit.ly/2YSuV46 App Store – https://apple.co/2HNH7gZ Huawei AppGallery - https://bit.ly/2D2OpNP  #BeritaFMT #Lawyer #ExPilot #ForgedDocument #RemainPrison

Transcript

00:00The Court of Appeal has dismissed a lawyer and her husband's application for a review

00:06of their conviction for using a forged document to secure the transfer of property 11 years

00:12ago.

00:13Khi Praminder Kaur and her husband, T Bir Singh, a former pilot, had sought the review,

00:19claiming the charges framed against them were defective.

00:23Last December, the Appeals Court agreed to hear the review premised on a single question

00:28of law, namely whether the punishment for an offence under Section 471 of the Penal

00:33Code is prescribed in Section 465 rather than Section 467.

00:39Delivering the court's unanimous decision, Justice Chou Ka Singh said that the charges

00:44had been properly framed and were not defective, wrong in law or illegal.

00:49Praminder was convicted for using a forged document to transfer a piece of property worth

00:55RM550,000 located in Bukit Pramata in Gombak, Selangor.

Category

Transcript

Recommended