Police FOUND 9 ponits of forgery in Obama's birth certificate
Category
📚
LearningTranscript
00:00I don't know if he's a natural born citizen or not, I don't think the country knows what the definition of that is anymore.
00:05That wasn't anything that we were pursuing.
00:09We're pursuing the document.
00:11So let me play this one more time for you, because it's getting late.
00:14I want to show you this evidence all over again.
00:17And I really want you to sit back now, think about what I just shared with you, and see how this comes.
00:23According to the dates on the certificates, these births took place in Honolulu during the month of August in 1961, just 16 days apart.
00:33The birth certificate on the left belongs to Barack Obama.
00:38The birth certificate on the right belongs to Johanna Ani.
00:44After five years of intense investigation, which included consultation with one of America's most respected forensic document examiners,
00:52and a team of European media forensic experts,
00:57the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office has reached a conclusion utilizing forensic techniques both old and new.
01:04It is the opinion of the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office that the birth certificate on your right belonging to Johanna Ani
01:12was in fact used as a source document in the digital creation of Barack Obama's long-form birth certificate.
01:20Nine points of forgery in which words, letters, and hand-placed date stamps
01:26have been digitally copied from the Ani long-form birth certificate and pasted onto Obama's long-form birth certificate.
01:35We'll look at the first five points of forgery together since they were brought over from the ID document in one group.
01:51I really want that to sink in.
01:53These were taken as one group.
01:55That's why, relationally, they are proportionate to each other.
01:59That's a key factor here.
02:04Now let's drop out the Ani document as a background and view that again.
02:35Now let's look at the date stamps in box 20 and 22.
02:42In this case, the stamps were brought over one at a time.
02:47But as we do this experiment, ask yourself,
02:50what are the odds that two stamps in two separate boxes,
02:55stamped by hand 16 days apart,
02:58two stamps in two separate boxes,
03:01stamped by hand 16 days apart,
03:04would have the exact same angle in box 20 and the exact same angle in box 22?
03:11First we'll look at the left stamp.
03:23Now the right stamp.
03:29It should be pointed out that these stamps were looked at by two separate document examiners
03:36who specialize in two separate forensic disciplines and who reside on two different continents.
03:42Both agree that these angles are identical on both the Obama document and the Ani document.
03:50Let's watch that again without all of the background clutter.
03:55Let's watch that again without all of the background clutter.
03:58It should be noted that Susan and Gretchen Nordyke were born five minutes from each other
04:27and had consecutive serial numbers.
04:29Therefore, their date stamps ostensibly would have been put on back to back.
04:35But as you can see, looking at the leftmost date stamps, underlined in red,
04:40and looking at the rightmost date stamps, underlined in blue,
04:45there is no similarity in terms of the angle of the date stamps.
04:49How ironic that Barack Obama's birth certificate
04:53and Johanna Ani's birth certificate, which were stamped 16 days apart,
04:58are identical in angle according to two separate disciplines
05:04within the world of forensic document examination,
05:07and yet the Nordyke twins, born five minutes from each other,
05:11stamped back to back don't show any similarity in angles.
05:16We've made a number of references to angles so far.
05:22The reason for that is if you're going to take an item off of one document
05:26and place it onto another, the angle is going to remain the same
05:33unless you intentionally alter it after you place it on the second document.
05:37Watch.
05:39Here's what we think we know about that.
05:51Whoever created this document wasn't thinking about angles
05:55or relationship to other things.
05:58That was the giveaway in the date stamps.
06:01What that is telling you is no matter where you place that date,
06:05its angle of trajectory will be identical.
06:08It will be the same unless you manually go in and change it.
06:12This was one of the things that began the free fall
06:16of this document collapsing upon itself.
06:19The position of words, by using a small X as the point of reference
06:26and dragging them all over,
06:29this individual wasn't thinking about their relational positions.
06:39When you have two separate documents with two hand-placed date stamps
06:43at the same angles, it should be obvious that a forgery has taken place.
06:48For the next example, we'll need to zoom in a little bit.
06:54Now we're going to focus on boxes 6D and 6E within the Obama PDF.
07:01Both Xs were taken directly from box 6D
07:05in the Ani long-form birth certificate.
07:09In fact, not only was the X pulled over,
07:13but the box itself was pulled over
07:17and various parts of the line on top of the X were also pulled over
07:23according to forensic document experts.
07:38Those little Xs, one of those Xs was used twice.
07:44That's why they appear twice on the Obama certificate.
07:48It was the same X from only one box
07:51in the Hani certificate.
07:54What the document examiner, Reid Hayes, noticed
07:57was the X was above the box,
08:00but the ink was bleeding into the word on top of it.
08:03That's why they had to take the box, the X, and the word,
08:06because she couldn't separate it.
08:08So obviously this document was a template of some sort or a source.
08:16We're not entirely sure.
08:18I don't believe it was a template
08:21because of the positioning of these things.
08:23What they did on the date stamps, they didn't change the angles,
08:26but they just merely set them a little higher in the boxes.
08:30That was how they thought they were concealing it,
08:33but it doesn't change the angles.
08:35So I'm not sure what the document was.
08:37We know it's a source. We're safe bet on that.
08:48Next we'll drop the Hani document out of the picture,
09:03except for the items that were used to create the Obama birth certificate.
09:18And that would have been
09:47And that would have been the X utilized again.
10:06Again, this has nothing to do with any kind of computer forensics
10:10that we previously encountered.
10:12This has nothing to do with a 7655 copier.
10:16This has something to do with somebody that had a knowledge of cut and paste
10:19and Photoshop and God only knows what else.
10:23But unfortunately those items, by forensic determination,
10:29two different disciplines, two different continents,
10:34have come to the same conclusion.