#reservedseatscase #supremecourt #pmlngovt #TariqfazalChaudhry #pti #imrankhan #sheikhwaqasakram
Government criticism of judges regarding decision on reserved seats, Tariq Fazal Chaudhry's Analysis
Government criticism of judges regarding decision on reserved seats, Tariq Fazal Chaudhry's Analysis
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00The Supreme Court judges have rewritten the constitution.
00:03We won't let it be that easy for you.
00:05This government will last for five years.
00:07And if anyone tries to destabilize it,
00:10we will deal with them with our own hands.
00:12This discussion has been going on for many years.
00:17This is a political facilitation.
00:21They definitely don't accept this situation.
00:25It amounts to rewriting the constitution.
00:27The love for Indi has been shattered.
00:30Yesterday, I was very clear that
00:32Ayin lost and Begumat won.
00:34Begumat won and Ayin lost.
00:37You have abused the judges in your speeches.
00:40We have not abused the judges.
00:42We have objected.
00:44It is their right. It is not our right.
00:46It is the bench's right.
00:48You have accused the judges of bench-fixing.
00:51Yes, sir.
00:52What bench-fixing?
00:54You are open-minded.
00:56We have always been open-minded.
00:58Whenever we have been objected
01:01to the bench management decision,
01:03we have always been open-minded.
01:05I will tell you more about the decision
01:08of 13 judges after the break.
01:10But first, listen to what you are criticizing.
01:13I haven't heard it.
01:15I want to say that no one has this right.
01:17They are saying that it is their right.
01:19No one has this right.
01:21No one has this right.
01:23It is not our job to make institutions
01:25and demolish them.
01:27But we have found a way.
01:29We didn't like it.
01:31Who is this judge?
01:33You have maligned every judge.
01:35Listen.
01:37The judges have rewritten the Constitution.
01:40We won't let it be that easy for you.
01:42This government will last for five years.
01:44If anyone tries to destabilize it,
01:46we will deal with him with our own hands.
01:49This debate has been going on for years.
01:54This is a political facilitation.
01:57They definitely don't accept this situation.
02:01It amounts to rewriting the Constitution.
02:04I felt that the Constitution was lost
02:07and Begumat won.
02:10Begumat won.
02:12The Constitution was lost.
02:14Political facilitation is going on.
02:16Listen to Mr. Sheikh.
02:18I don't think Mr. Sheikh is...
02:20No, no.
02:22He is talking nonsense.
02:24First, listen to him.
02:26We had a press conference.
02:28I will talk to him.
02:30First, listen to him.
02:32I don't know who is disappointed.
02:34I don't think you should have listened
02:36after the recusal application.
02:38Even today, this is a stated position.
02:40Here, you have reached to Begumat.
02:42You heard it yourself.
02:44You heard the words of the immi.
02:46What is the meaning of this?
02:48You should have explained it to me.
02:50I will explain it to you.
02:52Please.
02:54Mr. Kashyap, the thing is
02:56that the decision about the reserve seats
02:58that has been given by the Supreme Court
03:00we have a complete objection to it.
03:02Why did you say that you are disappointed?
03:04We said that we have an objection.
03:06And what is the objection?
03:08You should only read the points
03:10that the judges have given.
03:12The decision is not two-fold.
03:14The majority decision is valid.
03:16But you should only read the points
03:18and then you will know
03:20what it means to rewrite the Constitution.
03:22Why are we saying that the Constitution
03:24has been rewritten?
03:26What is the second thing?
03:28Two judges know about the Constitution
03:30but eleven judges don't know about the Constitution.
03:32Is it possible?
03:34Is it possible?
03:36You think that the majority decision
03:38is always valid.
03:40The majority decision is always valid.
03:42You are saying that Qazi Faisal is wrong.
03:44I am saying that
03:46the Constitution
03:48is a part of the majority.
03:50We have only written this on it.
03:52It is not a part of the majority.
03:54Listen to me.
03:56It is not a part of 8-5.
03:58There is a difference between them
04:00and Justice Mandu Khair.
04:02They consider 49 people to be PTI
04:04but not 41.
04:06This is the basic difference.
04:08This is the difference.
04:10The Constitution is in this.
04:12A decision was taken
04:14when our interim government was running.
04:16If you vote against
04:18the Prime Minister
04:20who nominated his party
04:22and the parliamentary party,
04:24your vote won't count
04:26and you won't be disqualified.
04:28It was according to the Constitution.
04:30I agree with you.
04:32That was also rewriting of the Constitution.
04:34Let me say something.
04:36Let me complete.
04:38Sheikh sahab,
04:40I have a request for you.
04:42These decisions are not one.
04:44For decades,
04:46for centuries,
04:48every year,
04:50there is a reference court
04:52or a high court decision.
04:54Tell me,
04:56when I am not a law student,
04:58I understand
05:00and you are telling me
05:02that I agree with you.
05:04What will be the impact
05:06of these decisions
05:08in the future?
05:10I agree with
05:12Qazi's interpretation
05:14of Mandu Khair's decision.
05:16I think that decision
05:18is right.
05:20The one who has written
05:22PTI in the constitution,
05:24is PTI.
05:26The one who has not written,
05:28has no right to give PTI.
05:30He had three days.
05:32He can take a break.
05:34This is the Constitution.
05:36He is free.
05:38The problem is that
05:40even if 41 members
05:42don't get seats,
05:44you still don't get them.
05:46I agree with you.
05:48I will give you two examples.
05:50They are trying to make
05:52two-thirds majority.
05:54Is this argument being given
05:56from different places?
05:58Fawad Choudhary said,
06:00congratulations to Faisal,
06:02he gave it to non-Assembly member
06:04Noonli.
06:06Is this how everyone
06:08looks at it?
06:10I can't imagine
06:12that this has to be the case.
06:14Two judges have different opinions.
06:16Why can't we take difference of opinion
06:18as difference of opinion?