The Waqf Board Amendment Bill is facing significant opposition from legal experts in the Muslim community. Critics argue that the amendment is unnecessary and inappropriate, particularly regarding the inclusion of women. Experts emphasize that the focus should be on securing Waqf Board properties instead. The controversy has sparked reactions in Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, the Chief Minister's hometown.
#WaqfBill #WaqfAct #PMModi #YogiAdityanath #Muslims #Musalman #Oneindia #Oneindianews
~PR.152~ED.194~HT.334~
#WaqfBill #WaqfAct #PMModi #YogiAdityanath #Muslims #Musalman #Oneindia #Oneindianews
~PR.152~ED.194~HT.334~
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00I am Puneet Srivastav.
00:02The central government is going to present a bill related to the Vak vote.
00:07It is an amendment bill.
00:08Many things are included in it.
00:10Many powers will be reduced in it.
00:15The status of women will be increased in it.
00:18To discuss all these issues,
00:21I am present in the office of the Diwani of Gorakhpur.
00:25We have with us Mr. Akbar Ali Mekrani.
00:30He is an experienced lawyer.
00:33He looks into the issues related to the Vak vote.
00:36We will talk to him about all these issues.
00:39Sir, welcome to One India Hindi.
00:42The central government is going to present a bill related to the Vak vote.
00:48Many powers will be reduced in it.
00:52You have been looking into the issues related to the Vak vote for a long time.
00:57In what way are you looking into it?
00:59Reducing the powers of the Vak vote
01:04will not be of any benefit to the government.
01:13What should happen is,
01:15how the property of the Vak vote should be protected.
01:19Today, the Vak vote has also become dishonest.
01:22The Mutawalli people have also become dishonest.
01:26They want to take away the property of the Vak vote.
01:32The people who know about the property of the Vak vote,
01:36who are going to do the Vak vote,
01:38they are themselves destroying the objective of the Vak vote.
01:43The government is going in the same direction.
01:47The government wants to protect the property of the Vak vote.
01:50The property of the Vak vote should be taken away.
01:54The property of the Vak vote should be used for public good.
01:59This is not happening.
02:01What is happening is,
02:03the government is assuming that the property of the Vak vote has been confiscated.
02:13This is not wrong.
02:15If this is the case,
02:17then the existing law is enough for this.
02:21There is a tribunal in the Vak vote.
02:24In the tribunal, people file a claim.
02:27Even today, people file a claim.
02:29They say that this property does not belong to the Vak vote.
02:32It is a wrong entry.
02:34Section 142 provides a provision
02:37that the Vak vote has the power
02:39to use the registered property of the Vak vote
02:42and if it finds that the Vak vote does not belong to the Vak vote,
02:47then it has the right to delete it.
02:50If it does not delete it,
02:52then the Vak vote tribunal has the power
02:55to release the property of the Vak vote
02:59and take it out of the Vak vote.
03:04This provision is already in place.
03:07What is not there is,
03:09that people have illegally confiscated the Vak vote property.
03:14Mutwali is selling it.
03:16Mutwali should be held accountable.
03:20The Vak vote is also included in it.
03:23Mutwali should be held accountable for selling it.
03:27I will tell you one more thing.
03:30When this act was introduced in 1995,
03:34the power of the Vak vote tribunal was appointed
03:38to the people who were civil judges
03:41in the first class judiciary.
03:48The Vak vote tribunal was seen in every district.
03:52The government used to see the Vak vote case without any expense.
03:57What has happened now?
03:59Right now, there is only one Vak vote tribunal in Lucknow.
04:04The government spends crores of rupees there.
04:09The people who take the case,
04:13whether they are from Meerut, Gorakhpur,
04:16they run from the whole of UP and go there.
04:19The rich people go there.
04:21The poor people cannot even go there.
04:24As it was before,
04:26the Vak vote tribunal used to decide the case
04:29without any expense.
04:31The judiciary used to decide the case.
04:34The senior judges used to give one hour
04:38to see the case of the Vak vote.
04:42The people used to go to the district
04:45without any expense.
04:49You mean to say that
04:51the problems related to this
04:53have to go to Lucknow.
04:55The Vak vote tribunal was made
04:57at the local level.
04:59As it was before.
05:01The Vak vote tribunal was terminated in the middle.
05:04The Vak minister, Azam Khan,
05:07terminated two tribunals in UP
05:10and made two tribunals in Rampur and Lucknow.
05:13Yogi ji came and said that
05:15it will not be in Rampur,
05:17it will be in Lucknow.
05:19My submission is that
05:21as it was before,
05:23the Vak vote tribunal was made
05:25without any expense.
05:27The Vak vote tribunal in Lucknow
05:29is useless.
05:31Millions of rupees are spent in a month.
05:33There are no staff.
05:35People run away.
05:37There is no benefit.
05:39It is better that the Vak vote tribunal
05:41should be amended
05:43as it was in 1995.
05:45There are changes in 40 rules
05:47in the amendment bill.
05:49Yes.
05:51Women should be included
05:53in the Vak vote tribunal.
05:55What do you say to this?
05:57Women should be included
05:59wherever they are.
06:01But what happens is
06:03since Yogi ji has come,
06:05the Vak vote tribunal is in his hands.
06:07He is not even able to
06:09hold an election.
06:11Women are not even able to
06:13write their names
06:15in the Vak vote tribunal.
06:17How long has it been?
06:19Since he has come,
06:21it has been 7 years.
06:23Since 7 years,
06:25there has been no election.
06:27How do the members of the Vak vote
06:29get elected?
06:31Before this,
06:332 members used to come
06:35to the parliament.
06:374 members used to go
06:39to the U.P. assembly.
06:412 members used to be
06:43educated
06:45in engineering.
06:47Many people
06:49have been elected.
06:51Modi ji
06:53or Yogi ji
06:55does not have a Muslim
06:57in his party.
06:59If he does not have a Muslim,
07:01he can only be a Muslim.
07:03He should have a Muslim
07:05in any other party.
07:07What is your name?
07:09Afzal Khan.
07:11Today,
07:13the parliament will present
07:15a bill
07:17regarding the
07:19renewal of Vak vote powers.
07:21What would you like to say?
07:23Vak vote powers
07:25will be reduced.
07:27Instead of
07:29paying attention to this,
07:31we should see
07:33how much property
07:35the Vak vote has.
07:37We should not
07:39change the rules of Vak vote.
07:41What is your name?
07:43Akendra Sarkar.
07:45Today, the parliament will present
07:47a bill regarding the
07:49renewal of Vak vote powers.
07:51It will reduce the
07:53wealth of women.
07:55What would you like to say?
07:57The Vak vote was
07:59created
08:01to protect
08:03the property
08:05that was
08:07owned by the Vak vote.
08:09The property
08:11should be protected by the Vak vote.
08:13To reduce
08:15the power of
08:17the Vak vote,
08:19this bill is being presented.
08:21Instead of
08:23paying attention to
08:25the Vak vote,
08:27the government should
08:29think about
08:31the illegal occupation
08:33of the Vak vote.
08:35The government should
08:37remove the property
08:39of the Vak vote
08:41so that the purpose of the Vak vote
08:43can be fulfilled.
08:45Usually, the property
08:47of the Vak vote is given
08:49to such people
08:51so that it can help
08:53the Muslim community.
08:55If someone does not have
08:57any support,
08:59the Vak vote can
09:01help them.
09:03But,
09:05the government should
09:07respect the rights
09:09of the Vak vote.
09:11That is the purpose of the bill.
09:13There is no other purpose behind it.
09:15The Vak vote can
09:17control the Vak vote
09:19on its own.
09:21The Vak vote can
09:23control the property
09:25of the Vak vote.
09:27There is no need
09:29to bring the bill.
09:31What is your name, sir?
09:33My name is Muhammad Jamal.
09:35I practice in Jharkhand.
09:37Sir, today the central government
09:39will present a bill
09:41related to the Vak vote.
09:43Many powers of the Vak vote
09:45will be reduced and
09:47the role of women will be fulfilled.
09:49What would you like to say
09:51about this bill?
09:53This bill
09:55is illegal and
09:57unjustified.
09:59Any kind of
10:01violation of the Vak vote
10:03or any kind of
10:05violation of the Vak vote
10:07or any kind of
10:09violation of the Vak vote
10:11or any kind of
10:13violation of the Vak vote
10:15or any kind of
10:17violation of the Vak vote
10:19or any kind of
10:21violation of the Vak vote
10:23or any kind of
10:25violation of the Vak vote
10:27or any kind of
10:29violation of the Vak vote
10:31or any kind of
10:33violation of the Vak vote
10:35or any kind of
10:37violation of the Vak vote
10:39or any kind of
10:41violation of the Vak vote
10:43or any kind of
10:45violation of the Vak vote
10:47or any kind of
10:49violation of the Vak vote
10:51or any kind of
10:53violation of the Vak vote
10:55or any kind of
10:57violation of the Vak vote
10:59or any kind of
11:01violation of the Vak vote
11:03or any kind of
11:05violation of the Vak vote
11:07or any kind of
11:09violation of the Vak vote
11:11or any kind of
11:13violation of the Vak vote
11:15or any kind of
11:17violation of the Vak vote
11:19or any kind of
11:21violation of the Vak vote
11:23or any kind of
11:25violation of the Vak vote
11:27It would never be right
11:29according to the
11:31law of a Muslim personal
11:53It is a Muslim personal
11:55Don't miss out.
12:09Follow One India for real-time updates.