Atta Tarar nay Kis kay kehnay par Press Conference ki thi? Aur kiya isper Implement Hoga?
#PTI #imrankhan #ptiban #attatarar #azamnazeertarar #khawarghumman #haidernaqvi #chaudhryghulamhussain #hassanayub #article6 #pmshehbazsharif #ppp #pmlngovt
Atta Tarar nay Kis kay kehnay par Press Conference ki thi? Aur kiya isper Implement Hoga? | Hassan Ayub's Analysis
Atta Tarar nay Kis kay kehnay par Press Conference ki thi? Aur kiya isper Implement Hoga? | Hassan Ayub's Analysis
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00In my opinion, he himself answered his own question.
00:03Azam Nazir Tariq Sahib, the law minister, during the press conference,
00:07he said that we did the consultation a year ago.
00:09This means that something or the other was happening.
00:12Something or the other is going on.
00:14Listen to what he said.
00:15But, Mr. Minister of Justice,
00:17at least from you, it seems that the consultation was not done.
00:20In this matter.
00:22Look, I had a consultation earlier on the stage.
00:26When it was decided politically,
00:28keeping in mind the current situation,
00:31last year,
00:32that it should not be done now.
00:34And this is such a thing,
00:36the material is available,
00:38and it is the government's privilege and authority
00:41that when it will use this option.
00:46Yes, Mr. Chaudhary Gulamshan,
00:48that is very clear.
00:50He is saying that we had taken this decision politically first.
00:53And we were waiting for the right time.
00:56Now, this right time,
00:58according to Mr. Atta Attar,
01:01but you are saying that
01:03there has been no discussion with me yet.
01:06So, what news do you have sitting in Lahore?
01:09Did Mr. Atta Attar himself,
01:11of course, he gave the decision so willingly.
01:14Did our Tahiyyat Qaid,
01:16the President of Pakistan Muslim League Noon,
01:19he must not have taken a go-ahead or endorsement from him.
01:22Or he must have asked Mr. Shahbaz Sharif,
01:25without this press conference.
01:27Mr. Chaudhary, before you,
01:29I would like Hassan to answer this.
01:31Look, from any perspective,
01:33Hassan, the decision he announced,
01:36you have heard it,
01:38it was a very big news.
01:40In any country,
01:41if someone has made a mistake,
01:43any political party,
01:44if the government has the material,
01:46that this is against the state,
01:48it becomes a right,
01:49the Supreme Court will decide.
01:51Can it be hidden,
01:52or is the news wrong,
01:53that you have made a practical decision.
01:55My question to you is,
01:57that Mr. Atta Attar,
01:59without the consent of Mr. Shahbaz Sharif,
02:02without the consent of Mr. Nawaz Sharif,
02:04did this press conference.
02:06This is a very important question.
02:08Look, in this matter,
02:09a very simple thing is that,
02:11he has been told,
02:13that Atta Attar,
02:15his own,
02:16this press conference was not done.
02:18And why was it done,
02:20why this kind of,
02:22miscommunication?
02:23No, there was no miscommunication.
02:25This was a press conference with intentions.
02:27Without the knowledge of the Prime Minister,
02:30this could not have been such a big press conference.
02:33Now, after doing this,
02:35what are the reasons,
02:36that he had to do this on purpose,
02:38to test the waters in the future.
02:41What do you think?
02:42After testing,
02:43look, he,
02:44in this regard,
02:45he is serious.
02:46This is not a casual matter.
02:48Whatever Mr. Atta Attar has said,
02:50there will be an investigation on this.
02:52To investigate,
02:53before that,
02:54he left a filler.
02:55After leaving the filler,
02:56this matter has become common knowledge.
02:58You are discussing it,
02:59it is the third or fourth day.
03:00Now, this discussion will go to the Parliament.
03:02When this discussion will go to the Parliament,
03:04then the final decision will be made on this.
03:07Until the Parliament does not agree,
03:09this matter will not move forward.
03:11Blaming Atta Attar,
03:13that Atta Attar,
03:14without the consent of the Prime Minister,
03:16has done this.
03:17This is not possible.
03:19This is not possible.
03:20Viewers,
03:21a little clarification here is that,
03:23for this action,
03:24if the government wants to take it to the Parliament,
03:27then it is the will of the government.
03:29The government is not bound.
03:31The government,
03:32the Interior Ministry,
03:33has to issue a simple notification,
03:35that we have such evidences,
03:37we think that Pakistan Tariq-e-Insaf,
03:39is doing such things against the existence of the state,
03:42or such crimes have been committed,
03:45due to which we are going to ban this party.
03:49And after that,
03:50that notification,
03:51within 15 days,
03:52you have to send it to the Supreme Court.
03:54The Supreme Court has to decide,
03:56that do you really have those evidences,
03:58that documentary evidence,
04:00the circumstances,
04:01which are present,
04:03on the basis of which you can do this work.
04:05So, eventually,
04:06the decision has to be made by the Supreme Court.
04:08The matter of the Parliament,
04:09from Hassan's point of view,
04:11we can definitely talk about it,
04:14that Pakistan People's Party,
04:16because it is present in the Parliament,
04:18it is not a part of the government.
04:20So, you have to consult with the People's Party,
04:22on the level of the Parliament,
04:23or on the level of their leadership.
04:25The Prime Minister,
04:26of course, is of the Pakistan Muslim League,
04:28the President is of the Pakistan People's Party.
04:30Some people also think,
04:31Mr. Naqvi,
04:32that maybe this consultation,
04:33I will come to you later.
04:34I wanted to clarify a little.
04:36The matter of Article 17,
04:37it is obvious,
04:38that it has to be decided in the Supreme Court.
04:41But the matter of Article 6,
04:42will not be decided in the Supreme Court.
04:43The reference will go to the Chief Justice,
04:46and on top of that,
04:48a special court,
04:50like the one that was made for the Musharraf Prison case,
04:52those three judges of the High Court,
04:54can make a decision on them,
04:55whether they are the Chief Justice,
04:57or they are the normal judges of the High Court,
04:59on top of those three judges,
05:00they can make a decision on them.
05:02What you are saying,
05:03the reference of Article 6,
05:07will have to go through the office of the President of Pakistan.
05:10It will go through,
05:11but it will go to the Supreme Court.
05:12The decision will not be made by the Supreme Court.
05:13No, no.
05:14The decision will not be made by the Supreme Court,
05:15but the Supreme Court will send it.
05:16Not the Chief Justice.
05:17No, no, no.
05:18Not the Supreme Court,
05:19but the Chief Justice.
05:20One and the same thing.
05:21Mr. Nagveer,
05:22this is about the Pakistan People's Party.
05:24On behalf of the People's Party,
05:25they are not talking openly about this issue.
05:29They are saying that,
05:30Pakistan is a fair party,
05:34but their attitude is not right.
05:35They will have to correct themselves.
05:37If they correct themselves,
05:38then there will be no action on this.
05:40Do you think that the Pakistan People's Party
05:42was not taken on board by the government,
05:45or that they did not share the idea
05:47that they are going to make such a big decision,
05:50and the government of the Noon League
05:52is on the head of the People's Party.
05:54Without the People's Party,
05:55the Noon League cannot exist.
05:57Look,
05:58first of all,
05:59this must have been discussed at some level.
06:02Whether it was discussed with the Prime Minister,
06:03the President of Pakistan,
06:04or with someone else.
06:06But,
06:07it is possible that the People's Party
06:08is not aware of when to make this announcement.
06:11It is possible that the Noon League
06:13made this announcement early,
06:14on the 8th of Muharram.
06:16It is possible that this announcement
06:17was to be made after the 10th of Muharram,
06:18or after a few more days,
06:19but they made this announcement early.
06:21Which I am trying to leave between the lines.
06:23And there is another story
06:24which I can leave between the lines.
06:26This is a matter of a few lows and a few highs.
06:31Explain this a little.
06:33This is a decision of the Supreme Court,
06:34the National Assembly of the Supreme Court,
06:36and especially the decision for the Nationalists.
06:38And after that,
06:39this ban,
06:40this press conference of Article 6,
06:42I feel that
06:43somewhere,
06:44somewhere in the middle,
06:45some kind of talk will be made
06:46that,
06:47take some and give some.
06:48No, tell us a little,
06:49shed some light.
06:50Between whom,
06:51some zero and zero.
06:52Look,
06:53it is possible that
06:54such a decision will be made,
06:55such an understanding will be made,
06:56such a thing will come forward.
06:58Because,
06:59on the same day,
07:00it went into review.
07:01The day they did the press conference,
07:02on the same day,
07:03it went into review.
07:04They filed a review petition.
07:05It is possible that
07:06this is some kind of
07:07give and take,
07:08that you back off
07:09from this special session.
07:11Or,
07:12the 49 people,
07:13only they should get a special session.
07:15The 48 people,
07:16which is Mr. Yahya Afridi's note,
07:18according to that,
07:19they should not get a special session.
07:20It is a very long shot.
07:21Yes,
07:22it is a very long shot.
07:23You are aiming very far.
07:24I don't know,
07:25I mean,
07:26I will get a little light
07:27from Hassan on this,
07:28but,