CJP ki Bench main Shamuliyat par Aitraz kis jamat nay Kiya ? Raja Mohsin Ejaz Reveals inside Story

2 months ago

#CJP #supremecourt #lahorehighcourt #thereporters #khawarghumman #chaudhryghulamhussain #haidernaqvi

CJP ki Bench main Shamuliyat par Aitraz kis jamat nay Kiya ? Raja Mohsin Ejaz Reveals inside Story

Transcript

00:00First of all, tell us, from which party was this objection raised in the Chief Justice's bench and what were the fundamental reasons for it?

00:12Look, these are the people who are associated with Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaf, the Rakeen-e-Assembly,

00:18or these were the people who were represented by Niazullah Niazi, who was a supporter of Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaf in the elections on 8th February.

00:26Today, when the hearing began, Niazullah Niazi got up at the very beginning of the hearing, came to the podium,

00:32and said that he wanted to say something, if he was allowed to.

00:36Along with this, he raised an objection on the bench and said that it was the objection of my client that the Chief Justice should not be a part of this bench.

00:45On this, the Chief Justice of Pakistan immediately remarked that we have heard your objection.

00:50Now, please be seated. This is a matter between the Election Commission and the Chief Justice of Lahore High Court.

00:56Okay, what was the reason that Niazullah Niazi said that we do not want you to be a part of this bench?

01:02Look, the reason was neither told nor was given a chance to tell.

01:07Because when he was raising an objection, and he was probably trying to give some references, some details on this matter,

01:15Niazullah Niazi said that we have heard your objection. Now, please be seated.

01:25After this, we saw that not only from the point of view of the Chief Justice of Pakistan, but also from the point of view of Justice Jamal Mandokhil,

01:31he expressed his objection.

01:33And the Chief Justice also gave these remarks. I will tell you the remarks of both respected judges.

01:38The Chief Justice said that what interest does a private person have in this matter?

01:43Justice Jamal Mandokhil said that if the Election Commission and the Chief Justice do not make a decision,

01:48that is, the Chief Justice of Lahore High Court, then will a common man be affected by this?

01:52At the same time, the advocates of Hamid Khan Advocate came to Rostrum and called for the dismissal of this case for some time.

02:03Because Mr. Hamid Khan is not available at the moment.

02:06However, the lawyer of the Election Commission, Sikandar Basheer Mohamad, raised his arguments at this time.

02:11On one occasion, Mr. Salman Akram Raja was mentioned that he was asked whether you also have an objection or not.

02:18Now, is he fighting his case individually or was he also representing a party?

02:23Mr. Salman Akram Raja, because he was a petitioner in the Lahore High Court regarding this case.

02:29Yes, absolutely. Look, Salman Akram Raja was not presenting himself as a lawyer in this case.

02:34However, he was in this case as an advocate.

02:36On one occasion, the Chief Justice called him to Rostrum and asked him whether he had objected to this case.

02:43On this, Mr. Salman Akram Raja said that he had not objected in his personal capacity.

02:49The Chief Justice of Pakistan then gave remarks on this case.

02:53He said that the court has been scandalized a lot.

02:57Enough is enough.

02:59Why not send Pakistan Bar for disciplinary action on the case of Niaz Ullah Niazi?

03:07Along with this, he also said that at the last hearing, I was also the head of the two-deck bench.

03:12Then, why was there no objection?

03:14Now, the bench does not make itself alone.

03:16In fact, the entire committee makes it.

03:18When one person makes the bench, then no objection was made.

03:21When one person used to make it, Niaz Ullah Niazi also got partial relief.

03:25Despite this, now he is objecting.

03:27Justice Jamal Mando Khel gave remarks and said that the committee has put us on the bench.

03:32Are we sitting here to be humiliated?

03:34The three of us later joined the bench.

03:37Obviously, the objection is on me.

03:39Okay, I understand this.

03:41On one occasion, Justice Jamal Mando Khel and Justice Aqeel Abbasi, who is the former Chief Justice of the High Court,

03:50Both of them said that the work done by the Chief Justice of the Lahore High Court,

03:56the notification of the Chief Justice of the Lahore High Court,

03:59they should have done this.

04:01This is what they should have done.

04:03Because it is not that they should be subordinated to the Election Commission.

04:06What was this matter?

04:08Please explain it in detail.

04:10Look, this remark was given by Justice Aqeel Abbasi that the Election Commission will have to think

04:14whether they are talking to the Chief Justice or to a section officer.

04:18Justice Jamal Mando Khel said that if the Election Commission does not obey the High Court's orders,

04:22then the court will be condemned.

04:24On this occasion, the Chief Justice was also asked whether the notification of the Tribunals of the Lahore High Court

04:30should be issued by the High Court itself.

04:32Justice Aqeel Abbasi said that if the Election Commission does not act on the decision,

04:37then the court, and what else should it do?

04:39Justice Jamal Mando Khel also said that the High Court should have noticed the condemnation of the court instead of the notification.

04:46It was said on behalf of the Lawyer of the Election Commission that the notification of the High Court

04:50and the decision should be adjourned.

04:52This was said on behalf of him.

04:54And on behalf of the Chief Justice, this remark was given that you want to say that the Chief Justice and the High Court

04:59will also be bound by the court's decision.

05:01He said that in this way, the court will be condemned even on the Chief Justice.

05:05Justice Aqeel Abbasi said that the Election Commission should first follow the orders of the High Court.

05:10Justice Jamal Mando Khel said that it is also possible that the Election Commission

05:13will issue a notification on the basis of an appeal.

05:16On this, the Lawyer of the Election Commission, Sikandar Basheer Mohammad said that

05:19I leave myself in the hands of the court.

05:21Justice Jamal Mando Khel said that if he had left himself in the hands of the court,

05:24in the High Court, then this would not have been an issue.

05:27He also said that I don't know why the issue of ego is being made.

05:31And at this point, it was said that the judges also need to discuss this point.

05:37And now we are dedicating this issue.

05:40After these remarks, it was said that we will call the Parliamentary Committee for a hearing soon.

05:49And on this, the Chief Justice said that we will call the Parliamentary Committee.

05:52Okay, let's move on to the motion.

05:54After that, he said that as soon as he takes his charge as the Chief Justice,

05:59then there should be a meaningful consultation between the Election Commission and the Chief Justice.

06:04Now, the matter is that, first of all, let's discuss the case of Niazullah Niazi.

06:10So, you don't know that Niazullah Niazi's son had applied for the Law Club.

06:16And his interview was taken by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Pakistan, Justice Qazi Faisal.

06:22And on this, he rejected his son.

06:25So, he has already complained about this.

06:27So, today he raised an objection against him.

06:30So, he understands the matter.

06:32Do you think this is the reason?

06:34Yes, he himself has stated this reason.

06:36At least listen to him.

06:38I have not asked him a question.

06:40No, you are saying that this is the reason.

06:42I have clarified that. I am not asking him a question. I know that.

06:44I know that.

06:45No, you are saying that this is the reason.

06:46This is the reason. He has expressed it.

06:48I have spoken to Niazullah Niazi.

06:50Niazullah Niazi was not given a chance to complete the matter.

06:52Look, there are a lot of personal issues here.

06:55Mine will also be there. Yours will also be there.

06:57Power Guman sir will also be there.

06:58Choyesh sir will also be there. Everyone will be there.

07:00I have spoken to Niazullah Niazi.

07:04I have spoken to the people who were talking about this objection.

07:08I do not want to go into the details of the objection.

07:12But there are some decisions of the Supreme Court of Pakistan because of the objection.

07:15There are some decisions of the Supreme Court of Pakistan because of the objection.

07:17He did not ask a question.

07:19When he was not asked by the court, he did not get a chance.

07:21Like you said, if he had been given a chance, he would have told us why we are objecting.

07:24I am not asking Mohsin.

07:26I want to give you a clarification.

07:30Look, Article 219C of the Constitution is very clear.

07:35I had told you earlier that when this matter happened,

07:37I had told you, Power Guman sir, that it will suspend him.

07:41But you said that it will not be suspended.

07:43I said that if there is no question, then other people can ask questions.

07:47Then I will take clarification from you on this issue.

07:49I will come to you.

07:51Choyesh sir, if there is a question, you can ask.

07:53After that, I will come to Ravi sir.

07:55No, there are many questions.

07:57But first listen to Hassan Ayyub sir.

07:59No, no, he wants to comment on this.

08:01I said that you can ask Mohsin Rai sir.

08:05Niyazullah Niyazi was the election commissioner of PTI, if I remember correctly.

08:11Even then, he was beaten up a lot in the Supreme Court.

08:17So, this is not one issue.

CJP ki Bench main Shamuliyat par Aitraz kis jamat nay Kiya ? Raja Mohsin Ejaz Reveals inside Story

Category

Transcript

Recommended