'Planting The Seeds Of Its Own Decline': Ritchie Torres Decries US Miscalculations Towards CCP

  • 3 months ago
During a House Select Committee on the CCP hearing last week, Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-NY) spoke about 'miscalculations' that the United States made towards China.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
00:02Representative Torres.
00:03Thank you, Mr. Chair. For far too long, the United States has been planting the seeds
00:08of its own decline through a series of strategic miscalculations and misplaced priorities.
00:13First came the deindustrialization of America. We made a miscalculation in allowing our domestic
00:18industrial capacity to atrophy from neglect. And then came the distraction of America.
00:24We made a miscalculation in allowing ourselves to be distracted by quagmires in the Middle
00:28East from the singular challenge to American leadership, which is the Chinese Communist
00:33Party.
00:34Thankfully, under the leadership of President Biden, aided by a bipartisan consensus here
00:38in Congress, we are correcting these historical errors to the benefit of U.S. strategic competitiveness.
00:46One of the greatest achievements of the Biden administration lies in fundamentally changing
00:51the trajectory of the semiconductor arms race, or what Mr. Miller calls the chip wars.
00:57With the CHIP Act and the export controls on China have been game changers. According
01:02to a report by the Semiconductor Industry Association and the Boston Consulting Group,
01:06by 2032, the United States will account for 30 percent of advanced semiconductor production
01:12compared to only 2 percent for China.
01:16Mr. Miller, what is the percentage of advanced semiconductors that are projected to come
01:20not only from on-shoring but also from near-shoring and front-shoring beyond the reach of the
01:25Chinese Communist Party?
01:27Representative, I think we are seeing substantial investments both in the United States but
01:30also in allied countries, in Europe, in Japan, in other partners that is adding to the resilience
01:35of the semiconductor supply chain.
01:38And to what extent does the restrictiveness of America's immigration system undermine
01:43the capacity to domestically produce advanced semiconductors?
01:46Representative, I think if we could have more immigrants with high skills in the semiconductor
01:51industry, we would have a more innovative ecosystem.
01:54You know, the term protectionism is often invoked as a pejorative to denounce the policy
02:03shift away from so-called free trade.
02:06But in my view, there is nothing remotely free about trade with China.
02:10The idealized vision of free trade implies a level playing field in which everyone is
02:15playing by the rules.
02:17China has never been one to play by the rules.
02:19China is heavily subsidizing its own industries in order to drive American manufacturers out
02:23of business.
02:25That is not competition.
02:27That is cheating.
02:28And President Biden's tariffs are protecting American manufacturers not from competition
02:34but from cheating.
02:35Mr. Paul, do you believe, as I do, that the protectionism versus free trade framing ignores
02:41the reality of cheating on the part of the Chinese Communist Party?
02:44Yes, it's an easy headline, but it doesn't distill all of the issues involved.
02:49And I would just point out there's a difference between building a moat or a wall around your
02:53country and simply locking your door, which is what I think the tariffs do, which is smart.
02:58No one wants to let something bad happen in their house.
03:02I feel like we in the China Committee have no greater mission than to prevent a third
03:07world war between the United States and China, to prevent China from escalating aggression
03:13in the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait.
03:16And a war in the Indo-Pacific, as you know, would largely be a naval war.
03:20And according to the Secretary of the Navy, quote, one Chinese shipyard has more capacity
03:26than all of our shipyards combined.
03:30We have a reputation as the military superpower, the naval superpower of the world.
03:36Are we truly the naval superpower of the world when we have no independent shipbuilding capacity
03:40and when ours pales in comparison to our greatest rival?
03:45I would say it's diminishing.
03:47And that is the concern here, is that we currently have a tonnage advantage, but it's unsustainable.
03:52We don't have a surge capacity.
03:53I mean, the thing that helped identify, and I'm glad the chairman mentioned the arsenal
03:58of democracy, was that we were able to do conversions very quickly to scale up battleship
04:06building capacity.
04:07And the difference now is that we don't have that.
04:11I mean, that has disappeared.
04:13We do have some shipyards that have been converted to just doing repair work that we could scale
04:18back up.
04:19But we are dangerously deficient when it comes to scaling up to meet the kind of conflict
04:26that you're talking about for any sustained amount of time.
04:31Mr. Miller, just one more question about, obviously much has been said about China's
04:36overcapacity of legacy shipmaking.
04:40Do you think that the rest to the supply chain security of the United States is so serious
04:44that it warrants a policy response from the United States, and what should that policy
04:48response be?
04:49Yes, I think a policy response is warranted.
04:52I think some mix of trade measures and restrictions on use of Chinese semiconductors in critical
04:57systems should be examined as potential policy responses.
05:00My time has expired, so thank you.

Recommended