• 4 months ago
State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller refused to comment on Julian Assange reaching a plea deal to avoid jail time in the United States.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00I thought we'd get around there eventually.
00:07I sort of expected you were going to say it's an ongoing judicial matter.
00:11But you're going to ask anyway.
00:13What was the value of, what was the importance for the United States of reaching a plea deal with him?
00:18Why was it important to settle this?
00:20So you're right. It is an ongoing judicial matter.
00:23And so I am really limited in what I can say where I can't really say anything about that.
00:27I know that the Justice Department has published court documents related to this case.
00:31I know he's scheduled to appear in court in the coming hours.
00:34And given that it is a pending case that is about to go before a federal judge,
00:38I think it's appropriate for me to not comment on the matter at this time.
00:42Sure. I'll try a little bit more.
00:44But obviously he's an Australian citizen.
00:46Can you talk about the nature of discussions between the United States and Australia at the diplomatic level?
00:50Was this important to resolve for the sake of the alliance between the U.S. and Australia?
00:54I think while the matter is pending, it's important for me not to comment on it at all.
00:58Maybe tomorrow I'll have more to say.
01:00But I think today I should refrain from commenting and defer to the Department of Justice.
01:04Okay. Unless anybody wants to pursue that.
01:06Can I ask a follow-up?
01:07Yeah. Go ahead.
01:08This obviously has been a source of disagreement between Australia and the United States.
01:11Do you consider that this matter is now on the cusp of being resolved?
01:15So I appreciate you trying.
01:17But I think I'm going to go back to the days when I was the Department of Justice spokesperson.
01:22And when we had a matter pending in court that was about to go for a federal judge,
01:25I think I very much would have objected to the State Department spokesperson opining on it from the podium before the matter was resolved.
01:31So I'm going to decline to do so today.
01:35And I'm sorry.
01:37Tell us what you think about having this case heard by a judge in a trench in the Pacific Ocean.
01:50I think that is a matter for the Department of Justice to comment on, not the State Department.
01:55I was wondering if this is sort of a relief for the State Department when it comes to engagement.
02:02I hate to interrupt, but I only interrupt to say you're going to get the same answer that I have given with respect to the other question.
02:10It just isn't appropriate for me, while this is pending and about to go for a federal judge, to comment on any way.
02:16The matter is not yet resolved.
02:17Once it's resolved, maybe it will be a different case, but not today.

Recommended