Diễn Đàn Luật 360 #1|Cuộc chiến TRANH CHẤP tài sản thừa kế giữa CON NUÔI và CON RUỘT

MCV Media

#MCVMedia #DDL #MCVNetwork  “DIỄN ĐÀN LUẬT 360” là một chương trình nơi các luật sư uy tín ở nhiều lĩnh vực tham gia. Trong mỗi số phát sóng sẽ có 2 luật sư cùng phân tích - tư vấn - phản biện về cùng 1 vấn đề/tình huống pháp luật. Đặc biệt trong chương trình, với mỗi tình huống các luật sư sẽ giúp khán giả nắm rõ và mở rộng kiến thức pháp luật thông qua việc tóm tắt và highlight những điều luật/ khoản mà khán giả cần nhớ, nắm hiểu. Đây là một cơ hội giúp cung cấp và ghi nhớ các kiến thức luật pháp có giá trị thực tiễn với cuộc sống và quyền lợi của từng khán giả.   Cuộc chiến về tranh chấp tài sản có thể xảy ra ở bất kỳ đâu, bất kỳ gia đình nào. Nhiều khía cạnh về mối quan hệ gia đình dẫn đến quyền thừa kế được hé lộ và sẽ mang tới nhiều điều bất ngờ cho người xem.   Diễn Đàn Luật 360 phát sóng vào 11H00 Thứ Tư hằng tuần trên kênh youtube MCVMedia.  ►Cùng MCV Media tìm hiểu về các điều luật tại đây:   Cùng MCV Media xem các sản phẩm xịn, deal siêu mịn:  ◼ Website: https://mshop247.com/  ◼ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@mshop.mcv?lan...  Cùng MCV Media chăm sóc sức khỏe cho những người thân yêu:  ◼ Website: doctornetwork.us ◼ Tải Doctor Network trên IOS: http://invite.doctornetwork.us ◼ Tải Doctor Network trên Google Play: https://play.google.com/store/apps/de...  Diễn Đàn Luật 360 #1|Cuộc chiến TRANH CHẤP tài sản thừa kế giữa CON NUÔI và CON RUỘT #DienDanLuat360  #MCVMedia #PhanNhuThao #DDL1#MCVNetwork #DDL DDL360_001   Cùng Media theo dõi các chương trình hấp dẫn và đặc sắc khác: ► BẠN MUỐN HẸN HÒ – FULL: https://bit.ly/BanMuonHenHo_Full   ► MẸ CHỒNG NÀNG DÂU – FULL : https://bit.ly/MECHONGNANGDAU2022   ► GÕ CỬA THĂM NHÀ - FULL: https://bit.ly/GOCUATHAMNHA  ​   Website: http://mcv.com.vn ~-~~-~~~-~~-~ © Chương trình thuộc bản quyền của MCV Media.Vui lòng không sao chép, re-upload dưới mọi hình thức. ✖Tài khoản của bạn có thể sẽ bị khóa vĩnh viễn nếu như sao chép và reup các nội dung trên.

Transcript

00:00Thank you very much for watching and see you in the next episode of Vietnam's Got Talent.

00:30Vietnam's Got Talent

01:00Parents are parents, children are children.

01:03We are all different, we shouldn't do what we want with all the assets we have.

01:06The Law of 360 is a reality show.

01:09At 9 p.m. every Tuesday on HTV9

01:12At 11 p.m. every Friday on MCV Media and MCV Network

01:22The Law of 360 is sponsored by YDS

01:26The guests of the show will be 2 lawyers

01:30On my right is lawyer Nguyen Ho Du

01:33Hello everyone, let me introduce myself, my name is Nguyen Ho Du

01:36Lawyer Nguyen Ho Du is the founder and CEO of Magnol E-Law

01:41He is a graduate of Ho Chi Minh City University of Economics and Commerce

01:45He is a graduate of Hanoi Law University

01:47He is a doctor of Vietnamese Social Sciences Academy of Economics

01:49He is a doctor of Ho Chi Minh City University of Economics and Banking

01:53He is a specialist in trade, business, real estate, civil affairs and dispute resolution

01:58He is a lawyer at the South Trade Center

02:02He is a lawyer at Ho Chi Minh City Court of Arbitration

02:05He is a lawyer at Ho Chi Minh City Court of Arbitration

02:07On my left is lawyer Dao Duc Hanh

02:10I am lawyer Dao Duc Hanh

02:11Lawyer Dao Duc Hanh is the CEO of Viet Dong Art Law Company

02:14Lawyer Hanh is a good lawyer of English, law and economics

02:18He is a good lawyer of business administration

02:24Vietnam's top lawyers

02:28Today's topic is about inheritance

02:31There are many stories about inheritance disputes

02:34which lead to painful consequences

02:36The case of inheritance disputes and disputes of rights for decades

02:40Mrs. C is a housewife who is not married and has only one child

02:44More than 10 years ago, she left behind thousands of billions of assets

02:49and her adopted son

02:51At that time, she inherited this property

02:53However, her relatives believe that this is not reasonable

02:57leading to a 10-year inheritance dispute

02:59According to the two lawyers, in this case, what do we need to discuss?

03:04And in this case, do those people ask for the right to share that property?

03:10Now the problem is that Mrs. C's adopted son

03:16We have to be able to determine whether this adopted son is eligible to receive this property

03:23According to the law, the adopted son must register with the state agency

03:28All procedures are in accordance with the law

03:31In this case, it is assumed that this adopted son is eligible to receive this property

03:39When the 2010 Act of Adoption came into effect

03:42Those who have a real adopted son but have not registered to receive that adopted son

03:46will have to go through procedures to receive the adopted son within 5 years

03:53Only then will the adopted son become a real adopted son

03:56According to the statute

03:59And if after 5 years, from January 1, 2011

04:02If after 5 years, the adopted son does not register to receive the adopted son

04:06At that time, the adopted son will no longer be an adopted son

04:09It will be a person who has nothing to do with it

04:12This case happened more than 10 years ago

04:14For example, before 2010, before that law, Mrs. C had already passed away

04:19At that time, the adopted son was definitely an adopted son

04:21Before the law came into effect, there were two forms

04:24The real adopted son and the adopted son according to the law

04:26The adopted son has to register according to the law

04:30And the second form is the real adopted son

04:32People around confirm that this is an adopted son and have self-reliance

04:35Then it is an adopted son and has the right to be separated

04:49As far as I know, this adopted son is also a real adopted son

04:53Has been raised since childhood

04:55Has been with her for more than 10 years

04:57Has really been a child in the family

04:59At this time, is it right to ask for the inheritance of their property?

05:04We have to analyze this issue like this

05:07Mrs. C's son, when he was raised, he had the right, benefits and honors

05:13First of all, he has the right to love and take care of his parents

05:17Then to support and honor the family tradition

05:21Just like a real adopted son

05:23As for the issue of property, it is also allowed to inherit property like a real adopted son

05:28I don't know when Mrs. C gave this adopted son the right to inherit property or the law

05:35If the property is legal, the adopted son will be able to inherit all of Mrs. C's property

05:44If Mrs. C has the right to leave all the property to this adopted son

05:48Then the relatives will not have any right to ask for the property

05:52And if Mrs. C lost the property in a unique way

05:56For example, if Mrs. C is not an adopted son but an adopted daughter

06:00Then the other relatives still have the right

06:02In fact, the inheritance is left

06:04If those who inherit it prove that they have contributed to it

06:08And they are united in it

06:10Then they still have the right to inherit to share that property

06:13Because that is their property

06:15Give to the person who lost

06:17According to here, they don't have any evidence that they have contributed

06:20Or contribute capital to do anything

06:22They just think that this property will have to be divided into some part for the people to help them

06:27This is a mouth with a moustache

06:29The other one has no moustache

06:30So why can't they inherit it all?

06:31It is related to the issue of dividing according to the law

06:34According to the law, there are 3 categories

06:37Father, mother, child, wife

06:39Grandparents and grandchildren

06:41Here, if the first category does not exist, it will fall through the second category

06:46If the second category does not exist, it will fall through the third category

06:49But here there are people who raise

06:51The first category is already enough

06:53So others have no right to claim

06:55In this case, the hypothesis has not been said

06:57Because the first category of Mrs. C

06:59Must be a biological child or a foster child

07:02Or husband

07:03This woman's husband is no longer there

07:05The second is her parents

07:07It doesn't say here

07:08So the hypothesis is possible that her parents are gone

07:11So this foster child has the right to inherit all her property

07:17According to the law, according to the first category

07:20The first category is the foster child or the foster child will have the right to inherit all the property of the deceased

07:25And does not have the obligation to divide the next category

07:28So why is this case closed?

07:31If the people in their circle can prove

07:34First, they have contributed to the property of Mrs. C

07:38Then they claim, they claim that property

07:41Second, it is possible that they prove the opposite

07:45This foster child is not the foster child of Mrs. C

07:48It is possible that this property will be divided into the second or third category

07:52It will take 10 years to prove

07:55And this child, they only prove one thing

07:58The first category of Mrs. C

08:00Only the foster child is that woman

08:04Then she has inherited all the property of Mrs. C

08:07When the child is adopted

08:08If the parents are gone

08:10Without any obligation

08:11All the property will be divided according to the second category

08:14Divide according to the second category

08:15It is to divide according to the law

08:16Divide according to the law

08:17Divide according to the law

08:18It is not the law to divide

08:19But you have to request to divide the property

08:21Or you can declare your own property

08:24First, in the case of Mrs. C

08:27There is no obligation

08:28Surely, it is necessary to inherit the property according to the law

08:31Then the daughter of Mrs. C

08:33Will declare her inheritance

08:35To prove that I am the foster daughter

08:38And only belong to the first category of Mrs. C

08:41So I get this property

08:43And the people in their circle

08:45They see that this problem is wrong or not suitable

08:49So they go to sue

08:51They sue first

08:52Ask for a lot of benefits

08:53For example, this property has a share of their contribution

08:57Or they do not confirm that this daughter is the foster daughter of this woman

09:01Then it is the second or third category of inheritance

09:04So this thing only lasts for 10 years

09:06If this property is in the name of Mrs. C

09:10When she passed away

09:11Of course, not in time

09:13So this daughter was adopted

09:15But she is being sued

09:16So how will this property be handled now?

09:19Will it be kept there?

09:20Will it be temporarily managed?

09:21How will it be?

09:22In the case of the property of Mrs. C

09:27In the past, whoever was managing the use

09:29That person was still responsible for managing the use

09:31Just manage it

09:33And run it

09:34Manage is mining

09:36Still mining

09:37But that mining will be paid for later

09:39Is it mining and receiving the products?

09:43No, no, no

09:44Not receiving, mining

09:45And then paid for keeping the property

09:48Ah, that means in Mrs. C

09:51She has 10 houses

09:52She divided it up for everyone to help her keep one

09:54And now she's gone

09:55Everyone wants to get those things back

09:57And the other people don't agree

09:59So in the process of pulling this case

10:00The longer it is, the better

10:01The longer it is, the property still needs to be kept

10:06And mining

10:07Yes

10:21To stand on the position of this pet

10:23What does this person need to do to end this case?

10:26That person will prove

10:28Provide evidence related to

10:29First, I am a real pet

10:31If you have confirmed that you are a local pet

10:34Prove that you are a pet

10:36And then ask the court to solve the problem

10:39According to the law

10:41For example

10:42On a beautiful day

10:43There is a child

10:44Appears

10:45And says it's her pet

10:46C

10:47So this pet

10:48Does the child stand in the first row?

10:50Or is the pet the first?

10:51Or is the pet and the pet in the same row?

10:53As Mr. Vu just said

10:55Pet and pet are the same

10:58For the law

11:00Pet and pet are not distinguished

11:02And are divided into the same

11:04The pet only needs to go through the ADN test

11:07Then confirm that this is the child of that person

11:10But to prove that that person is a pet

11:12That person has to do a lot of procedures

11:14Because the pet is outside, right?

11:16When people receive it

11:18At that time, they have to ask the court to solve

11:20Then there will be an ADN test and other procedures

11:22ADN test with one of the owners

11:24Can you get the result that it is the child of Mrs. C?

11:26ADN test

11:27Actually, you have to take a sample

11:30Take a sample of the lost person

11:32I thought I took a sample of the family

11:34No

11:35First

11:36The lost person

11:37When the lost child

11:38Then you can get it

11:40And when you lose

11:41For example, 10 years later

11:42The child appears

11:43Get it

11:44Is in the closest family

11:46Uncle

11:47Or the closest sister

11:49Can you still determine whether it is a child or not?

11:50Can still determine

11:51So I bet

11:52If that uncle

11:54If there is an outsider

11:56The uncle has a plot

11:58Say here is the child

11:59Say to save that property

12:01According to my knowledge

12:02ADN test will know

12:03This child is the child of that uncle

12:05Or the child of that aunt

12:07OK

12:08Now the ADN test technology has reached that level

12:10It will know which child of this aunt

12:12Right

12:14Exactly

12:15ADN is not determined by one uncle

12:18But at least two or three people in the family

12:22Like the brothers and sisters of Mrs. C

12:25And if we are lawyers

12:27Protect for Korean people

12:31There is an argument that proves

12:33This person is not the child of Mrs. C

12:37First, the child is legally unrecognized

12:40And second

12:41There is no care for their family

12:45You have to say a sentence

12:46The child needs to be responsible

12:48Responsible

12:49For their family

12:50For the lost child

12:51For example, the lost child does not take care of anything

12:53If it is not filial

12:55Then the money is the lost child's money

12:56But with the child

12:57If the responsibility is not fulfilled

12:58Then it is not the child's money

13:00Is it?

13:01No, it's just copyright

13:02Copyright

13:03Not unauthorized

13:04The child and the child are the same

13:06When dividing property

13:07In the copyright part

13:09When receiving property

13:11The child and the child are the same

13:13For example, the shame of parents

13:15Oh, the child is also copyrighted?

13:17If you don't take care of your parents, you will be copyrighted

13:18Yes

13:19Yes

13:20The law is the rule

13:21Do you have a framework

13:22How is it called

13:23Unacceptable and copyrighted as a child?

13:25The law also says

13:26First

13:27This person

13:28Is harmful to health and life

13:30Hurt the spirit

13:32Body of parents

13:33For example, beating

13:35The father did not take care of

13:37Many witnesses

13:38That's it

13:39Secondly

13:40For example, the parents have copyright

13:42But this person has the act of

13:44Forcing

13:45Prevent

13:46Or fake another copyright

13:48If it is discovered

13:49This person

13:50Not all of that property

13:57A child can be a copyrighted property

14:14This is been more than 10 years

14:16Does the law have a rule

14:17About the time for a case

14:19What about the claim of property

14:20Design like this

14:21How long is the maximum

14:22Must solve

14:23For a simple case

14:25It's about 4-6 months, but depending on the case, it's more complicated, so it takes longer.

14:32Cases related to real estate and real estate may take a long time,

14:39because they may collect evidence, or they may not know how much real estate is left.

14:45There may be a shortage, in Ho Chi Minh City, or in other provinces.

14:50Secondly, we have to ask the court for time to identify the savings or bank accounts.

15:02When the court identifies the savings, other agencies have to answer,

15:06so it may take a long time.

15:10So, in those 10 years, what if there is a shortage of real estate?

15:14It's related to the preservation of real estate, and the owner's rights.

15:20It's another case.

15:22Preservation of real estate.

15:23So, the owner of the real estate has the right to change and correct.

15:27If they can prove that they have the right to damage the real estate, it's related to the violation of the law.

15:31Wow.

15:31But in the case of a long period of time,

15:35can we know if the beneficiary or the beneficiary is the parent or the relative?

15:40Actually, in this case, the longer the period of time, the beneficiary is the parent.

15:48Because when there is a dispute, the other party may apply a temporary emergency measure

15:53such as banning the transfer of property, or banning the use of property when there is a dispute.

15:59So, it's not that the parent is deliberately prolonging the period of time

16:02to have the right to use the property of the parent.

16:06Can the parent recognize it?

16:08In this case, according to the law, the beneficiary is the parent.

16:12If the beneficiary can prove that he is the parent, then all the property is the beneficiary.

16:16So, if there is no dispute, the beneficiary is the first beneficiary.

16:20If there is a dispute, the longer the period of time, the more damage the beneficiary will suffer.

16:25I see.

16:34How can we know how much property the beneficiary has lost?

16:37Is there any agency that can inform the beneficiary that the beneficiary has just passed away

16:41without leaving any message or a list?

16:44What property does the beneficiary have?

16:45How much money does the bank account have?

16:48It's a very difficult question.

16:49We have to consider that if the beneficiary is the husband or the wife,

16:52then the beneficiary will be able to determine what property the husband or wife will have.

16:59Secondly, if the beneficiary has lost his child,

17:01then the beneficiary will have to control less.

17:04If the beneficiary has lost his property, then the beneficiary will know.

17:06But if it's another property or a bank account, then the beneficiary won't know.

17:09If the beneficiary wants to know if he has property loss or not,

17:12then he can contact the Environmental Protection Agency.

17:14As for real estate, we can see it in front of our eyes, right?

17:17Real estate, we can see old vehicles and so on.

17:19And when it comes to bank accounts, we can contact the bank

17:23to check if there is any savings or any money.

17:27When you contact the bank to check how many bank accounts the beneficiary has,

17:32and how much money is in the bank accounts, is it allowed?

17:34It's related to the fact that I'm a designer.

17:38So I applied to the court to ask the court to intervene and collect the evidence.

17:44So when you are listed as a designer,

17:47you have the right to request the court to send a request to the bank to provide those things.

17:56In this case, there is one part that I am very curious about.

17:59The designer is the designer of property.

18:01What about the designer of debt?

18:03Mr. Vu, please.

18:04The design of debt is also stipulated in Article 615 of the Criminal Code.

18:10When the debtor is dead,

18:13the designer has to pay the debt in place of the property that the deceased left behind.

18:19For example, the deceased left behind a property.

18:22If the debt is less than that property,

18:27the debtor has to pay the rest of the property.

18:31The beneficiary has to pay the rest.

18:33If the debt is greater than the property left behind,

18:38the debtor has to pay the rest.

18:39For example, Mrs. C has a property worth 1,000 billion,

18:43but the debt is 1,500 billion.

18:45After selling all her property, she has to pay the debt of 500 billion.

18:48So the debtor has to pay the debt to her mother.

18:50No, she only has to pay the debt in her property.

18:54So the debtor will lose 500 billion.

18:56That's right.

18:57The property of Mrs. C,

18:59as long as she has that amount,

19:00she has to pay the debt to that person.

19:03If the debt is less than that,

19:05the debtor will lose all the property.

19:07We can ask for the debtor's property,

19:10but we can't ask for the designer to pay the debt for the deceased.

19:13That's right.

19:14The designer only has the property.

19:16The designer only has the property,

19:18but the debtor has no property.

19:19I have a clear rule in Article 615.

19:23Only pay the debt to the property of the deceased,

19:26not to the designer.

19:30For example, if a husband loses a lot of money,

19:33does the wife have to pay the debt?

19:35The husband has to pay the debt,

19:37then the designer has to pay the debt.

19:41Oh.

19:42Then the debt of the designer

19:45has to be deducted from the property of the designer.

19:50If the property of the husband and wife is 50-50,

19:54the husband will have 50% of the property to pay the debt.

19:57In this case, there are different reasons.

20:02If the husband borrows money to serve the family,

20:07the wife has to pay the debt.

20:11Oh.

20:11If the husband loses the money,

20:13the wife has to pay the debt.

20:16If the wife doesn't know how to pay the debt,

20:19the husband has to pay the debt.

20:22What if the wife knows, but the husband says he doesn't know?

20:24The debtor has to prove it.

20:27It means that when the debtor loses the money,

20:30the priority is to pay the debt.

20:33It's not the designer's priority to pay the debt.

20:37When the designer divides the debt,

20:39the debtor doesn't know that the debtor has lost.

20:41The designer has already opened the property.

20:44The designer has already divided the property.

20:46Then the debtor finds out that

20:49the property has been divided,

20:51then the debtor has to pay the debt.

20:53Those who have been divided into those parts

20:56have to pay the debt.

20:58Mr. Hanh said that there are two cases.

21:00The first case is that the debtor

21:02loses the property,

21:05but he still has the debt.

21:06The debtor knows that he has lost the money.

21:10When he loses the money, he comes to ask for it.

21:12When the debtor hasn't divided the property,

21:14he has to pay the debt.

21:17Yes.

21:18If the debtor doesn't know that the debtor has lost,

21:23let's say 50 years later,

21:26the debtor comes back,

21:28he will sue the court

21:31to find the designer of the debtor.

21:36He will take the property and pay the debt.

21:39How many years have you been in debt?

21:40How can you pay the debt?

21:42You have to be responsible.

21:43You have to be responsible for the money you receive.

21:45It's too hard.

21:47The Law of 360 is sponsored by YBS.

21:51The Law of 360 is sponsored by YBS.

21:56In the past 10 years,

21:58do you have any similar cases

22:00related to the designer's property?

22:03Is there any case that you remember and are impressed with?

22:05Regarding the dispute over the designer's property,

22:08I have a case related to the designer,

22:10but it's like this.

22:12A and B have 3 children.

22:15Let's say E, F, and H.

22:16H is the youngest.

22:17The youngest is still very young.

22:19Before he died,

22:21he told his parents that

22:23his parents transferred the property to him.

22:26But when he grew up,

22:29his parents passed it on to him.

22:32After that, his parents passed away.

22:34The eldest son, E,

22:37was named and sold.

22:39He sold part of the property

22:41and was given to his youngest brother.

22:4230 years later,

22:45E was still in use.

22:48It's related to the family household.

22:52In the 1990s,

22:56the family household was created

23:00according to Article 71.

23:02So it's a family household.

23:05Yes, it's a family household.

23:08After that,

23:10the family household split the property.

23:13When they started the case,

23:15the court said

23:17they knew the property was for them.

23:21But when they sold it to me,

23:24I had no idea.

23:25After many years, I still had no idea.

23:27Now it's out of date.

23:29Do you have time to understand it?

23:31When did it start?

23:3330 years ago.

23:35Now it's 30 years.

23:37When it happened,

23:39did you have 30 years to file a case?

23:41I filed a case when the case was opened.

23:43Before that,

23:45I still had the right to file a case.

23:47After that, I didn't have the right to file a case.

23:49I was arrested by the court.

23:51The old law was 10 years.

23:53The new law was 25 years.

23:55Now it's 30 years.

23:5630 years.

23:57If you filed a case in 1929,

24:00the case would last for decades.

24:03That's right.

24:04In 30 years,

24:05you only had time to file a case.

24:07That's right.

24:08The law would last for decades.

24:09After 30 years,

24:11you lost the right to file a case.

24:13You lost the right to file a case.

24:18You are a married man.

24:20What should we do

24:21to reduce the problem of

24:23our children not being happy

24:25and quarreling?

24:26In my opinion,

24:28to limit the risk of quarrel

24:30when people lose their property,

24:33they have to determine the property.

24:36There are two types of determination.

24:37The first type is to divide the property for the children.

24:39The other type is to keep the property.

24:41If you keep the property,

24:42you will be entitled to the property.

24:45If you don't have the property,

24:46when people lose the property,

24:47there will be no dispute.

24:49That's the opinion of Mr. Hanh.

24:51In my opinion,

24:52in reality,

24:53a lot of things happen.

24:54The best thing is that

24:56parents should be entitled to the property.

24:58After losing the property,

24:59the property will be transferred

25:02to the beneficiaries.

25:03There are many cases like this.

25:05Parents don't give the property to their children.

25:09When they give it to their children,

25:11their parents are still alive.

25:12When their children receive the property,

25:16there are many cases like this.

25:17For example,

25:19if the children want to do business,

25:21it's okay.

25:22If the children don't want to do business,

25:24but they have the property,

25:25they can have fun.

25:27The second type is

25:30to kick their parents out

25:32of their own house

25:35and raise them.

25:37This is a real-life situation.

25:39The best thing is that

25:41parents should give the property back to their children.

25:44During the process,

25:45the property can be changed.

25:47If you give the property to your children too soon,

25:49the dispute of the property

25:51will become a dispute between parents and children.

25:53There will be no dispute between children.

25:55At that time,

25:56I gave him the property

25:57to take care of me and raise me.

25:59But until now,

26:00he treated me so badly

26:01that he didn't take care of me at all.

26:02So I asked for it back.

26:03But when I gave it to him,

26:04could I ask for it back?

26:05When you transfer the property

26:06to someone else,

26:07you can't ask for it back.

26:08Yes, I can't ask for it back.

26:09Many parents will lose everything.

26:11Losing the property.

26:12So there are many painful things

26:14when parents want to get the property first

26:16by giving it to their children.

26:18When they have given it all,

26:20they will be kicked out of the house.

26:22Make your parents smart.

26:24Make a will for your children.

26:26Then,

26:28your children will enjoy the property

26:29when you are gone.

26:30When you are gone, yes.

26:31At the moment,

26:32you can't.

26:33Yes, you can't.

26:34Because when you are awake,

26:35you are healthy,

26:36you can change your mind.

26:37As I said,

26:38if you have too much property,

26:40you should give less.

26:42Leave a part of it

26:44to raise your children.

26:46After that,

26:48you take care of your children.

26:50At that time,

26:51you should do a little bit

26:53of that property.

26:54You shouldn't do a little bit

26:55of all the property you have.

26:57I always tell my children

26:58that my mother only raised me

26:59until I was 18 years old.

27:00When I was 18 years old,

27:01I had to pack my luggage

27:03and leave the house.

27:04I had to find a way

27:05to raise my children

27:06by myself.

27:07I had to find a job

27:08or do something else

27:09that my mother didn't know about.

27:10My mother wasn't responsible anymore.

27:11My children are suffering

27:12because of that.

27:13They are suffering now.

27:14They are suffering now.

27:15But later,

27:16they will be happy.

27:17Yes.

27:18Maybe it's a lie.

27:19Maybe when I grow up a little bit,

27:21I will change.

27:22I will give my children something.

27:24But I think

27:26we are not responsible

27:28to create a property

27:30for our children.

27:32That's my point of view.

27:33Everyone has their own point of view.

27:35In my opinion,

27:36parents are parents.

27:38Children are children.

27:39They are different.

27:40We are not responsible

27:42to create a lot of property

27:43and then give it to our children

27:44to enjoy.

27:45We have to create something

27:47for our children.

27:48We have to create a foundation

27:49for our children

27:50so that they can step up

27:51from this foundation

27:52and go further.

27:53We don't take this foundation

27:54and use it.

27:56Secondly,

27:57as Thao said,

27:59you have to take care of yourself

28:01when you are 18 years old.

28:02In my opinion,

28:03when you are 18 years old,

28:04if you can't study anymore,

28:06you have to go out to work.

28:07But if you can study more,

28:09you have to try to take care of yourself.

28:11Yes, that's right.

28:12But Mr. Vu,

28:13you said that

28:14your children are cruel

28:15to their parents

28:16and then they

28:17disobey you.

28:18Disobey.

28:19In your case,

28:20your customers are...

28:21We protect our parents.

28:22Actually,

28:23the problem is

28:24that my father

28:25has a lot of land.

28:26He gives it

28:27to his children.

28:28There is a piece of land

28:29that my father

28:30doesn't give

28:31to anyone.

28:32He leaves it

28:33for his children

28:34next door

28:35to keep.

28:36After that,

28:37his children

28:38in general

28:39think

28:40that

28:41they have to

28:42give it

28:43to their children

28:44because

28:45my father

28:46is still

28:47young

28:48and weak

28:49to give it

28:50to everyone.

28:51So,

28:52my father

28:54still leaves it

28:55but

28:56this Australian

28:57made

28:58a fake

28:59document

29:00with a piece of land

29:01and gave it

29:02to himself.

29:03To himself.

29:04Yes, to himself.

29:05After that,

29:06my father found out

29:07and he

29:08advised

29:09that

29:10his children

29:11didn't accept it.

29:12After that,

29:13his children

29:14were

29:15disobeyed.

29:16Disobeyed.

29:17In general,

29:18he used

29:19a lot of swear words.

29:20My father

29:21was very sad.

29:22After that,

29:23he told me

29:24that

29:25I had to

29:26go to court

29:27to prove

29:28all the documents

29:29that

29:30were made

29:31to prove

29:32the ownership

29:33of the land

29:34of my children

29:35and prove

29:36the signature

29:37that

29:38my children

29:39made

29:40was fake.

29:41After that,

29:42the land

29:43was returned

29:44to my father.

29:45When your father

29:46gave the land

29:47to your children,

29:48did they give it

29:49to you?

29:50They only gave

29:51a part of it.

29:52They didn't give it to me.

29:53So many things

29:54made me sad.

29:55So your parents

29:56took care of your children.

29:57Yes.

29:58Like Thao said,

29:59my parents

30:00didn't have anything

30:01or didn't want

30:02to give me anything

30:03so that

30:04I could be independent.

30:05Actually,

30:06they didn't promise anything.

30:07They didn't give anything.

30:08They knew

30:09that if I didn't have anything,

30:10I would fight for it.

30:11But every day,

30:12they looked at

30:13my parents' land

30:14too much

30:15or they didn't fight

30:16and

30:17gave birth.

30:18I think

30:19their children

30:20thought that

30:22it was theirs.

30:23My father

30:24thought

30:25that he would

30:26give it to his children

30:27and would

30:28take care of them.

30:29My father thought

30:30that he would

30:31give it to him

30:32and he would

30:33feel that

30:34it was his.

30:35I only had

30:36one move

30:37to make

30:38it happen.

30:39To make a move.

30:40To make a move.

30:41Because

30:42transferring is

30:43illegal.

30:44It's a fake signature

30:45of the father

30:46to transfer.

30:47Thank you

30:48for sharing

30:49with us.

30:50We all have

30:51different opinions.

30:52In my opinion,

30:53we should

30:54educate our children

30:55not to wait

30:56for anything

30:57from their parents.

30:58For the issue

30:59of inheritance,

31:00I think

31:01it's their responsibility

31:02to prevent

31:03inheritance from happening.

31:04It's not

31:05their children's responsibility.

31:06It's their responsibility

31:07to educate their children

31:08and arrange everything

31:09after they pass away.

31:10Thank you

31:11for sharing

31:12with us.

31:13Thank you

31:14for sharing

31:15with us.

31:16I thought

31:17it was a stressful topic

31:18but it's not.

31:19It's interesting

31:21and we can learn

31:22a lot from it.

31:23The show

31:24is called

31:25360 Laws.

31:26Thank you

31:27for your help

31:28and advice

31:29and analysis

31:30and support

31:31from Du

31:32and Hanh.

31:33I hope

31:34to see you

31:35again

31:36in the next show.

31:37Thank you.

31:50Thank you.

31:51Thank you.

31:52Thank you.

31:53Thank you.

31:54Thank you.

31:55Thank you.

31:56Thank you.

31:57Thank you.

31:58Thank you.

31:59Thank you.

32:00Thank you.

32:01Thank you.

32:02Thank you.

32:03Thank you.

32:04Thank you.

32:05Thank you.

32:06Thank you.

32:07Thank you.

32:08Thank you.

32:09Thank you.

32:10Thank you.

32:11Thank you.

32:12Thank you.

32:13Thank you.

32:14Thank you.

32:15Thank you.

32:16Thank you.

32:17Thank you.

32:18Thank you.

Category

Transcript

Recommended