Law Professor Explains How Trump Defense In NYC Hush Money Trial Has Been 'Really Aggressive'

7 months ago

Randall D. Eliason, Professional Lecturer, GW Law joined Forbes Senior Law Editor Liane Jackson on "Forbes Newsroom" to discuss the hush money trial against former President Trump.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript

Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com

Transcript

00:00 what kind of a hurdle and how hard do you think it will be for the prosecution to create that

00:06 nexus and to get that to the next level from just, you know, this is business finance,

00:12 this is just financial records, to actually convince a jury and convince the public that

00:18 there was a broader conspiracy and that involved election fraud and that Trump was at the center

00:23 of this to actually get a conviction on that? What are your thoughts? I mean, you worked as the,

00:28 in the U.S. Attorney's Office for D.C. as the chief of the public corruption section. So,

00:33 from your experience and analyzing what's happening, what do you think?

00:37 I feel like it's a pretty strong case. The government's going to put on a pretty compelling

00:42 case. These documents cases like this, you know, that they're really hard for, to defend against,

00:48 usually, because the documents kind of speak for themselves, right? I mean, the documents are false.

00:52 I don't think they're going to really be able to dispute that they were false,

00:56 although it sounds like they'll try. You know, they're going to try to suggest that

01:01 they were actually paying Michael Cohen for real legal services and there was nothing false about

01:06 them. But I think that's, you know, the approach that defense has taken, at least based on their

01:11 opening, is really aggressive. It's sort of, you know, these weren't false and everybody else is

01:15 lying and everybody's just out to get the president. Instead of something maybe a little

01:19 more nuanced, which could have been, well, he didn't want his family to find out about this,

01:23 so yes, he, you know, paid to have the stories, you know, bought and suppressed, but it wasn't

01:32 about the campaign. It was about personal embarrassment in his family and it's kind

01:36 of a natural thing, you know, try to kind of downplay it that way without necessarily saying

01:40 everybody's lying. But that's the approach they've taken. So I think that combined with the strength

01:45 of the government's case is going to be pretty compelling. You know, Michael Cohen, of course,

01:52 kind of the star witness, has a lot of baggage, but there will be a lot of things to back up

01:57 everything he says, including Pecker's testimony, you know, already. So the jury's not going to have

02:04 to take just Michael Cohen's word for anything. You know, everything he says is going to be backed

02:08 up by other witnesses and by the documents and I think when you put it all together, it's going

02:12 to be a pretty strong case.

Law Professor Explains How Trump Defense In NYC Hush Money Trial Has Been 'Really Aggressive'

Category

Transcript

Recommended