#islamabadhighcourt #judgesletter #supremecourt #qazifaezisa #matiullahjan #khabar #meherbukhari
Judges’ letter: IHC full court session | Matiullah Jan's Analysis
Judges’ letter: IHC full court session | Matiullah Jan's Analysis
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00In the case of the first six judges, after Lahore, the full court of Islamabad High Court has also been held.
00:05The recommendations on the freedom of the judiciary have been under consideration,
00:09and the termination of institutional interference, and a unanimous decision has been made to give a reaction.
00:14Can the freedom of superior judiciary be a blow to the Asqud notice?
00:19The Asqud notice is a very extraordinary authority of the Supreme Court.
00:25And I am surprised that such extraordinary powers have been used in the past to overthrow and create governments.
00:33Now, why is it being used just to ask for compensation?
00:37I thought that the countless cases that the six judges of Islamabad High Court had investigated in their letters,
00:46the Supreme Court should have made a very strong statement on them,
00:50and they should have given notice to the accused and questioned them.
00:55After that, two or three judges of the Supreme Court should have made a commission
01:00and the statements of all the accused Africans should have been recorded and investigated.
01:05The police should have also been investigated and severe punishments should have been given.
01:11In my opinion, the incidents that the six judges have described,
01:15the attack on General Musharraf's court on November 3, 2007,
01:19was a dangerous attack on which the Supreme Court should have reacted in the same way.
01:26Today, we saw that after the full court hearing,
01:29the judge who punished Imran Khan and Shah Mehmood Qureshi in the Cypher case,
01:33Abul Hasnaat, has also been recommended to return to the Lahore High Court.
01:37Are you adding handcuffs to handcuffs?
01:40This seems to me to be an ordinary practice that judges were sent to Islamabad
01:47for the trial of Nalpindi Adiyala Jail and then the hearing of the case was completed.
01:52They were called back.
01:55I don't see any connection with this.
01:59Because Judge Abul Hasnaat has a connection with the Lahore High Court.
02:06He came here on an RC duty and was called back by the Lahore High Court
02:11for interfering in the case of a terrorist group.
02:14There is no such evidence in this.
02:16Okay.
02:17And Mr. Mati, tell us, the pressure and demand for freedom from inside the court,
02:23how much was the court's own role in reaching this point?
02:26Because today's hearing, for instance, headed by the Chief Justice of Islamabad High Court,
02:30if it had happened a year earlier, a lot would have been different today.
02:35You are right about this.
02:37In the past, Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui had also brought charges against the Chief Justice of that time, Anwar Qassi.
02:46And we have seen this before.
02:48In the case of Panama, the way the case was brought against Nawaz Sharif and the Sharif family,
02:54there were also serious charges against General Bajwa and General Faiz.
02:59And Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui had also brought charges against General Faiz.
03:04And this gave the people a reason to continue with the Panama case.
03:08There is no doubt about this.
03:10In the past, when the judges used to overturn the positions of the Army Generals and Army Officers,
03:16they used to take advantage of their loyalty to the PCOs.
03:19And now, since November 3, 2007, the Supreme Court has decided that the PCO Panama case will be considered treason.
03:28So now someone has decided that there is no need to issue a PCO, nor is there a need to take advantage of it.
03:33Now only the judges, without the PCO and without taking advantage of it, do all the work that they used to do after taking advantage of it.
03:42So in this, the judiciary has its own responsibility.
03:46And the judges of the judiciary should have given a very strong response at this time, which is still not visible.
03:53And it seems to me, as I said at the beginning, that the PCOs that were used to create and destroy governments,
03:59today they are not being used to give power to the judges of their courts.
04:06Only speeches are being held on this, suggestions are being made.
04:10Laws and regulations are very strict.
04:12What action is taken on such incidents?
04:14What should be done against these people?
04:16Mr. Imran Khan has once again charged the Superior Judiciary while having an unofficial conversation with the journalists.
04:23According to Imran Khan, the trust of the public is rising from the judiciary.
04:27And these past cases, be it Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto or other cases, are involved in this.
04:33According to Imran Khan, how much truth is there in this today?
04:36Meher, it is true that the trust of the public is rising from the judiciary.
04:41But with this, the trust of the public is also rising from politicians like Imran Khan.
04:46Whatever the state of the judiciary is at the moment, Imran Khan has a very big role in it.
04:52Who used to stand on the containers, take the names of female judges and threaten them.
04:58And who used to make shameful decisions, court decisions.
05:03And who also used the courts.
05:06And especially used institutions like NAB to make cases.
05:10He also tried to blackmail the chairman of NAB.
05:14So Imran Khan himself does not like these words.
05:17This is another thing that our courts have been very bad for the past 75 years.
05:22And we can say this.
05:24But politicians like Imran Khan, Nawaz Sharif and Asif Zardari can not say this.
05:30Because all these people in their own ways.
05:33And I will also say that the military leaders of Imran Khan, General Musharraf and General Zia-ul-Haq.
05:41At least now these people or their incidents.
05:45When they point fingers at the court, people should not forget their past.