Election 2024 | Niklo Pakistan Ki Khatir | Special Transmission | 6th February 2024 | Part 1 - video Dailymotion

ARY NEWS

#election2024 #niklopakistankikhatir #specialtransmission #arynews   For the latest General Elections 2024 Updates ,Results, Party Position, Candidates and Much more Please visit our Election Portal: https://elections.arynews.tv  Follow the ARY News channel on WhatsApp: https://bit.ly/46e5HzY  Subscribe to our channel and press the bell icon for latest news updates: http://bit.ly/3e0SwKP  ARY News is a leading Pakistani news channel that promises to bring you factual and timely international stories and stories about Pakistan, sports, entertainment, and business, amid others.

Transcript

00:00 [MUSIC PLAYING]

00:03 [MUSIC PLAYING]

00:06 [MUSIC PLAYING]

00:10 [GUNSHOTS]

00:14 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

00:17, why did this happen?

00:46 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

00:50 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

00:53 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

00:56 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:00 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:03 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:07 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:10 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:13 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:17 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:20 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:24 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:27 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:30 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:33 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:36 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:39 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:42 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:45 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:48 [COUGHS]

01:49 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:52 and

02:21 the next day I saw the video. I was so surprised. I was like, "What?" I was like, "Oh, my God."

02:28 So, I was like, "Wow." And I was like, "I don't know what to do." And I was like, "I'm

02:35 so surprised." And I was like, "Wow." And I was like, "Wow." And I was like, "Wow."

02:42 And I was like, "Wow." And I was like, "Oh, my God." And I was like, "Wow." And I was

02:49 like, "Wow." And I was like, "Wow." And I was like, "Wow." And I was like, "Wow."

02:57 And I was like, "Wow." And I was like, "Wow." And I was like, "Wow." And I was

03:05 like, "Wow." And I was like, "Wow." And I was like, "Wow." And I was like, "Wow."

03:13 [VIDEO PLAYBACK]

03:14 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

03:16 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

03:18 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

03:19 That's a big deal!

03:21 But...

03:22 Bilawal Bhotto was also out of the seat

03:24 Kashu, your nose is pointing to Bilawal Bhotto

03:26 Can he win?

03:27 It's definitely me!

03:30 I have no idea!

03:32 It's going to be a thorn in his side

03:33 Even in 2008-13 he didn't get a seat

03:35 But it's just not a walk over

03:37 I don't think it's going to be a thorn in his side

03:39 I think he'll have a chance to win by 600 or 1000 votes

03:41 Or even 1000 or 1200 votes

03:43 He'll win by good votes

03:45 He'll win by 2.5-3 lakh votes

03:47 I think he'll win by good votes

03:49 He'll win by 2-3 lakh votes

03:51 We have to work less than that

03:53 Atta Tarrar's position is not that strong

03:55 He's the only candidate

03:57 Atta Tarrar is not a popular candidate

03:59 I think he'll win by a vote compared to Bilawal

04:01 He's not a local from that constituency

04:03 He's from Bilawal

04:05 Even Tehreek-e-Insaab's Zaheer Abbas is standing here

04:09 You cannot compete with him

04:11 Shahid Safale is from Malik Sahiba's constituency

04:13 No, no, no

04:15 His sons are from here

04:17 Ali Parvez

04:19 Mr. Chaudhary, in your opinion

04:21 This constituency, especially the 1-7 constituency

04:23 Is going to be a good thorn in his side

04:25 Do you think it'll be a walk over for Bilawal Bhutto Zardani?

04:27 Or will Atta Tarrar give a strong competition?

04:29 No, I don't want to hear

04:31 Sir, I want to hear what your heart says

04:33 You tell us

04:35 You write down the answer to my 500 questions

04:37 If you've come to Lahore, then you should know about Lahore

04:41 Exactly

04:43 The information you have

04:45 And the news you have

04:47 No one has it

04:49 That's why your statement is important

04:51 We don't know about Lahore

04:53 We don't get votes from our family

04:55 Please tell us

04:57 Mr. Chaudhary, we'll vote for you

04:59 Mr. Chaudhary, it's a good thing your family doesn't vote for you

05:01 You should know yourself

05:03 Someone should correct their faults

05:05 They all are the same

05:07 If they don't vote, I'll vote for them

05:09 I'm sorry, I'll tell you what happened

05:13 When you get married, your wife said

05:17 Two people will trouble you a lot

05:21 Who are they?

05:23 One is me

05:25 And one is Arvind Dami

05:27 Arvind Dami

05:29 Programmer

05:31 So, you're on a 1 to 7 ratio

05:33 Listen to me

05:35 Did he become a husband?

05:37 No, he didn't

05:39 But you still haven't told us what will happen on 1 to 7

05:41 Look, this election is not like the elections of 1985, 1990, 1997

05:51 This is a completely new world

05:55 Even this is not the 18th or 13th election

05:59 A new world has been created here

06:03 You'll be surprised that the discounted factor

06:09 The young people

06:11 The snack video

06:13 Half of the Punjabi youth are on that

06:17 Snapchat?

06:19 Yes, snack video

06:21 Not snack, Snapchat

06:23 There's a snack too

06:25 There's an expert, a professor in NDU, Maria Hameed

06:29 She says, these people didn't explore

06:31 They're doing something

06:33 If half of the youth are on that

06:35 Then the ones who are going on it 7-8 times

06:39 There's no difference

06:41 So, what they're saying in Punjabi

06:43 This is not a fish of the sea

06:47 This election

06:49 This is a fish of the water

06:51 You predict, you put all the pressure

06:53 That Bilawal will win or Atatar

06:55 Atatar is a victim of difficulties

06:59 Bilawal Bhutto Zardari

07:01 If you look at the dynamics

07:03 There's a lot of individual votes

07:05 If we look at the last election

07:07 People's Party will be successful in co-opting it

07:11 It will be a tough competition

07:13 But it can make a difference

07:15 But it's not like PMLN will get a walkover

07:19 It's a good competition

07:21 And the other independents

07:23 Can't be discounted

07:25 Lahore is an urban city

07:27 It's open

07:29 I won't say this

07:31 You tell me

07:33 Salman Akram Raja's constituency

07:35 Salman Akram Raja's constituency

07:37 Is very clear

07:39 That the candidates are good

07:41 They're running campaigns

07:43 PMLN is not supporting them

07:45 They're not running campaigns

07:47 Raja sahib will come

07:49 I think we should move on to larger picture

07:51 We'll discuss this in detail tomorrow

07:57 But let's move on to the larger picture

07:59 At a bird's view

08:01 You're right, Mr. Chaudhary

08:03 The dynamics have changed

08:05 A lot of emotions are running high too

08:07 If you compare 2013-2018

08:09 Out of the 14 seats in Lahore

08:11 The number of noon league seats decreased

08:13 Then you look at the central districts

08:15 In 2008

08:17 71 seats were removed

08:19 In 2018

08:21 The number of seats in central Punjab

08:23 Decreased by 91%

08:25 The number of seats in central Punjab

08:27 Decreased by 62-63%

08:29 So the trend has gone downward

08:31 If you add a little bit of emotions

08:33 A little bit of fervour

08:35 A young element

08:37 The only uncertainty right now

08:39 Is what you expect from south Punjab

08:41 What you expect from south Punjab

08:43 That is

08:45 If you remove 28-30 seats

08:47 The number of seats will be in the position

08:49 To form a government

08:51 In Punjab and in Wafat

08:53 That's very interesting

08:55 In south Punjab

08:57 There is a very tough competition

08:59 There is a Muslim-league Nawaz

09:01 Everywhere

09:03 There is not so much in south

09:05 There is a lot in Multan

09:07 There is a party in Multan

09:09 There is a party in Multan

09:11 Multan was clean last time

09:13 6-6 PTI

09:15 If you go from Lahore to Multan

09:17 The south is clean

09:19 So here

09:21 They will have competition everywhere

09:23 Now whether they win or not

09:25 Will depend on

09:27 What turn out comes out the day after

09:29 And who will cast their vote effectively

09:31 So this depends on everything

09:33 This voter turnout

09:35 Will be a defining factor for the whole of Pakistan

09:37 If you are dominating the Zimbabwe Feefus party

09:39 And the Muslim-league Nawaz is small

09:41 No, there is a big party there

09:43 There is a party in Multan

09:45 There is a party in Multan

09:47 Where there is a big leader of Pakistan Muslim League

09:49 Who is sitting here?

09:51 I am talking about Punjab

09:53 Is there a big leader of Pakistan losing in any constituency or not?

09:55 There is no such thing as a big leader losing

09:57 But there is definitely a problem

09:59 If it was so easy

10:01 Then would Mian Sahab

10:03 Have said that there is a young man in me

10:05 Because we are seeing Bilawal Bhutto Sardari

10:07 Saying that there is a young man

10:09 And he is himself

10:11 A PTI candidate

10:13 But today Mian Sahab said that there is a young man in me

10:15 Do you think this can be cashed?

10:17 If Chaudhary Sahab still has it

10:19 Then why can't Mian Sahab have it?

10:21 Are you sure?

10:23 There is Mariam Nawaz Sahiba

10:25 There is a young man

10:27 Why is there no passion?

10:29 Mian Sahab is a king of comebacks

10:31 He is coming back for the fourth time

10:33 So whatever his political acumen is

10:35 It is coming on the basis of that

10:37 So don't discount his passion

10:39 It is a matter of passion

10:41 The one he is counting on is passion

10:43 He has a lot of public support

10:45 But I genuinely believe that

10:47 Mian Sahab's overwhelmingly

10:49 All this campaigning

10:51 Coming back

10:53 This is to launch Mariam Sahiba

10:55 Officially, politically as well

10:57 So give credit to the young man

10:59 Yes Chaudhary Sahab

11:01 Mr. Adhami and Anika

11:03 What we want to see is

11:05 Earlier the PTI was eaten by the People's Party

11:07 The PTI

11:09 Punjab's KP

11:11 You are absolutely right

11:13 So now

11:15 This election

11:17 The People's Party was nowhere

11:19 Two or three months ago

11:21 When the discussion started

11:23 That the 8th of February is going to be the election

11:25 So after that

11:27 I said to Raghu

11:29 That these people should take government

11:31 With all their hard work

11:33 Like the villages

11:35 They have travelled all over the country

11:37 And have made their own statements

11:39 Whether you like it or not

11:41 Now he is a relevant player

11:43 In today's power politics

11:45 Today

11:47 It is being discussed that

11:49 Bilawal or Zardari

11:51 Aswad Zardari or Bilawal

11:53 Or Nawazib or Shahbaz

11:55 Or some dark horse

11:57 You cannot discount them

11:59 Out of hand

12:01 Sir, the government of Wanni is from Punjab

12:03 You look at the North

12:05 The PTI has been very strong

12:07 In 2018

12:09 Attaq, Jhelum, Chakwal, Rawalpindi

12:11 Except for Raja Parvez

12:13 They were

12:15 They cleaned sweeped

12:17 There was a lot of tension in the centre

12:19 But in the centre again

12:21 There was a Ziti Road Party

12:23 There was a comment

12:25 You have understood my point

12:27 You can take it from there

12:29 How strong is the Noon in South Punjab

12:31 Come on

12:33 She is a tough one

12:35 I want to know

12:37 You have blindfolded your eyes

12:39 You do not see the light

12:41 Take off my blindfold

12:43 Tell me where in South Punjab

12:45 Will take out the Muslim League Noon

12:47 If you see

12:49 Muslim League Noon

12:51 Has won 12 or 13 seats

12:53 South Punjab has never been

12:55 The strength of the Muslim League Noon

12:57 Punjab has become the morning Mars

12:59 In South Punjab

13:01 In 2008

13:03 29 people's party won

13:05 That is how they could make

13:07 Central Government

13:09 In 2013

13:11 They took everything

13:13 In 2018

13:15 PTI was already sold

13:17 In 2013

13:19 It was in Noon

13:21 In 2018

13:23 It was in People's Party

13:25 I have not seen many people

13:27 Leaving the party

13:29 Shah Mehmood Qureshi

13:31 People are standing

13:33 It is a violation

13:35 It is disqualification

13:37 I am talking about the party

13:39 Not him

13:41 His daughter is standing

13:43 Zain is also standing

13:45 You see in Rahim-e-Arkhan

13:47 For example Khusro

13:49 Khusro always

13:51 2002 Kaaf League

13:53 PP

13:55 PTI

13:57 But this time he is not fighting

13:59 Khusro and Hashim

14:01 Hashim is fighting for PTI

14:03 But I think

14:05 PTI is free

14:07 I will check

14:09 Azad is free

14:11 Both are free

14:13 Let's take a break

14:15 We will take a break

14:17 [Music]

14:31 Welcome back

14:33 Our special program

14:35 Is going on all day

14:37 Till midnight

14:39 Election campaign is going on

14:41 All political parties

14:43 Are doing their last rallies

14:45 Where PTI is in their home ground

14:47 They will do their rallies

14:49 We were talking during the break

14:51 If you could comment on this

14:53 We will talk about the constituency

14:55 In detail tomorrow

14:57 Do you think

14:59 Something unusual will happen

15:01 Usually people go to People's Party

15:03 Do you think something unusual will happen

15:05 What can happen?

15:07 A big setback

15:09 No no

15:11 What can happen?

15:13 You know

15:15 It is unfortunate

15:17 I am in Sindh

15:19 I am not campaigning

15:21 I am not campaigning

15:23 Because they know

15:25 We don't get the vote bank

15:27 We can't put a dent in rural Sindh

15:29 Political parties

15:31 Don't do rallies

15:33 You saw Mr. Imran Khan

15:35 He did a rally in Karachi

15:37 He did a rally in Sindh

15:39 Because Punjab is a battle ground

15:41 You have 61 seats in Punjab

15:43 But out of that

15:45 20-22 are in Karachi

15:47 25 seats are in Karachi

15:49 So in South Punjab

15:51 Usually you can do rallies

15:53 When there are no governments

15:55 When there are no governments

15:57 Otherwise in election campaign

15:59 It is unfortunate

16:01 You can't compete with People's Party

16:03 That's why no one does campaigns

16:05 You see Khaiber Pakhtunkhwa

16:07 He was in power in the last two elections

16:09 But Bilawal

16:11 Did a good campaign

16:13 Because he thinks

16:15 He is independent

16:17 Maybe he can make some seats

16:19 Where he can see the scope

16:21 Of any party

16:23 I am surprised PM LN

16:25 Didn't do any big rallies

16:27 Didn't he do two rallies in Peshawar?

16:29 He didn't do a rally in Peshawar

16:31 Mardan, Charsadda

16:33 Swabi, Noshera

16:35 He did a rally in Peshawar

16:37 He did a rally in Karachi

16:39 Karachi

16:41 Last time he came to Karachi

16:43 He was a nomad

16:45 In 2018 in South Punjab

16:47 Muslim League Nawaz

16:49 Who said that their activity was not good

16:51 You know that Mecma Zaraat was very active

16:53 People were working hard for Mecma Zaraat

16:55 They were distributing water and everything

16:57 This time the picture is not clear

16:59 Because Mecma Zaraat is silent

17:01 Mecma Zaraat has left the work

17:03 No, no, he has left the work

17:05 He is getting paid for free

17:07 So Mecma Zaraat was very active

17:09 There was a big joke in the last election

17:11 He was beating someone

17:13 He said that Mecma Zaraat is not there

17:15 He was saying that Mecma Zaraat's people were wrong

17:17 He was saying that Mecma Zaraat's people were wrong

17:19 He was saying that Mecma Zaraat's people were wrong

17:21 He won the People's Party in 2008

17:23 He won the People's Party in 2013

17:25 His government is going to the South

17:27 His government is going to the South

17:29 The first thing is that in the South

17:31 You see that political engineering is not there

17:33 You see that political engineering is not there

17:35 You see that political engineering is not there

17:37 You see that political engineering is not there

17:39 You see that political engineering is not there

17:41 You see that political engineering is not there

17:43 You see that political engineering is not there

17:45 You see that political engineering is not there

17:47 You see that political engineering is not there

17:49 You see that political engineering is not there

17:51 You see that political engineering is not there

17:53 You see that political engineering is not there

17:55 You see that political engineering is not there

17:57 You see that political engineering is not there

17:59 You see that political engineering is not there

18:01 You see that political engineering is not there

18:03 You see that political engineering is not there

18:05 You see that political engineering is not there

18:07 You see that political engineering is not there

18:09 You see that political engineering is not there

18:11 You see that political engineering is not there

18:13 You see that political engineering is not there

18:15 You see that political engineering is not there

18:17 You see that political engineering is not there

18:19 You see that political engineering is not there

18:21 You see that political engineering is not there

18:23 You see that political engineering is not there

18:25 You see that political engineering is not there

18:27 You see that political engineering is not there

18:29 You see that political engineering is not there

18:31 You see that political engineering is not there

18:33 You see that political engineering is not there

18:35 You see that political engineering is not there

18:37 You see that political engineering is not there

18:39 You see that political engineering is not there

18:41 You see that political engineering is not there

18:43 You see that political engineering is not there

18:45 You see that political engineering is not there

18:47 You see that political engineering is not there

18:49 You see that political engineering is not there

18:51 You see that political engineering is not there

18:53 You see that political engineering is not there

18:55 You see that political engineering is not there

18:57 You see that political engineering is not there

18:59 You see that political engineering is not there

19:01 You see that political engineering is not there

19:03 You see that political engineering is not there

19:05 You see that political engineering is not there

19:07 You see that political engineering is not there

19:09 You see that political engineering is not there

19:11 You see that political engineering is not there

19:13 You see that political engineering is not there

19:15 You see that political engineering is not there

19:17 You see that political engineering is not there

19:19 You see that political engineering is not there

19:21 You see that political engineering is not there

19:23 You see that political engineering is not there

19:25 You see that political engineering is not there

19:27 You see that political engineering is not there

19:29 You see that political engineering is not there

19:31 You see that political engineering is not there

19:33 You see that political engineering is not there

19:35 You see that political engineering is not there

19:37 You see that political engineering is not there

19:39 You see that political engineering is not there

19:41 You see that political engineering is not there

19:43 You see that political engineering is not there

19:45 You see that political engineering is not there

19:47 You see that political engineering is not there

19:49 You see that political engineering is not there

19:51 You see that political engineering is not there

19:53 You see that political engineering is not there

19:55 You see that political engineering is not there

19:57 You see that political engineering is not there

19:59 You see that political engineering is not there

20:01 You see that political engineering is not there

20:03 You see that political engineering is not there

20:05 You see that political engineering is not there

20:07 You see that political engineering is not there

20:09 You see that political engineering is not there

20:11 You see that political engineering is not there

20:13 You see that political engineering is not there

20:15 You see that political engineering is not there

20:17 You see that political engineering is not there

20:19 You see that political engineering is not there

20:21 You see that political engineering is not there

20:23 You see that political engineering is not there

20:25 You see that political engineering is not there

20:27 You see that political engineering is not there

20:29 You see that political engineering is not there

20:31 You see that political engineering is not there

20:33 You see that political engineering is not there

20:35 You see that political engineering is not there

20:37 You see that political engineering is not there

20:39 You see that political engineering is not there

20:41 You see that political engineering is not there

20:43 You see that political engineering is not there

20:45 You see that political engineering is not there

20:47 You see that political engineering is not there

20:49 You see that political engineering is not there

20:51 You see that political engineering is not there

20:53 You see that political engineering is not there

20:55 You see that political engineering is not there

20:57 You see that political engineering is not there

20:59 You see that political engineering is not there

21:01 You see that political engineering is not there

21:03 You see that political engineering is not there

21:05 You see that political engineering is not there

21:07 You see that political engineering is not there

21:09 You see that political engineering is not there

21:11 You see that political engineering is not there

21:13 You see that political engineering is not there

21:15 You see that political engineering is not there

21:17 You see that political engineering is not there

21:19 You see that political engineering is not there

21:21 You see that political engineering is not there

21:23 You see that political engineering is not there

21:25 You see that political engineering is not there

21:27 You see that political engineering is not there

21:29 You see that political engineering is not there

21:31 You see that political engineering is not there

21:33 You see that political engineering is not there

21:35 You see that political engineering is not there

21:37 You see that political engineering is not there

21:39 You see that political engineering is not there

21:41 You see that political engineering is not there

21:43 You see that political engineering is not there

21:45 You see that political engineering is not there

21:47 You see that political engineering is not there

21:49 You see that political engineering is not there

21:51 You see that political engineering is not there

21:53 You see that political engineering is not there

21:55 You see that political engineering is not there

21:57 You see that political engineering is not there

21:59 You see that political engineering is not there

22:01 You see that political engineering is not there

22:03 You see that political engineering is not there

22:05 You see that political engineering is not there

22:07 You see that political engineering is not there

22:09 You see that political engineering is not there

22:11 You see that political engineering is not there

22:13 You see that political engineering is not there

22:15 You see that political engineering is not there

22:17 You see that political engineering is not there

22:19 You see that political engineering is not there

22:21 You see that political engineering is not there

22:23 You see that political engineering is not there

22:25 You see that political engineering is not there

22:27 You see that political engineering is not there

22:29 You see that political engineering is not there

22:31 You see that political engineering is not there

22:33 You see that political engineering is not there

22:35 You see that political engineering is not there

22:37 You see that political engineering is not there

22:39 You see that political engineering is not there

22:41 You see that political engineering is not there

22:43 You see that political engineering is not there

22:45 You see that political engineering is not there

22:47 You see that political engineering is not there

22:49 You see that political engineering is not there

22:51 You see that political engineering is not there

22:53 You see that political engineering is not there

22:55 You see that political engineering is not there

22:57 You see that political engineering is not there

22:59 You see that political engineering is not there

23:01 You see that political engineering is not there

23:03 You see that political engineering is not there

23:05 You see that political engineering is not there

23:07 You see that political engineering is not there

23:09 You see that political engineering is not there

23:11 You see that political engineering is not there

23:13 You see that political engineering is not there

23:15 You see that political engineering is not there

23:17 You see that political engineering is not there

23:19 You see that political engineering is not there

23:21 You see that political engineering is not there

23:23 You see that political engineering is not there

23:25 You see that political engineering is not there

23:27 You see that political engineering is not there

23:29 You see that political engineering is not there

23:31 You see that political engineering is not there

23:33 You see that political engineering is not there

23:35 You see that political engineering is not there

23:37 You see that political engineering is not there

23:39 You see that political engineering is not there

23:41 You see that political engineering is not there

23:43 You see that political engineering is not there

23:45 You see that political engineering is not there

23:47 You see that political engineering is not there

23:49 You see that political engineering is not there

23:51 You see that political engineering is not there

23:53 You see that political engineering is not there

23:55 You see that political engineering is not there

23:57 You see that political engineering is not there

23:59 You see that political engineering is not there

24:01 You see that political engineering is not there

24:03 You see that political engineering is not there

24:05 You see that political engineering is not there

24:07 You see that political engineering is not there

24:09 You see that political engineering is not there

24:11 You see that political engineering is not there

24:13 You see that political engineering is not there

24:15 You see that political engineering is not there

24:17 You see that political engineering is not there

24:19 You see that political engineering is not there

24:21 You see that political engineering is not there

24:23 You see that political engineering is not there

24:25 You see that political engineering is not there

24:27 You see that political engineering is not there

24:29 You see that political engineering is not there

24:31 You see that political engineering is not there

24:33 You see that political engineering is not there

24:35 You see that political engineering is not there

24:37 You see that political engineering is not there

24:39 You see that political engineering is not there

24:41 You see that political engineering is not there

24:43 You see that political engineering is not there

24:45 You see that political engineering is not there

24:47 You see that political engineering is not there

24:49 You see that political engineering is not there

24:51 You see that political engineering is not there

24:53 You see that political engineering is not there

24:55 You see that political engineering is not there

24:57 You see that political engineering is not there

24:59 You see that political engineering is not there

25:01 You see that political engineering is not there

25:03 You see that political engineering is not there

25:05 You see that political engineering is not there

25:07 You see that political engineering is not there

25:09 You see that political engineering is not there

25:11 You see that political engineering is not there

25:13 You see that political engineering is not there

25:15 You see that political engineering is not there

25:17 You see that political engineering is not there

25:19 You see that political engineering is not there

25:21 You see that political engineering is not there

25:23 You see that political engineering is not there

25:25 You see that political engineering is not there

25:27 You see that political engineering is not there

25:29 You see that political engineering is not there

25:31 You see that political engineering is not there

25:33 You see that political engineering is not there

25:35 You see that political engineering is not there

25:37 You see that political engineering is not there

25:39 You see that political engineering is not there

25:41 You see that political engineering is not there

25:43 You see that political engineering is not there

25:45 You see that political engineering is not there

25:47 You see that political engineering is not there

25:49 You see that political engineering is not there

25:51 You see that political engineering is not there

25:53 You see that political engineering is not there

25:55 You see that political engineering is not there

25:57 You see that political engineering is not there

25:59 You see that political engineering is not there

26:01 You see that political engineering is not there

26:03 You see that political engineering is not there

26:05 You see that political engineering is not there

26:07 You see that political engineering is not there

26:09 You see that political engineering is not there

26:11 You see that political engineering is not there

26:13 You see that political engineering is not there

26:15 You see that political engineering is not there

26:17 You see that political engineering is not there

26:19 You see that political engineering is not there

26:21 You see that political engineering is not there

26:23 You see that political engineering is not there

26:25 You see that political engineering is not there

26:27 You see that political engineering is not there

26:29 You see that political engineering is not there

26:31 You see that political engineering is not there

26:33 You see that political engineering is not there

26:35 You see that political engineering is not there

26:37 You see that political engineering is not there

26:39 You see that political engineering is not there

26:41 You see that political engineering is not there

26:43 You see that political engineering is not there

26:45 You see that political engineering is not there

26:47 You see that political engineering is not there

26:49 You see that political engineering is not there

26:51 You see that political engineering is not there

26:53 You see that political engineering is not there

26:55 You see that political engineering is not there

26:57 You see that political engineering is not there

26:59 You see that political engineering is not there

27:01 You see that political engineering is not there

27:03 You see that political engineering is not there

27:05 You see that political engineering is not there

27:07 You see that political engineering is not there

27:09 You see that political engineering is not there

27:11 You see that political engineering is not there

27:13 You see that political engineering is not there

27:15 You see that political engineering is not there

27:17 You see that political engineering is not there

27:19 You see that political engineering is not there

27:21 You see that political engineering is not there

27:23 You see that political engineering is not there

27:25 You see that political engineering is not there

27:27 You see that political engineering is not there

27:29 You see that political engineering is not there

27:31 You see that political engineering is not there

27:33 You see that political engineering is not there

27:35 You see that political engineering is not there

27:37 You see that political engineering is not there

27:39 You see that political engineering is not there

27:41 You see that political engineering is not there

27:43 You see that political engineering is not there

27:45 You see that political engineering is not there

27:47 You see that political engineering is not there

27:49 You see that political engineering is not there

27:51 You see that political engineering is not there

27:53 You see that political engineering is not there

27:55 You see that political engineering is not there

27:57 You see that political engineering is not there

27:59 You see that political engineering is not there

28:01 You see that political engineering is not there

28:03 You see that political engineering is not there

28:05 You see that political engineering is not there

28:07 You see that political engineering is not there

28:09 You see that political engineering is not there

28:11 You see that political engineering is not there

28:13 You see that political engineering is not there

28:15 You see that political engineering is not there

28:17 You see that political engineering is not there

28:19 You see that political engineering is not there

28:21 You see that political engineering is not there

28:23 You see that political engineering is not there

28:25 You see that political engineering is not there

28:27 You see that political engineering is not there

28:29 You see that political engineering is not there

28:31 You see that political engineering is not there

28:33 You see that political engineering is not there

28:35 You see that political engineering is not there

28:37 You see that political engineering is not there

28:39 You see that political engineering is not there

28:41 You see that political engineering is not there

Election 2024 | Niklo Pakistan Ki Khatir | Special Transmission | 6th February 2024 | Part 1

Category

Transcript

Recommended