#election2024 #niklopakistankikhatir #specialtransmission #arynews
For the latest General Elections 2024 Updates ,Results, Party Position, Candidates and Much more Please visit our Election Portal: https://elections.arynews.tv
Follow the ARY News channel on WhatsApp: https://bit.ly/46e5HzY
Subscribe to our channel and press the bell icon for latest news updates: http://bit.ly/3e0SwKP
ARY News is a leading Pakistani news channel that promises to bring you factual and timely international stories and stories about Pakistan, sports, entertainment, and business, amid others.
For the latest General Elections 2024 Updates ,Results, Party Position, Candidates and Much more Please visit our Election Portal: https://elections.arynews.tv
Follow the ARY News channel on WhatsApp: https://bit.ly/46e5HzY
Subscribe to our channel and press the bell icon for latest news updates: http://bit.ly/3e0SwKP
ARY News is a leading Pakistani news channel that promises to bring you factual and timely international stories and stories about Pakistan, sports, entertainment, and business, amid others.
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00 [MUSIC PLAYING]
00:03 [MUSIC PLAYING]
00:06 [MUSIC PLAYING]
00:10 [GUNSHOTS]
00:14 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
00:17, why did this happen?
00:46 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
00:50 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
00:53 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
00:56 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
01:00 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
01:03 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
01:07 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
01:10 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
01:13 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
01:17 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
01:20 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
01:24 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
01:27 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
01:30 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
01:33 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
01:36 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
01:39 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
01:42 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
01:45 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
01:48 [COUGHS]
01:49 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
01:52 and
02:21 the next day I saw the video. I was so surprised. I was like, "What?" I was like, "Oh, my God."
02:28 So, I was like, "Wow." And I was like, "I don't know what to do." And I was like, "I'm
02:35 so surprised." And I was like, "Wow." And I was like, "Wow." And I was like, "Wow."
02:42 And I was like, "Wow." And I was like, "Oh, my God." And I was like, "Wow." And I was
02:49 like, "Wow." And I was like, "Wow." And I was like, "Wow." And I was like, "Wow."
02:57 And I was like, "Wow." And I was like, "Wow." And I was like, "Wow." And I was
03:05 like, "Wow." And I was like, "Wow." And I was like, "Wow." And I was like, "Wow."
03:13 [VIDEO PLAYBACK]
03:14 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
03:16 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
03:18 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]
03:19 That's a big deal!
03:21 But...
03:22 Bilawal Bhotto was also out of the seat
03:24 Kashu, your nose is pointing to Bilawal Bhotto
03:26 Can he win?
03:27 It's definitely me!
03:30 I have no idea!
03:32 It's going to be a thorn in his side
03:33 Even in 2008-13 he didn't get a seat
03:35 But it's just not a walk over
03:37 I don't think it's going to be a thorn in his side
03:39 I think he'll have a chance to win by 600 or 1000 votes
03:41 Or even 1000 or 1200 votes
03:43 He'll win by good votes
03:45 He'll win by 2.5-3 lakh votes
03:47 I think he'll win by good votes
03:49 He'll win by 2-3 lakh votes
03:51 We have to work less than that
03:53 Atta Tarrar's position is not that strong
03:55 He's the only candidate
03:57 Atta Tarrar is not a popular candidate
03:59 I think he'll win by a vote compared to Bilawal
04:01 He's not a local from that constituency
04:03 He's from Bilawal
04:05 Even Tehreek-e-Insaab's Zaheer Abbas is standing here
04:09 You cannot compete with him
04:11 Shahid Safale is from Malik Sahiba's constituency
04:13 No, no, no
04:15 His sons are from here
04:17 Ali Parvez
04:19 Mr. Chaudhary, in your opinion
04:21 This constituency, especially the 1-7 constituency
04:23 Is going to be a good thorn in his side
04:25 Do you think it'll be a walk over for Bilawal Bhutto Zardani?
04:27 Or will Atta Tarrar give a strong competition?
04:29 No, I don't want to hear
04:31 Sir, I want to hear what your heart says
04:33 You tell us
04:35 You write down the answer to my 500 questions
04:37 If you've come to Lahore, then you should know about Lahore
04:41 Exactly
04:43 The information you have
04:45 And the news you have
04:47 No one has it
04:49 That's why your statement is important
04:51 We don't know about Lahore
04:53 We don't get votes from our family
04:55 Please tell us
04:57 Mr. Chaudhary, we'll vote for you
04:59 Mr. Chaudhary, it's a good thing your family doesn't vote for you
05:01 You should know yourself
05:03 Someone should correct their faults
05:05 They all are the same
05:07 If they don't vote, I'll vote for them
05:09 I'm sorry, I'll tell you what happened
05:13 When you get married, your wife said
05:17 Two people will trouble you a lot
05:21 Who are they?
05:23 One is me
05:25 And one is Arvind Dami
05:27 Arvind Dami
05:29 Programmer
05:31 So, you're on a 1 to 7 ratio
05:33 Listen to me
05:35 Did he become a husband?
05:37 No, he didn't
05:39 But you still haven't told us what will happen on 1 to 7
05:41 Look, this election is not like the elections of 1985, 1990, 1997
05:51 This is a completely new world
05:55 Even this is not the 18th or 13th election
05:59 A new world has been created here
06:03 You'll be surprised that the discounted factor
06:09 The young people
06:11 The snack video
06:13 Half of the Punjabi youth are on that
06:17 Snapchat?
06:19 Yes, snack video
06:21 Not snack, Snapchat
06:23 There's a snack too
06:25 There's an expert, a professor in NDU, Maria Hameed
06:29 She says, these people didn't explore
06:31 They're doing something
06:33 If half of the youth are on that
06:35 Then the ones who are going on it 7-8 times
06:39 There's no difference
06:41 So, what they're saying in Punjabi
06:43 This is not a fish of the sea
06:47 This election
06:49 This is a fish of the water
06:51 You predict, you put all the pressure
06:53 That Bilawal will win or Atatar
06:55 Atatar is a victim of difficulties
06:59 Bilawal Bhutto Zardari
07:01 If you look at the dynamics
07:03 There's a lot of individual votes
07:05 If we look at the last election
07:07 People's Party will be successful in co-opting it
07:11 It will be a tough competition
07:13 But it can make a difference
07:15 But it's not like PMLN will get a walkover
07:19 It's a good competition
07:21 And the other independents
07:23 Can't be discounted
07:25 Lahore is an urban city
07:27 It's open
07:29 I won't say this
07:31 You tell me
07:33 Salman Akram Raja's constituency
07:35 Salman Akram Raja's constituency
07:37 Is very clear
07:39 That the candidates are good
07:41 They're running campaigns
07:43 PMLN is not supporting them
07:45 They're not running campaigns
07:47 Raja sahib will come
07:49 I think we should move on to larger picture
07:51 We'll discuss this in detail tomorrow
07:57 But let's move on to the larger picture
07:59 At a bird's view
08:01 You're right, Mr. Chaudhary
08:03 The dynamics have changed
08:05 A lot of emotions are running high too
08:07 If you compare 2013-2018
08:09 Out of the 14 seats in Lahore
08:11 The number of noon league seats decreased
08:13 Then you look at the central districts
08:15 In 2008
08:17 71 seats were removed
08:19 In 2018
08:21 The number of seats in central Punjab
08:23 Decreased by 91%
08:25 The number of seats in central Punjab
08:27 Decreased by 62-63%
08:29 So the trend has gone downward
08:31 If you add a little bit of emotions
08:33 A little bit of fervour
08:35 A young element
08:37 The only uncertainty right now
08:39 Is what you expect from south Punjab
08:41 What you expect from south Punjab
08:43 That is
08:45 If you remove 28-30 seats
08:47 The number of seats will be in the position
08:49 To form a government
08:51 In Punjab and in Wafat
08:53 That's very interesting
08:55 In south Punjab
08:57 There is a very tough competition
08:59 There is a Muslim-league Nawaz
09:01 Everywhere
09:03 There is not so much in south
09:05 There is a lot in Multan
09:07 There is a party in Multan
09:09 There is a party in Multan
09:11 Multan was clean last time
09:13 6-6 PTI
09:15 If you go from Lahore to Multan
09:17 The south is clean
09:19 So here
09:21 They will have competition everywhere
09:23 Now whether they win or not
09:25 Will depend on
09:27 What turn out comes out the day after
09:29 And who will cast their vote effectively
09:31 So this depends on everything
09:33 This voter turnout
09:35 Will be a defining factor for the whole of Pakistan
09:37 If you are dominating the Zimbabwe Feefus party
09:39 And the Muslim-league Nawaz is small
09:41 No, there is a big party there
09:43 There is a party in Multan
09:45 There is a party in Multan
09:47 Where there is a big leader of Pakistan Muslim League
09:49 Who is sitting here?
09:51 I am talking about Punjab
09:53 Is there a big leader of Pakistan losing in any constituency or not?
09:55 There is no such thing as a big leader losing
09:57 But there is definitely a problem
09:59 If it was so easy
10:01 Then would Mian Sahab
10:03 Have said that there is a young man in me
10:05 Because we are seeing Bilawal Bhutto Sardari
10:07 Saying that there is a young man
10:09 And he is himself
10:11 A PTI candidate
10:13 But today Mian Sahab said that there is a young man in me
10:15 Do you think this can be cashed?
10:17 If Chaudhary Sahab still has it
10:19 Then why can't Mian Sahab have it?
10:21 Are you sure?
10:23 There is Mariam Nawaz Sahiba
10:25 There is a young man
10:27 Why is there no passion?
10:29 Mian Sahab is a king of comebacks
10:31 He is coming back for the fourth time
10:33 So whatever his political acumen is
10:35 It is coming on the basis of that
10:37 So don't discount his passion
10:39 It is a matter of passion
10:41 The one he is counting on is passion
10:43 He has a lot of public support
10:45 But I genuinely believe that
10:47 Mian Sahab's overwhelmingly
10:49 All this campaigning
10:51 Coming back
10:53 This is to launch Mariam Sahiba
10:55 Officially, politically as well
10:57 So give credit to the young man
10:59 Yes Chaudhary Sahab
11:01 Mr. Adhami and Anika
11:03 What we want to see is
11:05 Earlier the PTI was eaten by the People's Party
11:07 The PTI
11:09 Punjab's KP
11:11 You are absolutely right
11:13 So now
11:15 This election
11:17 The People's Party was nowhere
11:19 Two or three months ago
11:21 When the discussion started
11:23 That the 8th of February is going to be the election
11:25 So after that
11:27 I said to Raghu
11:29 That these people should take government
11:31 With all their hard work
11:33 Like the villages
11:35 They have travelled all over the country
11:37 And have made their own statements
11:39 Whether you like it or not
11:41 Now he is a relevant player
11:43 In today's power politics
11:45 Today
11:47 It is being discussed that
11:49 Bilawal or Zardari
11:51 Aswad Zardari or Bilawal
11:53 Or Nawazib or Shahbaz
11:55 Or some dark horse
11:57 You cannot discount them
11:59 Out of hand
12:01 Sir, the government of Wanni is from Punjab
12:03 You look at the North
12:05 The PTI has been very strong
12:07 In 2018
12:09 Attaq, Jhelum, Chakwal, Rawalpindi
12:11 Except for Raja Parvez
12:13 They were
12:15 They cleaned sweeped
12:17 There was a lot of tension in the centre
12:19 But in the centre again
12:21 There was a Ziti Road Party
12:23 There was a comment
12:25 You have understood my point
12:27 You can take it from there
12:29 How strong is the Noon in South Punjab
12:31 Come on
12:33 She is a tough one
12:35 I want to know
12:37 You have blindfolded your eyes
12:39 You do not see the light
12:41 Take off my blindfold
12:43 Tell me where in South Punjab
12:45 Will take out the Muslim League Noon
12:47 If you see
12:49 Muslim League Noon
12:51 Has won 12 or 13 seats
12:53 South Punjab has never been
12:55 The strength of the Muslim League Noon
12:57 Punjab has become the morning Mars
12:59 In South Punjab
13:01 In 2008
13:03 29 people's party won
13:05 That is how they could make
13:07 Central Government
13:09 In 2013
13:11 They took everything
13:13 In 2018
13:15 PTI was already sold
13:17 In 2013
13:19 It was in Noon
13:21 In 2018
13:23 It was in People's Party
13:25 I have not seen many people
13:27 Leaving the party
13:29 Shah Mehmood Qureshi
13:31 People are standing
13:33 It is a violation
13:35 It is disqualification
13:37 I am talking about the party
13:39 Not him
13:41 His daughter is standing
13:43 Zain is also standing
13:45 You see in Rahim-e-Arkhan
13:47 For example Khusro
13:49 Khusro always
13:51 2002 Kaaf League
13:53 PP
13:55 PTI
13:57 But this time he is not fighting
13:59 Khusro and Hashim
14:01 Hashim is fighting for PTI
14:03 But I think
14:05 PTI is free
14:07 I will check
14:09 Azad is free
14:11 Both are free
14:13 Let's take a break
14:15 We will take a break
14:17 [Music]
14:31 Welcome back
14:33 Our special program
14:35 Is going on all day
14:37 Till midnight
14:39 Election campaign is going on
14:41 All political parties
14:43 Are doing their last rallies
14:45 Where PTI is in their home ground
14:47 They will do their rallies
14:49 We were talking during the break
14:51 If you could comment on this
14:53 We will talk about the constituency
14:55 In detail tomorrow
14:57 Do you think
14:59 Something unusual will happen
15:01 Usually people go to People's Party
15:03 Do you think something unusual will happen
15:05 What can happen?
15:07 A big setback
15:09 No no
15:11 What can happen?
15:13 You know
15:15 It is unfortunate
15:17 I am in Sindh
15:19 I am not campaigning
15:21 I am not campaigning
15:23 Because they know
15:25 We don't get the vote bank
15:27 We can't put a dent in rural Sindh
15:29 Political parties
15:31 Don't do rallies
15:33 You saw Mr. Imran Khan
15:35 He did a rally in Karachi
15:37 He did a rally in Sindh
15:39 Because Punjab is a battle ground
15:41 You have 61 seats in Punjab
15:43 But out of that
15:45 20-22 are in Karachi
15:47 25 seats are in Karachi
15:49 So in South Punjab
15:51 Usually you can do rallies
15:53 When there are no governments
15:55 When there are no governments
15:57 Otherwise in election campaign
15:59 It is unfortunate
16:01 You can't compete with People's Party
16:03 That's why no one does campaigns
16:05 You see Khaiber Pakhtunkhwa
16:07 He was in power in the last two elections
16:09 But Bilawal
16:11 Did a good campaign
16:13 Because he thinks
16:15 He is independent
16:17 Maybe he can make some seats
16:19 Where he can see the scope
16:21 Of any party
16:23 I am surprised PM LN
16:25 Didn't do any big rallies
16:27 Didn't he do two rallies in Peshawar?
16:29 He didn't do a rally in Peshawar
16:31 Mardan, Charsadda
16:33 Swabi, Noshera
16:35 He did a rally in Peshawar
16:37 He did a rally in Karachi
16:39 Karachi
16:41 Last time he came to Karachi
16:43 He was a nomad
16:45 In 2018 in South Punjab
16:47 Muslim League Nawaz
16:49 Who said that their activity was not good
16:51 You know that Mecma Zaraat was very active
16:53 People were working hard for Mecma Zaraat
16:55 They were distributing water and everything
16:57 This time the picture is not clear
16:59 Because Mecma Zaraat is silent
17:01 Mecma Zaraat has left the work
17:03 No, no, he has left the work
17:05 He is getting paid for free
17:07 So Mecma Zaraat was very active
17:09 There was a big joke in the last election
17:11 He was beating someone
17:13 He said that Mecma Zaraat is not there
17:15 He was saying that Mecma Zaraat's people were wrong
17:17 He was saying that Mecma Zaraat's people were wrong
17:19 He was saying that Mecma Zaraat's people were wrong
17:21 He won the People's Party in 2008
17:23 He won the People's Party in 2013
17:25 His government is going to the South
17:27 His government is going to the South
17:29 The first thing is that in the South
17:31 You see that political engineering is not there
17:33 You see that political engineering is not there
17:35 You see that political engineering is not there
17:37 You see that political engineering is not there
17:39 You see that political engineering is not there
17:41 You see that political engineering is not there
17:43 You see that political engineering is not there
17:45 You see that political engineering is not there
17:47 You see that political engineering is not there
17:49 You see that political engineering is not there
17:51 You see that political engineering is not there
17:53 You see that political engineering is not there
17:55 You see that political engineering is not there
17:57 You see that political engineering is not there
17:59 You see that political engineering is not there
18:01 You see that political engineering is not there
18:03 You see that political engineering is not there
18:05 You see that political engineering is not there
18:07 You see that political engineering is not there
18:09 You see that political engineering is not there
18:11 You see that political engineering is not there
18:13 You see that political engineering is not there
18:15 You see that political engineering is not there
18:17 You see that political engineering is not there
18:19 You see that political engineering is not there
18:21 You see that political engineering is not there
18:23 You see that political engineering is not there
18:25 You see that political engineering is not there
18:27 You see that political engineering is not there
18:29 You see that political engineering is not there
18:31 You see that political engineering is not there
18:33 You see that political engineering is not there
18:35 You see that political engineering is not there
18:37 You see that political engineering is not there
18:39 You see that political engineering is not there
18:41 You see that political engineering is not there
18:43 You see that political engineering is not there
18:45 You see that political engineering is not there
18:47 You see that political engineering is not there
18:49 You see that political engineering is not there
18:51 You see that political engineering is not there
18:53 You see that political engineering is not there
18:55 You see that political engineering is not there
18:57 You see that political engineering is not there
18:59 You see that political engineering is not there
19:01 You see that political engineering is not there
19:03 You see that political engineering is not there
19:05 You see that political engineering is not there
19:07 You see that political engineering is not there
19:09 You see that political engineering is not there
19:11 You see that political engineering is not there
19:13 You see that political engineering is not there
19:15 You see that political engineering is not there
19:17 You see that political engineering is not there
19:19 You see that political engineering is not there
19:21 You see that political engineering is not there
19:23 You see that political engineering is not there
19:25 You see that political engineering is not there
19:27 You see that political engineering is not there
19:29 You see that political engineering is not there
19:31 You see that political engineering is not there
19:33 You see that political engineering is not there
19:35 You see that political engineering is not there
19:37 You see that political engineering is not there
19:39 You see that political engineering is not there
19:41 You see that political engineering is not there
19:43 You see that political engineering is not there
19:45 You see that political engineering is not there
19:47 You see that political engineering is not there
19:49 You see that political engineering is not there
19:51 You see that political engineering is not there
19:53 You see that political engineering is not there
19:55 You see that political engineering is not there
19:57 You see that political engineering is not there
19:59 You see that political engineering is not there
20:01 You see that political engineering is not there
20:03 You see that political engineering is not there
20:05 You see that political engineering is not there
20:07 You see that political engineering is not there
20:09 You see that political engineering is not there
20:11 You see that political engineering is not there
20:13 You see that political engineering is not there
20:15 You see that political engineering is not there
20:17 You see that political engineering is not there
20:19 You see that political engineering is not there
20:21 You see that political engineering is not there
20:23 You see that political engineering is not there
20:25 You see that political engineering is not there
20:27 You see that political engineering is not there
20:29 You see that political engineering is not there
20:31 You see that political engineering is not there
20:33 You see that political engineering is not there
20:35 You see that political engineering is not there
20:37 You see that political engineering is not there
20:39 You see that political engineering is not there
20:41 You see that political engineering is not there
20:43 You see that political engineering is not there
20:45 You see that political engineering is not there
20:47 You see that political engineering is not there
20:49 You see that political engineering is not there
20:51 You see that political engineering is not there
20:53 You see that political engineering is not there
20:55 You see that political engineering is not there
20:57 You see that political engineering is not there
20:59 You see that political engineering is not there
21:01 You see that political engineering is not there
21:03 You see that political engineering is not there
21:05 You see that political engineering is not there
21:07 You see that political engineering is not there
21:09 You see that political engineering is not there
21:11 You see that political engineering is not there
21:13 You see that political engineering is not there
21:15 You see that political engineering is not there
21:17 You see that political engineering is not there
21:19 You see that political engineering is not there
21:21 You see that political engineering is not there
21:23 You see that political engineering is not there
21:25 You see that political engineering is not there
21:27 You see that political engineering is not there
21:29 You see that political engineering is not there
21:31 You see that political engineering is not there
21:33 You see that political engineering is not there
21:35 You see that political engineering is not there
21:37 You see that political engineering is not there
21:39 You see that political engineering is not there
21:41 You see that political engineering is not there
21:43 You see that political engineering is not there
21:45 You see that political engineering is not there
21:47 You see that political engineering is not there
21:49 You see that political engineering is not there
21:51 You see that political engineering is not there
21:53 You see that political engineering is not there
21:55 You see that political engineering is not there
21:57 You see that political engineering is not there
21:59 You see that political engineering is not there
22:01 You see that political engineering is not there
22:03 You see that political engineering is not there
22:05 You see that political engineering is not there
22:07 You see that political engineering is not there
22:09 You see that political engineering is not there
22:11 You see that political engineering is not there
22:13 You see that political engineering is not there
22:15 You see that political engineering is not there
22:17 You see that political engineering is not there
22:19 You see that political engineering is not there
22:21 You see that political engineering is not there
22:23 You see that political engineering is not there
22:25 You see that political engineering is not there
22:27 You see that political engineering is not there
22:29 You see that political engineering is not there
22:31 You see that political engineering is not there
22:33 You see that political engineering is not there
22:35 You see that political engineering is not there
22:37 You see that political engineering is not there
22:39 You see that political engineering is not there
22:41 You see that political engineering is not there
22:43 You see that political engineering is not there
22:45 You see that political engineering is not there
22:47 You see that political engineering is not there
22:49 You see that political engineering is not there
22:51 You see that political engineering is not there
22:53 You see that political engineering is not there
22:55 You see that political engineering is not there
22:57 You see that political engineering is not there
22:59 You see that political engineering is not there
23:01 You see that political engineering is not there
23:03 You see that political engineering is not there
23:05 You see that political engineering is not there
23:07 You see that political engineering is not there
23:09 You see that political engineering is not there
23:11 You see that political engineering is not there
23:13 You see that political engineering is not there
23:15 You see that political engineering is not there
23:17 You see that political engineering is not there
23:19 You see that political engineering is not there
23:21 You see that political engineering is not there
23:23 You see that political engineering is not there
23:25 You see that political engineering is not there
23:27 You see that political engineering is not there
23:29 You see that political engineering is not there
23:31 You see that political engineering is not there
23:33 You see that political engineering is not there
23:35 You see that political engineering is not there
23:37 You see that political engineering is not there
23:39 You see that political engineering is not there
23:41 You see that political engineering is not there
23:43 You see that political engineering is not there
23:45 You see that political engineering is not there
23:47 You see that political engineering is not there
23:49 You see that political engineering is not there
23:51 You see that political engineering is not there
23:53 You see that political engineering is not there
23:55 You see that political engineering is not there
23:57 You see that political engineering is not there
23:59 You see that political engineering is not there
24:01 You see that political engineering is not there
24:03 You see that political engineering is not there
24:05 You see that political engineering is not there
24:07 You see that political engineering is not there
24:09 You see that political engineering is not there
24:11 You see that political engineering is not there
24:13 You see that political engineering is not there
24:15 You see that political engineering is not there
24:17 You see that political engineering is not there
24:19 You see that political engineering is not there
24:21 You see that political engineering is not there
24:23 You see that political engineering is not there
24:25 You see that political engineering is not there
24:27 You see that political engineering is not there
24:29 You see that political engineering is not there
24:31 You see that political engineering is not there
24:33 You see that political engineering is not there
24:35 You see that political engineering is not there
24:37 You see that political engineering is not there
24:39 You see that political engineering is not there
24:41 You see that political engineering is not there
24:43 You see that political engineering is not there
24:45 You see that political engineering is not there
24:47 You see that political engineering is not there
24:49 You see that political engineering is not there
24:51 You see that political engineering is not there
24:53 You see that political engineering is not there
24:55 You see that political engineering is not there
24:57 You see that political engineering is not there
24:59 You see that political engineering is not there
25:01 You see that political engineering is not there
25:03 You see that political engineering is not there
25:05 You see that political engineering is not there
25:07 You see that political engineering is not there
25:09 You see that political engineering is not there
25:11 You see that political engineering is not there
25:13 You see that political engineering is not there
25:15 You see that political engineering is not there
25:17 You see that political engineering is not there
25:19 You see that political engineering is not there
25:21 You see that political engineering is not there
25:23 You see that political engineering is not there
25:25 You see that political engineering is not there
25:27 You see that political engineering is not there
25:29 You see that political engineering is not there
25:31 You see that political engineering is not there
25:33 You see that political engineering is not there
25:35 You see that political engineering is not there
25:37 You see that political engineering is not there
25:39 You see that political engineering is not there
25:41 You see that political engineering is not there
25:43 You see that political engineering is not there
25:45 You see that political engineering is not there
25:47 You see that political engineering is not there
25:49 You see that political engineering is not there
25:51 You see that political engineering is not there
25:53 You see that political engineering is not there
25:55 You see that political engineering is not there
25:57 You see that political engineering is not there
25:59 You see that political engineering is not there
26:01 You see that political engineering is not there
26:03 You see that political engineering is not there
26:05 You see that political engineering is not there
26:07 You see that political engineering is not there
26:09 You see that political engineering is not there
26:11 You see that political engineering is not there
26:13 You see that political engineering is not there
26:15 You see that political engineering is not there
26:17 You see that political engineering is not there
26:19 You see that political engineering is not there
26:21 You see that political engineering is not there
26:23 You see that political engineering is not there
26:25 You see that political engineering is not there
26:27 You see that political engineering is not there
26:29 You see that political engineering is not there
26:31 You see that political engineering is not there
26:33 You see that political engineering is not there
26:35 You see that political engineering is not there
26:37 You see that political engineering is not there
26:39 You see that political engineering is not there
26:41 You see that political engineering is not there
26:43 You see that political engineering is not there
26:45 You see that political engineering is not there
26:47 You see that political engineering is not there
26:49 You see that political engineering is not there
26:51 You see that political engineering is not there
26:53 You see that political engineering is not there
26:55 You see that political engineering is not there
26:57 You see that political engineering is not there
26:59 You see that political engineering is not there
27:01 You see that political engineering is not there
27:03 You see that political engineering is not there
27:05 You see that political engineering is not there
27:07 You see that political engineering is not there
27:09 You see that political engineering is not there
27:11 You see that political engineering is not there
27:13 You see that political engineering is not there
27:15 You see that political engineering is not there
27:17 You see that political engineering is not there
27:19 You see that political engineering is not there
27:21 You see that political engineering is not there
27:23 You see that political engineering is not there
27:25 You see that political engineering is not there
27:27 You see that political engineering is not there
27:29 You see that political engineering is not there
27:31 You see that political engineering is not there
27:33 You see that political engineering is not there
27:35 You see that political engineering is not there
27:37 You see that political engineering is not there
27:39 You see that political engineering is not there
27:41 You see that political engineering is not there
27:43 You see that political engineering is not there
27:45 You see that political engineering is not there
27:47 You see that political engineering is not there
27:49 You see that political engineering is not there
27:51 You see that political engineering is not there
27:53 You see that political engineering is not there
27:55 You see that political engineering is not there
27:57 You see that political engineering is not there
27:59 You see that political engineering is not there
28:01 You see that political engineering is not there
28:03 You see that political engineering is not there
28:05 You see that political engineering is not there
28:07 You see that political engineering is not there
28:09 You see that political engineering is not there
28:11 You see that political engineering is not there
28:13 You see that political engineering is not there
28:15 You see that political engineering is not there
28:17 You see that political engineering is not there
28:19 You see that political engineering is not there
28:21 You see that political engineering is not there
28:23 You see that political engineering is not there
28:25 You see that political engineering is not there
28:27 You see that political engineering is not there
28:29 You see that political engineering is not there
28:31 You see that political engineering is not there
28:33 You see that political engineering is not there
28:35 You see that political engineering is not there
28:37 You see that political engineering is not there
28:39 You see that political engineering is not there
28:41 You see that political engineering is not there