#AshtarAusaf #Disqualification #AbidZuberi #JavedLatif #NawazSharif #saeedghani #zulfiqaralibhutto #supremecourt #WaseemBadami
(Current Affairs)
Host:
- Waseem Badami
Guests:
- Mian Javed Latif PMLN
- Abid S Zuberi (Advocate Supreme Court Bar)
- Ashtar Ausaf Ali (Former Attorney General)
- Saeed Ghani PPP
Mian Javed Latif opens up on Nawaz Sharif's acquittal in Al Azizia reference
Has Nawaz Sharif's lifetime disqualification ended??? Legal Analysis
ZAB presidential reference: PP Leader Saeed Ghani shares PP's stance
Follow the ARY News channel on WhatsApp: https://bit.ly/46e5HzY
Subscribe to our channel and press the bell icon for latest news updates: http://bit.ly/3e0SwKP
ARY News is a leading Pakistani news channel that promises to bring you factual and timely international stories and stories about Pakistan, sports, entertainment, and business, amid others.
(Current Affairs)
Host:
- Waseem Badami
Guests:
- Mian Javed Latif PMLN
- Abid S Zuberi (Advocate Supreme Court Bar)
- Ashtar Ausaf Ali (Former Attorney General)
- Saeed Ghani PPP
Mian Javed Latif opens up on Nawaz Sharif's acquittal in Al Azizia reference
Has Nawaz Sharif's lifetime disqualification ended??? Legal Analysis
ZAB presidential reference: PP Leader Saeed Ghani shares PP's stance
Follow the ARY News channel on WhatsApp: https://bit.ly/46e5HzY
Subscribe to our channel and press the bell icon for latest news updates: http://bit.ly/3e0SwKP
ARY News is a leading Pakistani news channel that promises to bring you factual and timely international stories and stories about Pakistan, sports, entertainment, and business, amid others.
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00 In the name of Allah, the most Gracious, the most Merciful.
00:07 Assalamu Alaikum.
00:09 Before we come to any topic,
00:11 I would like to say that we have to take a lot of responsibility for the loss of many precious lives.
00:21 Many young men have given their lives in the name of terrorism.
00:26 In an incident of terrorism, six terrorists were sent to hell,
00:30 but more than twenty security forces were martyred.
00:34 May Allah make this country a safer place to live in, Inshallah.
00:39 And this should be a matter where the security agencies,
00:48 whether police, paramilitary or Pak forces, should stand with them without any ifs and buts.
00:55 May Allah elevate the status of the martyrs.
00:58 It was a very charged day, and I would say a very historic day.
01:03 Look at it from the perspective that three former Prime Minister's cases were filed in different courts.
01:08 Imran Khan's jail trial is still going on.
01:13 Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto's murder was considered a murder in court.
01:19 This was the beginning of the case.
01:25 In 2011, President Asif Ali Zardari sent a reference,
01:29 and the case was closed.
01:31 After 2012, the case is open again.
01:33 This is another case of a former Prime Minister.
01:35 And another former Prime Minister,
01:37 Imran Khan, Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif,
01:39 who were punished in Avinfield and Al Azizia.
01:44 They were released in a flagship and were not held in Panama.
01:47 One case of Al Azizia was left,
01:49 and today they are released from Al Azizia.
01:52 Are all obstacles in the way of Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif,
01:57 and can he take a seat in the elections?
01:59 Or is he still not eligible?
02:01 Is Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif going to start his election campaign at any moment?
02:06 And many other things.
02:08 We will first take a political angle and then a legal angle.
02:11 Mr. Javed Atif Shah, he must be a very happy person tonight.
02:14 He is the Senior Deputy President of Pakistan Muslim League.
02:17 He is with us. Huzoor, Assalamu Alaikum.
02:19 Wa Alaikum Assalam.
02:21 Sir, we spoke to you last time, coincidentally,
02:25 on the day when the case of Avinfield was closed,
02:31 and Al Azizia was first closed.
02:33 When it was said that it was a temporary case for today.
02:36 And then you said that once the case of Al Azizia is solved,
02:39 then Mr. Nawaz Sharif will start his election campaign.
02:42 Because if the case was going on in the courts,
02:44 then when will the court come?
02:45 The court cannot say that I cannot come from the Jalsa tomorrow.
02:49 So today this matter has also been solved.
02:51 Now, at any time, will Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif start his election campaign?
02:55 Will he start the address of the election?
02:57 Thank you, Wasim Badami Sahib.
03:02 First of all, the first two things you said,
03:05 one of them is the police force or military soldiers,
03:10 their martyrdom is certainly a moment of worry for the entire Pakistani nation.
03:17 And because of their martyrdom,
03:20 the Pakistani people sleep peacefully at night.
03:27 So no nation can forget their martyrdom.
03:31 Right.
03:32 Nor can we.
03:33 Salute to them all.
03:35 Secondly, you said that three former ministers have been charged today.
03:42 Among them, you see that more than half a century,
03:47 almost half a century has passed,
03:49 the case of Prime Minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto,
03:54 today it seems that his court murder,
03:59 what were the consequences of it,
04:02 and who benefited from it.
04:07 Similarly, there was another Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif,
04:10 whose case was filed,
04:12 from which today, seven years later,
04:15 and in that, two and a half years are also his imprisonment,
04:19 which he spent.
04:21 The people who made this decision and who gave it,
04:25 and there was also a monitoring judge above,
04:27 despite his presence, this injustice that happened,
04:32 Nawaz Sharif was released today after seven years.
04:36 But because of that, the state or the nation,
04:41 suffered, the economy was in a bad state.
04:44 Will there be any question of getting these punishments,
04:48 giving and monitoring judge,
04:50 will there be any question of them too,
04:55 or will the process continue in the same way,
04:58 that after half a century,
05:00 you are doing a trial today,
05:03 and thinking that the injustice that happened,
05:09 at least to clear people's minds,
05:12 to clear people's minds,
05:14 we are doing a trial after half a century.
05:16 If I rephrase the question,
05:18 that is, is this story over after the release of Al Azizia,
05:22 or are you saying that the story will end when all the responsible people,
05:28 who are sitting in the justice institutions,
05:30 or some other, they too get punished,
05:32 then the story will end.
05:34 See, the story that is alive today after half a century,
05:41 how you, without giving justice,
05:44 or without bringing people into the box of justice,
05:47 those people, because of whom the nation was divided,
05:51 because of whom the social tensions increased,
05:54 because of whom the state travelled,
05:57 because of whom the fingers were raised on the courts,
06:00 because of the revenge of a few people or because of the decisions,
06:05 how can it be removed?
06:07 And if...
06:08 So is it right to say that half of your demand has been fulfilled,
06:11 half is left,
06:12 because Nawaz Sharif has been released,
06:14 but the guilty have not been punished, is it right to say this?
06:17 It is right to say this because,
06:20 see, you will have to start from somewhere, Mr. Waseem Badami.
06:25 You see that a judgment of the Faizabad protest comes,
06:29 and a reference file is filed against the person who gave the judgment,
06:34 so after that who will fulfill the demands of justice?
06:38 And then this, Mr. Naseem Hassan Shah,
06:41 in an interview he said,
06:43 who was involved in the decision of the Zulafqar Bhutto murder,
06:49 I will say, or was involved,
06:51 he had admitted that the people who do justice,
06:57 they do not come under pressure and all people are not brave,
07:00 they also come under pressure to save their job and make decisions.
07:04 Then tell me that if in this way the decision makers,
07:09 who are said to be the ones who take the decision,
07:13 and it is also true that they are the deputies of Allah on earth,
07:17 they do justice,
07:19 and if they come under pressure and make a decision,
07:23 then they are the same big criminals as the ones who put pressure.
07:27 So, Mr. Mian, when the matter will be resolved,
07:29 then it will go far, right?
07:30 Then if someone has supported that action politically,
07:34 and stood on that stance for years,
07:36 Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif,
07:38 and supported that action and kept raising slogans against Bhutto for Zia,
07:42 then there is no decision against him,
07:44 there is no action against him,
07:46 at least he should express his regret that
07:48 he was standing in the wrong direction of history for a long time.
07:52 See, when we did the "Misaq-e-Jumuriyat" (Presidential Assembly)
07:56 Mr. Waseem Badami,
07:58 so in that, after all those things of the past were discussed,
08:04 everyone said that we have been using our shoulders,
08:09 we have been used in the past,
08:12 everyone admitted this,
08:14 everyone apologized on that,
08:16 both sides did it,
08:18 now if you want to apologize again,
08:20 then everyone should do it again,
08:22 and there is no fault in this,
08:25 if you admit your mistake.
08:28 It is a good thing that in future,
08:30 you show a good path to the community,
08:34 to the people, to the people of the Jamaat.
08:36 And Mian Sir, will Nawaz Sharif start the Jalsas,
08:39 will the schedule of the Jalsas be issued at any time?
08:42 Yes, absolutely, why not?
08:45 You see, the Muslim League Noon,
08:48 for the last 2-3 weeks at least,
08:51 we start our work at 8 in the morning,
08:56 and at 2 in the night,
08:58 we discuss it,
09:00 and similarly...
09:02 What happened in Jalalpur?
09:04 What is that Jalsa?
09:06 It is a very big Jalsa,
09:08 it is not a joke.
09:10 No, no, no,
09:12 the Jalsas have not started yet,
09:14 we are doing a worker convention,
09:16 and we are doing corner meetings at different places.
09:20 But the chairs that were there for the corner meeting,
09:22 were not filled, right?
09:24 If these chairs are not filled,
09:26 then how will we sit on the chair of Wazir Azhar Udhman?
09:28 Okay, Waseem,
09:30 if you see, my brother,
09:34 where the Jalsa or the corner meeting is held,
09:38 have you ever said that the corner meeting
09:40 has taken the form of a Jalsa?
09:42 I am not sitting here to mock any political party,
09:46 I am sitting here to raise questions,
09:48 with great respect.
09:50 Waseem, I am talking to you about everyone,
09:56 you are quoting a question,
09:58 you are giving a reference,
10:00 similarly I am giving a reference,
10:02 that it happens...
10:04 In winters, there will be a little dry,
10:06 the corner meeting happens,
10:08 sometimes the corner meeting becomes a Jalsa,
10:10 sometimes it is a small one,
10:12 it happens,
10:14 I am not denying this.
10:16 Okay,
10:18 Waseem, this is a legal debate,
10:20 I am not going into detail,
10:22 but you tell me,
10:24 what will you do about this debate,
10:26 that there is still a question
10:28 about Mr. Mian's marriage,
10:30 because there are two points,
10:32 one is that a Supreme Court bench
10:34 has already said that under section 621(f)
10:36 the term 'Tahiyyat Nahili' is there,
10:38 and one is that Parliament has already
10:40 amended the term in the election act,
10:42 according to which 'Nahili' means
10:44 'five years of Nahili',
10:46 and that is more powerful than Parliament,
10:48 someone else will say that it is a Supreme Court decision,
10:50 but it has to be decided,
10:52 there is a question mark,
10:54 even after today's debate.
10:56 My brother,
10:58 it is very good,
11:00 that in the Supreme Court,
11:02 in reference to this request,
11:04 the statements that came,
11:06 which I read in the newspapers,
11:08 you also saw it,
11:10 on the electronic media,
11:12 you also saw it,
11:14 that it was said that
11:16 a terrorist,
11:18 or a person in serious allegations,
11:20 or in cases,
11:22 you will make his 'Nahili'
11:24 five years,
11:26 and on not taking salary from his son,
11:28 you will make his 'Tahiyyat'
11:30 'Nahili'
11:32 This is a very interesting comment,
11:34 but Mr. Mian, this is a remark,
11:36 and the decision is in front of you.
11:38 One second,
11:40 my brother,
11:42 I am saying to you,
11:44 you quoted the Supreme Court's decision,
11:46 I am quoting the Supreme Court's
11:48 other decisions also.
11:50 No, you are quoting the remarks.
11:52 The decision of Wardah,
11:54 Now what you are saying,
11:56 these are remarks,
11:58 that there is five years in murder,
12:00 and on lying,
12:02 this is a comment.
12:04 No, these are remarks,
12:06 during a trial,
12:08 or on a request,
12:10 you are quoting the Supreme Court's
12:12 one decision, the 'Tahiyyat' one,
12:14 I am quoting the other decision,
12:16 in the case of Faisal Wardah,
12:18 in which the 'Tahiyyat'
12:20 was not 'Nahili' to him,
12:22 but to Jangeer Treen,
12:24 or Nawaz Shiv,
12:26 Faisal Wardah was 'Nahili' to him,
12:28 for five years,
12:30 this Supreme Court,
12:32 and the last judgment,
12:34 is from Faisal Wardah,
12:36 and the law,
12:38 that the Supreme Parliament made,
12:40 is a matter of later,
12:42 so you see,
12:44 the Supreme Court's two decisions,
12:46 and the Assembly's law,
12:48 and apart from this,
12:50 the base,
12:52 that you are making,
12:54 and you are 'Tahiyyat' 'Nahili' to,
12:56 now there is no charge left on it,
12:58 all those cases,
13:00 they are cleared,
13:02 so after that,
13:04 the foundation that is finished,
13:06 and the legal debate,
13:08 and Mian Sir,
13:10 there is an election ahead,
13:12 do you think,
13:14 that if the election is delayed,
13:16 for 8-10 days,
13:18 then the election commission's right,
13:20 will not be destroyed,
13:22 even Maulana Sir,
13:24 has supported this statement,
13:26 do you think the same?
13:28 No,
13:30 because the situation,
13:32 that is created,
13:34 by the Pakistan government,
13:36 is not a complete foundation,
13:38 that even for a moment,
13:40 the election should go ahead,
13:42 so you are saying,
13:44 that the election should not be on 9th February,
13:46 it should be on 8th February,
13:48 not a day ahead,
13:50 absolutely, it should be on 8th February,
13:52 not a moment ahead,
13:54 and the Muslim League,
13:56 we will absolutely oppose this,
13:58 God forbid,
14:00 if someone thinks,
14:02 that the elections are not on 9th February,
14:04 and that in February,
14:06 the snowfall,
14:08 and other things,
14:10 are being made a point,
14:12 and that the situation in Pakistan,
14:14 was not like this before,
14:16 and that after the martyrdom of Benazir Bhutto,
14:18 the elections were not held,
14:20 and that was delayed,
14:22 it was on 8th February,
14:24 yes, I think it was on 8th February,
14:26 yes, absolutely,
14:28 but yesterday,
14:30 the Afghan voters,
14:32 were registered on the Pakistani voters,
14:34 by the PTI, so that they can increase their vote bank,
14:36 and today, Maulana Sahab told Asim Shirazi,
14:38 that if the elections are held,
14:40 8-10 days ahead,
14:42 then it is fine,
14:44 we have waited so long,
14:46 no, no, I don't think,
14:48 and I don't think it is appropriate,
14:50 that we make it permissible,
14:52 and that the elections should go ahead,
14:54 8-10 days,
14:56 there is still time,
14:58 and if the elections are to be held,
15:00 in February,
15:02 then why can't it be held in December,
15:04 or in January,
15:06 ok, so there is still time,
15:08 and before going,
15:10 tell me,
15:12 you said,
15:14 that there will be no seat adjustment,
15:16 and not at all in Punjab,
15:18 you went to the IPP office,
15:20 and Shahbaz Sahab also went,
15:22 so were you not there for the seat adjustment,
15:24 were you not doing it,
15:26 see, I am saying today,
15:28 that in Punjab,
15:30 the two or three seats,
15:32 that Shaujaj Sahab has,
15:34 for the seat adjustment,
15:36 that too,
15:38 Nawaz Sharif has the authority,
15:40 to make a final decision,
15:42 and from any other Jamaat,
15:44 in Punjab,
15:46 there will be no seat adjustment,
15:48 and this too,
15:50 will be decided by Nawaz Sharif,
15:52 but,
15:54 still I will say,
15:56 that in Punjab,
15:58 we do not need seat adjustment,
16:00 or to agree with anyone,
16:02 so Mian Sahab,
16:04 you listen to a statement,
16:06 it is a translation of IPP,
16:08 Fayyad Ulhasan Chauhan Sahab,
16:10 you tell us,
16:12 what does it mean,
16:14 that this discussion has started,
16:16 on the wishes of both the parties,
16:18 and a decision will be made,
16:20 on which seats,
16:22 and a committee has been formed,
16:24 and in a few days,
16:26 things will be finalized,
16:28 and they are saying,
16:30 that there were wishes from both the parties,
16:32 and you are on the other side,
16:34 and a committee has been formed,
16:36 so it means that the matter has progressed,
16:38 and you are saying,
16:40 that this is the first and second,
16:42 both the wishes,
16:44 only one translation is telling,
16:46 they know better,
16:48 so you are saying,
16:50 that the wishes are on the other side,
16:52 and there are no wishes on this side,
16:54 and the candidate for the ministry of the Noon League,
16:56 is without any doubt,
16:58 Mian Mohammad Nawaz Sharif,
17:00 In Sha Allah,
17:02 and the candidate for the ministry of the Punjab,
17:04 is without any doubt,
17:06 Shabaz Sharif,
17:08 he will be the leader of the Jamaat,
17:10 whose name is Nawaz Sharif,
17:12 ok, thank you very much,
17:14 Mr. Javed Latif,
17:16 for giving your opinion,
17:18 it is very interesting,
17:20 you are doing a categorical denial,
17:22 and you are saying,
17:24 that there were wishes from both the parties,
17:26 and there are no wishes from this side,
17:28 and you are saying,
17:30 that we do not support this statement of Mr. Zardari,
17:32 in which he says,
17:34 that the election should go ahead,
17:36 so there should be an election on 8th February,
17:38 and not on 9th February,
17:40 the Noon League will oppose this,
17:42 although Maulana Sahab supported this statement,
17:44 and Mr. Zardari has given this statement himself,
17:46 and interestingly,
17:48 PTI and Noon are the two Jamaats,
17:50 which are saying that the election should be on 8th February,
17:52 this is the political angle of the matter,
17:54 let us see it from a legal angle,
17:56 and let us try to understand it in simple words,
17:58 because we have two great legal minds with us,
18:00 the former Attorney General of Pakistan,
18:02 Mr. Ashtar Ausab,
18:04 he is with us,
18:06 and the former President of Supreme Court Bar Association,
18:08 Mr. Abid Zubairi,
18:10 we will connect them too,
18:12 hopefully they will be with us soon,
18:14 thank you very much for giving us this opportunity,
18:16 Mr. Ashtar,
18:18 I had raised this question in the last segment,
18:20 Mr. Javed Ali,
18:22 please explain it to us in simple words,
18:24 what is your opinion on this,
18:26 on one hand,
18:28 the Supreme Court has decided that
18:30 the term 'Nahili' means 'Tayyab Nahili',
18:32 and on the other hand,
18:34 the Parliament has amended it,
18:36 in the election act,
18:38 that 'Nahili' means 5 years,
18:40 so who will tell us,
18:42 what will happen?
18:44 The thing is that,
18:46 the law and the constitution,
18:48 the one who makes it,
18:50 the one who amends it,
18:52 the one who makes it better,
18:54 the one who ruins it,
18:56 that is the Parliament,
18:58 the Supreme Court can explain it,
19:00 the Supreme Court can neither make a law,
19:02 nor can it add anything to it,
19:04 nor can it amend it,
19:06 nor can it ruin it,
19:08 so the Supreme Court
19:10 can neither make a law,
19:12 nor can it ruin it,
19:14 now wherever in the constitution,
19:16 a period has been given for something,
19:18 for example,
19:20 it is said that if a person is punished
19:22 in contempt of court,
19:24 then the term 'Nahili' will be of this much years,
19:26 it is said that if there is a government employee,
19:28 then his/her eligibility will not be up to that time,
19:30 until two years have passed,
19:32 it is said that if there is a punishment
19:34 in moral depravity,
19:36 then the punishment will be
19:38 of a person who is in a state of contempt of court,
19:40 then he/she cannot fight the election for a long time,
19:42 in that,
19:44 the Parliament can change the law
19:46 in the constitution itself,
19:48 and can change it,
19:50 for that,
19:52 no legislation,
19:54 or election act,
19:56 or subordinate legislation can do it,
19:58 yes,
20:00 where in the constitution,
20:02 no period has been given for 'Nahili',
20:04 then there,
20:06 the Parliament can fill that void,
20:08 in simple words,
20:10 there is no need of two thirds majority,
20:12 the law that the Parliament makes,
20:14 it makes it with simple majorities,
20:16 if the amendment has to be done in the constitution,
20:18 then two thirds should be there,
20:20 that too is the work of the Parliament,
20:22 it is just a matter of numbers,
20:24 so you are saying that,
20:26 if there is a fact,
20:28 then the Parliament can do it,
20:30 but the Parliament can not do it,
20:32 because the Parliament is not a system,
20:34 so you are saying that,
20:36 if there is a decision,
20:38 and on one side,
20:40 there is not a two thirds amendment,
20:42 but a simple majority resolution,
20:44 or an amendment in the election act,
20:46 then without any doubt,
20:48 because the law makers of the amendment,
20:50 are the members of the Parliament,
20:52 so there is no debate in this,
20:54 it can be a debate,
20:56 but your opinion is that,
20:58 the amendment will be done by the Parliament,
21:00 secondly,
21:02 the decision that came,
21:04 it is written clearly,
21:06 that because the Parliament,
21:08 did not make any long term proposal,
21:10 so we will imagine,
21:12 that it is permanent,
21:14 hmmm,
21:16 so the Parliament did it,
21:18 and the Parliament has a special right,
21:20 that they can do something,
21:22 with retrospective effect,
21:24 now the Supreme Court,
21:26 as I said earlier,
21:28 Sir,
21:30 I am sorry to interrupt you,
21:32 but I want to understand,
21:34 that the Parliament has the right,
21:36 to do something with retrospective effect,
21:38 or the court will decide,
21:40 because the practice and procedure,
21:42 maybe in one case,
21:44 they said that this is it,
21:46 but the application is not permanent,
21:48 so will the court decide,
21:50 that you have decided,
21:52 but when will the application be done,
21:54 we will decide,
21:56 is it not so?
21:58 Sir,
22:00 this particular case,
22:02 232,
22:04 because it was not there earlier,
22:06 if it was there earlier,
22:08 it would have been 5 years,
22:10 and the Supreme Court would have said,
22:12 that it is 5 years,
22:14 and now you have said,
22:16 that it will be 3 years,
22:18 that is not possible,
22:20 so it was not there earlier,
22:22 but the Parliament has made the application,
22:24 absolutely,
22:26 and Mr. Abhishek is with us,
22:28 so I will say,
22:30 Mr. Abhishek,
22:32 how much do you agree with the Supreme Court,
22:34 that it was not there earlier,
22:36 and the Supreme Court,
22:38 in the decision,
22:40 because it was not there,
22:42 that the application is not permanent,
22:44 so it will be assumed,
22:46 that it is permanent,
22:48 but the Parliament said,
22:50 that we have made the application,
22:52 and now you have said,
22:54 that it is 5 years,
22:56 Mr. Zubair?
22:58 In the name of Allah, the most merciful,
23:00 I would like to say something,
23:02 with a little respect,
23:04 the court did not say,
23:06 in its judgement,
23:08 that the permanent,
23:10 and permanent,
23:12 the decision of the Supreme Court,
23:14 was coming from 2010,
23:16 Mr. Nawaz Sharif's decision,
23:18 came in 2018,
23:20 before that, in the 2013 elections,
23:22 he was declared ineligible,
23:24 in 62(1)(f),
23:26 the amendment of 62(1)(f),
23:28 came in 2010,
23:30 in which,
23:32 some words were included,
23:34 in which it was written,
23:36 that you are not,
23:38 a good man,
23:40 and this was,
23:42 a negative declaration,
23:44 from the court,
23:46 the court said,
23:48 that you are ineligible,
23:50 and this was interpreted,
23:52 by the Supreme Court,
23:54 in its various decisions,
23:56 the decisions of 2019,
23:58 and the decisions came,
24:00 and Samiullah Baloch,
24:02 and all these decisions,
24:04 the court gave,
24:06 in which it said,
24:08 that as long as this declaration,
24:10 will remain,
24:12 in the court,
24:14 because in 62(1)(f),
24:16 there is no mention,
24:18 of your disqualification,
24:20 this will be permanent,
24:22 and the fundamental rights,
24:24 that Article 17 gives,
24:26 to a person,
24:28 to fight elections,
24:30 to be a part of a political party,
24:32 will not be affected,
24:34 so it is said,
24:36 that because the term is not given,
24:38 and later, the Parliament,
24:40 in 232(a)(b),
24:42 made an amendment,
24:44 and stated the term,
24:46 will remain,
24:48 and as long as this declaration,
24:50 will remain,
24:52 your disqualification,
24:54 will be permanent.
24:56 Ok, you gave your opinion,
24:58 now your opinion is different.
25:00 Sir, can you tell us,
25:02 to understand,
25:04 it may sound funny,
25:06 but is this really correct?
25:08 For example, in simple words,
25:10 that he is not a traitor,
25:12 and he is disqualified,
25:14 and he has been killed,
25:16 and he has been punished for it,
25:18 for all the punishments,
25:20 for how many years,
25:22 is he disqualified,
25:24 according to the current date?
25:26 See, there are two articles,
25:28 of the Constitution,
25:30 62 and 63,
25:32 62 deals for qualification,
25:34 the article 63,
25:36 has given in 63(g) and (h),
25:38 that his disqualification,
25:40 will be for 5 years,
25:42 and the article 63(1)(h),
25:44 of the Constitution,
25:46 says that a person,
25:48 has been given,
25:50 moral turpitude,
25:52 and if he is not punished,
25:54 for less than 2 years,
25:56 then his disqualification,
25:58 will be for 5 years.
26:00 So, if the killer,
26:02 is not disqualified,
26:04 then he will be eligible,
26:06 for the election,
26:08 after 5 years?
26:10 So, the article 62,
26:12 is using the term,
26:14 moral turpitude,
26:16 that if a person,
26:18 has committed a crime,
26:20 morally wrong,
26:22 then he will be punished,
26:24 for 2 years.
26:26 So, it is possible,
26:28 that the killer,
26:30 will be punished,
26:32 for 5 years,
26:34 but technically,
26:36 he is not disqualified,
26:38 because,
26:40 the article 62,
26:42 is talking about,
26:44 disqualification,
26:46 and the rest of the crime,
26:48 is in the article 63,
26:50 that he is disqualified,
26:52 but here,
26:54 he is not qualified,
26:56 he is not a Sadiq,
26:58 Amin, Segesius,
27:00 and he is not,
27:02 in the declaration court,
27:04 and this is the reason,
27:06 why the article 62,
27:08 is not disqualified,
27:10 because,
27:12 the article 62,
27:14 is not a period,
27:16 it is a fact,
27:18 and it is a fact,
27:20 that the article 62,
27:22 is not a period,
27:24 and it is a fact,
27:26 that the article 62,
27:28 is not a period,
27:30 and it is a fact,
27:32 that the article 62,
27:34 is not a period,
27:36 and it is a fact,
27:38 that the article 62,
27:40 is not a period,
27:42 and it is a fact,
27:44 that the article 62,
27:46 is not a period,
27:48 and it is a fact,
27:50 that the article 62,
27:52 is not a period,
27:54 and it is a fact,
27:56 that the article 62,
27:58 is not a period,
28:00 and it is a fact,
28:02 that the article 62,
28:04 is not a period,
28:06 and it is a fact,
28:08 that the article 62,
28:10 is not a period,
28:12 and it is a fact,
28:14 that the article 62,
28:16 is not a period,
28:18 and it is a fact,
28:20 that the article 62,
28:22 is not a period,
28:24 and it is a fact,
28:26 that the article 62,
28:28 is not a period,
28:30 and it is a fact,
28:32 that the article 62,
28:34 is not a period,
28:36 and it is a fact,
28:38 that the article 62,
28:40 is not a period,
28:42 and it is a fact,
28:44 that the article 62,
28:46 is not a period,
28:48 and it is a fact,
28:50 that the article 62,
28:52 is not a period,
28:54 and it is a fact,
28:56 that the article 62,
28:58 is not a period,
29:00 and it is a fact,
29:02 that the article 62,
29:04 is not a period,
29:06 and it is a fact,
29:08 that the article 62,
29:10 is not a period,
29:12 and it is a fact,
29:14 that the article 62,
29:16 is not a period,
29:18 and it is a fact,
29:20 that the article 62,
29:22 is not a period,
29:24 and it is a fact,
29:26 that the article 62,
29:28 is not a period,
29:30 and it is a fact,
29:32 that the article 62,
29:34 is not a period,
29:36 and it is a fact,
29:38 that the article 62,
29:40 is not a period,
29:42 and it is a fact,
29:44 that the article 62,
29:46 is not a period,
29:48 and it is a fact,
29:50 that the article 62,
29:52 is not a period,
29:54 and it is a fact,
29:56 that the article 62,
29:58 is not a period,
30:00 and it is a fact,
30:02 that the article 62,
30:04 is not a period,
30:06 and it is a fact,
30:08 that the article 62,
30:10 is not a period,
30:12 and it is a fact,
30:14 that the article 62,
30:16 is not a period,
30:18 and it is a fact,
30:20 that the article 62,
30:22 is not a period,
30:24 and it is a fact,
30:26 that the article 62,
30:28 is not a period,
30:30 and it is a fact,
30:32 that the article 62,
30:34 is not a period,
30:36 and it is a fact,
30:38 that the article 62,
30:40 is not a period,
30:42 and it is a fact,
30:44 that the article 62,
30:46 is not a period,
30:48 and it is a fact,
30:50 that the article 62,
30:52 is not a period,
30:54 and it is a fact,
30:56 that the article 62,
30:58 is not a period,
31:00 and it is a fact,
31:02 that the article 62,
31:04 is not a period,
31:06 and it is a fact,
31:08 that the article 62,
31:10 is not a period,
31:12 and it is a fact,
31:14 that the article 62,
31:16 is not a period,
31:18 and it is a fact,
31:20 that the article 62,
31:22 is not a period,
31:24 and it is a fact,
31:26 that the article 62,
31:28 is not a period,
31:30 and it is a fact,
31:32 that the article 62,
31:34 is not a period,
31:36 and it is a fact,
31:38 that the article 62,
31:40 is not a period,
31:42 and it is a fact,
31:44 that the article 62,
31:46 is not a period,
31:48 and it is a fact,
31:50 that the article 62,
31:52 is not a period,
31:54 and it is a fact,
31:56 that the article 62,
31:58 is not a period,
32:00 and it is a fact,
32:02 that the article 62,
32:04 is not a period,
32:06 and it is a fact,
32:08 that the article 62,
32:10 is not a period,
32:12 and it is a fact,
32:14 that the article 62,
32:16 is not a period,
32:18 and it is a fact,
32:20 that the article 62,
32:22 is not a period,
32:24 and it is a fact,
32:26 that the article 62,
32:28 is not a period,
32:30 and it is a fact,
32:32 that the article 62,
32:34 is not a period,
32:36 and it is a fact,
32:38 that the article 62,
32:40 is not a period,
32:42 and it is a fact,
32:44 that the article 62,
32:46 is not a period,
32:48 and it is a fact,
32:50 that the article 62,
32:52 is not a period,
32:54 and it is a fact,
32:56 that the article 62,
32:58 is not a period,
33:00 and it is a fact,
33:02 that the article 62,
33:04 is not a period,
33:06 and it is a fact,
33:08 that the article 62,
33:10 is not a period,
33:12 and it is a fact,
33:14 that the article 62,
33:16 is not a period,
33:18 and it is a fact,
33:20 that the article 62,
33:22 is not a period,
33:24 and it is a fact,
33:26 that the article 62,
33:28 is not a period,
33:30 and it is a fact,
33:32 that the article 62,
33:34 is not a period,
33:36 and it is a fact,
33:38 that the article 62,
33:40 is not a period,
33:42 and it is a fact,
33:44 that the article 62,
33:46 is not a period,
33:48 and it is a fact,
33:50 that the article 62,
33:52 is not a period,
33:54 and it is a fact,
33:56 that the article 62,
33:58 is not a period,
34:00 and it is a fact,
34:02 that the article 62,
34:04 is not a period,
34:06 and it is a fact,
34:08 that the article 62,
34:10 is not a period,
34:12 and it is a fact,
34:14 that the article 62,
34:16 is not a period,
34:18 and it is a fact,
34:20 that the article 62,
34:22 is not a period,
34:24 and it is a fact,
34:26 that the article 62,
34:28 is not a period,
34:30 and it is a fact,
34:32 that the article 62,
34:34 is not a period,
34:36 and it is a fact,
34:38 that the article 62,
34:40 is not a period,
34:42 and it is a fact,
34:44 that the article 62,
34:46 is not a period,
34:48 and it is a fact,
34:50 that the article 62,
34:52 is not a period,
34:54 and it is a fact,
34:56 that the article 62,
34:58 is not a period,
35:00 and it is a fact,
35:02 that the article 62,
35:04 is not a period,
35:06 and it is a fact,
35:08 that the article 62,
35:10 is not a period,
35:12 and it is a fact,
35:14 that the article 62,
35:16 is not a period,
35:18 and it is a fact,
35:20 that the article 62,
35:22 is not a period,
35:24 and it is a fact,
35:26 that the article 62,
35:28 is not a period,
35:30 and it is a fact,
35:32 that the article 62,
35:34 is not a period,
35:36 and it is a fact,
35:38 that the article 62,
35:40 is not a period,
35:42 and it is a fact,
35:44 that the article 62,
35:46 is not a period,
35:48 and it is a fact,
35:50 that the article 62,
35:52 is not a period,
35:54 and it is a fact,
35:56 that the article 62,
35:58 is not a period,
36:00 and it is a fact,
36:02 that the article 62,
36:04 is not a period,
36:06 and it is a fact,
36:08 that the article 62,
36:10 is not a period,
36:12 and it is a fact,
36:14 that the article 62,
36:16 is not a period,
36:18 and it is a fact,
36:20 that the article 62,
36:22 is not a period,
36:24 and it is a fact,
36:26 that the article 62,
36:28 is not a period,
36:30 and it is a fact,
36:32 that the article 62,
36:34 is not a period,
36:36 and it is a fact,
36:38 that the article 62,
36:40 is not a period,
36:42 and it is a fact,
36:44 that the article 62,
36:46 is not a period,
36:48 and it is a fact,
36:50 that the article 62,
36:52 is not a period,
36:54 and it is a fact,
36:56 that the article 62,
36:58 is not a period,
37:00 and it is a fact,
37:02 that the article 62,
37:04 is not a period,
37:06 and it is a fact,
37:08 that the article 62,
37:10 is not a period,
37:12 and it is a fact,
37:14 that the article 62,
37:16 is not a period,
37:18 and it is a fact,
37:20 that the article 62,
37:22 is not a period,
37:24 and it is a fact,
37:26 that the article 62,
37:28 is not a period,
37:30 and it is a fact,
37:32 that the article 62,
37:34 is not a period,
37:36 and it is a fact,
37:38 that the article 62,
37:40 is not a period,
37:42 and it is a fact,
37:44 that the article 62,
37:46 is not a period,
37:48 and it is a fact,
37:50 that the article 62,
37:52 is not a period,
37:54 and it is a fact,
37:56 that the article 62,
37:58 is not a period,
38:00 and it is a fact,
38:02 that the article 62,
38:04 is not a period,
38:06 and it is a fact,
38:08 that the article 62,
38:10 is not a period,
38:12 and it is a fact,
38:14 that the article 62,
38:16 is not a period,
38:18 and it is a fact,
38:20 that the article 62,
38:22 is not a period,
38:24 and it is a fact,
38:26 that the article 62,
38:28 is not a period,
38:30 and it is a fact,
38:32 that the article 62,
38:34 is not a period,
38:36 and it is a fact,
38:38 that the article 62,
38:40 is not a period,
38:42 and it is a fact,
38:44 that the article 62,
38:46 is not a period,
38:48 and it is a fact,
38:50 that the article 62,
38:52 is not a period,
38:54 and it is a fact,
38:56 that the article 62,
38:58 is not a period,
39:00 and it is a fact,
39:02 that the article 62,
39:04 is not a period,
39:06 and it is a fact,
39:08 that the article 62,
39:10 is not a period,
39:12 and it is a fact,
39:14 that the article 62,
39:16 is not a period,
39:18 and it is a fact,
39:20 that the article 62,
39:22 is not a period,
39:24 and it is a fact,
39:26 that the article 62,
39:28 is not a period,
39:30 and it is a fact,
39:32 that the article 62,
39:34 is not a period,
39:36 and it is a fact,
39:38 that the article 62,
39:40 is not a period,
39:42 and it is a fact,
39:44 that the article 62,
39:46 is not a period,
39:48 and it is a fact,
39:50 that the article 62,
39:52 is not a period,
39:54 and it is a fact,
39:56 that the article 62,
39:58 is not a period,
40:00 and it is a fact,
40:02 that the article 62,
40:04 is not a period,
40:06 and it is a fact,
40:08 that the article 62,
40:10 is not a period,
40:12 and it is a fact,
40:14 that the article 62,
40:16 is not a period,
40:18 and it is a fact,
40:20 that the article 62,
40:22 is not a period,
40:24 and it is a fact,
40:26 that the article 62,
40:28 is not a period,
40:30 and it is a fact,
40:32 that the article 62,
40:34 is not a period,
40:36 and it is a fact,
40:38 that the article 62,
40:40 is not a period,
40:42 and it is a fact,
40:44 that the article 62,
40:46 is not a period,
40:48 and it is a fact,
40:50 that the article 62,
40:52 is not a period,
40:54 and it is a fact,
40:56 that the article 62,
40:58 is not a period,
41:00 and it is a fact,
41:02 that the article 62,
41:04 is not a period,
41:06 and it is a fact,
41:08 that the article 62,
41:10 is not a period,
41:12 and it is a fact,
41:14 that the article 62,
41:16 is not a period,
41:18 and it is a fact,
41:20 that the article 62,
41:22 is not a period,
41:24 and it is a fact,
41:26 that the article 62,
41:28 is not a period,
41:30 and it is a fact,
41:32 that the article 62,
41:34 is not a period,
41:36 and it is a fact,
41:38 that the article 62,
41:40 is not a period,
41:42 and it is a fact,
41:44 that the article 62,
41:46 is not a period,
41:48 and it is a fact,
41:50 that the article 62,
41:52 is not a period,
41:54 and it is a fact,
41:56 that the article 62,
41:58 is not a period,
42:00 and it is a fact,
42:02 that the article 62,
42:04 is not a period,
42:06 and it is a fact,
42:08 that the article 62,
42:10 is not a period,
42:12 and it is a fact,
42:14 that the article 62,
42:16 is not a period,
42:18 and it is a fact,
42:20 that the article 62,
42:22 is not a period,
42:24 and it is a fact,
42:26 that the article 62,
42:28 is not a period,
42:30 and it is a fact,
42:32 that the article 62,
42:34 is not a period,
42:36 and it is a fact,
42:38 that the article 62,
42:40 is not a period,
42:42 and it is a fact,
42:44 that the article 62,
42:46 is not a period,
42:48 and it is a fact,
42:50 that the article 62,
42:52 is not a period,
42:54 and it is a fact,
42:56 that the article 62,
42:58 is not a period,
43:00 and it is a fact,
43:02 that the article 62,
43:04 is not a period,
43:06 and it is a fact,
43:08 that the article 62,
43:10 is not a period,
43:12 and it is a fact,
43:14 that the article 62,
43:16 is not a period,
43:18 and it is a fact,
43:20 that the article 62,
43:22 is not a period,
43:24 and it is a fact,
43:26 that the article 62,
43:28 is not a period,
43:30 and it is a fact,
43:32 that the article 62,
43:34 is not a period,
43:36 and it is a fact,
43:38 that the article 62,
43:40 is not a period,
43:42 and it is a fact,
43:44 that the article 62,
43:46 is not a period,
43:48 and it is a fact,
43:50 that the article 62,
43:52 is not a period,
43:54 and it is a fact,
43:56 that the article 62,
43:58 is not a period,
44:00 and it is a fact,
44:02 that the article 62,
44:04 is not a period,
44:06 and it is a fact,
44:08 that the article 62,
44:10 is not a period,
44:12 and it is a fact,
44:14 that the article 62,
44:16 is not a period,
44:18 and it is a fact,
44:20 that the article 62,
44:22 is not a period,
44:24 and it is a fact,
44:26 that the article 62,
44:28 is not a period,
44:30 and it is a fact,
44:32 that the article 62,
44:34 is not a period,
44:36 and it is a fact,
44:38 that the article 62,
44:40 is not a period,
44:42 and it is a fact,
44:44 that the article 62,
44:46 is not a period,
44:48 and it is a fact,
44:50 that the article 62,
44:52 is not a period,
44:54 and it is a fact,
44:56 that the article 62,
44:58 is not a period,
45:00 and it is a fact,
45:02 that the article 62,
45:04 is not a period,
45:06 and it is a fact,
45:08 that the article 62,
45:10 is not a period,
45:12 and it is a fact,
45:14 that the article 62,
45:16 is not a period,
45:18 and it is a fact,
45:20 that the article 62,
45:22 is not a period,
45:24 and it is a fact,
45:26 that the article 62,
45:28 is not a period,
45:30 and it is a fact,
45:32 that the article 62,
45:34 is not a period,
45:36 and it is a fact,
45:38 that the article 62,
45:40 is not a period,
45:42 and it is a fact,
45:44 that the article 62,
45:46 Allah Hafiz.