Leo Frank Trial - Hugh Dorsey Closing Arguments Part 5
- 9 months ago
This case's defense is hazy and unfocused. While they flutter and circle, they never become light. Regarding other claims, like the depth Jim Conley pushed his victim into, the defense is hazy and imprecise. The defense is unsure and vague as to which hole Jim Conley forced his victim into. Regarding the hole Jim Conley forced his victim into, the defense is unsure and vague. The defense is unsure and vague as to which hole Jim Conley forced his victim into. Regarding the hole Jim Conley forced his victim into, the defense is unsure and vague. The defense is unsure and vague as to which hole Jim Conley forced his victim into. The incidents surrounding the slaying of a young woman in a factory are the most crucial details in this text.
After spending a full day searching the factory on May 1 when Mr. Dot Holloway grabbed old Jim Conley and claimed he was his nigger, squad number two of the Pinkertons discovered so much blood that it took them until May 15 to discover it. After Mr. Barrett claimed to have seen blood there before he returned to see it, Mr. Quinn had to ask him to look at the blood spots he had discovered on the second floor. He called Schiff three times to get the Pinkertons down because he was so anxious to hire a detective. He claimed that Lemme Quinn had to come and ask him to see the blood stains that Mr. Dot Barrett had discovered on the second floor. This implies that Mr. Dot Quinn was eager to hire a detective and read about the position in the newspaper before returning to see it.
Lemme Quinn sarcastically recited Leo M. Frank's claim that he returned to the dressing room on the second floor and used an electric flashlight to examine the blood spots. Nobody on earth has ever seen Leo M. Frank, however, looking at what Beaver, Storne, and Storne claimed to be blood close to the dressing room on the second floor, according to Barrett, Jefferson, Mel Stanford, Beaver, Storne, and Storne. Frank claimed to have twice visited the morgue, but Rogers claimed he didn't even glance inside. Rogers never claimed that he didn't look at the body, so Mr. Dot Rosser misrepresented the evidence. Mr. Dorsey claimed that Rogers never looked at the body, but Mr. Arnold is adamant that this isn't the evidence.
The Negro's intentions toward the girl remain ambiguous, even if he took the time to write the notes and tie a cord around her neck. The defense is hazy and evasive on other claims, such as whether Jim Conley shot his victim down that staircase back there or down the other hole in the Clark Wooden Wear Company's building.
On other claims, like whether the Negro actually robbed the girl even if he took the time to write the notes or tie a cord around her neck, the defense is hazy and imprecise. The circumstances surrounding the murder of a young woman in a factory are the most significant details in this text. After spending a full day
After spending a full day searching the factory on May 1 when Mr. Dot Holloway grabbed old Jim Conley and claimed he was his nigger, squad number two of the Pinkertons discovered so much blood that it took them until May 15 to discover it. After Mr. Barrett claimed to have seen blood there before he returned to see it, Mr. Quinn had to ask him to look at the blood spots he had discovered on the second floor. He called Schiff three times to get the Pinkertons down because he was so anxious to hire a detective. He claimed that Lemme Quinn had to come and ask him to see the blood stains that Mr. Dot Barrett had discovered on the second floor. This implies that Mr. Dot Quinn was eager to hire a detective and read about the position in the newspaper before returning to see it.
Lemme Quinn sarcastically recited Leo M. Frank's claim that he returned to the dressing room on the second floor and used an electric flashlight to examine the blood spots. Nobody on earth has ever seen Leo M. Frank, however, looking at what Beaver, Storne, and Storne claimed to be blood close to the dressing room on the second floor, according to Barrett, Jefferson, Mel Stanford, Beaver, Storne, and Storne. Frank claimed to have twice visited the morgue, but Rogers claimed he didn't even glance inside. Rogers never claimed that he didn't look at the body, so Mr. Dot Rosser misrepresented the evidence. Mr. Dorsey claimed that Rogers never looked at the body, but Mr. Arnold is adamant that this isn't the evidence.
The Negro's intentions toward the girl remain ambiguous, even if he took the time to write the notes and tie a cord around her neck. The defense is hazy and evasive on other claims, such as whether Jim Conley shot his victim down that staircase back there or down the other hole in the Clark Wooden Wear Company's building.
On other claims, like whether the Negro actually robbed the girl even if he took the time to write the notes or tie a cord around her neck, the defense is hazy and imprecise. The circumstances surrounding the murder of a young woman in a factory are the most significant details in this text. After spending a full day