Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • 4/2/2025
During a House Homeland Security Committee hearing on Tuesday, Rep. Brad Knott (R-NC) spoke about cuts to the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Thank you. The chair now recognizes the gentleman from North Carolina, Mr. Knott, for his five
00:06minutes of questioning.
00:07Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you to the witnesses who were here. I will say that I
00:11am a little bit miffed whenever I hear grievances about the current president and the funding
00:17that seems to be at issue. When you look at sanctuary cities, sanctuary states, and the
00:22amount of tax dollars that are going to illegal immigrants in states just like Illinois, New
00:28York City, California, et cetera, where illegals we now know are getting free health care,
00:33free education, free transportation, these allocations in dollars far exceed the total
00:38budget of FEMA. So I find it a little bit disingenuous that we're railing on money that
00:44should otherwise be reappropriated or reallocated.
00:47Mr. Knott, would the gentleman yield?
00:49No, ma'am. And when we have had four years of draining billions and billions and billions
00:55of dollars to people who are not here illegally, crocodile tears over FEMA not having enough
01:01money seems to be somewhat disingenuous. In regards to the issue at hand that we should
01:07be discussing, I would love to ask you, Mr. Hendricks, as a former federal prosecutor,
01:14drones are being used to a very effective extent to undermine law enforcement and truly
01:21our national security, whether it's the cartels, whether it's local transnational gangs, whether
01:27it's the Chinese Communist Party, whoever it may be, drones are a force multiplier.
01:33And one of my gravest frustrations, whether it was the Bureau of Prisons, whether it was
01:37federal law enforcement along the border, whether it was counter surveillance measures
01:42that were being executed, what are technologies that we can implement and we can provide or
01:49promote that would stop criminals from using drones so effectively?
01:55There are some technologies that allow us to establish wide-world operations, so we
01:59eliminate aircraft from operating in the area. Of course, then the threat has evolved so
02:04that now they're just flying aircraft on fiber optic cables, right? So it's hard to do that.
02:09Another thing I think is important from our standpoint is to look at what things we can
02:14do to enforce our capabilities so that they're not vulnerable to these technologies.
02:19Our counter-UAS systems, for example, should be tested to certified threats by an independent
02:24agent based on the particular scenario that you're trying to protect.
02:28Okay, and can you explain just briefly how that would work in the field? How would that
02:33technology be best implemented?
02:35So the wide-world technologies, for example, as you identify your particular aircraft that's
02:39going to be operating, you could look at it as comparable to, roughly comparable to
02:44remote ID or to UAS traffic management. Identify those aircraft that are operating in the area
02:49then any other aircraft that's reported or detected by radars are certainly uncorrupted.
02:54Okay, thank you, sir.
02:56Yes, sir.
02:57Dr. Ledbetter, I want to talk to you in regards to the components that go into many drones
03:01that we use in a law enforcement capacity, in a first responder capacity. It's my understanding
03:06that many of those components are made in other countries, whether it's China, whether
03:10it's other nation states. Are you familiar with the basic percentage of our components
03:17that are put into American drones that are made in China or other countries?
03:22I'm not familiar with that number, sir.
03:24Are you familiar? Is it a problem that you're aware of?
03:27It is a problem, yes, sir.
03:28And how would you quantify, briefly, we've got a minute and a half from your expertise,
03:32how can we assist bringing some of those jobs and technologies back to the United States
03:37for manufacturing?
03:38Well, it's absolutely critical. I find that most, whether it's first responders, military
03:45members, whatever, they want to get the job done and they'll get the job done. And right
03:48now the cheapest, most available resource out there is going to be a DJI, which is Chinese
03:54product. And we need to comply with NDAA and bring those parts back into the United
04:03States and build a compliant American-made drone. Did I answer your question?
04:11It did, but in regards, I guess, to follow up, in regards to what we can do in this committee,
04:16are there certain regulations, rules, laws that make it more costly for drone manufacturers
04:21to operate or to produce their materials here as opposed to overseas that you're aware
04:25of?
04:26Absolutely. Supply chain is, you know, we're hamstrung by the supply chain to get parts.
04:32Availability is another issue. And then price. We're looking at anywhere from three to five
04:37times the cost per part to make an American-made drone versus a DJI or Chinese part.
04:45In regards to the technology, as you understand it, how are American companies, how are American
04:49innovators faring as it relates to international competitors?
04:54I don't really have that data. I know as far as we're concerned, it takes significantly
05:00more money, more resources, and more time to build a compliant drone versus a non-compliant
05:06drone.
05:07And one more question. When you say compliant drone, just so we understand, what are you
05:10referring to?
05:11NDAA compliance.
05:12Okay. Thank you, sir. Mr. Chairman, I yield back.

Recommended