• 2 days ago
During a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing to consider the nominations for the Department Of Defense on Thursday, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) expressed her concerns regarding military pharmaceutical supply chains.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Health care for our men and women in uniform is critical
00:05in peacetime and even more so in wartime. Mr. Bass, if you are confirmed as
00:11Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, you're going to be
00:14responsible for ensuring nearly 10 million service members and their
00:20families receive quality health care, including timely access to medication.
00:28I am very concerned about our over-reliance on foreign nations for
00:32the very medications that put the health of service members at risk and
00:38our national security along with it. DOD spends over $5 billion on
00:43prescription drugs each year. It's a lot of money. But in November 2023,
00:49the Defense Logistics Agency released a report revealing that the supply
00:55chain for a third of all drugs on the FDA's essential medicines list is at
01:03very high risk. Why? Because the ingredients from these drugs are
01:08sourced from China, or we don't even know where they're sourced from. So,
01:15Mr. Bass, do you agree that it is a threat to our readiness and the
01:19potential health of our service members that DOD's pharmaceutical supply
01:24chain relies so heavily on China? Thank you, Senator, and thank you again for
01:31meeting with me. I do agree that it is a threat. It is a vulnerability. So, this
01:37over-reliance gives our adversaries the power to restrict DOD's access to drugs
01:44when we need to be able to treat our men and women in uniform. It also leaves us
01:49with much less visibility into the practices of foreign manufacturers, which
01:55by the way, routinely have quality issues that threaten both the efficacy and the
02:01safety of these drugs. For these reasons, the DOD report recommends boosting the
02:08production of finished drugs, active pharmaceutical ingredients, and other key
02:14starting materials so that we are making more of this right here in the United
02:19States. Mr. Bass, do you think DOD should work to onshore the critical drugs the
02:25military needs, including writing contracts that require manufacturers to
02:32onshore these capabilities? Thank you, Senator. I do. I think that we need to
02:38work with our industrial base, our private and public partners, and we need
02:43to have rapid response contracts, and we need to make sure that we either onshore
02:47or nearshore capabilities. Good. I'm glad to hear you say this. DOD should
02:53prioritize domestic purchasing, but there are some instances where it makes sense
02:59for DOD to actually produce the medication itself, like when the DOD is
03:05the sole customer for that medication. One example, the adenovirus vaccine, which
03:13is critical in preventing serious respiratory illness among service
03:17members, particularly service members in basic training. DOD developed the
03:23vaccine and licensed it then to private industry, but because the military is
03:28basically the only buyer, DOD couldn't find a commercial manufacturer for
03:34nearly a decade. DOD eventually had to pay a private manufacturer nearly a
03:39hundred million dollars just to resume production, and during the years that the
03:45private sector refused to manufacture for DOD, there were thousands of cases of
03:50adenovirus per month and service members who actually died. So, Mr. Bass, if
03:58confirmed, will you commit to expanding DOD's capabilities of producing
04:04essential drugs in-house to reduce risk and to secure DOD's medical supply chain?
04:12Thank you, Senator. The health and well-being of all of our military
04:16members is a priority. I am not familiar with the report, but I commit to working
04:20with you and your staff. All right. I appreciate that because this is a
04:24serious problem, and ultimately these are investments that will pay off. One expert
04:30estimated that DOD would make its money back in three years after building its
04:36own adenovirus manufacturing facility. This is a long-standing bipartisan
04:43concern. I worked with Senator Rubio for years on this, and last year the Senate
04:48adopted our language directing DOD to enter into contracts to domestically
04:54manufacture drugs and drug components that are currently sourced overseas and
04:59that are used exclusively by the military. I want to see us get that in
05:04the final version of the NDAA. There's more work to do, and I look forward to
05:09working with you on this, Mr. Bass. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Recommended