default
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00He brought all of them out.
00:02Prasadji said, no, we will help them.
00:05When the students go to the court, we will provide all the facilities.
00:09And we will highlight their efforts in the court as well.
00:14My junior, our legal team, Pranav Kumar, who is not here yet, Srishti Singh, Devashish Giri,
00:21all of them together, Kishoreji and Pappuji, all of them together,
00:26we made our draft.
00:28What all were the shortcomings?
00:30I have told a few shortcomings, but there are a lot of shortcomings.
00:35The illegality that happened.
00:38At the 38th centre, there was a glaring violation of law.
00:45The norms of examination were not followed.
00:48We have given them everything.
00:52We did not go anywhere.
00:55We did not get the question paper on time.
01:00We started late examinations.
01:03And at some station, there was no biometrics, which is mandatory.
01:13At some stations, we were helping the teachers.
01:20Some of the invigilators themselves were prompting answers at some stations.
01:26All these written statements have been given to the commission by the students.
01:33It has been given to the government as well.
01:38But no one has done anything.
01:40There is a reason for the commission not to conduct an inquiry.
01:43The commission itself is involved.
01:46There is a deliberate failure of the commission.
01:51But it seems that there are some people involved in the commission.
01:57If there was an inquiry, then we would know who it is.
02:01But listen to one thing.
02:04Merit should be the priority.
02:08If you select by unfair means, you will not get a place for meritorious candidates.
02:15Why do you want to protect the meritorious candidates?
02:19If the commission selects the meritorious candidates again, they will be selected again.
02:29So, the commission's job is to find out the merit.
02:33But here, the commission is diluting the merit.
02:38Why is it diluting?
02:40First of all, there is a commitment.
02:45If there is an inquiry, then we will know.
02:48But there should have been a minimum where there is a clear violation of the rules.
02:54Where it is clear that there is a hanky-panky.
02:58Someone has tried to help some people.
03:01I will not say that there has been an underhand selection of many people.
03:06I do not have any evidence.
03:09I am not even saying.
03:11This is the merit.
03:13Now, Bapu has gone to the commission center.
03:15The government itself has accepted it.
03:17The commission itself has accepted it.
03:19Where there were 173 questions, there should have been 192.
03:24How did this happen?
03:26So, Bapu is going to the same center.
03:30The fact is that there is direct evidence.
03:34It is written in the writ.
03:36The commission has read the writ.
03:38It has been serviced.
03:40They have received it.
03:42It has been given a notice.
03:44If you read it, you will understand.
03:46At 32-28 centers, it is apparent that there has been malpractice.
03:53Rules have not been followed.
03:55And there is a scope of manipulation.
03:58There is manoeuvring.
04:00Everything is visible.
04:03The writ was filed yesterday.
04:06Our juniors, the two people sitting on my right,
04:12I made it with their help.
04:14I settled it.
04:16I finalized it.
04:18It was filed yesterday.
04:20Today, we have,
04:22Arvind Singh Chandel,
04:24Mani Niyamoti,
04:27They are the subjects.
04:29Different subjects are allocated to different judges.
04:33At 10.30 pm, I mentioned that
04:37it is a question of the careers of 4 lakh students.
04:42It is not an ordinary case.
04:44It will take months to get a normal course.
04:47Please, out of turn,
04:51make it an independent hearing
04:54so that the commission can publish the results.
04:58And once again...