• 3 days ago

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Colonel Narciso Antonio Romero Félix received a notification of the measure of coercion on December 17, that is, three days.
00:13Immediately, and hoping that justice will be applied, we have deposited a resource of appellation that will be known in the next few hours in the National Institute.
00:25This is so because we have the firm hope that the truth will prevail in this case and our representative will know his resource, his process of freedom.
00:41Not only that, as we have said, and we ratify here once again, that there were violations of fundamental rights, which we are going to demonstrate with testimonial evidence and with visual evidence that they existed.
00:59Such as the alleged violation of the defendant, which was violated by the public prosecutor, and this persists in keeping hidden this violation, this order that they say they have, which we know they do not have.
01:15In addition, to demand that some belongings that were taken from the house of the defendant be returned, such as garments that had been stored there for years, part of family inheritance, money that was the result of the savings of the defendant, and other accessories that were stolen by the public prosecutor without order.
01:38They also took the homework from the house, so as not to give evidence that they were. This, we say, was an unhealthy practice and has been a loyal part of the public prosecutor.
01:53This defendant has real and well-known roots in the territory. He has family ties, work ties, social ties. In addition, we have said and we ratify that he is a citizen who has had a commendable behavior in society.
02:09So much so that today, 26 years in the police force, and he has never been subjected to any act, not even internal, in the police station. He has studied both here and abroad, and he has obtained a moratorium, both in the country and abroad.
02:24Reporter-Doctor, a few days ago we saw another of the lawyers file a request for appeal saying that the deputy superintendent, who was in that case, had not received the warehouse at that time, when he was appointed. In the case of your defendant, these accusations that the Public Prosecutor's Office made, did he have knowledge of the weapons that were in that auditory warehouse?
02:48It is that the police departments, what they receive are functions. Functions, they send you to look for you, they put you in a place and they are your functions. Now, each department has its divisions. There is a delivery manager, a civilian manager, an internal auditor, there is a dispatcher.
03:07In short, the colonel, what he receives are functions. In fact, he has had 25 functions in the country and this was the last one he had. So, we understand that when he sees like this, the authority and other investigations are made by the superiors. In this case, it was the same colonel who asked for an authority, and this authority was made and he never presented himself.
03:31Is there evidence of that request?
03:33He has no evidence of it, but it was made and we all know how the police work when they give orders to the agents who occupy positions. But what the agents receive are functions, they are not administrative charges.

Recommended